QE3 launches at last – here’s what it means for your money

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Sep 14, 2012

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (8) Print this article

I have to admit, I wasn’t convinced that the Federal Reserve would do more quantitative easing last night.

I couldn’t quite see how it was justified. The stock market’s at a four-year high. The US economy is weak, but deflation isn’t an obvious problem. And the election is only months away.

I should have had more faith in ‘Blackhawk’ Ben Bernanke and his desire to take monetary policy to the outer limits.

The Fed chairman is determined to reflate the US economy – whatever the cost…

What ‘QE unlimited’ means for the market

QE3 has arrived. And this time, it’s unlimited.

Up until now, the Fed has been printing money to buy up US Treasuries (US government debt). So far, it has always put an explicit limit on the amount.

This time, the Fed has said it will buy $40bn-worth of mortgage-backed securities every month, until the labour market improves “substantially”. In other words, for now at least, it is targeting employment, rather than inflation.

This is important. The Fed hasn’t even put a number on the unemployment rate it thinks is acceptable. But the Fed’s new forecasts suggest that unemployment will be high until at least the end of 2014.

As Paul Ashworth at Capital Economics notes, if the Fed wants unemployment to fall to 7% from the current 8.1%, then that means between two and three years of monthly purchases. That could add up to more than a trillion dollars over three years – a similar size to the first batch of QE.

What does it all mean? The Fed is targeting the housing market directly. By buying mortgage-backed securities it will keep mortgage rates low. That should ensure the nascent recovery in the US property market stays on track. We tipped some US housing market stocks earlier this year – you can read the piece here: A once-in-a-generation opportunity to pick up prime US real estate. Most of these stocks could no longer be described as anything like cheap but they may still eke out more gains as this news sinks in.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


 

In passing, this move by the Fed raises some interesting questions about democracy and central banking in general. Bernanke insists the move isn’t political. That’s probably true.

At the same time, it was quite stupid of the Republicans to tell the one man who has more short-term power over US consumer confidence than anyone else in the country, that they were going to fire him if they won the election. If Barack Obama was ever looking for a poll boost from the Fed, this is the best he could have hoped for.

How this affects your investments

If this new bout of QE shows one thing, it’s that Bernanke really doesn’t care about inflation. The Fed said it is determined to keep going with a weak monetary policy, even when signs of recovery appear. “We’re going to give it some time”, said Bernanke.

It’s the old ‘Greenspan put’ again. If at first you don’t succeed in blowing a proper asset bubble, try, try and try again. And while the market might start to run out of faith in QE, there’s nothing to stop Bernanke from doing even more if he decides it’s needed.

So what should you do? Well, stick with the same things I recommended earlier in the week. As I said then, QE or no QE, eurozone stocks look better than US ones, simply because they’re cheaper.

Yes, US stocks jumped on QE3 yesterday. But as you probably noticed, European stocks have been surging this morning too.

The one thing that could derail this particular party is the ‘fiscal cliff’ in the US. This is the package of spending cuts and tax rises that will kick in next year if politicians can’t agree on a deal to prevent it. It’s another reason to favour cheap European stocks over expensive US ones – expensive stocks generally have further to fall than cheap ones.

And of course, hang on to gold. The yellow metal is heading higher once again, and little wonder. The world’s central banks have now fully signed up money-printing as being the solution to all our woes. Even the cautious Bank of Japan is likely to feel the need to react to the Fed’s move by printing more money itself to keep the yen weak. The race to devalue is back on. That can only be good for gold.

Another beneficiary should be gold mining stocks. Gold shares have had a tough time, but they’ve been rising in anticipation of more QE. That’s likely to continue. Of course, you have to be picky with mining stocks. This week, conveniently enough, we launched our new precious metals newsletter. Its author, Simon Popple, targets some very specific types of mining stocks that he thinks are best-placed to benefit from money printing in the years ahead  – to find out more about it, click here.

• This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .

Follow John on Twitter || Google+ John Stepek

Our recommended articles for today

Germany says 'yes' – but the euro’s not safe yet

The decision of Germany's constitutional court means the European Central Bank can go ahead with its latest rescue plan. But the single currency is by no means safe yet, says Matthew Partridge.

The best way to invest in Britain’s property market today

SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
UK property is not a good investment at the moment. But there is one sector of the market where you could get a reasonable return on your money. Phil Oakley explains.

