How this weekend’s Venezuelan elections could hit the oil price

By Matthew Partridge Oct 03, 2012

Matthew Partridge

Share with
friends:

Comments (11) Print this article

Forget the US election. The contest that you should really be paying attention to takes place this Sunday – in Venezuela.

It might not seem that important. But in fact, the outcome of this election won't just affect the lives of people in this Latin American country. 

The result could impact on the entire global economy – via the oil price.

Why Hugo Chavez could be on the way out

So who are the candidates in the Venezuelan election? 

In one corner, you have the current incumbent, ‘Caudillo’ Hugo Chavez. Facing him, and breathing down his neck in the polls, is Henrique Capriles, who is backed by over 30 opposition parties.

They have radically different visions of how the country should be run. Chavez wants to continue the move towards a command economy, while Capriles wants to institute market-based reforms.

Most of Latin America has spent the last two decades opening up to trade and loosening barriers to the private sector. However, under Chavez, Venezuela has gone in the opposite direction.

After taking power in 1999, Chavez started to move private firms into state control. He also went on a spending spree that was designed to shore up his political standing.

To fund this, he used the national oil company as a piggy bank, putting up taxes on the oil sector. As we noted earlier this year, this has been a disaster.

Starved of investment, production has fallen greatly, even against a backdrop of higher crude prices. That has helped to keep the global oil price high – Venezuela is a key oil-producing nation.

Chavez’s role in keeping the price of oil higher than it probably should be extends to the international stage. At the moment Opec – the oil producers’ cartel – is divided into two groups.

One group thinks the priority should be to moderate prices. This isn’t because they are charitably-minded – it’s because they worry that other energy sources will take over if crude gets too dear. It’s a calculated view taken in the interests of long-term self-preservation.

But Chavez needs money now. He is firmly in the camp, alongside Iran, that reckons oil output should be cut in order to raise prices – and revenues – as quickly as possible.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


However, the election, which takes place in less than a week, might change all of this. While the campaign started with Chavez in front, Capriles has been gaining momentum. Most analysts now agree that the contest is very close. Indeed, one survey of public opinion shows that the gap between the two is as small as 2%. And Capriles’ rallies have been drawing more crowds than those of Chavez, despite government-led disruption.

Of course, Chavez could try to rig the election anyway. There are long-standing concerns that the electoral roll, which has shot up in recent years, contains a large number of dead people, for example. The president has also put his supporters on the council in charge of counting the votes. There are even fears that he may use armed gangs to suppress any protests.

However, Capriles is an experienced politician, who has faced similar pressures when he successfully ran for positions in local and regional government. He has assembled a huge army of volunteers to monitor polling stations. While this will not cut out fraud entirely, it should make it much harder for the government to rig the vote.

So, what happens if Chavez loses?

Capriles has kept his cards close to his chest about his policies. However, he has made two major promises regarding the oil industry.

Firstly, he has emphasised that he will encourage foreign companies to invest in oil exploration and development. While he will not move the state oil company into the private sector immediately, he will reform it so that it is run along business lines.

In the medium term, these policies should boost output, and increase the amount of oil on the world market. More market-friendly policies would help Venezuela to exploit its oil reserves more effectively. Given that these are the second-largest in the world, behind Saudi Arabia, that could have a huge impact.

Of course, while markets are forward-looking, these reforms will still take time to affect global supply. However, Capriles’ stance on foreign policy may have more of an impact in the short-term.

He has pledged to phase out barter deals with countries such as Cuba. This will increase the amount of oil that goes directly onto world markets. And if he drops Venezuela’s support for Iran, this will reduce support on Opec for oil production cuts, paving the way for higher production – and therefore lower prices.

In short, a Chavez victory would have little impact on the oil price – it’s expected after all. But a Capriles victory could put a dent in a market that is already jittery about slowing economic growth, and being propped up largely by fears over Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

If you like the idea of speculating on a falling oil price, but would prefer not to spread bet, you can use an exchange-traded fund (ETF), such as ETF Securities Short WTI Crude Oil (LSE: SOIL) which rises in value as the oil price falls. Just remember that this type of ETF is only suitable for relatively short-term trades, and you should monitor its performance closely.

