Lessons from Weimar

By MoneyWeek editor-in-chief Merryn Somerset Webb Aug 20, 2010

Merryn Somerset-Webb

Share with
friends:

Comments (4) Print this article

I had dinner with Adam Fergusson, author of When Money Dies: The Nightmare of the Weimar Hyperinflation, this week. We reviewed the book in the magazine a few weeks ago. For those who haven't yet rushed out to buy the book, it's a fascinating account of the way utterly uncontrolled inflation turned Germany from a relatively sophisticated capitalist nation into the sort of barter economy that had its middle classes trading pianos for potatoes.

Adam is a slightly bemused man. He wrote the book in the 1970s. When he started it, UK inflation was around 13%. By the time he was half way through, it had flown past 20%, which explains why the book sold as well as it did when it was published. However, after Margaret Thatcher and Geoffrey Howe (to whom Fergusson was an adviser) tackled inflation in the 1980s, he rather lost interest in the book, as did everyone else.

So it came as some surprise to him a few years ago to find it, now long out of print, changing hands in the US for $1,800 as investors and politicians tried to figure out what would happen if they found themselves addicted to quantitative easing (QE), the modern bankers' version of printing money. The republished edition has become something of a best-seller (although the rise in supply has pushed the price down to under a tenner).

I asked Adam the question he must hear all the time: can it ever happen here? He says absolutely not. There are only two environments in which hyperinflation can really take off, one of total cynicism (think Zimbabwe) and one of utter ignorance.

The latter caused the Weimar Republic's problems, says Adam. With no understanding of the Quantity Theory of Money, politicians assumed the problem was not too much money, but not enough, as did the workers who kept demanding more of it. (As Adam says, workers always strike for the wrong thing – they shouldn't demand more money, they should demand policies for stable prices.) So the government printed more and gave it to them – over and over.

Our governments aren't quite that ignorant: they know that massive monetisation of government debt (the risk today) is the route to hyperinflation. So it would take a moral vacuum of huge proportions for them to take it. But that doesn't mean high inflation isn't on the way. It's already clear that UK inflation will stay sticky. If, after the biggest recession for generations (one driven by a bank crisis for good measure ) we still have CPI at over 3%, it is, as CLSA's Russell Napier points out, hard to see what might push inflation down.

That's particularly the case given that another round of QE looks quite likely and that rising wages in China mean we are set to import even more inflation from Asia. I asked Adam about this too. We might be lucky enough never to see prices rising at 50% a month, I said, but what about 14%-15% a year? "Oh that's easy," he said.

Comments (4)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Graham Cox

    (19 August 2010, 05:56PM)  Complain about this comment



    I thought this edition was about being cheery?

    No chance of 15% unless one is daft enough to define inflation to include tax rises and a desperate government decides to lead an indirect tax assault.

    Inflation is not 3% today. Actual inflation as measured by the CPIY (ie CPI less taxes like VAT) is about 1.7%. That is cheerier, no?

    Think of it this way. If they raised income tax instead of VAT it would be 1.7% headline as well as tax adjusted.

    Inflation is the measure of prices in the economy and not taxes. The Bank of England's target is very poorly drafted.

    Graham

    PS QE is reversible, printing money is not.

    PPS The remaining inflation rate also has hidden taxes in and so overstates: eg higher parking charges.


  • 2. Lefty Goldblatt

    (19 August 2010, 08:37PM)  Complain about this comment

    anybody wanna buy a house?

  • 3. Robert Burgess

    (20 August 2010, 05:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    We live on a densly populated island with few remaining natural resources. Industry is our nations only long term option for making a living. In a free market economy, unless and until our nations currency exchange rates are pegged so labour costs equate favourably with the labour costs of other industrial nations, Britian will remain a place where industry is not economically viable. If Britain did peg it currency to equate prices of imorted goods would go up until they reached a level where it would be economic to produce them ourselves, but is this inflation or down right common sense.

  • 4. Will Richardson

    (29 August 2010, 10:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    An alternative interpretation is that supply collapsed when Germany lost the Ruhr to France as follows

    http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=3773

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>