Comments (8)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Lupulco

    (14 September 2012, 11:53AM)  Complain about this comment

    Maybe if Obama thinks that he his going to lose, he is going to stitch up the incoming Republicans, just the Republicans stitched the Democrats.
    Still it is only Mickey Mouse Money and if you live month to month and have no real assetts you might as well enjoy the show.

  • 2. Lumino

    (14 September 2012, 12:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    Buy Europe we're told... why? Because the CAPE is low.

    Now, why would the average of the last 10 years' profits in europe be high compared with today's prices? The 10 years of an unsustainable party in Europe's pants during which huge imbalances and debts built up... Compared with the prices as of today, with question marks over the currency, widespread recession, riots in the streets and a realisation the last 10 years was not the "new normal".

    The current year P/E ratios in Spain and Italy are *higher* than the UK. Doesn't sound cheap to me...

  • 3. CHRIS

    (14 September 2012, 05:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    By the look of his face in the picture you have used I'd say this is a very worried man. QE by the Fed and BoE has nothing to do with stimulating employment as you claim in your article but is merely a way to keep the bankrupt banks functioning. Some are claiming that because of Bens actions the US will actually see hyperinflation by the end of 2014. If I was Ben I'd be worried if this was my legacy.

  • 4. Yann

    (14 September 2012, 10:37PM)  Complain about this comment

    Who is purchasing US bonds nowadays? It beats me.
    Is it not obvious that the USA's best wish is to obtain a 10-15% inflation rate during a few years ?
    30 years of debt erased, then everything can start over again like with Reagan.

  • 5. Tim Wood

    (14 September 2012, 10:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    Is not mining fresh supplies of new gold conceptually the same as printing more fiat money? Is it not inflationary? Not quite. What underpins the value of gold is the cost of mining and refining of fresh supplies. As the purchasing power of gold increases the incentive increases to find and extract more gold until cost and price equilibrium is reached; if the purchasing power of gold falls then mines from which extraction costs are highest will be closed or mothballed until cost and price equilibrium is reached. If we assume that the marginal cost of bringing physical gold to market reflects the average productivity of all other economic activity the stability of the purchasing power of gold regulates itself.
    The cost of printing more paper IOUs is negligible: that is why printing money is inflationary. Anything amounting to a mere paper IOU is essentially worthless – and that includes any certificate of ownership of gold not 100% backed by physical gold. Caveat Emptor!

  • 6. Tall Tom

    (15 September 2012, 08:17AM)  Complain about this comment

    One of the consequences of this continual round of QE is that it will not do anything to alleviate the unemployment problem.

    The FED is handing out Corporate Welfare.

    This is the key statement...They have said that if the economy strengthens, which means that unemployment DECREASES, then they will stop handing it out.

    Hmmm...Let me think about that...

    If I am a businessman and someone is PAYING me because unemployment is high then I will do everything in my power to ensure that unemployment remains high.

    I am in business, not to employ people, but to make money.

    If someone is willing to pay me to NOT employ people, you can rest assured that I will NOT be employing people. I am in it for the money.

    This will ensure a Romney victory in November.

  • 7. Tall Tom

    (15 September 2012, 08:17AM)  Complain about this comment

    One of the consequences of this continual round of QE is that it will not do anything to alleviate the unemployment problem.

    The FED is handing out Corporate Welfare.

    This is the key statement...They have said that if the economy strengthens, which means that unemployment DECREASES, then they will stop handing it out.

    Hmmm...Let me think about that...

    If I am a businessman and someone is PAYING me because unemployment is high then I will do everything in my power to ensure that unemployment remains high.

    I am in business, not to employ people, but to make money.

    If someone is willing to pay me to NOT employ people, you can rest assured that I will NOT be employing people. I am in it for the money.

    This will ensure a Romney victory in November.

  • 8. smlaing

    (15 September 2012, 07:11PM)  Complain about this comment

    This is a real game changer. They really don't care. It's like............."Oh stuff this, just keep printing until something happens". He'd be better off handing the $2T to all USA'a unemployed and they can spend the rest of their lives sunning in Acapulco. This will be more inflationary than the last 2 QE put together........and some!

    Stocks will rally but only for a while. I suspect precious metals will easily outperform stocks. If accelerating inflation embeds then money will slowly come off stocks and into commodities fuelling the fire.

    The real use of that &2T is $1.95T will end up in the pockets of the Mayfair Set and the rest........on benefits.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>