If you'd rather take a longer-term view, one share that should also benefit is EasyJet (LSE: EZJ). Clearly airlines are hugely cyclical, so this isn't a 'buy and hold forever' investment. But with fuel making up a large proportion of EasyJet's costs, a fall in the price of crude should increase its profit margins. And on a price/earnings ratio of ten, it looks reasonable value.

• This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .

Follow John on Twitter || Google+ John Stepek

Our recommended articles for today

What’s so important about gold?

Once dismissed as primitive and irrelevant, gold has been rediscovered by investors. Little wonder, says John Stepek. Here, he explains why gold is an essential part of your portfolio.

These eggheads have big plans

Some of the UK’s most successful businesses have their origins in British universities. Here, Tom Bulford looks at 11 fledgling businesses that could one day become the 'next big thing'.

Comments (11)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Andrew Nicholas

    (03 October 2012, 11:51AM)  Complain about this comment

    Not a chance in hell that Chavez will allow anyone to beat him.

  • 2. jr 1987

    (03 October 2012, 01:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    also shorting oil is very risky with Iran being so close to creating a nuclear bomb. the long term trend is up anyway i don't see what a country like venuzuela can do about that

  • 3. Sean

    (03 October 2012, 04:39PM)  Complain about this comment

    What a totally one sided, biased and ignorant piece of financial journalism.

  • 4. Dan

    (03 October 2012, 05:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    The article is pretty rational in its assessment of Mr. Capriles. Unfortunately, given the nation's history over the last 15 years, I don't necessarily think an opposition win will result in a seamless transition of power. Venezuela finds itself in a fragile situation that might go down the path of civil unrest in the case of a Chavez loss. It is not unfathomable to believe the extent of this unrest will lead to higher oil prices instead of lower ones.

  • 5. Dilip

    (03 October 2012, 06:29PM)  Complain about this comment

    Now that Easyjet has been tipped on this page I will use that a reason not to invest in it. I also agree with the earlier comment that this article is biased.

  • 6. Andrew

    (03 October 2012, 09:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    Saudi Arabia has threatening more production but the oil price is still high. Will an election result in Venezuela make a difference ...errr No. I als agree with other comments this article is biased.

  • 7. smlaing

    (04 October 2012, 08:38AM)  Complain about this comment

    I hope Chavez gets back in. His reforms have raised living standards for the people whilst subordinating US interests.

    The "Free Markets Reforms" you talk of wouldn't be the same ones that Augusta Pinochet implemented in Chile would they?

    I hate those cover words "Free Market Reforms" because they don't exist. The word "Free should be removed!

  • 8. Boris MacDonut

    (04 October 2012, 12:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    Chavez is not a bad guy. He provides petrol to the masses at 5 cents gallon and he funded the career of the excellent race driver Pastor Maldonado.

  • 9. MrDodge

    (04 October 2012, 03:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    Issues with Capriles:
    (1) He hasn't actually said what his plans are
    (2) An ally was caught on camera illegally accepting campaign donations
    (3) He went to prison for an attack on the Cuban embassy
    (4) The opposition government before Chavez sold oil to the US at below its market value in return for political support – free market capitalism?

  • 10. MrDodge

    (04 October 2012, 03:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    Allegations made against Chavez in this article are that
    1. He mis-used the oil revenue and failed to ensure adequate investment in future production
    2. he tried to use violence to disrupt opposition rallies
    3. he’ll attempt to rig the election
    Point (1) is probably true, but the opposition also mis-used oil revenues. Point 2 might have been true in previous elections, but there is no evidence that the Government is behind recent violence. On point 3, there have always been allegations of electoral fraud by both sides in Venezuela, without any firm evidence. They now have a modern voting system which should minimize the opportunity for abuse.

    I don't doubt that Chavez's socialist vision is doomed to failure. But at least he has tried to help the poor, and has put a stop to interference from the US Government, something which has blighted the entire continent for decades.

  • 11. JimW

    (04 October 2012, 04:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    Agree with others that its biased against Chavez because it doesn't take into account why Chavez became leader plus the interference by the USA which should've known better then to interfere in another country politics so openly. They should've learned that from there time with Cuba.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>