Was that it? No - there's worse to come for Britain

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Dec 21, 2009

John Stepek

Comments (9) Print this article

London office blocks © Graham Barclay/Bloomberg News

Commercial property could sink the UK recovery

How ironic.

Just as half the country is grinding to a halt beneath the snowfall, we hear that the British economy has probably emerged from recession. The Confederation of British Industry reckons that Britain’s economy will have grown by about 0.5% between October and the end of this year. Economists also expect third-quarter growth figures to be revised higher.

At the start of the year, we were looking at falling house prices, plunging stock prices and mass unemployment. Now everyone is shaking the snow from their tin hats, and gingerly asking: “Was that it?”

“No,” is the short answer. Here’s why...

Recession? What recession?

Unemployment growth is slowing. The economy is probably growing again. And the indomitable British shopper has returned. Sent into a panicked feeding frenzy over the weekend as the snow threatened to block access to the shops, British consumers spent £4bn over Saturday and Sunday, reckons the British Retail Consortium.

But let’s take a closer look. For one thing, the retail sales figures were very flattered by last year’s grim performance, as the BRC’s own Stephen Robertson pointed out. And to put it bluntly, retailers are past masters at talking their books. It’s a traditional game played at this time of year. On the last weekend before Christmas, headlines scream about a ‘retail bloodbath’, feeding consumers the idea that there are bargains galore on the high street, and that it’s a buyers’ market out there. Shops are over a barrel, and you can have your pick of the deals. It’s fantastic free advertising for the retail industry. No wonder the post-January sales carnage is never quite as bad as expected.

But 2010 might be different. As my colleague David Stevenson pointed out last week, many retail chains are running out of time. There will be fewer white knights to save stragglers next year. And lenders are likely to become less forgiving as the extraordinary circumstances of 2009 give way to a more ‘business as usual’ attitude.

The heart of the problem

And this gets to the heart of the problem. 2009 was less bad than expected because the Bank of England laid out such a vast safety net. As we’ve pointed out already, low interest rates have kept people in their homes, and tenants in their premises. Meanwhile, banks have hidden the black holes on their balance sheets by allowing commercial property owners much more breathing space on their loans than they normally would.

The trouble is, all of this has to end at some point. People are starting to price in rises in interest rates next year. That’s partly because inflation is being very stubborn, and partly because they genuinely expect to see a recovery.

Now I suspect the Bank of England doesn’t want to hike rates this year at all if it can avoid it. At the back of the Bank’s mind is the fear of deflation. Like most Western central bankers outside of Germany, the Great Depression is the defining event in their philosophy. The mainstream view is that the depression was as awful as it was because the politicians and the bankers didn’t do enough to stop it. They tightened the money supply prematurely. That’s why everything went into relapse mode. The same goes for Japan.

Those are the outcomes that Ben Bernanke in the States and Mervyn King over here want to avoid. We think it’s a bit more complicated than that. You can go back through history and find plenty of occasions when a slump didn’t turn into a rampant depression, despite apparent government inaction (see Bill Bonner’s recent column on the panic of 1920 for example: Do nothing, and order will prevail.)

Indeed, according to Kenneth Rogoff, who’s arguably one of the leading lights on banking crises and the fallout from them, Japan’s experience has been extremely unusual, certainly compared to other post-World War II banking crises. My colleague Jody Clarke interviews Rogoff in this week’s edition of MoneyWeek magazine - he’s well worth reading. If you're not already a subscriber, claim your first three issues free here.

Why commercial property could sink the UK recovery

But regardless of what you believe is the best way to deal with a recession, the ultimate decision on whether money gets tighter or not may not remain in the hands of the Bank. Commercial banks aren’t going to be in a position to increase lending next year. As the Bank of England points out in its latest Financial Stability Report, banks still have a huge amount of exposure to bad debt in the commercial property sector.

The trouble is, as retailers and other businesses struggle to meet rental payments and the number of empty properties rises, landlords will no longer have enough cash flow to service even the most forgiving loan terms.

“Lenders may be forced into selling a wave of properties as the stock of repossessed assets grows,” reports Graham Ruddick in The Telegraph. The resulting slump in property values could “reduce banks’ recovery rates and could potentially prompt other banks to sell their assets, leading to further falls in property values.” In other words, banks won’t be able to raise enough money to cover their losses. That in turn would leave them less able to lend to the wider economy.

