Tune out. Buy gold. Be happy.

By Bill Bonner Feb 14, 2012

Bill Bonner.

Share with
friends:

Comments (8) Print this article

Where we part company with Warren Buffett...

The Sage of Omaha explained in Fortune magazine why bonds are dangerous.

He went on to explain why he doesn’t like gold either. He points out that since 1965, the total return on gold (not adjusted for inflation) was 4,455%. But the total return on stocks was higher, at 6,072%.

The difference between the two is that gold is a ‘sterile’ investment, says Buffett. Stocks are not.

He’s right. Gold is only useful at protecting purchasing power when the monetary system is in danger. At almost all other times, you’re better off with stocks, businesses, farmland or another productive asset.

That’s why Buffett now prefers stocks. And it is why we now prefer gold.

Buffett willingly gives up the protection of gold in order to the get the upside from stocks. We willingly give up the upside from stocks in order to get the protection from gold.

Who’s right?

Only time will tell. Our guess is that time will tell us that Buffett is right in the near term. But we’re still not going to switch to stocks. Because the risk is too high that time will be on our side.

In other words, the most likely outcome, as far as we can tell, is that the financial world will stumble along more or less in the same direction it is going now. Perhaps for many years. Gold, already expensive in terms of purchasing power, may go nowhere or even down. After all, we’re still in a Great Correction. As long as we follow in Japan’s footsteps there’s no particular reason for gold to rise.

But we do not bet on the most likely outcome. We bet on the outcome that is underpriced. The outcome that is most likely to pay off or blow us up. In our view, investors do not yet fully appreciate the risks of a financial catastrophe, a war or a revolution.

In yesterday’s news, we learned that hundreds of thousands of Greeks had taken to the streets.

Meanwhile, hardly a day passes that we don’t hear of an impending attack on Iran.

The developed economies are borrowing money at two to five times the rate of GDP growth.

And the world’s major central banks eagerly print money.

Maybe Buffett will be right. Maybe the next 47 years will be like the last. But it seems like a bad bet to us. All the key circumstances are completely different – even opposite.

You remember the years from ’65 to 2012. They weren’t perfect. But they weren’t bad. The US was on top of the world and headed higher. It was owed more money by more people than any nation ever had been. It was the leading energy exporter. It was the world’s leading capital investor. Its people were earning more and more money – in real terms. Total consumer and government, as a percentage of GDP, was barely a fifth of today’s level.

Of course, it wasn’t all good. The US was getting deeper and deeper into a costly and losing war. This would lead to some big bills to pay in the ‘70s and to some tough times. But, overall, America’s best days were still ahead.

And today?

Now, the emerging markets are growing much faster, taking more and more market share from the US. America is deep in debt and adding more debt every day. Major industries have been zombified. More than half the voters depend on money from the government. America’s degenerate capitalism and is geriatric democracy cannot adapt to the challenges it faces. And the typical working man hasn’t had a real increase in wages since the Johnson administration.

In ’65, the US was heady for glory. In ’12, it may be going to Hell.

But who knows? Maybe Buffett will be right.

Still, we’ll stick to our formula.

Buy gold on dips. Sell stocks on rallies.


DR banner

Receive Bill Bonners free Daily email 'The Daily Reckoning' straight to your inbox


And more thoughts

• “Wanna lose some money?”

Easy. Buy Facebook. It’s said to be going public at 150 times earnings.

In order to justify the price, says our colleague, Chris Mayer, Facebook would have to sign up every human being on the planet and a few extraterrestrials too.

The whole internet complex is a “bubble that’s about to pop,” he says.

“It’s rumored that Facebook’s IPO will value the company somewhere between $75 and $100 billion – about 150 times 2011 net income, 212 times free cash flow, and just shy of 27 times last year’s sales. Facebook’s sales have grown 77-fold since 2006, and its valuation based on private secondary markets has soared 92-fold during the same time.”

Wow! How do you beat that?

We tried to use Facebook. It just seemed like too much trouble. And what do you get out of it? Another way to keep up with your friends? That is, another way, in addition to phone, mail, SMS, email and carrier pigeon. Seems like more than enough ways already.

We also tried LinkedIn. We signed up. But we could never figure out what the point is.

