The US is heading for recession – here’s where to take cover

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Oct 03, 2011

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (6) Print this article

Making recession calls is a well-worn route to fleeting fame as an ‘investment guru’.

Get it right, and you’re feted as a seer. Get it wrong, and most of the time, no one takes much notice. So in terms of risk / reward pay-off, it’s an attractive strategy.

It also means that investors can be forgiven for taking cries of ‘recession ahead!’ with a big pinch of salt.

But on Friday, one group issued a recession warning that you shouldn’t ignore. Why? Because these guys have a good track record – and they’re not in the habit of crying wolf.

The recession indicator with a six out of seven track record

The Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI) has an impressive record on predicting US recessions. Its best-known indicator is its Weekly Leading Index growth indicator. This has just fallen again, week-on-week. The index now sits at -7.2, after hitting -6.7 last week.

The exact composition of the index isn’t known. ECRI is a private forecasting group and it doesn’t want to give away its secret recipe. But in essence, the index looks at various indicators of economic activity – everything from the stock market to factory production data – and rolls it all up into one index. When this is falling, it indicates that the economy is deteriorating, and vice versa when it’s rising.

And when it turns down hard enough, a recession in the US very often follows. As BusinessInsider.com notes, “a significant decline” in the index, “has been a leading indicator for six of the seven recessions since the 1960s”. And the single recession it ‘missed’ in 1981/82, it only lagged by nine weeks. You can see how effective the index is in the chart below (recessions are market by grey bars, the ECRI index is in blue, and US GDP is in red).

ECRI versus US GDP chart

(Source: Bloomberg)

“Aha”, an optimist might argue. “But what about false alarms? I remember reading all about this a year or so ago. Wasn’t the ECRI index pointing downward back then?”

It’s true. The most recent ‘false alarm’ was when the ECRI index slid last year. In July 2010, it hit a low of -11, which had never been seen before without a recession following on. We flagged it up at the time as a bearish indicator.

However, even before the Federal Reserve came to the apparent rescue of asset markets with its second bout of quantitative easing (QE2), ECRI itself declared that the slide in its index wasn’t actually signalling a recession on this occasion. And they were right.

If you think this is bad, you ain’t seen nothing yet

That’s why it’s worth paying attention now. Because this time, ECRI believes the US is heading for recession. And the announcement on the ECRI website doesn’t pull any punches.

“The US economy is indeed tipping into a new recession. And there’s nothing that policy makers can do to head it off.” As far as ECRI is concerned, it’s too late. The downturn has kicked in – sales are falling, production declining – it’s a vicious circle and the only way out is to get through it.

ECRI notes that a “recession doesn’t mean a bad economy – we’ve had that for years now. It means an economy that keeps worsening,” The group expects unemployment to go “much higher”, and the deficit to “soar”. In short, “if you think this is a bad economy, you haven’t seen anything yet. And that has profound implications for both Main Street and Wall Street”.

This probably shouldn’t come as a huge surprise to investors. After all, markets have turned down decisively across the globe. Europe is the obvious catalyst, but the US economy has been looking poorly for a while. Throw wobbles about China into the mix, and you have a recipe for a hard comedown. ECRI’s warning is just another nail in the coffin of hopes for a rapid turnaround.

But it gets even more depressing. ECRI adds that this could be a pattern for the foreseeable future. When bullish pundits are trying to calm the nerves of investors, they often point out the recessions are relatively rare events.

Well, not anymore. ECRI notes that we’re likely to be in “an era of more frequent recessions”, with shorter recovery periods in between. And this is “hardly unheard of. From 1799 to 1929, nearly 90% of US expansions lasted three years or less, as did two of the three expansions between 1970 and 1981”.

In other words, we’re getting back to normal. If anything was an aberration, it was the ‘Great Moderation’ – the credit-driven good times of the ‘80s and ‘90s. This sort of market is often dubbed a ‘hippo market’ – so-called because it doesn’t really go anywhere in the long run, it just wallows around. But the way I see it, it’s just a more palatable name for a bear market.

Investing for a hippo market

What can you do as an investor? Timing the rallies and declines in the market is one option. But it’s not easy, as fund managers are always telling us. When it comes to stocks, we’d be more inclined to keep a watch list of the companies you like. When a big plunge comes (as they will), drip feed some money in, and hopefully in the long run, you’ll come off best.

