The problem may be that we're not printing enough money

By Matthew Partridge Feb 10, 2012

Matthew Partridge

Share with
friends:

Comments (17) Print this article

Yesterday the Bank of England decided to pump another £50bn into the British economy via quantitative easing. It wasn’t a surprise – most analysts had expected the move. 

Dr Ros Altmann, the head of Saga, warned that this will make pensioners “poorer for the rest of their lives.” Savers are right to feel victimised. They are being thrown to the wolves in the effort to bail out our hugely over-indebted economy. And the Bank also risks driving inflation higher by reducing confidence in the pound.

But that’s the path the Bank has chosen. And with the British economy looking very fragile indeed, there’s another problem. The real worry is that the £50bn alone may not do anything to boost activity.

Here’s why – and how to protect your wealth.

Watch the money supply

Economists agree that the money supply has had a strong effect on growth in the short and medium term. In the past, the money supply has generally grown by about 2% more than nominal GDP growth.

The average rate of ‘real’ (ie, adjusting for inflation) growth for the UK economy between 1948 and 2010 was 2.5%. That’s what’s known as Britain’s ‘trend growth’ rate. So if the Bank is targetting a rate of 2% inflation on top of this, then the money supply needs to grow by around 6.5% each year.

MoneyWeek videos

Video tutorial: What is quantitative easing?What is quantitative easing?
Tim Bennett explains what quantitative easing (QE) is.

Watch all of Tim's videos here

Too much monetary growth will make the economy overheat, producing inflation. However, too little will lead to deflation and recession. Economist Tim Congdon of International Monetary Research believes that it should not be lower than 5%.

The measure that the Bank of England uses is M4ex. This is all the cash and money in bank accounts held by households and the private sector, excluding banks and other financial companies.

From the spring of 2000 to the summer of 2008, M4ex grew year-on-year by at least 5% a quarter. However, from September 2008 onwards, it fell to 2.7% - and has since fallen even further. Indeed, the latest figures from December show that the money supply is falling on both a quarterly and monthly basis.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


Forcing investors to take more risk

So what are the Bank of England’s options? With interest rates at 0.5% there’s no more scope for cuts. The government has tried getting banks to lend more money to firms – but increased capital requirements mean that they couldn’t even if they wanted to.

So the Bank has opted for QE. It buys gilts (and very occasionally other assets) from investment managers, who then put the money into something else. It’s the ‘hot potato’ effect, as Merryn Somerset Webb points out in the latest issue of MoneyWeek magazine.

By driving gilt yields down, the Bank basically forces more risk-taking in the economy. Gilt purchases will also reduce long-term interest rates and make it easier to deal with the deficit.

So far, the Bank has bought £275bn worth of assets since March 2009. This is going to be expanded to £325bn over the next few months. But is it enough?

Some economists think not. Given that the total amount of M4ex in the economy is £1.55 trillion, the extra purchases represent only 3.7% of the money supply. In other words, it won’t boost the money supply sufficiently to help the economy. Indeed, Trevor Williams of the Shadow Monetary Policy Committee believes that QE needs to be extended to £500bn.

How to protect yourself as the Bank stumbles along

It’s an interesting argument. And our own regular contributor James Ferguson has argued on several occasions that QE is the only thing that stopped Britain from suffering a fate like Ireland’s following the financial crash. (For more on this, see James's article: Ignore inflation – deflation is the real threat to your wealth.)

The trouble is, none of this is much consolation to those suffering as their savings and pensions fail to keep up with inflation. And if there’s one thing that we know QE does, it’s that it weakens the currency. That in turn will raise the price of imported goods and energy.

Yes, the fact that the VAT hike is dropping out of the year-on-year comparisons gives the Bank a bit of breathing space. But it seems likely that with more money-printing a distinct possibility, inflation may not fall as far as the Bank likes to imagine it will this year.

So on the one hand, consumers will continue to feel the inflationary squeeze. On the other, the Bank’s efforts may do little more than keep the economy stumbling along.

What does this mean for your money? Well, one benefit of the weak pound is that it should help firms sell more overseas. And there have been signs of a revival in Western manufacturing as the advantages of setting up in China become less and less compelling. My colleague James McKeigue looks at how to profit from this in the latest issue of MoneyWeek: China's had its day and manufacturing is coming home.

