Huge government debts mean you should hang on to gold

By Associate Editor David Stevenson Jan 14, 2010

David Stevenson

Share with
friends:

Comments (14) Print this article

Investors seem to have incredibly short memories.

"Seldom have markets returned so swiftly to the scene of the crime. A range of investments linked to hopes of global growth all crashed together in 2008", says John Authers in the FT.

"Now [investors] are rushing back into the same places. The repetition of behaviour that so recently inflicted so much pain is hard to explain".

The consensus is that governments and central banks pulled us back from the brink in 2008. And now it's onwards and ever upwards for asset markets.

But markets are becoming increasingly vulnerable. And while we can't be sure of what will trigger another slide, the higher they rise, the more severe the correction will be. And when it comes, governments will be in no fit state to bail the economy out again. Here are five reasons to be on your guard…

1. Stock markets are expensive

First, stock markets are expensive. The Shiller p/e is the valuation of the US stock market based on a ten-year moving average of earnings. Basically this strips out short-term profit wobbles, and gives a good idea of how cheap or expensive a market is in historical terms.

Right now, the US market has rallied so sharply that the Shiller p/e is on 21 times. That compares to a historical average of around 15 or so. Sure, it's been even higher in the past. It hit a peak of 40-plus in the daft 'dotcom' boom of 2000, and 33 in 1929. But these were huge exceptions – and we all know what happened next. The fact remains that 21 is very near the upper end of the Shiller's normal long-term historic range - going back to 1870.

In other words, US shares, which still drive the rest of the world's stock markets, are right back into bubble territory. And if we should have learned anything from the past ten years of vanishing returns, it's that people who buy things when they're expensive, tend to lose money in the long run.

2. There are signs of complacency

Second, take a look at the VIX – otherwise known as Wall Street's fear gauge. This measures the cost of insuring against sudden market movements. If traders are paying less for insurance, it means they're less fearful for the future. That's the case right now. The VIX is at its lowest level since May 2008. But such complacency is a bad sign, not a good sign - after the May low, the S&P 500 index halved in value over the next nine months.

3. The supply of bears is running out

Third, there's the American Association of Individual Investors retail sentiment index. This currently shows near-record lows in bearishness, says James Phillipps at Citywire. When the supply of bears runs out, it suggests that almost everyone has got back into the market. That means no buyers left, which is bad news for shares.

4. The bond issue glut

Fourth, there's the recent bond issue glut. Companies have been rushing to take advantage of lower loan costs while they can. It's nice for the borrowers. But it's not good news at all for bond investors, for whom "it's hard to argue there's any value at all", says Euan McNeil at Aegon Asset Management.


Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: When will house prices bottom out - and how will you know?

  • Why UK property prices are going to fall 50%
  • When it will be time to get back in and buy up half price property

If more companies are competing for the money that's out there, then they have to offer potential lenders better terms. So bond prices will fall (pushing up yields). That also puts pressure on shares. Why pay for a share (which is riskier, after all) if you can get a bond that offers an attractive alternative?

5. The real economy is too weak to support forecasts

Fifth, the real economy is too weak to support investors' optimistic forecasts for future growth. Private individuals are de-leveraging – paying off debts. That's likely to take a while, and in the meantime will make it harder for economies to expand. As Albert Edwards of Société Générale pointed out this week, the real bedrock of economies is the smaller company sector. Here, despite recent stock market moves, "optimism has barely recovered".

This all suggests to us that markets will have a very tough time making progress in 2010. That's why we're sticking with defensive stocks.

Hang on to gold

As for the longer run, we'd also be hanging on to gold. The yellow metal may well suffer along with most other asset classes in any correction. But its bull market has a long way to run yet. Why?

Because of inflation, is the short answer. In the absence of growth from the private sector, the public sector is trying to pick up the slack by spending stacks of money it doesn't have. But in the long run, that'll only make things worse. Edwards' colleague Dylan Grice reckons that if you include all the claims on 'developed world' governments, such as pensions and healthcare, then true state deficits are many times higher than the published figures. These millstones are so heavy, says Grice, that they logically mean just one thing. Most of these governments are insolvent. And the only way out is through some form of default.

