Britain's inflation problem is only going to get worse

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Dec 14, 2010

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (33) Print this article

The deputy governor of the Bank of England, Charlie Bean, said yesterday that inflation had been high "for an uncomfortably long time". The BoE's interest rate-setting committee is watching it "like proverbial hawks".

Well, they'll not be happy about the latest data. It seems that UK inflation just doesn't want to stick to the BoE's script.

This morning, we learned that annual consumer price index (CPI) inflation in the UK rose to 3.3% in November, from 3.2% the previous month. Retail Price Index (RPI) inflation – generally viewed as a better 'cost of living' measure – jumped to 4.7%, from 4.5% in October.

And none of this shows any sign of changing soon.

What's behind the rise in CPI inflation?

CPI inflation hit an annual rate of 3.3% last month. That means that CPI has been above the BoE's central target of 2.0% for 12 months. Worse still, CPI has been at 3% or above for the entirety of 2010. That means that Mervyn King's typewriter has been taking a hammering with all the letters he's had to write to the chancellors (both Alistair Darling and George Osborne) this year.

What was to blame for the increase this time around? Well let's see. National Statistics reports that food and non-alcoholic beverage prices rose. There was a record rise in the price of clothing – up 2% between October and November. And there was also a strong rise in the price of furniture, furnishings and even electrical goods.

Even those who believe inflation isn't going to be a problem are starting to get a little concerned. A note from Jonathan Loynes at Capital Economics points out that even core inflation (which strips out food and energy costs) remains stubbornly high at 2.7%, "way higher than the equivalent measures in the US and eurozone".

There are a number of issues here. Firstly, there are the things that are widely seen as temporary, such as sterling weakness, higher commodity prices, and rising taxes. But what if these issues aren't as temporary as the BoE would like to think?

China's inflation problem could soon be ours

China isn't exporting deflation any more – as we can see by the rising cost of clothing. Bear in mind that the clothing part of the CPI basket hasn't, until this year, risen for more than a decade. That doesn't look like a temporary blip to me. That looks like a shift in trend.

And the Chinese don't seem to be inclined as yet to tackle their burgeoning inflation problem with any real vigour. Rumours that rates would be hiked over the weekend turned out to be incorrect – Beijing settled for a tweak to the amount of capital that banks had to hold in reserve. China's monetary policy is its own affair of course. But if China doesn't tackle its inflation problem, it'll become our inflation problem.

As for taxes – a rise in VAT might be seen as a temporary issue. But what if workers start to demand higher wages to compensate?

So far, the BoE has pinned its hopes on this nebulous idea of the 'output' gap. In essence, this is an estimate of the gap between the economy's actual growth and its potential growth. The idea is that, when demand drops during a recession, lots of people lose their jobs, and equipment is left sitting idle. So when demand recovers, there should be lots of spare capacity to pick up the slack, before you start getting inflationary pressures building.

But what if a lot of those people's skills and a lot of that equipment is simply obsolete? What if some areas of the economy are never coming back? Arguably, it'll be a very long time before we need the same number of estate agents as we did in 2006 / 07 for example.

According to one of the fund managers at our recent Roundtable discussion, many British manufacturers are now running up against skill shortages. They've rehired people who were laid off during the recession, and even backdated their wages in some cases.

The public sector may be about to feel the sharp end of the cuts. But private sector businesses who have survived this long are hoping to see a bit of light at the end of the tunnel. And staff at those businesses may well feel that they've put up with frozen wages for long enough.

Rises in living costs may act as a tax on consumers, which is of course deflationary. But once the fear of unemployment or redundancy passes, workers may well stop absorbing those costs, and start to demand higher wages to compensate. Particularly as corporate profit margins have been really quite healthy.

The BoE is clearly loath to act. But its resolve will be sorely tested in the year ahead. And as Loynes says, if inflation expectations start to pick up, the bank "may be forced to tighten monetary policy just as the biggest fiscal squeeze for decades is hitting the economy".

Is now the time to fix your mortgage?