Another way to protect yourself is to focus on high-yielding stocks in sectors that will not be hit by a weak economy. The ‘defensives’ story has become more popular in recent months, and yields have slipped back. But there are still some decent options out there. My colleague Phil Oakley looked at one such stock, GlaxoSmithKline, earlier this week.

Comments (17)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Jon

    (10 February 2012, 01:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    ...but is it simply money supply that we need to look out for, or velocity too ?

    At the moment the velocity is down as people (and banks) hoard the money supplied.

    As soon as velocity picks up - either through the 'good times' returning, or higher inflation driving spending, then the much higher stock of money supplied is tanatmount to having super-primed the biggest bazooka to ever hit the monetary system.

    What is needed now is some serious thought as to how to defuse the bazooka when necessary; capital controls, personal and bank lending limits, etc

  • 2. Ellen

    (10 February 2012, 01:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    The problem is that this extra liquidity doesn't find its way into the hands of the general population which seems to be whats happening. The banks are using the money to build themselves and their balance sheets up. Ironically, it may well protect savings in nominal terms, at least. But it is savers and those on fixed incomes who are hurting the most as their "liquidity" is not going up in line with the money supply. James Fergusons theory is probably right but if asset values are not allowed to fall to where people can afford to buy them, we will never see growth. And a further expansion of debt is not the answer.

  • 3. CHRIS

    (10 February 2012, 04:33PM)  Complain about this comment

    One of the worst mistakes in the article is to repeat the crazy line that QE is being used to boost the economy and fend off deflation. This is rubbish. QE is being used to buy nearly all the government freshly issued debt. In so doing it keep rates low and avoids the government having a bond auction failure which would really show how bad the finances of the UK are. By devaluing the existing money it causes inflation and so artificially props up the overpriced assets such as residential property. It enriches the banks and speculators and simultaneously crucifies the prudent and the savers who are forced to become speculators or lose out. By continually 'printing' to fund the deficit it also reduces the pressure on the government to actually reduce the deficit with genuine cutting out of waste etc. It is a disaster, a disgrace and another indication that the UK is run by crooks.

  • 4. Chris

    (10 February 2012, 04:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    Dominic saying he's thinking of buying and house and this article with a title 'we're not printing enough money' . Admit it MW you've been got at haven't you? The powers that be have put pressure on you behind the scenes to fall into line have they?

  • 5. Dave kellas

    (10 February 2012, 07:52PM)  Complain about this comment

    Chris absolutely right, they are a bunch of crooks. So I guess it its to gold and silver. yeah I am wondering why Dominic, James and now Mathew are suddenly "falling into line". But atleast Bill Bonner has remained true stating the true corruption and deceit that has encroached Britain and the rest of the 'free' world

  • 6. dr ray

    (11 February 2012, 09:29AM)  Complain about this comment

    If QE is targeting M4ex as you say and M4ex by definition excludes money held by financial institutions then it truelly is a scam being perpetuated on UK citizens because the money being printed is all ending up with the banks so in theory they can carry on QE without ever affecting M4ex.
    Its like the scene in "fools and horses" where Rodney is upstairs unscrewing the bolt holding up one chandeleire while Del is propping up the other chandeleire from below further down the room.
    "carry on Rodney - loosen it up one more turn" --- crash

  • 7. Pat

    (11 February 2012, 10:32AM)  Complain about this comment

    Does QE drive yields down? Another buyer increases demand so you would expect the price of gilts to go up so yields down. But presumably the BoE would not take any losses on a default so the risk for the remaining gilt holders goes up. I think that the Bank now holds something like 30% of outstanding gilts (is this right?) so the risk of default on the other owners has gone up. Should this not push the yield up?

  • 8. Michael Reid

    (11 February 2012, 11:11AM)  Complain about this comment

    Nassim Taled commented upon QE to say that it is a transfer of money from the poor to the rich.

    It goes to banks who use it to pay themselves bonuses while the poor's savings and wages are eroded by the resultant inflation.

  • 9. CG

    (11 February 2012, 11:16AM)  Complain about this comment

    Some of the comments here make more sense than the people printing the money!
    Exactly right: The problem is whilst ever you 'give' the banks money they will take it... and as we all know they are not lending it out! (what a scam)..buying gilts is not the answer as this money doesnt filter into the system! (please get real people who run our economy).

