Vacuum-sealed markets

By Bill Bonner Jan 30, 2012

Bill Bonner.

Share with
friends:

Comments (1) Print this article

Tutto va bene

That was what the crew told passengers on the Costa Concordia just before it sank. 

And it was what the crew of the USS America – the biggest cruise ship of all – was telling passengers last week.

Tutto va bene. Everything’s all right.

Trouble was, tutto was not going as bene as they claimed. Instead, the ship is sinking.

Stocks sank on Friday. Oil slipped below $100. And the yield on a ten-year T-note dropped to 1.89%. Gold kept going up.

None of these are signs that the voyage is going well.

The US economy has come back to output levels of ’07. But this not only marks it as the weakest post-war recovery ever, it shows that something else is going on. Most economists have no idea what. So, they just think this ‘recovery’ is unusually slow. Ben Bernanke, for example, has pledged to hold down interest rates (at negative real levels) for another three years. He also let it be known that he has his finger on the trigger, ready to blast out some more QE at a moment’s notice. 

Last week produced news that the US economy expanded in the previous quarter. It went up at a 1.8% annual rate, far below the 3% consensus estimate of economists.

That returned it to ’07 output levels, but at what cost? The feds have added $6 trillion in new debt to regain some $600 billion in annual output. Whoa! 

And indications are that growth will be just as disappointing this year as it was last. Bloomberg has the story:

Jan. 27 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. economic growth may not top 2 percent this year and a third round of quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve would have little effect, said Martin Feldstein, a professor of economics at Harvard University.

“We’re going to have a hard time reaching 2 percent this coming year,” he said in an interview on Bloomberg elevision’s “InsideTrack” with Sara Eisen in New York. The economy is still in a “danger zone,” Feldstein said, even as the recession risk “is less now than it was.”

Feldstein, speaking before the GDP report was released, said last year’s growth in household spending was largely due to consumers drawing down their savings, which he said they won’t be able to maintain this year.

“The thing that made that increase in consumer spending possible was people cut their savings rate” he said. “It’s hard to believe it’s going to happen again” at the same pace.


Claim your free gold report: Why you should buy gold now

  • How to buy gold TAX FREE

  • The single best gold fund you can buy today and the little-known way you can get a DISCOUNT when you buy in

  • Stunning opportunities in gold stocks!

Claim your free copy right here


 

Another Bloomberg report tells that consumer spending is already weakening:

Spending at retailers lost momentum each month in the fourth quarter, slowing from a 0.7 percent gain in October to a 0.1 percent increase last month. Merchants including Macy’s Inc., Gap Inc. and Target Corp. cut prices to attract more business during the holiday shopping season.

Spending failed to meet expectations even as inflation took a smaller bite out of Americans’ wallets. A measure of prices tied to consumer spending advanced at a 0.7 percent pace last quarter, down from 2.3 percent in the prior period and the smallest gain in more than a year. That compares with the Fed’s long-run goal of 2 percent.

Government agencies also struggled last quarter as they cut spending at a 4.6 percent annual rate, the fifth straight decline. For all of 2011, government spending dropped 2.1 percent, the biggest decline since 1971.

Our guess is that consumer spending will weaken further as the bear market in housing gets worse. December house sales were the worst in nearly half a century. AP is on the beat:

The Commerce Department said Thursday new-home sales fell 2.2 percent last month to a seasonally adjusted annual pace of 307,000. The pace is less than half the 700,000 that economists say must be sold in a healthy economy.

About 302,000 new homes were sold last year. That's less than the 323,000 sold in 2010, making last year's sales the worst on records dating back to 1963. And it coincides with a report last week that said 2011 was the weakest year for single-family home construction on record.

The median sales prices for new homes dropped in December to $210,300. Builders continued to slash price to stay competitive in the depressed market.

And guess what? The outlook for housing is still not improving. Business Insider explains why:

Michelle Meyer, the well-known housing analyst for BofA/ML, has some bad news: The housing crisis isn't over.

In fact, in her 2012 outlook piece, she says it's "far from over" and that prices still have another 7% to decline nationally.

The basic problem: There are still tons more foreclosures or "liquidations" yet to come….our securitized products research team estimates another eight million homes will be liquidated over the next four years, which adds to the six million homes that have already been liquidated since 2007. All told, we expect 14 million foreclosures or a quarter of all homeowners with a mortgage.

Ms Meyer’s estimates seem rather optimistic to us. We’d guess that house prices will go down another 20%. Maybe more. Because people have less money to spend on housing. Real disposable incomes are lower today than they were a year ago.

People who buy houses don’t really worry too much about the price. What concerns them is the monthly payment. They buy as much house as their monthly income will allow.

That was the real driver of the housing bubble of ’05-’07. Interest rates had been going down for 30 years, lowering monthly mortgage payments. That made it easier to pay a mortgage. Housing prices were going up steadily, giving the impression that houses were a good investment. And the mortgage industry would lend to anyone, solvent or insolvent, jobless or working, dead or alive. That put a lot of air into the housing market. 

Now, interest rates are still going down, as near as we can tell. But with incomes going down and lenders much more cautious, the air has whooshed out of the market. It’s no longer pressure packed. Now it’s vacuum-sealed.  

Remember, household debt to income was only 70% at the beginning of the ‘80s. Now, it’s 120%. In order to get it down, households need to unload debt – especially mortgage debt.

That is, they need to save. Savings rates have recently fallen to 3.5%, down from 5.7%. They will probably go back up and the Great Correction continues.

Which will mean housing will fall, maybe by 20% more.

Let’s see, housing falling, incomes falling, consumers retrenchin, negligible GDP growth.

Tutto va bene!

• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, sign up to the email list here .

Information in The Daily Reckoning is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. The Daily Reckoning is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Customer services: 020 7633 3600. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do FSA number: 1152 34

Comments (1)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Smibby

    (30 January 2012, 06:31PM)  Complain about this comment

    Always interested to hear your comments.
    Two things struck me.I read today:-
    GDP growth in the US went up 2.8% in the last quarter.Inventory build up accounts for 1.94 points of growth.(In the 3rd quarter inventories were down 1.35 points).If you take out inventories the economy slowed dramatically in the 4th quarter.Growing just 0.86%.Government spending was reduced.
    Does that mean Simon.C.was spot on?Section whatever,(117?)
    Obama administration massaging the figures.
    ALWAYS interested when one of your pundits gets it right

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>