The Fed is desperate to print more money – here’s how to profit

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Jan 26, 2012

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (9) Print this article

Ben Bernanke has ridden to the rescue again.

The S&P 500 – the main US stock market index – is back in bull market territory, having risen just over 20% since October.

How did the Federal Reserve chairman pull it off? The good old-fashioned way. By promising to keep interest rates as low as possible for as long as he can.

When Alan Greenspan was at the helm of the Fed, it was called ‘the Greenspan put’. It’s what got us all into this mess in the first place. And it’s likely to end in tears all over again.

But in the meantime, what does it mean for your investments?

Central banking gets complicated

Remember the good old days, back before the credit crunch? Central bank watching was so simple then.

When Mervyn King or Ben Bernanke met up with their little teams of central planners, all you needed to worry about was one thing: what were they going to do with interest rates?

Now it all seems to be much more complicated. It’s not about what they do with interest rates today any more. It’s about what they think they might do with interest rates in two years’ time. And about whether or not they think they might print more money at some point. And about exactly what they think inflation might be in 2014.

MoneyWeek videos

Video tutorial: What is quantitative easing?What is quantitative easing?
Tim Bennett explains what quantitative easing (QE) is.

Watch all of Tim's videos here

Take last night. The Fed announced that it’s likely to keep interest rates low until late 2014. (It had previously promised low rates to mid-2013, hence the market’s excitement at getting another year of cheap money). However, it also set a formal inflation target of 2% - the first time the Fed has actually admitted to having an explicit goal.

This begs a lot more questions than it answers. How can Bernanke know that inflation is going to be so well-behaved over the next 24 months? The answer of course, is that he doesn’t. And when you look deeper into the views of the various Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC - their equivalent of our Monetary Policy Committee) you soon see that individual opinion is pretty varied. 

Some Fed members think US rates should rise as early as this year, says the FT. Others reckon it’ll be 2016 before they do.

But here’s the good news. You don’t have to worry about the details. The latest move might seem complicated. But it all boils down to one thing. Bernanke is telling investors: “I will keep money as cheap as I can for as long as I possibly can.”

How do we know? Everything in the way this presentation was spun pointed to “downside risks”. You don’t have to be a raging optimist to accept that some of the data on the US economy has been looking more positive recently.

There are plenty of caveats to all this – I’ll mention some in a moment – but the Fed was resolutely gloomy about growth prospects. And as the FT notes, “most of the FOMC expect inflation to be at or below the new target of 2% at the end of 2014,” with unemployment still above 7%. If that’s the case, then it in fact “implies that monetary policy is too tight” just now.

In other words, Bernanke is just looking for an excuse to press the button on the printing press again.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


So what does this mean for you?

The main impact of the Fed’s speech was to whack the dollar. That made everything else go up. This was probably Bernanke’s main goal for now. If the US manufacturing recovery is to continue, then a weak dollar would be very helpful.

Yes, this is a ‘beggar-thy-neighbour’ policy and another shot in the currency wars. But who’s going to complain just now?

The Europeans aren’t going to whine about a stronger euro – they’re still terrified it might not exist this time next year. The Japanese still seem reluctant to act decisively to weaken the yen, despite the outcry from their manufacturers. And the Chinese are happy with a weaker dollar – it means their currency falls too.

Of course, this is all good for gold, which is why you should be hanging on to it. The yellow metal shot back above $1,700 an ounce on the Fed’s announcement.

However, I’m not convinced that a ‘weak dollar’ policy will have legs. The market’s view of the US economy has shifted. It’s no longer merely the place you run to when everything else is going pear-shaped. It’s becoming attractive in its own right again.

Whether that’s overly hopeful or not (the likes of Apple are reporting outstanding results, as my colleague Phil Oakley wrote yesterday, but overall, earnings so far this quarter have beaten hopes by the least in a decade), the fact is that the more investors believe America is the place to be this year, the more investment flows it will attract.

Despite the Fed’s best efforts, the dollar is no longer a one-way street. So as we’ve been saying for a while now, it’s worth having some exposure to the US in your portfolio. That doesn’t mean you have to pile into US stocks – in the next issue of MoneyWeek magazine (out tomorrow) our roundtable experts pick some of their favourite UK-listed US plays. If you're not already a subscriber, get your first three copies free here.

• This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .

Our recommended article for today

It’s time to rebalance your portfolio

From time to time, it's important to think about rebalancing your portfolio. Tim Bennett explains why, and how you should go about it.

Comments (9)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Neil Tennants

    (26 January 2012, 11:07AM)  Complain about this comment

    Is that Phil Oakley the one who had that song Electric Dreams in the 80s?

  • 2. Ray Graham

    (26 January 2012, 11:44AM)  Complain about this comment

    I subscribe to Money Week but it appears to constantly want me to subscribe to several other magazines most of which give contrasting views all of which are purely speculative and quite confusing!

  • 3. Albert Iremonger

    (26 January 2012, 12:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    Neil
    That was Phil Oakey not Oakley. I suggest you subscibe to NME as well as Money Week

  • 4. HL

    (26 January 2012, 12:07PM)  Complain about this comment

    Ray Graham, you are so right -- different views, all expounded with an air of certainty, all telling us how to invest for profit.

    But there's a problem, isn't there ? If these gurus know so much about investing, how come they are still beavering away, writing articles for the likes of us ? Why aren't they billionaires, relaxing on their yachts ?

    Just asking.

  • 5. Albert Iremonger

    (26 January 2012, 12:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    Sorry Neil - you were right - it was Oakley. I am signing up for Smash Hits as my knowledge of 80s pop is clearly weaker than I thought

  • 6. Segedunum

    (26 January 2012, 04:17PM)  Complain about this comment

    Well, that's my mind made up. By more precious metals.

    The thing I find funny is the way the Fed dismisses the threat of inflation and gives some totally bogus hint that they're somehow going to keep it under control. Maybe they just hope it won't be a problem.

    Inflation and money printing is like a runaway train. It doesn't look as if it's moving but once it does move it is already too late. We're going to get hyperinflation.

  • 7. HL

    (26 January 2012, 05:19PM)  Complain about this comment

    Segedunum, those of us who lived through the 70s remember all too well how people's savings were inflated away.

    Prime Minister Harold Wilson was furious about the rapid price rises, or so he said. He once claimed that he had seen a loaf of bread in a supermarket with two price tags, a low one covered up by a higher one.

    Naturally, Wilson dismissed any suggestion that his government was in any way responsible. He blamed the supermarket. Plus ca change.

    So yes, buy gold and silver before it's too late !

  • 8. jrj90620

    (26 January 2012, 05:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    I thought you guys were pushing the strong Dollar idea.Now,maybe you are rethinking that stance.How you could ever suggest holding the common stock of a bankrupt govt(the U.S. Dollar is the common stock of the U.S. Govt) was a good idea,is beyond me.The reason Bernanke can be assured that inflation will stay below 2% is because govt creates the phony inflation numbers.Shadowstats,an organization that calculates the actual inflation rate,says inflation,using methods of calculation used in 1980,over the last 12 months,has been about 11%.

  • 9. LERENARD

    (26 January 2012, 07:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    Instead of printing money and giving it to the banks and stock market speculators, 'Helicopter Ben' Bernanke should live up to his sobriquet and literally drop the money from helicopters into the streets. The average Joe could certainly make good use of the new greenbacks, paying his mortgage and revitalizing the dying high streets ! That would be the 'American dream' come true at last for the dispossessed !

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>