The Bank of England must get it right soon

By Associate Editor David Stevenson Aug 12, 2010

David Stevenson

Share with
friends:

Comments (15) Print this article

The quarterly Bank of England Inflation Report isn't really the sort of tome to set the pulses racing.

And normally, ploughing through 54 pages of heavy-duty text, tables and charts would be more than enough to test the staying power of even the most diligent of economic students.

But…these aren't exactly normal times. The country has just about emerged from the worst recession in living memory. There's a likely 'double-dip' on the way. The base rate is still at its lowest-ever 0.5%. Yet house prices are now falling again. As for stock markets – they're flying all over the place. The FTSE fell almost 2.5% yesterday.

So the Bank's views matter much more than usual. But the trouble is, can we believe anything it says? And what could then go wrong?

Is the 'recovery' nearly over?

This has been the most eagerly awaited Bank of England Inflation Report for ages. That's because the UK economy is at a crossroads.

The 'recovery', such as it is, looks like it's about to go into reverse again. The government is set to slash its spending, which will mean lots of public sector work, and jobs, being lost. Consumer confidence is crashing, says the latest Nationwide survey. People are starting to worry about how much, if any, spare cash they'll have left when things get tougher. And the global picture is looking grimmer by the day.

Meanwhile, the cost of living is climbing at 3.2%, well above the official 2% target. Yet average wages are growing at less than half that. This is already putting a big spending squeeze on many Brits.

So the base rate being held at the current all-time record low level of 0.5% is just about the only bit of cheer around for lots of us right now. That's because it's keeping down the cost of variable rate home loans. Without this, many more families would be on the edge of a financial cliff, while plenty would already be right over it.

Normally, with the cost of living climbing at over 3%, you'd expect interest rates to be much higher than at present. Yet the Inflation Report includes a hint from Bank Governor Mervyn King that the base rate will stay where is for longer than had been expected. That, you'd think, must be more good news for borrowers.

Except that there are two big snags.

Two big problems for the economy

The first is that the Bank now reckons growth will now be weaker than it had forecast before. In other words, this means more job losses, and less spare cash around, than had been expected. And while it sees inflation eventually falling further than previously predicted, this will take longer to happen because of the likes of VAT hikes.

This nasty mix of lower growth and higher inflation is often called stagflation. In short, this means more pain all round for even longer.

Then there's the second catch. This is even worse – the base rate could be forced up anyway. For its forecasts, the Bank has always produced its infamous 'fan' charts. With these, the range of possible outcomes is so wide you'd imagine they must cover almost any result.

What's more, these predictions are always tempered with a swathe of health warnings. With almost every forecast there's a major caveat added about the "high degree of uncertainty" surrounding it.

Yet the Bank has just admitted it has no more idea than the rest of us about what's going to happen in the economy. Not in as many words, mind you. Central bankers don't do that. But actions speak louder. Threadneedle Street is now spending a total of £3.5m overhauling its forecast model – because the previous one just didn't work.

Of course most of us had worked that out already. In 2007 the Bank proclaimed that: "this is not an international financial crisis". Ouch. In August 2008 it said its "central projection" was for "broadly flat GDP over the next year or so". In fact, the economy soon shrank over 6%.

Since then, the forecasts for the recovery have consistently been too bullish. On top, the Bank said in August 2009 that inflation was "more likely to be below target in the medium term than above". Yet the cost of living has been over the 2% target in 42 out of the last 51 months.

That may be the past, but it's also crucial for the future. Our government still has to sell a shedload of its bonds – gilts – to fund the budget deficit – the difference between its spending and tax take.

Gilts look set to become awful investments

Yet investors in ten-year gilts are currently getting less than a 3.2% yield, which is no higher than our inflation rate. In 'real' – inflation adjusted – money terms, these investors are merely breaking even.

In my book, that makes gilts a poor value investment. But they could become a downright bad one. "There are few worse sins in central banking than falling "behind the curve" and the consequences can be dire", says Philip Aldrick in the Telegraph. "Should the market lose faith, institutions would sell sterling and ten-year yields would rise".

