The UK remains mired in stagflation: here’s what to do

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Aug 09, 2012

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (12) Print this article

Just in case anyone was feeling too cheerful amid Britain’s fantastic Olympic performance, Sir Meryvn King came along to rain on the parade yesterday.

In short, everything’s awful.

The UK economy won’t grow at all this year. Just a year ago, the Bank of England’s prediction was for 2% growth. The recovery has been somewhere between pitiful and non-existent.

And it’s not for want of trying on the Bank’s part. We’ve seen plenty of money-printing and interest rates can’t go much lower.

Still, at least Sir Mervyn has inflation beat. Doesn’t he?

The Bank of England’s real inflation target

There’s an upside to the weak economy, apparently. Inflation may return to the target level by the end of the year. Indeed, Sir Mervyn reckons there’s a danger that it will fall below the Bank’s forecasts.

That would be great. Part of the big problem for the UK has been that wage growth has been below inflation. In real terms, consumers are getting no interest on their savings, and their cost of living is rising. Meanwhile, they can’t get hold of as much credit as they used to.

So, given that Britain is a consumer-driven economy, it’s little wonder that we’re struggling.

There’s just one problem. Judging by history, the chances of this ‘below-target’ inflation materialising for long, if at all, are incredibly slim.

In fact, I’m amazed that people continue to treat the Bank of England’s inflation forecasts as credible predictions. The inflation forecasts do tell you something, but it’s not what the rate of inflation will be - it’s what the Bank wants you to think it will be.

Let me explain.


Lead indicators for Britain's economy

Gold/silver ratio:
A warning for the markets
Where to next for
UK house prices?
Is Britain's inflation
about to take off?


What is the Bank’s real goal here? Yes, its target rate for Consumer Price Index inflation is 2%. But that’s not what the Bank is really aiming for these days.

Britain is heavily indebted. That’s what is weighing down the balance sheets of banks, consumers and the government. Writing off the debt is one way to get rid of it, but it’s potentially very traumatic.

A less painful, but long and drawn out way of getting rid of the debt, is to inflate it away, while keeping interest rates low. Sticking to the 2% inflation target isn’t the way to go about that; you want inflation to be at least a little bit higher than that.

But you can’t admit this. Because if you acknowledge that you just want to inflate debt away, then people will start actually worrying about inflation. The rates people demand for lending money might start to rise to compensate for this future inflation, regardless of what you do with interest rates.

As you may have noticed, every time the inflation rate approaches the 5% mark in the UK, it starts to become a headline issue. So it’s a real tightrope.

That’s why another of the key jobs of any central bank is expectations management. Having a target that you can pretend you are trying to stick to is a useful way to avoid scaring the horses.

If I were Mervyn King, I’d keep saying I had inflation under control too. But I’d probably be aiming for an ideal level of between 3% and 5%, with an average of 4% keeping me happy.

With inflation below 2.5% right now, that might seem an overly cynical take on the Bank’s position. But as Simon Ward at Henderson Global Investors points out, “the governor’s self-congratulation about inflation performance and prospects… is premature.”

Why? “Much of the first-half decline reflects commodity price weakness that has since reversed, while core pressures – particularly in the services sector – remain stubborn.” Inflation, says Ward, is likely to stay above the 2% target and start rising again later next year.

Moreover, by talking down inflation, Mervyn leaves himself room for more money-printing in the near future. That usually means a weaker pound, which in turn leads to higher inflation.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


What this means for your money

The trouble is, while the Bank might be too optimistic on the inflation outlook, it’s probably got the awful growth outlook about right. And the 'Funding for Lending' scheme (FLS) is unlikely to help much.

Yes, it will lower the cost of funding for banks. But the chances of this being passed on to consumers in any meaningful way seems very low, as MoneyWeek regular James Ferguson pointed out when the scheme was launched. (If you’re not already a subscriber, you can get your first three issues free here.)

We’ve already seen the launch of several cheap fixed-rate mortgage deals for people with huge amounts of equity in their homes. But that’s not expanding lending, it’s just making borrowing that bit cheaper for people who didn’t really need it in the first place.

In other words, we can expect today’s environment of grinding stagflation – slow growth and rising prices – to continue into the future.

That in turn means that money will continue to be tight for consumers. The best you can do is make sure you have your cash savings sitting in the best-paying Individual Savings Account you can find.

As for your investments, it’s another good reason to hang on to the solid dividend-payers we’ve been favouring for a while. Big companies can cope with stagflationary conditions better than most, mainly because they are in a better position to set prices than other companies.

No doubt about it, it’s an increasingly crowded trade. And blue-chip dividend payers are not the only things we’d suggest putting in your portfolio: we like cheap European and Japanese stocks, and gold too. But having a core section of your portfolio that pays a decent income that you can reinvest in other opportunities as they arise still makes sense to us. For more on building an income portfolio, see my colleague Phil Oakley’s recent piece on the topic: Build an income portfolio that could set you up for life.

Follow John on Twitter || Google+ John Stepek

• This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .

Our recommended articles for today

Three assets you need to own

For many of us, the prospect of retirement is sliding ever further away. So it's vital you get the most out of your portfolio, says Bengt Saelensminde. Here, he explains the three assets you should buy to protect and grow your financial savings.