That can happen in one of two ways. Either governments globally don't repay the money they've borrowed. Or - a more likely alternative - they stoke up lots of inflation, maybe between 10-20% a year, so that they can repay their debts out of massively devalued currency.

Why inflation is likely

If you don't think that will eventually happen, look at yesterday's UK debt auction. The Treasury managed to unload £2.25bn of government bonds, or gilts. It was happy to pay an interest rate of more than 4.3% until - wait for it - December 7th 2049.

In other words, the keepers of Britain's public purse are taking a big 40-year bet. They're gambling that the UK will grow in 'nominal' terms - i.e. in actual money - at least as fast as this interest rate. Because only then will the government be able to raise enough extra tax each year to fund the annual cost of this gilt.

If Britain's economic growth rate, and so the extra tax-take, falls short of what's needed, our government's easiest option is simply to engineer inflation higher. So it'll just keep printing more money until eventually it manages to push prices up.

Grice agrees with us, that when that happens, gold will be just about the best way to protect your money. You can find out more about how to buy gold here: Investing in gold.

Our recommended article for today

One small-cap tech company with huge potential

The risks of investing in small cap companies are much greater than with blue-chips, but the potential profits are much higher. Tom Bulford explains why, and tips one broadband provider that could bring huge returns.

Comments (14)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. chris

    (14 January 2010, 03:41PM)  Complain about this comment

    "Now [investors] are rushing back into the same places. The repetition of behaviour that so recently inflicted so much pain is hard to explain".

    Maybe the best explanation is that these investors now believe, probably correctly, that the stock market is now 100% rigged by the Government and as such is a one way bet.

  • 2. PRO

    (14 January 2010, 03:53PM)  Complain about this comment

    There is a sense of deja vue here.
    Since spring you have been saying
    -get out of this fools market it is about to crash
    -buy and hold gold in preperation for the crash
    -property markets are about to fall 50% more

    The lack of a timescale on your projections I mean Money Weak as a whole not just this journo means that, eventually you wil be right, even if it takes 20 years.

    I think you need to rethink your mantra or put a forseabble time table on your prophesies of doom, so we can judge your judgement. My prophesy is this, the world will end, the sun will cool and the universe will contract back into a ball of black matter. I know I will be right - eventually.

  • 3. GoldBug

    (14 January 2010, 05:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    I have to agree with PRO - I have been bombarded with the "Get out of this sucker rally now" spam email since about last August!

    I am a regular reader of MW, but feel that they are often very quick to jump on the fundsters that get it wrong but constantly fail to judge themselves by the same standards.

  • 4. Chang

    (14 January 2010, 08:29PM)  Complain about this comment

    Moneyweek is far to obsessed with gold, it is not the only thing that will hedge against inflation. Money market rates will soar to mirror inflation, so anything that pays variable rate interest will also protect value. Those who buy newly issued bonds now are gonna lose out big, having being locked into peanuts coupon rates while watching the value of their money being whittled away by inflation. Holding gold costs you around 0.5%pa, it produces no income and it has already had a stonking bull run over last few years. I'm sure there's millions of Indians just itching to sell their gold once it's clear the market top has been reached.

  • 5. Jiggers

    (15 January 2010, 10:52AM)  Complain about this comment

    The problem with gold, as I see it, is that every time it changes hands, VAT has to be paid by small investors who are not VAT registered. I'll stick with realisticly priced property.

  • 6. Jiggers

    (15 January 2010, 10:52AM)  Complain about this comment

    The problem with gold, as I see it, is that every time it changes hands, VAT has to be paid by small investors who are not VAT registered. I'll stick with realisticly priced property.