In other words, investors would demand more for their money. So gilt prices would automatically fall. In turn, a falling pound would push up the cost of imports. Companies would be forced to pay higher interest rates on their debt. So consumer prices would rise. "The Bank would then be forced to defend the pound by lifting rates", say Aldrick.

"Alternatively, business would assume the Bank had lost the ability to rein in inflation", he says, "and start lifting prices accordingly – again creating a vicious circle leading to rate rises".

In other words, the Bank is now very much under the microscope. If it's too optimistic about its inflation forecast yet again, and the markets panic, that vicious circle could kick in fast. And not only will gilt investors get hit, the whole country will be in even more trouble.

Our recommended article for today

Buy this safe stock exchange

Not so long ago, listed stock exchanges were booming. But investors have on average lost a huge 70% of their capital on them in the past few years. Theo Casey looks at this fast-changing sector, and finds that one market in particular now offers a very tempting entry point.

Comments (15)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Vinne

    (12 August 2010, 11:08AM)  Complain about this comment

    I think the printing press is going to be rolled out again!!!
    These are troubled times we are living in!

  • 2. Martin George

    (12 August 2010, 11:19AM)  Complain about this comment

    While I agree with a lot of Moneyweek's commentary, the problem is knowing what to do. Basically, we have a structural failure of our "mediaeval" economic and fiat-currency financial system, which needs moderate growth, modest inflation and permanent increasing debt in order to continue working. Take one or more of those factors away, and you have terrible trouble. It's also clearly unsustainable, especially where you have a consumer and money-printer of last resort, which is de-facto the USA at present, and also the type of changing demographics seen in USA, Western Europe and Japan. The actions proposed so far by "those in power" are basically sticking plasters and medication to treat symptoms. They will not work in the long term. Some one bold needs to propose a radical change in the system to accommodate in an equitable fashion, the changes and needs of each society that the economy serves. After all econmics and finance are only human inventions - who says we can't change them?

  • 3. Jack Gordon

    (12 August 2010, 11:47AM)  Complain about this comment

    I admire your honesty in telling us the truth. Now it seems that all we can do is to work harder and consume less. And... keep doing it for the next five years... or so.

  • 4. James W

    (12 August 2010, 12:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    Correct me if I'm wrong (I am an extremely novice economist), but are the following assumptions correct on my part:

    1) It's in the government's interest (no pun intended) for inflation to be high in order to erode their debt.

    2) It's also in their interest for the base rate to remain low for the same reason.

    3) It's also in their interest to prop up house prices (via low interest rates) to try and keep consumer confidence propped up and encourage spending.

  • 5. Bob Roberts

    (12 August 2010, 12:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    If house prices crashed then spending would stop - which it is already - and hence the shares of retailers/makers of 'things' would collapse... leaing to massive unemployment.

    There - sorted that.

  • 6. beta adjusted

    (12 August 2010, 01:33PM)  Complain about this comment

    What a surprise.

    But we are all still here. So keeping that dim, sputtering candle of hope going/divide and conquer strategy of being 'liberal' with the truth apparently works quite well.

    From what I've read (google greg pytel for a layman's explanation (complete with spelling/grammatical errors)) the only option is precisely to attempt to sweep the problems under the carpet or re-ignite the bubble (agree more with former), the scale of the debt crisis is simply too large. We are dealing with the collapse of a gigantic, global ponzi scheme. Whatever happens next, the future looks pretty bleak.

  • 7. Peter H

    (12 August 2010, 01:34PM)  Complain about this comment

    The tone of your article & previous Monetweek e-mails is that life is grim & no one has any money for self-indulgence.
    I have just been to the IOW, ferries were full, booking limited, the island was crowded with pedestrians & cars. Similarly when we go out for a meal, restuarants are busy; locally there is no lack of boats on the Broads, Wroxham is heaving with people. How to explain the contradiction?

  • 8. Durham

    (12 August 2010, 01:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    Mervyn King (one of the GREAT Gordon Browns yes men) contributed to this mess,failed to see it coming even when it was sitting on top of him and does the the wrong thing during it,this old fool should be out on his ear, but not in this fairytale goverment world we live in where failures don't fail.only thing that shocks me is how these people have any credibility left.

  • 9. Sohail

    (12 August 2010, 01:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    I am sorry i don't find these articles very helpful.Firstly it is stating the obviouse.It merely lists out all the things that could happen.