That'd be good news for savers, and who knows? The broader economy might even be in a fit state to take the strain. But if you have a mortgage, my honest view is that it might be time to look at fixing your costs. Obviously if you have one of those dynamite cheap deals that were put in place before the credit crunch, you may still be better off sticking with it. But it's time to start thinking and budgeting as if the future – for Britain certainly – contains higher interest rates, rather than the threat of ongoing deflation. I can't guess at when it'll happen, but I do suspect it'll be sooner than most expect.

Our recommended article for today

Buy-and-hold - the 'boring' way to healthy profits

Trading stocks is all very well. But there's a lot to be said for the good, old-fashioned 'hands-off' approach. Buying 'boring' long-term investments and forgetting about them could set yourself up for some very healthy profits, says Bengt Saelensminde. Here's how.

Comments (33)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Michael

    (14 December 2010, 11:52AM)  Complain about this comment

    Higher interest rates and quantitative easing and the biggest public spending cuts for decades and a slump in the property market? All at once? Never one to produce a sensible analysis when alarm and panic will do instead, John has outdone himself this time.

  • 2. Alex

    (14 December 2010, 11:56AM)  Complain about this comment

    I think the vast majority of employees even in the public sector are far too concerned about loosing there jobs to start agitating for inflation stoking pay increases.

    I very much doubt you'll see any significant increase in interest rates, inflation or not. Eroding savers returns and real stanadards of living over the rest of the decade is far preferential to collapsing the housing market.

    Not what MW wants to hear of course. As you're becoming obsessed with house prices 'crashing'.

  • 3. Hussain

    (14 December 2010, 12:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    "Shift in trend" - this argument appeals to me. We may see a new inflation target for BoE - can't see how it can be brought back to under 3%!!!

  • 4. Velocity

    (14 December 2010, 12:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    I'm obsessed with UK house prices crashing too. Sellers are holding out with the 'old normal' prices much, much longer than i expected. Sellers just aren't interested so who will blink first? Sellers of course.

    And once prices do come down, buyers may well be even less interested, not wanting to catch a falling knife and quite happy to sit and wait even longer until things settle down.

    Namely when prices come down they'll have to crash significantly to get buyers attention.

    So here we are with bankrupt banks, grotesquely fat public sector gorging on debt due to falling tax revenues, inflation of CPI and deflation of house prices, wages and unemployment.

    "The best position to weather recession" as that genius Gordon Brown stated. Throw that toilet at Westminster into the Thames and let us (the market) resolve things.

  • 5. Glum

    (14 December 2010, 12:22PM)  Complain about this comment

    Velocity (4)

    Absolutely spot on!

  • 6. Bobbio

    (14 December 2010, 01:11PM)  Complain about this comment

    Alex, do you think “Eroding savers returns and real stanadards of living” will be a good thing for house prices?

  • 7. gs

    (14 December 2010, 01:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    I would contend that in an odd way the BOE and their opponents (in the inflation argument) are BOTH correct.

    The reason being that what all Western economies are going to have to adjust to is a (relative and possibly absolute) decline in their standard of living as economic power moves East, correcting to some extent the gross imbalances of the last decade. It is consistent with this that we spend a higher proportion of our incomes on the goods captured in the various inflation measures and especially "essentials" such as food and energy (which of course the government's chosen inflation measure ignores). But this, like the imported inflation effect of a weaker currency, is not a continuous force that will rise to infinity. More an adjustment to a level consistent with our overall "wealth" as a nation.

    tbc

  • 8. gs

    (14 December 2010, 01:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    The trade off from this will of course be that the cost of other "nouveau essentials" of the last decade which were propelled by the availability of easy credit (primarily property) will adjust downwards now that the era of easy credit has past.

    What will be interesting to observe will be when the tipping point occurs for other "nouveau essentials" such as £25 dresses from Topshop. For now, retailers remain convinced that the rising cost of increasingly scarce raw materials and less abundant Chinese/Indian etc labour will be passed effortlessly on to the Western consumer without impacting sales volumes. I suspect this is misplaced (given the now structural and growing unemployment pressures) and that margin compression or revenue declines will occur in the near future.

