We’ve fixed the economy

By Bill Bonner Nov 14, 2012

Bill Bonner.

Share with
friends:

Comments (6) Print this article

“In the end more than they wanted freedom, they wanted security. When the Athenians finally wanted not to give to society but for society to give to them, when the freedom they wished for was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free.”

Edward Gibbon (1737-1794)

Dow down 58 yesterday. No panic. Just hesitation... and worry.

A TV news report this morning said that Congress only had 18 days to solve the 'fiscal cliff' issue. Seems like plenty of time.

But the 'fiscal cliff' is no big deal anyway. If we go over the cliff, the feds will have to jettison a bit of their projected spending increases. It still leaves them in growth mode. It still leaves the zombies with about half the nation’s energy, resources and money. The other half is barely able to carry the load, especially since there are so many zombies getting in their way.

Yesterday, we noted that 22 million people had been added to the food stamp and disabled list since Obama took office. At the rate the zombies are multiplying there will not be a single normal person left in the US by 2052. We’ll all be riding in government-provided wheelchairs and living on food stamps.

And who will pay for it? That’s the thing about zombies, they need living flesh. In the coming zombie Armageddon, the last productive citizens will be hunted down and torn to pieces. Then what?

We don’t know. Our guess is that the whole corrupt system of robbing Peter to pay zombies will blow up long before we get to zombie Armageddon. But we could be wrong.

And since we want to see how this all turns out, we have a proposal. Let’s ‘cut to the chase’, as they say here in Hollywood. At no additional cost, the feds could turn the whole population into zombies right away. Currently, the Fed is paying bondholders – mostly banks –  $40bn per month.

Instead of giving it to the fat-cat zombies, why not spread it around to the skinny-cat zombies? Milton Friedman once spoke of dropping money from helicopters as the ultimate way to beat a debt trap. Why not do it? Just drop the money right into households all across the country.

Of course, we’re speaking metaphorically. There aren’t enough helicopters to pull off a trick like that.


DR banner

Receive Bill Bonner's free daily email 'The Daily Reckoning' straight to your inbox


Instead, the Fed could just give the $40bn to the Social Security Administration. They’re good at handing out other people’s money. They could easily arrange for every family to get about $500 a month just from the Fed’s new cash. It wouldn’t cost Washington a penny, because the Fed creates its money out of thin air.

This way, the feds would avoid the blockage in the banking system. As it is, the Fed gives the banks the money. They use it to buy financial assets – notably US government bonds. The rich get richer. The poor stay poor. Only a little of the money ends up in consumers’ hands. So, as far as increasing demand – which is the stated policy objective – QE3 and all the QEs that preceded it have been duds.

Giving the money directly to consumers, on the other hand, would produce an immediate increase in demand. Heck, with $500 more a month, you can lease a new car. You can upgrade your apartment or go out to dinner four or five times. You can buy 50 bottles of decent Chilean wine or 50 packs of cigarettes.

Since most of the money would go to low and middle income families, it would almost all be spent. With a modest 1.5 x multiplier, you could expect that the economy would get a jolt of about $60bn in extra spending per month.

Since consumer spending is part of the GDP, no matter how stupid and counterproductive it is, this would boost the GDP by $720bn per year. Whoa! Now you’re cooking with gas. That’s an increase to GDP of about 5%, bringing the total rate of increase to about 7% per year.

Our plan has a big political advantage too. It gives money directly to the people rather than to the greedy SOBs in the 1%. It creates millions of new jobs. And it actually reduces the US budget deficit, since the feds will collect taxes on all that additional activity.

And it puts all Americans on more or less even footing. We’ll all be zombies. And we’ll all go broke more or less at the same time, as the helicopter money brings our whole system of fraudulent finance to grief much sooner.

• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, sign up to the email list here .

Information in The Daily Reckoning is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. The Daily Reckoning is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Customer services: 020 7633 3600. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do FSA number: 1152 34

Comments (6)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. BobN

    (14 November 2012, 07:51PM)  Complain about this comment

    Great quote from Gibbon. I presume its from his 'Decline and Fall ....' Can you give the Chapter (or where else) its from so i can dig out my copy and reread the section.
    regards bob

  • 2. Critic Al Rick

    (14 November 2012, 09:41PM)  Complain about this comment

    Every possible way I see things developing, barring a suitable miracle(s), those of the 99% in the West who are not already Zombified are now destined to become Zombies; all 99% destined to become subjects of Totalitarianism.

    What other outcome can there be when the feckless are prosthetisised (to varying extents and capabilities dependent upon their status within or outside of the regime) whilst the worthwhile have their arms and legs amputated for conversion to prosthetics?

  • 3. Europeanyokel

    (14 November 2012, 11:08PM)  Complain about this comment

    Great logic, Bill. But maybe the reason the US Government isn't feeding the money to the 99% is (1) avoiding the Weimar Republic trap and (2) avoiding to disobey its masters, the banksters?

  • 4. mikkip

    (15 November 2012, 08:25AM)  Complain about this comment

    More doom and gloom... more doomsaying... if the Fed really wanted to increase aggregate demand then they probably would hand money out to the masses... but the resulting hyperinflation would bring down the government... therefore is it fair to say that the real purposes of qe is to enrich the insiders and the stated purpose of increasing demand is a lie? Or am i sounding like a conspiracy nut?

  • 5. Guy

    (15 November 2012, 05:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    Perhaps the real reason for QE is just to keep the "system" alive, because the alternative is likely blood-on-the-streets anarchy and terror. What percentage of the population in the west can feed themselves if the cash machines stop giving out cash, or if the local supermarket shelves are empty. Perhaps the people at the top are terrified by their lack of ability to steer the ship, rather than sinister conspirators. The world is big and complicated. The conspiracy theories require some group to be able to understand it and control it. I find it hard to give them that much credit.

  • 6. Jack

    (16 November 2012, 04:50PM)  Complain about this comment

    You're proposing that the $100 bill left at the reception of the Motel while the potential customer inspects the rooms travels all around town paying bills rather than just those of the Motel Manager and his banker. With careful manipulation of taxation, the government might even be able to get their $100 of stimulus back again just like the potential customer did when he declined to stay at the Motel.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>