How money buys happiness

By Bill Bonner Feb 08, 2013

Bill Bonner.

Share with
friends:

Comments (3) Print this article

“As long as I live under the capitalistic system, I expect to have my life influenced by the demands of moneyed people. But I will be damned if I propose to be at the beck and call of every itinerant scoundrel who has two cents to invest in a postage stamp.
This, sir, is my resignation.”

William Faulkner resigns from the Oxford, Mississippi Post Office

One of the rarely cited advantages of having money is that you’re less beholden to others who have it too. The more you have, at least in theory, the more you can ignore the other fellow with it, and go about your business. Nor need you drink the same cocktail or rush to the same mall so you can outfit yourself in the same duds.

In short, with a little cash of your own, you can do what you want.

And the fellow who said “money can’t buy happiness”, had apparently not read yesterday’s New York Times:

Broadly speaking, the data now indicate that as people get richer, they report getting happier too. Though it’s not quite that simple. Justin Wolfers, an economist at the University of Michigan who helps advise the US government on happiness statistics, told me that poor people in poor countries are not unhappy simply because they don’t have wads of cash. They are more likely to have fewer choices, more children who die in childbirth and other grave problems. And while wealthier nations are generally happier, there is no evidence, Wolfers says, that an artist would be happier if she became a hedge-fund trader.

But we’re talking capital, not cashflow. The trouble with cashflow is that it doesn’t spring ab ovo, from nowhere. It comes to your hands from the greasy mitts of someone else. If they don’t keep the cash flowing, you may not have any. Unless you’re a government employee or a tenured professor, a job is just a job. You serve at the pleasure of others. If you give them displeasure, they can cut off your income.

Capital is different. If you have enough of it, you don’t have to work for anyone. You can go fishing, pick your teeth and maintain unpatriotic opinions.

Capital frees you from politics too. According to the most recent numbers, nearly half of US households now rely on other people’s money for some or all of their income. They are beneficiaries of one or more of the feds’ transfer programmes. Money is taken from others; it is transferred to them, as if to a getaway car.


DR banner

Receive Bill Bonner's free daily email 'The Daily Reckoning' straight to your inbox


The feds even have the chutzpah to give the recipients of this stolen loot an electronic card called the “Independence Card.” Independent is exactly what these people aren’t. Instead, they are like feudal serfs, says Charles Hugh Smith.

“The core of American liberty is widespread private ownership of property”, he writes. If you want to be free you have to have your hands on the ‘means of production’. Otherwise, you’ve got to learn to bend.

Imagine that you have zero equity in the house you own, he suggests. How free are you then?

Or imagine that you need to buy a house and need a mortgage. The mortgage market is almost 100% controlled by the feds. How free are you?

He does not mention it, but imagine that you rely on the feds for unemployment comp, food stamps, health care, or Social Security? Are you a free man? Or a serf?

Smith says we live in a condition of creeping ‘neo-feudalism’. A few people own a lot of property. Most own very little. His attention is focused on housing, where he believes the feds are quietly taking more and more property out of private hands and putting it in the hands of rich, concentrated elites.

He’s probably right about that. But it seems to us that even more neo-feudalism is taking place right out in the open, where large groups now depend on the feds, and on Fed’s EZ money, to maintain their current standards of living.

Balance the federal budget? Stop the Fed’s printing presses? Let interest rates rise to a normal level? Forget it. The serfs can’t afford it.

• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, sign up to the email list here .

Information in The Daily Reckoning is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. The Daily Reckoning is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Customer services: 020 7633 3600. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do FSA number: 1152 34

Comments (3)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Jack

    (08 February 2013, 10:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    This tussle between independence and fuedalism has been the recent history of the UK.
    The Feudalists comprise the Tory toffs and the Labour party, who believe in a structured social order with themselves at the top and everyone else dependent on them - the former by birthright, the latter because they think themselves cleverer. The independence party are the Thatcherites who lowered the ladder to allow whoever will to better themselves by their own efforts.
    The UK's economic performance of the country over the last 35 years provides the verdict on the two approaches.

  • 2. Jal S. Desai

    (10 February 2013, 11:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    Dear Bill,
    People who say money can't buy happiness don't have any money!
    If a person has plenty of money, he need not become anyone's servant. But how do you get lots of money? You can inherit the money or you can save the money. In the US, people stupidly go on borrowing money which leads them into a debt trap. An intelligent person will save 50% of his after-tax income. You also have to invest the money in a safe investment which may give you a low rate of return, but,at least, you won't lose your capital.
    You can, of course, come up with a new idea or product or book which might make you millions, but how many people can do that? Therefore, the only way to wealth is saving a large amount every month.
    Regards,
    Jal S. Desai

  • 3. Ellen

    (11 February 2013, 06:35PM)  Complain about this comment

    As we are being philosophical, I will dissent here.

    Money satisfies physiological needs and brings an obvious power over other people. Depending on how this power is used might determine how, or if, a rich person can be happy.







Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>