You probably already know which sorts of stocks we like – big blue-chips with decent dividend yields and the cashflow to cover them. My colleague David Stevenson highlights a few decent bets in the current issue of MoneyWeek magazine: Central banks can’t stop the next Great Recession (if you would like to become a subscriber, you can claim your first three issues free here). And if it’s a strategy that appeals to you, you should take a look at this note from Stephen Bland, whose Dividend Letter newsletter will help you to build a diversified portfolio of big blue-chips with solid dividend yields. Better yet, it’s simple to follow, which means you’re far more likely to stick with it in the long run. Find out more and see if it’s for you here.

Our recommended article for today


How to play the next stage of the eurozone crisis

The eurozone is stumbling from one crisis to another, but there's really only a few real options left for the currency union. Here James Ferguson looks at what they are, and John Stepek looks at ways to play the uncertain future of the single currency.

Comments (6)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Grassy

    (03 October 2011, 11:34AM)  Complain about this comment

    Well, NO ONE should be surprised what the ECRI weekly indicator has come up with. You cant keep borrowing money and then expect not to pay it back ? Without consequences.
    Now how does the rest of the world deal with this. China and India do they need USA or is there a dislocation ? I doubt it Global Economies are symbiotic.
    GRASSY

  • 2. Cliff Hanger

    (03 October 2011, 01:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    How come no one mentions peak oil and triple digit oil prices when analyzing economic trends and in particular recessions?

    Of course we are approaching a new normal, the era of cheap and plentiful oil that has underwritten western prosperity for the last 50 years is over. We are entering an extended period of very low or zero growth interspersed with recessions that get progressively deeper in severity and longer in duration.

    Anyone that researches this to even a moderate degree cannot be surprised by this. What is surprising (and depressing) is the almost complete lack of political acknowledgement to begin tackling what will become the defining issue within the next 5-10 years. The time to preparation was a least 10 years ago.

  • 3. Bob

    (03 October 2011, 01:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    Call me stupid, but I really do not understand all these articles saying to buy blue chip shares because a recession is coming - surely, in that regard ALL shares will fall.

    Does it not make sense to stay in cash until the markets correct, then buy your blue chips?

  • 4. smlaing

    (03 October 2011, 05:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    Absolutely Bob.

    They can't bring themselves to say "dump shares".

    The recession will likely precede a liquidity crisis of a magnitude never seen if the Euro project collapses. One should contemplate dumping everything. In the 2008 liqudity freeze absolutely everthing went down. Nothing whatsoever went up.

    Only a fool would put their capital at risk to chase a paltry dividend in this environment!

  • 5. Critic Al Rick

    (03 October 2011, 06:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    QUOTE:
    'ECRI notes that we're likely to be in "an era of more frequent recessions".

    Given that QE seems to be the way the 'powers that be' are attending to the Mess, there will never be a real Recovery; and just as amateur 'fire-brigade' tactics leave a fire smouldering after each quenching to flare up again and again, doses of QE won't permanently solve the problems of the economies of the West.

    Given the essence of the cause of the Mess, negative Balance of Payments for decades, QE will never fettle it. All QE will do is 'kick the can further down the road' until on one 'kick' that 'can' explodes.

    Given human nature and the measures required to properly fettle the Mess, those measures are very unlikely to be taken.

    In the meantime, yes I can well envisage a series of more frequent Recessions.

    My definition of 'Recession': a period of adjustment where the 'Parasites' emerge stronger at the expense of the downtrodden (real) wealth creators (past & present).

  • 6. Critic Al Rick

    (03 October 2011, 06:31PM)  Complain about this comment

    QUOTE:
    'ECRI notes that a "recession doesn't mean a bad economy - we've had that for years now. It means an economy that keeps worsening".

    In my book a 'bad economy' is one with a poor Balance of Payments; a worse economy is one with a poor Balance of Payments and greater than tolerable Inflation. In my book GDP is more proportional to Tax Take than a measure of how well an economy is doing. You can have respectable Growth but still have an apalling Balance of Payments. You could be in Recession but have a good, albiet deteriorating, Balance of Payments. So, I agree, Recession doesn't necessarily mean 'bad economy'.

    But I don't agree that an economy in Recession is necessarily one that keeps worsening. Indeed, there is no way our economy is going to properly Recover without, not just being in Recession, going through a Depression.

    But ... that would entail an enormous damage limitation exercise, and there's none so blind as them that don't want to see!!

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>