  • 9. Inflation is out of control

    (14 December 2010, 03:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    Forget all the lies from the Bank of Theft from Savers in England about underlying inflation being low. These figures are the official CPI Index from ONS site.

    The CPI Index first hit 90pts in Aug 1997, it took almost 8 years for a 10 point rise to first hit 100 in May 2005

    The next 10.3 pt rise took just 3 years when it got to 110.3 in Sep 2008

    Since then we have already had a 5.3 points rise in just 2 years!!

    Inflation is out of control and interest rates need to rise high and fast. Anyone with any cash in the bank is having it part of it stolen every night. Those in debt will just have to pay the piper.

  • 10. wee jay

    (14 December 2010, 03:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    Buy and hold ? say that to people who bought RBS shares four or five years ago

  • 11. Tony Hart

    (14 December 2010, 04:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    Am I right in saying that credit card interest rates are over 18%? And that no-one can get a mortgage for less than 5%? So what IS going on with interest rates?

    Is the BOE, there fore, totally redundant in today's economy? Does it matter to anybody what the base rate is? As John writes, it is China and the other emerging nations who determine what the prices of our goods are. And goodness knows what happens when the cost of oil and natural gas goes up. Will Iraq and Russia take pity on us?

  • 12. Alex

    (14 December 2010, 04:29PM)  Complain about this comment

    Well Bobbio, it's a process which has been going on in the UK since the early 1970s. And looking at a chart of house prices since then, I'd say it has suprisingly little negative impact upon them. Wouldn't you?

  • 13. Alex

    (14 December 2010, 04:33PM)  Complain about this comment

    Ps Tony, no you are most definitely wrong, there are loads of sub 5% mortgage deals fixed and variable, although you require a deposit of 10% plus to get them. Having said that......that sort of deposit requirement if the long term norm, zero/micro deposit loans only really appeared in the 3-5 years pre 2007 ( in any volume ) and are now quite rightly gone.

  • 14. JohnnyC

    (14 December 2010, 04:55PM)  Complain about this comment

    Inflation has been above target for years and often 50% or more above target.
    Meryvn King is a waste of space - he is Sepp Blatter in disguise and the MPC are the FIFA EC in disguise - promising one thing and doing the complete opposite. He is always lying to my face. I wrote to the BOE and questioned earlier this year why they don't increase interest rates to counteract inflation. I got a total load of waffle in response that shattered my confidence in the BOE forever. They convinced me that they want to be on the Fed's coat tails to the bottom and then blame the US when it all goes wrong.
    The BOE should have the same remit as the ECB - period.
    Buy gold until the Fed change their monetary policy and ignore the BOE as they are not leaders but followers!

  • 15. jj

    (14 December 2010, 05:45PM)  Complain about this comment

    I wonder if your govt reports honest inflation numbers.I know that both the U.S. and China understate the real inflation rate by several %.It is in their interest to do so in the U.S.,since it has allowed govt to not increase social security payments for 2 years.Allows the Fed to keep interest rates at near zero.You can't get something for nothing and all these easy money policies by central banks can only result in currency devaluation and higher prices.You don't need strong demand for goods and services for prices to rise.I don't think Zimbabwe has suffered hyperinflation due to a strong economy.

  • 16. Roberto Birquet

    (14 December 2010, 07:55PM)  Complain about this comment

    Alex:
    Eroding savers returns and real stanadards of living over the rest of the decade is far preferential to collapsing the housing market.
    ----------
    Oh well said Alex. What we want is low living standards, less incentives to save and costly housing. Presumably resulting in no-one new people outside bankers and the YaYa set affording a home. The answer to public sector debt is ever higher provate sector debt. The economics of the mad house. Well done!

  • 17. Roberto Birquet

    (14 December 2010, 08:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    The BoE should have already lost the confidence of the markets. Possibly why so much money is poured into equities. It wants inflation in order to destroy the debts of banks, government and most importantly, consumers. This is where Alex may agree. BoE, the Government and the banks are desperately supporting house prices.
    To any rational observer, they are heavily overpriced. (The fact so many hang on to the idea they are not is proof of the bogus "economic man") Price falls will destroy bank balance sheets. Inflation will artificially stop price falls. If prices need to fall by 30%+, which they do, then a cumulative 15% inflation over the next three years would result in a market equilibrium in which prices have fallen just 15%. Collective phew of banks, estate agents and brainless property pundits. A conspiracy of dimwits.

