When will inflation take off?

By Phil Oakley Aug 02, 2012

Phil Oakley

Share with
friends:

Comments (11) Print this article

Bill Gross - founder of bond manager PIMCO, and one of the most respected bond investors around - is usually worth listening to.

He doesn’t get everything right - who does? - but his monthly overviews always provide plenty of food for thought.

Gross is a realist, which probably explains why he became a bond rather than an equity fund manager. He tries to look at things as they are, rather than being a mindless cheerleader for the long-term prospects of the stock market.

In his latest piece he claims that the "cult of the equity" is dying. Predictably, it’s drawn a lot of attention.

But there’s a much more crucial point in his piece. It’s about the one thing that could have a more devastating impact on your savings in the future than anything else - inflation…

Bad news for savers - bonds and equities are both in for a rough ride

Bill Gross has been arguing for a while that economic growth in the future will be much weaker than we’re used to, mainly due to debts the global economy has racked up.

Under this 'new normal' scenario, you can’t expect stocks to perform as well as they did in the 20th century. Indeed, their performance since 2000 has been very poor - hence his view that the 'cult of equity' is dead or dying.

The trouble is, bond yields are so tiny that you can’t realistically expect them to perform well in the future either. This is all terrible news for savers and pension funds. You can’t build a decent retirement pot on the back of near-zero bond yields and miserly dividend yields.

That means people will probably have to safe a lot more and work a lot longer than they currently think they will. For some, retirement may just be a pipedream.

Worse still, Gross reckons that Western governments are set on a course of action that will make things even more painful for today’s investors.

Having run out of money, our politicians seem to believe that cost cutting is a surefire vote loser. Few want to raise taxes either. So for Britain, the USA and now even the eurozone, all hopes rest with the printing presses, and attempts to inflate our debts away.

If inflation takes off, then bond yields would have to go higher, and bond prices would fall sharply. Surging inflation would be bad news for most equities too.

But the big question is: when will it happen?

We should embrace deflation - but we won’t

I think Gross is right to be worried about inflation. But for now, as I’ve discussed here before, the forces of deflation are so big that it’s going to take money printing on a huge scale to create the sort of inflation that can get rid of the debts in Western economies.

The UK is in recession with high levels of debt and cash-strapped consumers. America is in a similar boat, as is the eurozone. And now China looks to be in trouble with falling company profits and over-investment.

Asset prices are falling, debts are going bad, and people are trying to cut back. This is not a recipe for a major inflation problem.

One way to heal our economies would be to accept this process of bankruptcy and deflation. If you believe in capitalism, you have to accept both the good and the bad parts of it.

Recessions are sometimes a necessary process. They push bad businesses into bankruptcy, and inflict losses on those who made bad investment decisions.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


However, they also provide opportunities. The resources that were being used inefficiently by bad businesses can be bought up cheaply by people who can make better use of them. Lower costs make businesses more competitive. The falling prices that come with this type of correction mean that you can buy more goods with the money in your pocket.

Meanwhile, keeping interest rates above the rate of inflation encourages people to save. These savings supply firms with the funds to invest in more wealth-creating projects.

Getting to this point is usually quite painful, but once an economy has reached this point it can begin to prosper again.

The trouble is, this won’t happen. Our central bankers and politicians would rather protect the interests of an insolvent financial system by creating money out of thin air.

They would rather make goods and services more expensive for the general public, and destroy the value of people’s savings, than accept that some asset prices are too high, and some debts shouldn’t be repaid.

The Bank of England knows that this is the game plan. Why do you think it has stuffed its staff pension fund with inflation-protected bonds?

So what do you do with your money?

So I think that Gross and others who fear inflation will be proved right -  eventually.

For inflation to take off, money printing needs to reach a point where people become afraid of rising prices or a collapsing currency, and so start to spend money as quickly as they can.

But the world may have to experience a deflationary shock, and falling prices, before central bankers get desperate enough to act. If this scenario plays out then holding a good chunk of cash in your portfolio would be a good strategy.

This will allow you to wait for investment opportunities (not to mention also buying you more goods and services, if prices fall). Buying bonds with very long maturities - 30 years or more - could also make you money in the short-term, although you’d have to time your exit correctly.

So how do you hedge against inflation erupting? Well, you won’t be surprised to hear us recommending gold. With increasing talk of more money printing in America and European Central Bank president Mario Draghi promising to do “whatever it takes” to save the eurozone, gold - at just over $1,600 an ounce - looks interesting right now.

There are other inflation hedges out there but they don’t look great value at the moment. Inflation-protected bonds look expensive.

Water and electricity grid companies are allowed to raise their prices in line with inflation but have gone up in price a lot recently. However, these shares may fall in price if the economy experiences deflation. So they belong on your watch list.

• This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .

Our recommended articles for today

What is UK property really worth? Here are three ways to find out

Are UK house prices too high? And how do you value residential property anyway? Phil Oakley looks at some of the most popular valuation methods to find out what property in Britain is really worth.

Why they’ll nationalise the banks

As the single currency collapses, the authorities are likely to nationalise the banks, says Bengt Saelensminde. Here's how to protect your wealth.

Comments (11)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Kerrin Tansley

    (02 August 2012, 11:11AM)  Complain about this comment

    I have to agree that the outlook is pretty grim with a seismic double whammy coming along. First deflation to destroy asset prices and the inflation to make debt and savings worthless.

    It seems to me that the only "safe" investments are:

    Gold - the only money no government can print

    Soft commodities - everyone will still need to eat above all.

