Do these banks think we're stupid?

By MoneyWeek editor-in-chief Merryn Somerset Webb Feb 02, 2010

Merryn Somerset-Webb

Share with
friends:

Comments (8) Print this article

I don't imagine that there are many readers who need to take out a pay-day loan. That's a good thing.

Pay-day loans, like so many financial products, sound just fine at first glance. You contact a firm such as Wonga or QuickQuid (slogan: Make Today Payday). They'll give you "quick approval" for a loan up to £1,500 – apply before 2.30pm one day and you could have the money the same day, or so says the QuickQuid website.

Then you pay them back when you get your paycheque.

The problem? You don't just pay back the money you borrowed. You pay a "finance charge" too. How much that is depends on the credit rating QuickQuid gives you.

If you are rated "good", you'll pay back an extra £12.50 for every £50 you borrow. That equates to an annual charge of 1,410.33%.

If you are "average", the charge goes up to £14.75 and the effective rate to 2,222.46%. Yes, you did read that right. Wonga charges even more – a "typical APR" of 2,689%.

Wonga thinks this is just fine – it says it offers a short-term service with "unique flexibility and complete transparency" and, at least if you take out one of its loans, you'll know exactly what you are going to end up paying for it.

I get this argument and I do actually think that transparency and flexibility justify a high interest rate. But a rate 50 times that on an expensive credit card? No. That's the kind of rate charged by a company that either thinks its customers are numerically illiterate or knows they are desperate. It just isn't fair.

Still, while most of us think that we wouldn't ever find ourselves taking out this kind of loan, there's a strong chance we already have. How?


Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: When will house prices bottom out - and how will you know?

  • Why UK property prices are going to fall 50%
  • When it will be time to get back in and buy up half price property

Simply by having an account with the Halifax or Bank of Scotland. It used to be that the typical overdraft rate on a Halifax current account was 19.5%. Now you get charged a set fee – a bit like QuickQuid's financing fee.

It is £1 a day if your overdraft is under £2,500 and £2 a day if it is over that. Go over your authorised limit and you'll pay £5 a day.

Look at those numbers again. Under certain circumstances, they mean that even an authorised Halifax overdraft is more expensive than a payday loan: go overdrawn by £10 and you'll pay £1 (assuming it is authorised). That's equivalent to an interest rate of more than 3,500%.

Obviously, the more you borrow, the lower the effective rate becomes. But even at high loan levels, it is still high (an overdraft of £3,000 over a year costs you £730).

Again, the transparency of all this is good. But, again, there is no reason for the charges to be so high: the only conceivable reason for it is thinking you can get away with it. And the only way you can get away with this stuff is if you assume the general public – your customers – are too stupid to notice or to care.

It's an attitude that goes all the way up the financial industry.

Look at Goldman Sachs this week. After months of running a "we-deserve- every-penny" PR campaign, the investment bank announced that its 100 London partners would be capping their pay and bonuses at a mere £1m each – barely enough for a small yacht.

This is all because they want to be seen to be "exercising restraint".

Feel more kindly towards them than you did two weeks ago? Me neither. Either they have earned and deserve the money and can make a good case for taking it, or they can't. Most of us think they can't and they must surely think us very dim indeed if they expect us to be distracted from the core issue by a few rich people being mildly less rich.

The core issue is that a small number of people at the top of banks and at executive level in other big companies are grossly overpaid on any measure.

This isn't the kind of thing that rips us off as directly as a £5 a day overdraft fee, but it rips us off nonetheless.

It costs us as shareholders (the more we allow staff to be overpaid, the less we get in dividends). It also contributes to the rising levels of inequality in the UK: a report out from the National Equality Panel has just concluded that the current divide between rich and poor is greater than at any time since the second world war.

If there were to be a slogan for this decade, it would be nice if it were something along the lines of "making financial life fairer".

