The Bank of England may need to print a lot more than £50bn

By Phil Oakley Jul 05, 2012

Phil Oakley

Share with
friends:

Comments (15) Print this article

The economic storm clouds are getting darker. Despite the government running big budget deficits and the Bank of England printing money, Britain’s economy is stuck in a rut. With interest rates near zero, the economic policy makers are running out of options.

So it’s little wonder that the Bank has decided to print another £50bn today.

Will it work? Given that the £325bn printed so far hasn’t done the trick, probably not. In fact, it’s just giving an easy profit opportunity to overstretched banks while destroying the incomes of pensioners by keeping bond yields artificially low.

Yet the Bank of England will probably stick with this strategy. As my colleague Matthew Partridge noted this morning, inflation is the easiest way out as far as our politicians and policy makers are concerned.

But to get the economy out of its debt problem will need money printing on an unprecedented scale. And there’s a strong risk that this could destroy the value of the pound in our pockets.

Households and the governments still have too much debt

The Bank of England is right to be worried about the UK economy. There is little evidence of any sustainable upturn. And why should there be? The government and household sectors still have too much debt. They either cannot or do not want to spend more money they haven’t got.

These debts will not be paid off overnight (unless everyone defaults, of course), which means that an economy bumping along is probably the best we can hope for. The problems in the eurozone are not helpful to our exporting sector - but the real problem is the lack of domestic demand.

In the midst of the debate about austerity versus growth, it seems that the growth camp – championed by the likes of Paul Krugman, Francois Hollande and Ed Balls – are conveniently ignoring one obvious fact: the size of the government is already too big - in the UK it accounts for just under half of all economic activity.

But it has taken on too much debt, so taking on more is not the answer. However, the problem is that, because the state has become so dominant, it means that when you cut government spending, you shrink the main source of income flow in the economy.

What we need is a private sector recovery based on investment that produces sustainable and recurring cash flows – ie an economy based on productive investment, rather than consumption (and public sector spending is basically a form of consumption). It also needs to be a big recovery to offset the bloated size of the state.

But even with record low interest rates, firms either don’t want to invest or cannot get the money they need from the banks. So that leaves the Bank of England saddled with the job of getting us out of the mess we’re in. Interest rates can’t go much lower, which leaves us with money printing. But this isn’t working either.

To find out why not, we need to go back to some basic economics and the 'Quantity Theory of Money'. This is the theory on which the hopes of the Bank of England and our economy seem to rest on.


Lead indicators for Britain's economy

Gold/silver ratio:
A warning for the markets
Where to next for
UK house prices?
Is Britain's inflation
about to take off?


Why money printing isn’t working

In simple terms, the amount of money in an economy (the money supply, M) multiplied by the number of times it changes hands (the velocity of circulation, V) equals the amount of money GDP in an economy. (Prices, P, multiplied by the number of transactions, T).

MV = PT

What the Bank of England is trying to do is to increase the amount of nominal (money) GDP, in order to lower the debt burden in the economy. It’s trying to do this by boosting the supply of money. Of course, the main risk here is that inflation takes off uncontrollably, but if it works, it should erode the real value of all that debt, which is at the root of the economy’s problems.

But the strategy is not working. Despite the creation of £325bn of new money, the money supply has been shrinking for the last year. The cash paid to banks for government bonds is not getting into the economy.

UK broad money supply growth

UK broad money supply growth

What about the velocity of circulation, how fast is money changing hands? We can work this out using some simple maths – by dividing money GDP by the money supply.

UK velocity of circulation

UK velocity of circulation

As you can see, during the upswing in the UK economy during the first half of the last decade, money changed hands at a faster rate. It started to fall at the start of 2005 before bottoming at the start of 2010. It has picked up a bit since then, but is nowhere near the levels associated with a healthy economy.

It is clear that the Bank of England’s extra money is not getting into the economy. It is not ending up in the hands of people who can or want to spend it. Why? Because we are in a Japanese-style recession where this policy does not work.

You only have to look at the balance sheets of the UK banks to see that they are getting rid of loans and improving their financial positions. Households with too much debt are trying to get their finances in order and are not about to go on a shopping spree.

The level of money GDP growth is slowing down (see chart below) and looks in danger of stalling. It needs to be higher so that tax receipts are big enough to start paying down debt.