  • 7. Steve

    (15 January 2010, 12:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    Much agreement with this article - however the final piece on inflation seems to slip explaining how inflation will come about. After all soveriegn treasuries generate money supply growth by 1. selling bonds to the central bank for newly created currency 2. fractional reserve banking. Both these machanism are failing as 1. over borrrowed treasuries are running out of scope for issuing further bonds and 2. banks are reducing lending and and their customers are deleveraging.
    Where will the currency come from to create infalation going forward?

  • 8. gsillence

    (15 January 2010, 01:46PM)  Complain about this comment

    Steve's point is extremely important. The "inflationists" conistently overlook the FACT that the money being created by stimulus packages etc is completely dwarfed by the impact of private sector deleveraging and the reduced money multiplier effect. Assuming that Western governments recognise the impending bankruptcy of Japan and understand that it stems from their failed attempt to plug a gap in private spending with extraordinary public spending/deficits, the best that stimulus packages here will achieve is to cushion the blow. Gold represents a great hedge against unforseen disaster (of many and varied varieties) but the inflation hedge element is a myth. As this publication has pointed out in the past, while gold will protect against inflationary shocks, it has not historically protected against sustained periods of above trend inflation. Anyone who is in it purely because they fear inflation from government stimulus, might still turn a profit but is missing the point.

  • 9. IJ

    (15 January 2010, 02:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree with Chang, and just don't get gold. But I don't buy the arguments as to why, and cannot accept that it's a store of value or hedge against anything... just another asset people speculate in, but with no uses. For each thing gold is meant to be hedge against, there seem to be better alternatives. Inflation - commodities that have a use, real estate (if realistically priced, as Jiggers says); deflation - cash; Armageddon - canned food, weapons. Chances are gold will keep going up, but for the wrong reasons.

  • 10. JJ Adams

    (15 January 2010, 02:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    The past average P/E ratio is obviously high because earning were very low in 2008 and 2009 due to the recession. You trade on current performance and not past, otherwise MW would allow me to buy gold at its last year price $US 800. Please tell us what the P/E ratio is based on 2010 projected earnings.

  • 11. old_nis

    (15 January 2010, 09:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    Jiggers, you clearly know nothing about gold. Investment gold is NOT subject to VAT. Silver does have VAT added, but the upside potential is enough to overcome that, provided you treat silver as a "buy and hold" for long-term investment.

  • 12. Petey Wheatstraw

    (18 January 2010, 05:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    All of the gold doubters can go all in stocks, bonds, and real estate - whatever. Bottom line is this: I'll give up on my gold as soon as the central banks give up on theirs (Britain was already foolish enough to sell a substantial portion of their holdings, and that will surely cost them dearly when the various printers of fiat currencies start behaving like the rats they truly are and begin accusing any fiat not their own of being worthless).

    Global governments are fast approaching a "let them eat cake" moment.

    Off with their heads.

  • 13. Jim

    (18 January 2010, 09:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    Gov bonds of £2.25 billion are being unloaded presumably to be paid back after 39 years in 2049.

    Does that not seem a very long time to have an investment, unless people are investing for there kids, hmm, good luck to that.

    Seriously though, who are these people or organisations that can put that money aside for that length of time. Presume pension funds could be one choice. Patriotism another?

  • 14. IJ

    (19 January 2010, 09:48AM)  Complain about this comment

    Petey - you say you'll sell your gold when governments sell theirs, yet when Britain sold its gold it was the very time to buy. ..

    Now the price is 4 times higher. Gold is very consensual, this website and other media are constantly pushing it, I'm seeing adverts on TV telling people to buy gold. They sell it in Harrods. I just don't really get it. With a stock or a bond, you can look at, say, the yield and weigh it up against default risk, or make an assumption about a company's future profits, etc. You may well get it wrong but at least you had something to go on. With gold, I feel I have nothing to go on. I wouldn't be surprised if the price went to $2000, even $3000. But I would be just as unsurprised if it fell to $500. I don't want to buy something that's gone up so much already and that I understand so little.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>