So, we apologise to all the many people who offered to make us a ‘friend’ or a 'contact’. I’m afraid we had to ignore them all. Not because we don’t want them as friends and contacts. But simply because we can’t keep up with the volume of contacts we have already.

Our advice to dear readers: Sell Facebook and LinkedIn, as soon as you get a chance. Turn off Facebook. Unplug yourself from LinkedIn.

Tune out. Turn off. Buy gold. Be happy.

• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, sign up to the email list here .

Information in The Daily Reckoning is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. The Daily Reckoning is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Customer services: 020 7633 3600. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do FSA number: 1152 34

Comments (8)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Stuart Bowes

    (14 February 2012, 05:42PM)  Complain about this comment

    ha ha ha - my sentiments exactly Bill - Face Book shmashe Book. Life is too short. And the problem with the sage is that he thinks 47 years is not too long to wait for equities returns to overtake gold returns. And he doesn't seem to have considered the very real prospect of being wiped out in the mean time. Or dying of being 150 years old. Anyway, i've hedged my bets by buying a gold mine. The only problem is.... it's in Zimbabwe.

    All the best.

  • 2. Patrick

    (14 February 2012, 05:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    In amongst all this sneering at the Facebook IPO, I've done some digging back in the archives. And much as I enjoy The Daily Reckoning (over 10 years of saved emails is proof!) ... I must highlight your comments ahead (& shortly after) Google's offering in 2004:

    Why would anyone want to buy Google.com at 125 times earnings? (16th August ’04)

    Google has slashed its IPO price, down from $135 to just $85 per share ...... The world's leading search engine is a bargain at this firesale price, right? It now values itself at $85 billion. For that money, dear reader, you could own the entire GDP of New Zealand for one year. (19th August ’04)

    Real capitalists do not buy Google, for example. Speculators buy Google. Investors won't live long enough to get their money back from earnings or dividends. (30 Dec ’04)

    Well .... got to admit, the dividends haven't exactly been flowing ... but maybe the shares being 700% higher at $606 are small compensation!

  • 3. Muhammed Alam

    (15 February 2012, 06:45AM)  Complain about this comment

    It was reported that Facebook had admitted in its IPO related submissions that current earnings would more than suffice for future cash flows and that the sole reason for the IPO was to make employees' holdings "more liquid and valuable".

    If so, it beats me why any sensible person would subscribe for the Facebook IPO at current levels.

  • 4. Hugh A. Thomas

    (16 February 2012, 03:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    Mr. Buffet Conveniently starts his comparison at 1965. In 1965 I was illegal for Americans to own gold. Buffet is an oligarch and spends much of his time and influence in directing the government to steer policy towards scenarios that will benefit the companies in which he owns stocks. Buffet doesn’t like gold because he can’t influence and control it. If you have a gold coin in your hand, Buffet is screwed in that he can’t get to your savings, he can’t pander to a politician to make a law that will dilute your holding and advantage him. Gold in your hand is viewed by Buffet in the same way a lock on your door is viewed by a burglar. “Those damned locks are just a waste of money, they create nothing, they are a dead asset.”

  • 5. wanda kinzeler

    (16 February 2012, 10:11PM)  Complain about this comment

    Can i short Facebook? how do i do that? buy puts??

  • 6. Bill Clopton

    (16 February 2012, 10:44PM)  Complain about this comment

    Back in the 80's and 90's there wasn't all this newly printed money flying around. The next few years will see an enormous transfer of wealth: the money from the likes of Warren Buffet will transfer to the people who figured out what is coming and bought gold and silver.

  • 7. Segedunum

    (18 February 2012, 01:07AM)  Complain about this comment

    The Facebook IPO is rife with insider trading with the usual suspects running it and those diving in and buying are going to get burned badly.

    Stocks are dead. In terms of buying power and factoring in inflation stocks have not risen at all. Over the past ten years gold has outperformed Berkshire Hathaway.

    It's always telling once you see precious metals get mentioned by the 'mainstream' with people trying to warn you off. I can't help but feel that Buffet might not even understand the fundamentals behind precious metals though.

    I'm sure we've also seen dozens of those 'Cash for Gold' shops springing up. Watch out when those shops change to 'We Sell Gold'..............

  • 8. Ade

    (18 February 2012, 09:01PM)  Complain about this comment

    Can only agree with every point in this article

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>