How to be your own estate agent

By MoneyWeek editor-in-chief Merryn Somerset Webb May 25, 2012

Merryn Somerset-Webb

Share with
friends:

Comments (4) Print this article

If you are selling a house in Britain, you are probably finding it a trying business. Outside London and select areas of the southeast prices are falling fast, transactions are minimal and only those prepared to slash, slash and slash again at their asking prices find that they sell fast. According to the latest HMRC figures, a mere 72,000 houses changed hands in April this year. That’s down from 88,000 in March and 137,000 in April 2006.

At the same time, “the credibility gap between typical asking prices and resultant sales prices means that many buyers are being mercenary when it comes to making offers”, says property commentator Henry Pryor. “Most have learned that an asking price is not necessarily a guide to current value and are often treating them with derision. Selling has never been tougher.”

You might think that in an environment like this the advice of a good estate agent has rarely been more valuable. On the other hand, you might think that if your agent has set the price of your house at the wrong level and then failed to sell it without putting you through the trauma of expectation re-adjustment and a period of limbo, he doesn’t deserve much of a fee.

If it’s the latter, you may want to think about selling privately via one of the many For Sale By Owner (FSBO) websites. In Canada and America, where estate agent commissions tend to be a shockingly high 6% or so, these have taken off. They now represent 12% and 10% of the market respectively.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


 

This makes sense. As Colby Sambrotto of UsRealty.com told the FT, “the market is distressed and… when many homes are worth less than their purchase price, tacking on a full 6% commission can erode a seller’s profits or, worse, compound losses”. However, while the North Americans are clearly all for FSBO, in Britain the concept has “struggled to get off the ground”, says Graham Norwood, also in the FT.

The websites on offer are “amateur” with too few properties listed to make visiting them worth the bother. Still, given how difficult and expensive it is to sell via traditional routes right now, it might be worth a go both for British and any European properties you are trying to offload.

How? Visit www.ft.com/soldontheidea for a list of FSBO websites, the best in Britain probably being Sarah Beeny’s Tepilo.com. Then check local sale prices to set your own price; de-clutter; make all minor repairs; print out details to hand around; take and post good, high-resolution photos; put up a sign; consider advertising in local papers; have a solicitor ready; and, finally, prepare to negotiate.

Comments (4)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Boris MacDonut

    (28 May 2012, 04:29PM)  Complain about this comment

    The lack of transactions alone ,now averaging fewer than a million a year ( meaning the average Joe moves house once every two decades!) should show Osborne the folly of retaining Stamp duty ,especially below £500k purchase price. This tax, once pulled in £9 billion for the Treasury , now it is less than £1.7 billion. Then again if he scrapped it, it would give him a short term boost in popularity...........on second thoughts keep it Gideon.

  • 2. Christopher

    (01 June 2012, 12:41AM)  Complain about this comment

    No Boris.
    That revenue was 'borrowed' from the future was never sustainable. When will the penny drop?

  • 3. Boris MacDonut

    (07 June 2012, 03:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    #2. I can see the logic there, but surely Stamp duty reduces the amount of real cash available for a deposit, rather than being made up from the extra burden of lending. Either way it should be scrapped and attention turned towards building an extra 200,000 small homes for the pent up demand.

  • 4. 4caster

    (30 June 2012, 12:01AM)  Complain about this comment

    I have always thought stamp duty is a tax on mobility and therefore a cause of unemployment. It prevents people from taking jobs outwith commuting distance from the homes they cannot sell for a price that covers the stamp duty on the ones they are buying.
    If Boris's figures are right, the logic is that a reduction in stamp duty would not only generate more revenue, but would also stimulate employment and thus the economy. What is George Osborne waiting for?

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>