Annual change in money GDP

Annual change in money GDP

So what can be done? It seems that the Bank of England is going to have to print a lot more money to get the economy moving again. More importantly it is going to have to think about how to get people to spend this money to make it move around the economy faster.

What seems clear is that buying government bonds from banks is not the answer. It could try giving money directly to companies to invest (indeed that’s what it has attempted to an extent with the recent deal to lend money to banks expressly for this purpose) or to younger people or pensioners who have a higher propensity to spend. However, a form of this was tried in the US with tax rebates, but most of the money was saved. It didn’t work in Japan either.

More worrying is that so much money will have to be printed that it will light the blue touch paper on inflation. Once rooted in the mindset of consumers, they will spend money more quickly to avoid price rises. This may solve the debt problem, but it would destroy the currency as well.

The bond market would probably crack and Pandora’s box will have been well and truly opened – as my colleague John Stepek pointed out earlier this week.

This is a horrible scenario which Mervyn King is undoubtedly aware of. But he’s equally worried that without more money printing, the economy may start to deflate, which given the amount of debt there is around, would be very painful too. Sadly, there is no easy way out for the British economy.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


So what do you do about it?

At the moment, deflation may seem to be the biggest immediate threat to the UK and other economies. This partly explains why government bond yields  are so low despite high budget deficits. But what about further out?

It seems to us that if politicians are determined to do it, they’ll be able to create inflation. They’re certainly not keen to take tough decisions needed on government spending and excess welfare liabilities. So they will keep printing money. 

This is why you need inflation hedges. You need to protect the purchasing power of your money. Our views on gold as an inflation hedge should be well-known by now. But there are other alternatives such as index-linked bonds and companies with inflation-linked income streams such as UK water companies and electric utilities. You could also look at putting together a portfolio of stocks with higher than average dividend yields that look capable of growing them in the future – see here for more on that.

My colleague John Stepek outlines some other ideas for protecting your wealth from a slide in sterling in this week’s MoneyWeek magazine cover story. If you're not already a subscriber, get your first three copies free here.

Comments (15)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Boris MacDonut

    (05 July 2012, 03:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    At the risk of repeating myself. Good.

  • 2. Ray Parson

    (05 July 2012, 03:35PM)  Complain about this comment

    Inflation linked income streams are all well and good but what if the BoE does actually end up botching the currency and send inflation soaring... those sterling based income streams would then be of no use to anybody!
    Best way to hedge this by opening up a foreign currency account in a currency that looks much more safer than pound sterling which sadly looks doomed.

  • 3. Colin Dixon

    (05 July 2012, 08:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    So much analysis, and yet a simple one-sentence dismissal of Krugman, Nobel prize and all. The government sector may be too big, but on what scale? And there are more ways for the government to stimulate demand than hiring more civil servants. As this article points out, we're enduring death by a thousand cuts as common sense fails to a produce a solution. Maybe it's time for some uncommon sense - it took a world war to set up fifty years of growth, after all, after decades of fruitless depression havering by the good and the great.

  • 4. Barkingmad

    (06 July 2012, 12:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    @Boris - "At the risk of repeating myself. Good."

    Which bit? You mean you agree we should shrink the public sector and promote growth in the private sector - if so - I agree.

    Or that you think we should continue to print money and inflate our way out of our debts? Or both?

  • 5. Boris MacDonut

    (06 July 2012, 01:19PM)  Complain about this comment

    #4 . The headline says "...need to print more money". I say and have said for 4 years , Good. Inflate away. Only the rich fear inflation.

  • 6. Omega

    (06 July 2012, 04:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    Why would the rich fear inflation? They are the ones who can protect themselves the most by buying hard assets such as precious metals, art, land, property etc.

    Inflation hurts those in fixed incomes, e.g. pensioners, savers, who are not rich.

    Printing will not inflate the debt away, as the increase in money supply is more likely to go into commodities than into wages - this actually makes the debts more difficult to service.

  • 7. Boris MacDonut

    (06 July 2012, 06:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    #6 Omega. How daft. Those with nothing to lose can,by definition, lose nothing. Inflation reduces the value of all assets, except a few expensive paintings. Why do you think all the hedgies buy Magritte?