  • 18. Alec

    (14 December 2010, 09:29PM)  Complain about this comment

    Printing money equals inflation and there is nothing else to add apart from the fact that it is the deliberate policy of the BoE and King and Brown in particular. The previous deputy governor of the BoE said in 2008 "they didn't see the financial crisis coming"! How much more incompetent can the BoE be when it was clear to anyone with half a brain that reckless lending and reckless borrowing were out of control in 1999/2000! The plan now is to inflate away the debt. In other words 'steal your money'.

  • 19. Jon

    (15 December 2010, 08:10AM)  Complain about this comment

    @15 jj - spot on. The measure of inflation has been changed (CPI from RPI) and the constituent parts that make it up manipulated to allow inflation to appear lower than it actually was/is, all on completely spurious grounds - for example "to align to European measures" (as if different European countries are all alike and have similar spending / inflation patterns).

    A consequence, deliberately i believe, of this was to enable UK interest rates to be driven down to enable government borrowing costs to reduce, and, as you point out, government spending to be pegged at lower levels.

    Theft and deception by the UK Government for many years. Some media reporters have mutedly been raising this for a while now.

  • 20. Jon

    (15 December 2010, 08:15AM)  Complain about this comment

    ...and a slightly different tack, are GDP growth figures quoted inclusive or exclusive of "inflation", and if inclusive, which measure.

    I am curious whether "growth" of, say, 1.2% in an environment with inflation of, say, 3% is actually a 1.8% contraction.

  • 21. Alex

    (15 December 2010, 08:45AM)  Complain about this comment

    Roberto, I agree 100% with everything that you have said in response to my posts. It is the economics of dimwits, but then again those economic responses are dictated by the Government of the day, whose policies are dictated by the Great British Public. Who, however pleasant/wise they may be on an individiual level are as a group possibly the most arrogant, greedy, stupid bunch of dimwits ever to get together and call themselves a nation.

  • 22. Alan

    (15 December 2010, 09:12AM)  Complain about this comment

    The bank of England do not want to raise interest rates but their hand will be forced very soon. Home owners have had it very good for a long time but I think that the long suffering savers may soon have the advantage.

    The problem with the prolonged low interest rate is that many people are spending money as if the 0.5% base rate is fixed for good and for all. When the rates start to rise house prices may soon fall back to the levels of the early nineties. In short, there is much pain ahead.

  • 23. Alan

    (15 December 2010, 09:12AM)  Complain about this comment

    The bank of England do not want to raise interest rates but their hand will be forced very soon. Home owners have had it very good for a long time but I think that the long suffering savers may soon have the advantage.

    The problem with the prolonged low interest rate is that many people are spending money as if the 0.5% base rate is fixed for good and for all. When the rates start to rise house prices may soon fall back to the levels of the early nineties. In short, there is much pain ahead.

  • 24. Alan

    (15 December 2010, 09:12AM)  Complain about this comment

    The bank of England do not want to raise interest rates but their hand will be forced very soon. Home owners have had it very good for a long time but I think that the long suffering savers may soon have the advantage.

    The problem with the prolonged low interest rate is that many people are spending money as if the 0.5% base rate is fixed for good and for all. When the rates start to rise house prices may soon fall back to the levels of the early nineties. In short, there is much pain ahead.

  • 25. Dr Bob

    (15 December 2010, 09:22AM)  Complain about this comment

    The average UK taxpayer is up to their eyes in debt. In what way is moderate inflation "bad"?

    Inflation at this level is very good for the country and exactly what is needed. Puritanical savers who think they should be rewarded for stuffing cash in the bank like a miser instead of using it to fund productive enterprise by eg buying shares deserve pity. Pity that is for being so financially illiterate as to hold cash.