Your gateway to the Mekong boom

Bangkok lies at the heart of one of the most strategically important regions in the world. Lars Henriksson explains why it's set to boom, and picks the stocks to profit.

Comments (12)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. CarlJ

    (09 August 2012, 11:22AM)  Complain about this comment

    John, I would be very interested to hear MW's view on interest rates: to what extent are they controlled by a real market of buyers and sellers as opposed to the executive fiat of central banks? In other words, does the price of credit ever reflect people's time value of money or is it more like the rate of income tax - set to whatever the government wants it to be? For a long time now it has felt very much like the latter even though people often talk airly about "when interest rates start to rise". Can they ever rise in spite of the mandarins (who totally oppose the idea)? I'd love to know.

  • 2. Bob

    (09 August 2012, 12:41PM)  Complain about this comment

    I have my house buying fund sitting in cash doing nothing.... I want to buy a house but the house price denial of sellers and As continues in the UK... no way am I paying the ludicrous asking prices still... I want to go into shares but the FTSE, DOW and NASDAQ look so top heavy at the moment that surely a sizeable correction is weeks or just months away... surely such a correction would wipe out even the dividends of blue chips.... I mean, we might see a 10% fall in stocks, or more, that would wipe out the benefits of 5% dividends from blue chips... No way should stock markets be this high in this economy.

  • 3. steve aklund

    (09 August 2012, 02:19PM)  Complain about this comment

    great honest reporting John but dont expect tohear this from the BBC or any other MSM outlet. Perhaps moneyweek should consider opening up their own tv channel - just a thought.

  • 4. Ian B

    (09 August 2012, 02:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    Just occurred to me that what with the BoE blatantly lying about inflation figure what can we expect the true inflation figure to be at any given time. Is it usually double or even triple the reported value?

  • 5. alec

    (09 August 2012, 05:56PM)  Complain about this comment

    Whatever Mervyn King says you can take with a very large pinch of salt. He's been a complete disaster from start to finish. The sooner he wanders off into retirement with a tax-payer funded inflation indexed pension the better.

  • 6. NeutronWarp9

    (09 August 2012, 07:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    2-Bob

    Ah, the world according to Bob and many others.

    Everything you want is 'over' valued and you are not prepared to pay the going rate. But when eventually you do buy you will squeal for the price of each asset to rise to a 'fair' level so that you can tell everyone what a financial whiz you are.

    In reality, like the rest of us, you do not have a clue which way things will go and hence you are sitting on your pot of soon to be inflated away money.

  • 7. Pusser

    (10 August 2012, 11:40AM)  Complain about this comment

    I think we really have to think long and hard about our future and perhaps consider carrying on the corruption in the banks and politics and some public services; invade new countries and steal their natural resources, meet interesting people and kill them. Alternatively we could bring our experience to bear on a new slave trade headed by another knighted dignity.

    It worked well for us in the past so perhaps it will work for us again. I have not read any better ideas so far.

    And....one unconnected query. What were the recent rounds of QE actually spent on or bought and who lost and who gained?

  • 8. Bob

    (10 August 2012, 07:36PM)  Complain about this comment

    NeutronWarp9 - what a bitter, nasty unprovoked attack. I pity you that you feel that you have to attack strangers on the internet.

    What a sad way to live a life IMPO.

    A stranger is trying to get under my skin on the internet. I am now going to go away and forget that you even exist.

  • 9. Critic Al Rick

    (10 August 2012, 10:40PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ 7. Pusser

    "What were the recent rounds of QE actually spent on or bought and who lost and who gained?"

    In my view most, if not all, the QE was bailing-out Banks by the back door. Their potential liabilities, in view of all the rehypothecation, must be astronomical.

    If that amount of QE, £375bn, had gone into general circulation I would have expected a lot more inflation than we have/are experiencing.

    Correct me if I am wrong, but I consider most of the inflation we have experienced in recent years has been due to increase in VAT and increased cost of imports due to the weakening of the GBP via very low BoE baserate.

    cont ...



  • 10. Critic Al Rick

    (10 August 2012, 10:42PM)  Complain about this comment

    ... cont

    Inflation has been prolifically wrecking the economy since the gold standard was removed from finance in (?) the early '70s. It's wrecking effects have been 'hidden' by selling off the 'family silver' and by a dearth of debt; compounded by Bankster ineptitude leading to Credit Crunch I. (Expect Credit Crunch II before long.)

    But now, the 'family silver' has been all but completely sold off and the UK's credit card has been more than maxed out; the tide has gone out revealing the naked swimmers; inflation reduces GDP, increases Budget Deficit, increases Balance of Payment Deficit; it's an Economy Wrecker.

    The powers that be are out of control; damned if they do and damned if they don't. We need a Depression and need to Default in order to reduce the National Debt to manageable levels.

    From a purely financial aspect, there will be no winners, we'll ALL be losers; until the Budget is balanced and we have a healthy Balance of Payments - a very tall order!

  • 11. Critic Al Rick

    (10 August 2012, 11:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ 2. Bob

    " ... no way am I paying the ludicrous asking prices ..."

    You and me both!

  • 12. Critic Al Rick

    (10 August 2012, 11:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ 2. Bob

    " ... no way am I paying the ludicrous asking prices ..."

    You and me both!

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>