  • 10. egg

    (11 February 2012, 12:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    Bonuses should be limited to £1000 for all bankers! Greenspan and King ought to be strung up as well and held responsible for the mess they have created. There are not enough controls and transparency in the banking system yet, so greedy bankers will continue in the same path with the same velocity until hit by a correction, i.e, another force. Isn't that Newton's First Law of Motion?

  • 11. christopherht

    (11 February 2012, 12:22PM)  Complain about this comment

    QE or printing money steals the value of savers funds. It is in fact government initiated retrospective taxation. It might be interesting to add that statistic to the to others under the taxation heading to see what we are all really paying.

  • 12. Dinu

    (11 February 2012, 07:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    Many people are aware that the Governments are trying to devalue their currencies and QE is the tool they think is the only answer.Obviosly the consequences of it for the ordinary folks and savers are higher inflation & low returns on savings.
    What I dont understand is why do the Bankers or anyone else have to be given Bonuses.When a person is employed theyare required to a good job (like all employees) & the employees agree to do so.And they receive appropriate remuneration.If not they would not take the job.So why bonuses?
    Regards Goowin,King,etc. what is it about UK that we are so hung up on Titles.Is it the idea to create divisions in the Society?Other countries seem to be doing ok without this anti-democratic tradition.Are we the only modern country to follow this unequal
    system?Doctors.Nurses,Teachers,Engineers,etc essential to the Societyare doing good work without Titles.
    Like many others I am becoming a cynic & I dont like it.

  • 13. sancho panza

    (11 February 2012, 11:20PM)  Complain about this comment

    Another question is: For how long will people continue to put up with this?

    Will they continue to endlessly vent their spleen in comment columns about the injustice and exploitation of the system - (the easy not- to-say fruitless response) - or will they miraculously realise this is getting them nowhere and decide on a more direct approach?

    Will they have to wait until they reach a Greek-type crisis and hope for the backing of the police, whose powerful union yesterday announced "that its members refused to "stand against our parents, our brothers, our children or any citizen who protests" and threatened to arrest members of the troika – officials from the EU, the ECB, and the IMF – for "blackmail, covertly abolishing or eroding democracy and national sovereignty".

  • 14. sancho panza

    (11 February 2012, 11:20PM)  Complain about this comment

    Another question is: For how long will people continue to put up with this?

    Will they continue to endlessly vent their spleen in comment columns about the injustice and exploitation of the system - (the easy not- to-say fruitless response) - or will they miraculously realise this is getting them nowhere and decide on a more direct approach?

    Will they have to wait until they reach a Greek-type crisis and hope for the backing of the police, whose powerful union yesterday announced "that its members refused to "stand against our parents, our brothers, our children or any citizen who protests" and threatened to arrest members of the troika – officials from the EU, the ECB, and the IMF – for "blackmail, covertly abolishing or eroding democracy and national sovereignty".

  • 15. Gary Cook

    (12 February 2012, 04:15AM)  Complain about this comment

    I think Moneyweek are trying to talk the UK Stock Market down and Tim Price is a King Bear who is probably shorting the market,while the US will always control the worlds stock markets,who cares if Greece defaults.Not the UK,s problem.Look at comments by Jim O,Neill of Goldman Sachs and others.

  • 16. yorrrick

    (12 February 2012, 05:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    BoE might be doing the right thing. In the recently issued BoE pamphlet on QE:
    http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetarypolicy/pdf/qe-pamphlet.pdf
    the BoE says "if banks are concerned about their financial health, they may prefer to hold the extra reserves without expanding lending. For this reason, the Bank of England is buying most of the assets from the wider economy rather than the banks"

    Injecting debt-free new money into the economy allows debtors to pay down some of their debt without collapsing the money supply. If BoE did a lot more QE our money supply could stay roughly where it is while debt is reduced. Inflation can be controlled by higher capital requirements on banks to stop them lending while QE is running.
    This may be a way out of the country's debt crisis if carefully managed.
    We should welcome having free BoE money (like cash is) circulating round the economy rather than commercial bank money that comes with a matching debt millstone.

  • 17. Steve

    (13 February 2012, 12:04AM)  Complain about this comment

    QE is just about acceptable as a temporary measure to buy time (literally) whilst real action is taken to reduce government spending and take advantage of the effect of the pound and the moves toward reshoring to reboot manufacturing. Sadly this is not what is happening. There is no real move to cut expenditure and the banks are hanging on to the booty.
    We have a weak government and not just because of coalition. We have weak people in charge. We dont need a film about Maggie, we a new one and soon!

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>