Budget 2013: good for builders and banks; bad news for the rest of us

By Phil Oakley Mar 20, 2013

Phil Oakley

Share with
friends:

Comments (8) Print this article

Britain’s economy is still in deep trouble.

Chancellor George Osborne threw out a few eye-catching initiatives, which we’ll cover in more detail shortly. Some were good ideas: the drop in small companies’ national insurance bills is good news, as is the scrapping of stamp duty on Aim shares - my colleague Tom Bulford will be pleased about that one, I reckon.

And some were bad ideas - the initiatives to help people buy houses will boost home builders’ profits and help prop up banks, but it’s hardly helping to rebalance the economy away from our ludicrous obsession with property prices.

But overall, nothing has changed.

The government continues to ignore the fact that it spends too much and is relying on optimistic views of future economic growth to cut the budget deficit. The forecasts from the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) border on a joke. If proof was ever needed that humans are lousy at predicting the future, then look at the OBR’s record.

Can Britain really grow?

The OBR has cut its forecasts for growth again. In June 2010, it predicted that Britain’s economy would be growing by 2.9% a year in 2012/13. Now it says it will be just 0.6%.

OBR GDP ForecastsDec 2012 (%)Mar 2013 (%) 
2013 1.2 0.6
2014 1.2 1.8
2015 2.3 2.3
2016 2.7 2.7
2017 2.8 2.8

Source: OBR

So you can understand why I might be skeptical about the OBR’s prediction that the economy will start growing strongly again from next year. In fact, there have been virtually no changes to its growth forecasts from 2014 to 2017. Meanwhile, the government is still expected to add over half a trillion pounds to the national debt over the next five years.

OBR Deficit Forecasts (£bn)Dec 2012Mar 2013
2012-13 119.5 114
2013-14 99.3 107.6
2014-15 88 97.3
2015-16 73.30 87.1
2016-17 49 60.8
2017-18 31.3 42.1
Cumulative Addition to Debt 460.4 508.9

Source: OBR

The OBR likes to talk about things such as spare capacity, potential output and by how much theoretically the UK economy can grow. It can then stick some numbers into spreadsheets and fancy economic models and come up with a forecast.

But this conveniently ignores some hard facts. Britain’s economy will not recover quickly because the previous period of expansion was not sustainable. It was based on excess credit and excess consumption.

Too much money was spent on things that will not give an economic return. When a business invests, it looks to get a cash return on the cash it spends. If it makes a mistake then the business and its shareholders suffer. The government and too many consumers borrowed money to spend on things that don’t give any cash back.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


The government spent too much on things like public sector wages and quangos and got too little back in terms of output in return. The public spent too much on property and consumer goods. Property prices stopped rising, but the debts remain - and in the government’s case it continues to spend far too much.

Government spending (£bn) chart 

However, the OBR thinks that consumers will lead the economic recovery by running down their savings and spending more. Will they really do this?

Well they might run down their savings, because the government is relying on the Bank of England printing presses to create inflation to get rid of the debt. This was borne out again today by Osborne’s comments which basically gave the Bank a green light to continue ignoring its inflation target.

The higher inflation that is already being seen in energy prices and imported goods looks set to continue and will put more pressure on households to make ends meet. With wages currently growing at just 1.2%, consumers are set to become worse, not better off, and look in no position to rescue the economy.

I hope Osborne and the OBR are right about the pace of economic recovery. But I suspect that they are too optimistic and that Britain’s debts could go a lot higher than people expect as growth disappoints. If the economy can only grow by 0.5-1% (or less), then borrowing will be a lot higher, as the projected tax receipts won’t be pouring into the Treasury’s coffers.

Unfortunately, Britain’s political classes will always think of themselves before the long-term needs of the country. Instead of doing the right thing and chopping down the size of the state and cutting taxes, they are choosing inflation instead which will make most people worse off.

What does it mean for your money?

The new Bank of England governor will be there to fund the government with his printing press in an attempt to keep the bond market vigilantes at bay, but this might mean that the value of the pound could fall further.

We’ve been saying for a while that high inflation and a falling pound that comes from Britain’s economic mess is not good for people’s savings. That’s why investing in overseas assets is a good thing to do - as the pound falls the value of overseas investments could go up.

You can do this by buying overseas shares, property or inflation protected bonds. All of these types of investments can be bought and sold relatively cheaply and easily through exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from stockbrokers.

My colleague John Stepek pointed out some ways to diversify out of sterling and the UK in a recent MoneyWeek cover story: How to avoid a pounding in the currency wars. If you’re not already a subscriber, get your first three issues free here.

Comments (8)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. J Barrows

    (20 March 2013, 07:01PM)  Complain about this comment

    The initiative on housing is disastrous. In short time those government backed stakes will turn rotten and be yet another drag on the UK. Has the chancellor never heard of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? De facto government backed enterprises guaranteeing loans to people with questionable ability to pay it back. I wonder how choosey banks will be in lending now they have a cushion of an additional 15% thanks to the government? And all this taking place with a backdrop of record low interest rate propping up silly prices. And with Carney to make an entrance in the summer, this has currency crisis written all over it. I despair

  • 2. Sid

    (20 March 2013, 07:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ J Barrow

    I have just been looking at the implications of this housing initiative, then add Mark Carney into the mix and the penny drops. There is only one conclusion you can come to.

  • 3. Ellen

    (20 March 2013, 08:01PM)  Complain about this comment

    Well, it certainly makes investment decisions much easier - buy anything to get out of sterling.

  • 4. jackanory

    (20 March 2013, 09:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    The only hope we have now is for the media to go medievel and drive this man and his polices out of this country! This is crazy, dos'nt he know how we got into this mess?

  • 5. Vince

    (21 March 2013, 11:42AM)  Complain about this comment

    In the 70's and 80's it was the unions crazy rounds of higher and higher pay demands that threatened to ruin the country. But at least we eventually had some politicians and a good percentage of the population that decided it had got to stop. But who's going to cry stop now? Not the politicians, they are the ones doing it! Not the population at large, they seem to want to vote out the lowest spending government! It's depressing!

  • 6. Thomefan

    (21 March 2013, 04:50PM)  Complain about this comment

    Sooooo, time to buy shares in house builders then? The ones which Moneyweek suggested were a sell last year - eg Barratt?

    http://www.moneyweek.com/investment-advice/share-tips/dont-buy-housebuilder-barratt-developments-shares-22800

  • 7. WishIWasElsewhere

    (22 March 2013, 02:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    #4 Sad thing is there is no one else to replace him with. Labour are the ones who created this mess in the first place. Neither politicians nor people seem to have the courage to grab the bull by the horns and take a short term hit for the long term good.

  • 8. Boris MacDonut

    (24 March 2013, 02:55PM)  Complain about this comment

    #7wishyouwereelsewhere. Are you on the same planet as us?
    To say Labour were responsible for the global banking meltdown is an extraordinary evercise in either disengenuity or misapprehension. Did Labour cause the Greek debacle, or Ireland, or Iceland, or Cyprus, or Spain or Lehmans, or Bear Stearns,or RBS ,or HBoS? You confuse coincidence with causation.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>