    Inflation linked bonds - no gain but capital value keeps pace.

  • 2. Chester

    (02 August 2012, 11:16AM)  Complain about this comment

    Interesting that the "D" word is now being discussed rationally in the mainstream financial press. 2 years ago, no one knew how to spell it

    I totally agree that central banks will do everything possible to avert a deflationary adjustment, but their powers are on the wane. QE is now being openly discussed as stupid and ineffective, and despite talking big, the Fed is sitting on its hands as at last night

    More QE will doubtless be on the way, but will not outpace credit deflation until it's work is done. Some believe inflation will become an issue in 2016, and that gold has a long way to fall before it becomes worth buying as a hedge against inflation. Time will tell, as always

  • 3. DavidC

    (02 August 2012, 11:25AM)  Complain about this comment

    A very good piece. I've been arguing this about deflation for a while now. If the 'too-big-to-fails' had been made to fail as a result of over leveraging and over-indebtedness, and their assets/liabilities sold AT MARKET PRICES, we would be on our way out of this by now, much like Iceland.
    These half-wits in central banking and government know NOTHING about cycles and growth in systems. There is NO system in which (exponential) growth can continue indefinitely.

    DavidC

  • 4. Lumino

    (02 August 2012, 11:44AM)  Complain about this comment

    This piece seems to be saying:

    1) The only realistic way out of this mess, ultimately, is inflation, some time in the future

    2) But we'll have deflation first

    Ok, a fair-enough estimation of how things *might* play out.

    So what are we suggested to do?

    1) Invest in cash, the one asset whose value is guaranteed to be destroyed if and when inflation comes

    2) Invest in gold, an asset which will surely suffer during any deflationary bout.

    Brilliant!

  • 5. Jim

    (02 August 2012, 03:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    Doesn't it come down to "demand".

    Seems we have the supply but suffering from lack of demand so instead of having the result of QE head to the financiers why isn't sent out to the rest of the country.

  • 6. 4caster

    (02 August 2012, 05:42PM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree with most of the article, but I see nothing sinister in the fact that the Bank of England staff pension scheme is over 80% invested in Index Linked Gilts.
    As one of only a few fully funded public sector pension schemes, its liabilities are to pay fully indexed pensions for as long as the Bank of England employs staff. It makes sense to match the assets of the fund to its liabilities. All pension schemes should be doing that. If private sector final salary schemes had been as prudently run, their funds would not be up the spout.

  • 7. Jo

    (02 August 2012, 09:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    #3 "These half-wits in central banking and government know NOTHING about cycles and growth in systems"

    David, they know EXACTLY what they are doing. They have checkmated everyone, leaving us no safe place to run as stated by #4. They could not be more cleverly calculating.

    Think the safest is to buy land and grow your own food, although @ any moment they could tax land to death. Start local currencies and go back to bartering with the neighbours to get out of the corrupt system that keeps people poor. This will lead to an ultimately "richer" lifestyle.

    It is tempting to take out a huge mortgage,, if poss, but I don't trust even that, because it is becoming exceedingly obvious that all the markets are manipulated and I am not privy to the BoE's grand plans.

  • 8. Mendipmanic

    (03 August 2012, 01:41PM)  Complain about this comment

    For me , massive government investment in science, r&d and infrastructure using printed money loaned to industry at competitively low rates, instead of loaning to banks is the answer.
    This will create jobs, increase income from taxes, cut the cost of benefits put more money into the economy, generate a feel good factor and possibly inflate us out of debt.

  • 9. Critic Al Rick

    (03 August 2012, 08:59PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ 8. Mendipmanic

    I see where you are coming from. I also consider, rightly or wrongly, that before then (or simultaneously, subject to priority), in order to save banks (considered too big to be allowed to fail), at the very least (probably) £tns of money rehypothecatingly introduced as debt by them needs to be cancelled by QE.

    Oh what a tangled web we weave!

    If anybody knows my consideration to be wrong, please put me right.

  • 10. EMS

    (13 August 2012, 11:05AM)  Complain about this comment

    Money printing today (digital creation [QE]) is different to the past (printing of bank notes. This is something that is being overlooked. It is usually expressed as a question –why are we not seeing greater increases in inflation? The answer is simple inflation relies upon that newly created money being put into the hands of those that can’t afford to hold onto it and have to spend it. QE has placed the money in the hands of the banks who aren’t spending or distributing it to those who will spend it. We see the temporary affects in stock market spikes when banks re-invest that QE in stocks and shares, giving the illusion of growth. Until that money is released by banks to people who will spend it then the inflationary impact of QE will be limited instead it will build up like water from a river being dammed. At present it is unclear how that inflation will find its way into the economy. Will it be through controlled gate valves or will the dam burst? The writer is long cash and gold.

  • 11. EMS

    (13 August 2012, 11:05AM)  Complain about this comment

    Money printing today (digital creation [QE]) is different to the past (printing of bank notes. This is something that is being overlooked. It is usually expressed as a question –why are we not seeing greater increases in inflation? The answer is simple inflation relies upon that newly created money being put into the hands of those that can’t afford to hold onto it and have to spend it. QE has placed the money in the hands of the banks who aren’t spending or distributing it to those who will spend it. We see the temporary affects in stock market spikes when banks re-invest that QE in stocks and shares, giving the illusion of growth. Until that money is released by banks to people who will spend it then the inflationary impact of QE will be limited instead it will build up like water from a river being dammed. At present it is unclear how that inflation will find its way into the economy. Will it be through controlled gate valves or will the dam burst? The writer is long cash and gold.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>