    Any investor worth his salt is heavily indebted right now in the expectation of continued moderate inflation. You don't speak for me when you say 3-5% inflation is bad John. It is expected and appreciated. Good job Mr King, keep it up!

  • 26. Alex

    (15 December 2010, 10:27AM)  Complain about this comment

    Alan, the problem is simply this, the average UK saver has just £7,000 in savings on depsoit, but £58,000 in debt ( including their mortgage ).

    So the impact of any rise in interest rates on savings ( especially as interest income is taxed as the top slice of income ) is never going to compensate for the increased interest on peoples debts.

    And as daft as they seem, you know what, I think the average man/woman in the street realises that full well.

  • 27. Roger

    (15 December 2010, 10:37AM)  Complain about this comment

    Bob, Dr in what, Myopia
    Alex 21 - tragic but true

  • 28. IJ

    (15 December 2010, 10:40AM)  Complain about this comment

    Though I wouldn't go quite as far in my characterisation of the nation, Alex makes a very good point: "those economic responses are dictated by the Government of the day, whose policies are dictated by the Great British Public". This is a democracy, not a dictatorship. We get the government and policy we deserve. It's no use blaming the bankers and politicians for our woes. We all participated in the bubble, and most of us thought the good times were here to stay. Many believed in Gordon Brown's "no more Tory boom and bust." After all, politicians will choose the words that strike a chord with the public at a given time. Unless we accept our share of blame and stop seeking scapegoats, the bad times may just roll.

  • 29. Amit

    (15 December 2010, 01:31PM)  Complain about this comment

    We have seen (and are currently seeing) a further shift in wealth - the rich are getting richer (effectively bailed out); and the poor are getting poorer. Those who took out loans / mortgages that they could not pay off are being bailed out. Given that the base rate is at record lows of 50bps, if a 100bps rise in rates means some people or companies will go under - then they don't deserve to remain solvent.

    We need to shift the balance to get back to a point where people and companies have savings (which demonstrates a contribution to the economy - i.e. working and paying taxes) which will then lead to investment (as opposed to primarily borrowing to invest).

    Remember, Merv shifted a large chunk of his pension pot to inflation linked bonds. Pensioners / the less well off / savers are getting raped. It has come to a point where inflation will be very difficult to bring under control.

  • 30. JohnnyC

    (15 December 2010, 01:50PM)  Complain about this comment

    Dr. Bob - is that a typo Dr. Rob?

    You have so not got a clue of the consequences of inflation for your wealth that I can only feel sorry for you - don't be so gullible if you think we can inflate our way out of debt - it's not just the value of the debt that's being eroded but our entire nation's economic worth in the global market place.

  • 31. Alex

    (15 December 2010, 04:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    Actually JohnnyC inflating a country out of recession is a tried and tested solution. It does actually work. As for our place in the Global market place, again given that all major economies are inflating there way out of the recession doing so does nothing at all detrimental to our peer position. Whereas putting ourselves in an artificial economic straight jacket would.

  • 32. Rick

    (15 December 2010, 10:07PM)  Complain about this comment

    Inflation may be hoped to counter the 'recession' (for 'recession' some may read depression) in the economy; and, it would appear, rapidly increasing house prices have been considered synonymous with strong economy (some would say that out of this consideration has been born a false economy, the mother of the 'recession'); but it also appears that some individuals consider high house prices can be maintained whilst inflation takes its counteractive course, and that whilst the GBP subsequently lost value there would be a consequential correction in the British house market.

    But have these individuals considered that a lowering of value of the GBP does not equate to the lowering of the number of them required to purchase a house; i.e. does not equate to a correction of the British house market.

    Inflation, everything else assumed constant, will not correct the house market.

    But not everything else will remain constant!

  • 33. Tony Hart

    (17 December 2010, 05:39PM)  Complain about this comment

    Our inflation is caused by imports. I just do not believe that aything the BOE does will help. If they raise interest rates, then the £ may increase in value (against other currencies). That may make imports cheaper but it would make our exports more expensive; no gain there.

    We just need to grin or grimace and bear it.

    We might as well scrap the MPC.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>