Go long tear gas

By Bill Bonner Oct 21, 2011

Bill Bonner.

Share with
friends:

Comments (5) Print this article

In 2005, few people on the planet could afford Americans’ standard of living. Not even Americans.

But now the wheel has turned. The US is facing financial reality. And yesterday, we gave you our most audacious forecast ever: the popolo minuto are headed for the barricades. Yes, dear reader, prepare for revolution, repression, and ruin. Buy stocks in companies that make police batons and pepper gas, prisons and window glass, drones and bandages.

The Christian Science Monitor:

Think life is not as good as it used to be, at least in terms of your wallet? You'd be right about that. The standard of living for Americans has fallen longer and more steeply over the past three years than at any time since the US government began recording it five decades ago.

Bottom line: The average individual now has $1,315 less in disposable income than he or she did three years ago at the onset of the Great Recession – even though the recession ended, technically speaking, in mid-2009. That means less money to spend at the spa or the movies, less for vacations, new carpeting for the house, or dinner at a restaurant.

In short, it means a less vibrant economy, with more Americans spending primarily on necessities. The diminished standard of living, moreover, is squeezing the middle class, whose restlessness and discontent are evident in grass-roots movements such as the tea party and "Occupy Wall Street" and who may take out their frustrations on incumbent politicians in next year's election.

Per capita disposal personal income – a key indicator of the standard of living – peaked in the spring of 2008, at $33,794 (measured as after-tax income). As of the second quarter of 2011, it was $32,479 – almost a 4 percent drop. If per capita disposable income had continued to grow at its normal pace, it would have been more than $34,000 a year by now.

The misery index – which combines inflation and unemployment – is almost back to where it was 30 years ago – after inflation had reached 13% and stocks had been going down for 16 years. 

But wait. Things didn’t turn out so bad after that, did they? In the early ‘80s came “Morning in America” and a 20-year boom.

Don’t count on it this time, dear reader. 1981 was everything 2011 is not. Back then, interest rates and inflation were sky high. Stocks were low. And Paul Volcker had just taken over at the Fed. When he said he was going to turn things around, he meant it.

Today, interest rates are at a half-century low, stocks are still expensive and Ben Bernanke is as confused as Volcker was clear-headed. Turn things around now and you get rising interest rates, falling stock prices and more misery. Look out the window. You can see the sun on the horizon twice a day. But only once is it rising. 

The world has turned. Against us. Mitt Romney may have God in his pocket. But from our perch here at the Daily Reckoning headquarters in Paris, it looks more likely that the gods have gone over to the over side.


DR banner

Receive Bill Bonners free Daily email 'The Daily Reckoning' straight to your inbox


And more thoughts

• “Can you help me,” said the tall, attractive, dark-haired young woman.

We had just gotten out of the subway at the Auteuil stop. It is a strange station, where the metro trains only go in one direction. 

“I want to go the other way and I don’t know how to do it.”

“Of course, Mademoiselle,” we began gallantly. Then, we explained how the system worked in this part of the underground railway. 

But she looked off into the distance. She seemed to be puzzled, with a far-away look in here eyes. We explained the geography and the mechanics of it. We oriented her, pointing her to what we believed was True North. We would have been happy to explain the motion of the earth around the sun and the shifting of the seasons, too, for she was pretty and smiled. But she seemed to be looking for more practical advice.

“Come over here, here’s a map, look, see how the subway line goes this way here and that way there. Don’t you see how it works?”

“No…”

“Well… just look at this… see the pattern…?”

“I’m afraid not…” she said quietly, lowering her head a bit and raising her right arm. In her right hand, we hadn’t noticed, was a white cane.

“Oh… I see… but I guess you don’t see, do you?”

“No.”

• One of the hardest things to understand is how come modern democracy could be so shiftless… and modern capitalism is so unproductive. As to the first question, how come the feds bail out the banks, when the voters are clearly against it? And how come they continue to spend trillions on foreign wars… when the voters clearly cannot afford it? As to the second, how is it possible for the most sophisticated, high tech, hugely funded capitalist system the world has ever seen to allocate capital so badly? Over the space of its most recent, and most flamboyant decade, it actually made people poorer! 

It scarcely seems possible.

But here we are. American democracy and America capitalism have been hijacked by zombies. Trillions of dollars are directed to sectors with negative real rates of return – education, heath, bureaucracy and war. Washington is the nation’s richest city. And government – along with its zombie clients – are America’s only thriving industries. 

More to come soon…

• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, sign up to the email list here .

Comments (5)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Tony

    (21 October 2011, 05:46PM)  Complain about this comment

    There are millions of americans over the age of 55 who are still working right? So instead of giving more and more taxpayers money to greedy unproductive parasitic banks, why not give each of these over 55`s a million dollars each on condition that a) they give up their job b) they have to pay off their mortgage and c) they have to buy a new AMERICAN car. This should go a long way to reducing unemployment, a long way towards securing abetter future for the car industry and help reduce the property market debt. Everyone wins and at a lot smaller cost than the wasted billions going into propping up many of those who caused this crisis in the first place, to say nothing about making a lot of over 55`s very, very, happy!

  • 2. Jack

    (21 October 2011, 05:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    When money is created it is lent, and it is required to be paid back with interest. This means that there must be more money in the world at the later date than at the earlier one.
    If the money is used to create wealth, then there is more wealth at the end than at the beginning. But what if that wealth is shoddy? What if the time, effort and resources used for creation of razor blade, crown corks of other disposable items? Then at the latter date there is no wealth to support more money.
    The story of industry since the late 1960s has been of disposable goods. 50 years in which wealth has not accumulated.

  • 3. Dr Jim

    (22 October 2011, 03:08AM)  Complain about this comment

    It's frightening and disheartening to have the decline of Western (i.e. global) civilization rubbed in one's face. Frustrations may be vented, suggestions earnestly made, but in the end, the greed of man's desires is taking us down and all we can do is try to live consciously and dodge the bullets. The economic conundrum in which we find ourselves, in other words, is a manifestation of the soulless, selfish, short-sighted way our species has chosen (?) to live. I only hope there is enough of a spark to keep those of us who want to live with integrity on that narrow path. All of what Mr. Bonner says - sometimes with a glibness that seems a bit defensive - is true. Now what?

  • 4. Mickc

    (22 October 2011, 04:59PM)  Complain about this comment

    I thank Bill for his Daily Reckoning, knowledgeable, if depressing.
    Cheer me up, tell me you helped the blind lady.

  • 5. sharonsj

    (14 November 2011, 10:44PM)  Complain about this comment

    For the past several years, I have been complaining on all sorts of blogs (including to the media) about price inflation. But no one in the news ever mentioned it until recently. I wonder if that was part of the "everything is fine, be happy" attitude (or maybe cover-up)? Was it the result of all that quantitative easing that the news never investigated?

    We are at the point where nobody I know (except for the well off) can pay their bills. So the idea that our economy is 70% consumer driven is nonsense. Instead of police batons, I am investing in cans of food and coffee, not to mention liquor. So when things fall apart, my friends can party and watch the revolution being televised.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>