Ex-City trader Riccardo Marzi, in his Events Trader email, reckons that this could be one of the biggest issues of 2010. In fact, there’s a chance that problems with rolling over commercial property debt could even result in a second banking crisis.

So even if the economy’s pulling out of recession, don’t expect a rampaging recovery next year. We could well see a double dip. So where should you invest? Well, our Christmas Roundtable experts give their views in the next issue of MoneyWeek. It’s out on Thursday this week, a day earlier than usual. If you’re not a subscriber, get your first three issues free here. Oh, and if you’re looking for a perfect last-minute Christmas present, you can purchase a gift subscription for a friend here.

Comments (9)

Comments

  • 1. Bob Roberts

    (21 December 2009, 02:46PM)  Complain about this comment

    What affect, if any, would this have on UK residential property prices - houses?

  • 2. Frederik s'Jacob

    (21 December 2009, 03:56PM)  Complain about this comment

    In 2006/7 you were bearish on the markets and lost out on the last 40% of the DJII rise. This year you have been consistently bearish missing out on another 50-60% rise of stock markets. I have written to you before that you should really take liquidity and 0% interest rates into account because otherwise you will always miss the boat.

  • 3. J Moore

    (21 December 2009, 08:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    If developers can get commercial property at a cheap enough price and then get permission for change of use. They can make some tidy profits turning it into flats or houses and selling just below the local market prices. This happened in the mid 90s. There is less chance of getting knocked back for planning in a recession as you are creating employment and extra local and government tax's.

  • 4. dog FM

    (21 December 2009, 08:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    I have to agree with Fred's Jacob - strategically you are probably correct but in terms of trading you have been too pessimistic and subscribers following you have also lost out. You need to allow for the massive amounts of liquidity the desperate governments are trying to buy votes with and the 0% rates that people are enjoying.
    This will continue until they are forced to turn the taps off - then we will see everything down and a run to cash or gold perhaps.

  • 5. John

    (21 December 2009, 08:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    A collapse in commercial property prices and rents will actually be good for the UK economy. The banks can take the hit in their stride offsetting the loss against their obscene profits in currency exchanges. In recent decades, especially the last, commercial prices and rents have become severely bloated, almost extortionate, and have been a drag on the economic well being of Britain. Just as individuals have flooded into the buy-to-let market to support their income and pensions, so have companies flooded into commercial property in order to lever up their exponentially increasing unearned share of the national wealth.

  • 6. Thomas (NL)

    (21 December 2009, 10:19PM)  Complain about this comment

    Glad I avoided your advice so far. UK is not an island, it is part of a global economy that is gathering momentum.
    Stop being such doom sayers. You keep calling current investors suckers, but hey, I made a nice return this year investing in the upturn. Shares are now fairly valued, in 2010 it will be harder to make similar retruns. Another financial crisis? Only if you guys can scare enough people into it. So far you are the suckers, hope it stays like that...

  • 7. Bill

    (06 January 2010, 12:39PM)  Complain about this comment

    It's still a huge property bubble out there.
    In the US they let even the biggest banks go bust, if only to encourage the others, so why don't we?
    My money's on RBS going bust.
    Farmers know that 7 good years are followed by 7 bad and those producing food are the only people to benefit with prices rising even now.
    Land is only worth what people produce from it and that's hard work. No wonder people prefer banking nonsense!

  • 8. headwind

    (13 January 2010, 01:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    well i've heard this side and that. I am still bearish on domestic and business property prices and worry about a double dip when all this Q E is over.

  • 9. richard

    (26 January 2010, 12:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    UK house prices are like 'the 'kings clothes'...they have fallen to nowhere near what the first time buyer can reasonably afford.
    Outside of the Soth East the market should eventually once again establish the price for a first time buyer to 3 times the average salary...say £25,000 p.a. at £75,000
    I believe that we will not have a buoyant residential market until the current ridiculous prices are brought into line with the above.
    Markets eventually determine correct price levels, not hype.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment to within 1,000 characters, and relevant to the main topic. Comments not directly on topic will be removed.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the CAPTCHA box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.