    If you are offering advice then you need to make some recommendations.Not sure i can see any value in just commentary on the obviouse.Much better to comment and have a view even you are wrong ,rather than this may happen or that may happen.

  • 10. ricardo

    (12 August 2010, 02:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    Sohail, reading between the lines I think the advice was Gilts aren't a very good investment right now, or in the future. And with interest rates being what they are you aren't going to get a very good return on cash now, or in the near future.

  • 11. Roberto Birquet

    (12 August 2010, 05:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    5. Bob Roberts
    Not true, you are using the same line repeated ad nauseum in the mainstream media.
    As someone who does not own a house, if prices fall I would not have to save so much to pay for a deposit on my first home. That would result in freeing up more money to use for consumption - buying stuff in shops. In my case, and in that of millions, your analysis is back to front.
    Overall, some would spend less with a fall in prices, others more. It is a zero-sum game. Current economics is that of the crazy gang. Only debt fuels an economy. If houses were cheap, more money is left over for other things. Really straightforward.
    The alternative, to which Martin George may have been alluding, is to pay middle income people better wages, even if that means less at the top. I believe it was Henry Ford who was asked why he paid such good wages. He replied: I want the workers to buy my cars.

  • 12. David B

    (12 August 2010, 08:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    GILTS LOOKING AT THE DMO WEBSITE 29.5 BN ISSUED IN JUNE 24.8 BN IN JULY I DONT BELEIVE ITS POSSIBLE TO SELL ALL THESE ID LIKE TO BET THE BOE IS BUYING LARGE AMOUNTS FROM THE GEMMS BROKERS ITS THE ONLY WAY THE PRICES CAN BE KEPT SO HIGH THIS IS THE QE THEY DONT TELL YOU ABOUT THIS ISSUANCE OF GILTS TELLS YOU HOW DESPERATE THE GOVT IS . IF YOU KEEP ON ISSUING AT THIS RATE IT 300 BN PER YEAR GET READY FOR HYPER INFLATION IVE SOLD 90% OF MY GILTS AND BOUGHT LAND
    ITS THE ONLY THING THAT LASTS AS MR OHARA SAID IN GONE WITH THE WIND...............

  • 13. Martin George

    (13 August 2010, 12:19AM)  Complain about this comment

    11 - Roberto: Quite right! One tactic is to pay middle and lower earners more, at the expense of the top. Ratios of the earnings of highest paid to lowest paid in almost all kinds of organisations are way too high in the USA and most of EU, which is unhealthy for an economy. But even then there are far too many things going on in the current economy whose mid to long term consequences and effects are not remotely taken into true economic account, and we don't seem too bothered even to estimate them - we say "the market will work it out". In the long term that may be true, but in the short term there will be bad news - take energy infrastructure for example, which takes years to build. But I digress...

  • 14. JAW

    (13 August 2010, 04:59PM)  Complain about this comment

    David Stevenson asks: Can we believe anything the BoE says? The answer is no, it is always being economical with the truth. The truth would frighten us all and destroy the markets. Gordon Brown (probably the most profligate and therefore the worst Chancellor of the Exchequer in history) made it independent and gave it the brief of regulating inflation within narrow perimeters. And what does the BoE do... it generally and presently ignores inflation and sets itself as the overseer of the economy... its actions (including being economical with the truth) are designed exclusively to attempt to stabilize UK economics in a difficult era.

    To counteract the excesses of the Labour Government and to prevent householders and businesses from collapse the BoE has to keep interest rates near zero for a long as possible. That is going to be the one certainty... make all your predictions around that fact.

  • 15. Roberto

    (14 August 2010, 01:34PM)  Complain about this comment

    Re 4 James W

    I wouldn't claim to know any more than you but logic seems to support what you say, namely if debt is horrendous, the answer lies in devaluing it. Unfortunately the currency will get devalued at the same time but that has happened often enough before and given that 'the market' will decide what price to put on our currency, the govt and Central bank can turn a relatively blind eye in any case. The problem, of course, is that devalued debt also means devalued assets and will only reinforce the idea that saving is a mug's game, especially once inflation gets out of control.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>