This isn't going to happen at the instigation of our financial institutions or by itself. But we can probably make a start on getting it going by reminding the financial world that we aren't quite as dim as they think – closing down our overcharging current accounts, taking a stand against all unfair fees and, as shareholders and voters, against the very idea that an employee of any company is worth a paycheque of a million pounds plus a year.

• This article was first published in the Financial Times

Comments (8)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. E Chapman

    (02 February 2010, 12:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    And I thought HMRC was bad. They charge a 5% surcharge on top of their normal interest if you are one month late paying your tax. That works out at 60% per annum. Peanuts really.

  • 2. Tim

    (02 February 2010, 01:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    I cannot believe the Halifax could ever possibly conceive these charges make any business sense. They are giving people who really dont need it £5 a month, and charging £1 a day to people who are struggling. I for one have closed my account with them and moved my mortgage after over 20 years being with them, i was incensed particularly because they timed the new charges to start just before Christmas when people will be using their overdrafts the most, utter madness

  • 3. Mark

    (02 February 2010, 04:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    Has there ever been a case in law won against an extortionate credit bargain? As someone who in the past has been obliged albeit very reluctantly to surrender to a loan with an indecent interest rate appended: It would be refreshing to see more transparency from the financial sector where the total cost of a loan is made clear. Especially for those who are less informed on such matters than I was. http://www.whiteball.co.uk/

  • 4. Michael Hegarty

    (02 February 2010, 05:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    It does seem that the banks devote a great deal of time and thought to devising new and better was to fleece their customers. Both here in the UK and overseas my bank accounts are forever being renamed and 'improved', a process that leaves me with fewer benefits and higher charges every time. However, the practices outline in this piece must surely be hot contenders for the most duplicitous and unjustifiable ever. Just because something is mentioned in the small print of an agreeent does not make it transparent.

  • 5. Trimalchio

    (02 February 2010, 10:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    Goldman's bonuses cost us in other, subtler ways too...

    Effectively this is a private tax. It comes from somewhere and that somewhere is a margin on all the financial transactions that pass through their hands. This includes mortgages, investments, pensions and other things that we all need. You don't see it because it's down the line a long way from the product that you buy. But it's your money they're creaming off just the same.

  • 6. Annie Conomist

    (03 February 2010, 09:59AM)  Complain about this comment

    "...a small number of people at the top of banks and at executive level in other big companies are grossly overpaid ..." : I completely agree. I would appreciate an explanation of how the financial industry (especially banks, but also fund managers, pension funds, etc) takes so much rent from the customer. Where is the effect of competition in financial services? Why is this industry like no other? A future blog perhaps, Merryn?

  • 7. Dr Ray

    (03 February 2010, 10:24AM)  Complain about this comment

    We are all forced to contribute to the corrupt system. There are things we can do but the options are limited. Firstly, squeeze every last penny from your savings and spending. Use cashback websites and credit cards and pay off credit cards and overdrafts in full. Be a rate tart. If buying financial products use a commission sharing broker to get the initial charge (or idiot tax ) back. Finally consider lending and borrowing on ZOPA. This cuts out the commercial banks and loan sharks and permits lending directly from individuals to individuals. Borrowers get a good rate and transparent charges and lenders get maybe 6-8% gross after bad debts and charges.

  • 8. alus

    (03 March 2010, 05:36PM)  Complain about this comment

    This article makes such loan providers look bad because the interest charge is high, I do not think they are bad at all. There is always an option not to take it out, if you believe the loan is unfair and APR is too high go and shop around!
    People with bad credit ratings are seen as a greater risk from the barrower’s point of view, therefore higher profits are expected. That is also the reason why they are not offered a standard loan at lower APR. However, if I had a bad credit rating and had an urgent need for cash, I would be pleased to see as many offers as possible as long as they are transparent.
    The other argument of the rates being unreasonably high seems to suggest there is a gap in the market, or maybe it is unprofitable to offer lower rates to such market segment.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>