  • 8. Omega

    (06 July 2012, 08:26PM)  Complain about this comment

    #7 Boris MacDonut - You state "Those with nothing to lose can,by definition, lose nothing" - My post did not say otherwise so what's your point?

    I assume you are someone who has nothing to lose and that you think inflation will somehow benefit you. You are wrong, inflation will only make your little salary buy less, your little salary will not increase, as the money supply will be directed into hard assets and not wages.

    You state "Inflation reduces the value of all assets" - No it doesn't, it increases the nominal value of assets, that's why it's called inflation. Are confusing it with deflation?

  • 9. Critic Al Rick

    (06 July 2012, 09:04PM)  Complain about this comment

    The situation is different now.

    In the past the damage done by inflation to Balance of Payments and Budget Deficit has been 'con-cealed' by increased debt and/or 'selling off the family silver'.

    Well now the UK's credit card has been more than maxed out and there ain't a lot of 'family silver' left; there ain't much left to 'con-ceal' the damage further done by inflation to the already very serious Deficits.

    There's absolutely no way unadulterated QE can aid growth in any more than the short term. QE is effectively theft from mainly pensioners by Banksters. Theft to offset their gambling liabilities this time.

    Neither will QE serve to inflate debt away, it'll only serve to exacerbate it. It's not just pensioners that's going to be 'stuffed this time'.

    The situation is different now!

  • 10. Screwloose

    (07 July 2012, 04:59PM)  Complain about this comment

    @Colin Dixon

    Krugman doesn't hold a Nobel Prize, his award was from the Swedish Central Bank.

    Alfred Nobel was wise enough to only endow Prizes for Physics; Chemistry; Medicine; Literature and Peace. No Prize for the dismal 'scientists' - perhaps he thought it would only encourage them..?

  • 11. Boris MacDonut

    (07 July 2012, 07:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    #8 Omega. The reason you don't get it is you think I am selfish enough to want to make a few quid for myself. I am altruistic and my wish for more QE is to ease the pain for those in debt. I really can't win with you doom-mongers .One day you only want to consider real terms prices then ,when it suits you, you want t0 push nominal value of assets. Mentali Antonius Mentali.
    I lived through 20% inflation in my teens,happiest days of my life.

  • 12. 4caster

    (08 July 2012, 10:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    Boris, why do you want to ease (further) the pain for those who did not live within their means and got themselves into too much debt? They withdrew equity from their homes as if they were cash machines, spent the proceeds, and then got into difficulties when the housing bubble started to deflate.
    The people who have been shafted by the banksters and the Bank of England are the frugal ones who have sacrificed expenditure to save for retirement, in pension funds or otherwise. Through artificially low interest rates their nest-eggs are relentlessly falling in value, likewise the income from them.

  • 13. Boris MacDonut

    (09 July 2012, 02:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    #12 Because if you die in debt, you make a profit out of life. There is no great nobility in saving. the credit card has been the great liberating force in the lives of amny of our relatively poor countrymen. I am heartily sick of personal debt being cast as some sort of biblical sin.

  • 14. Ken Cameron

    (10 July 2012, 10:35AM)  Complain about this comment

    If the hidden agenda for QE (money printing/ increasing the amount of money in the economy for a fixed asset base) is to create debt default by inflation then clearly it is not working as it did in the 70s as insufficient inflation has occurred. A possible reason for this is that wage inflation is being blocked due to the labour market having become far more competitive due to the Thatcher reforms and the removal of barriers to worker migration, especially in Europe. For this reason wage rates are being held down and so cannot respond to inflationary pressures. The additional money created by QE is therefore mainly finding its way to the rich justifying the phrase “Socialism for the Rich”.
    In effect the current establishment has snookered itself. They secretly need inflation plus wage inflation but have colluded with the EU to establish a system where this is highly unlikely to happen.

  • 15. Noneleft

    (03 August 2012, 02:36PM)  Complain about this comment

    Omega, 4caster- you will find there are no lights on when engaging with Boris Donut - he is impervious to all logic in economic matters, does not understand inflation, and misapplies lessons from economic history. He also thinks the eurozone crisis has now been solved, simply by the latest pronouncement from the ECB president.

    The title of an excellent 1976 live album by Joe Walsh comes to mind!

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>