The drugs don’t work

By Bill Bonner Oct 10, 2012

Bill Bonner.

Share with
friends:

Comments (2) Print this article

First, here’s Nobel Prize-winning Joseph Stiglitz calling for more spending by the feds: "For both Europe and America, the danger now is that politicians and markets believe that monetary policy can revive the economy. Unfortunately, its main impact at this point is to distract attention from measures that would truly stimulate growth, including an expansionary fiscal policy and financial-sector reforms that boost lending."

Yes, get them to spend more money, use more resources on crackpot schemes. Give more money to zombies.

Why not? The whole idea is to boost spending. Or as Stiglitz would say, to “increase demand”. Well, nobody is more demanding than a zombie, especially when he’s got a gun in his hand and someone else’s money in his pocket.

Sometimes we wonder. Maybe it’s all a big joke.

Everybody knows you can’t really become richer by spending. And everyone knows that spending by the zombies is the least efficient and effective spending of all. At least when people are squandering their own money they get what they want, or at lease what they deserve.

But let the feds spend it and you get what the feds want – boondoggle wars, vote-buying giveaways, rewards for the incompetent and inconsequential. Show us a government that spends $2 and we’ll show you one dollar that makes people worse off. The other is merely wasted.

Still, the leading economists of our time insist that the feds should pass around more cash and that somehow this will make us all better off.

Martin Wolf, associate editor at the Financial Times, has been pushing this dope for years. But poor Mr Wolf seems to be working himself into a corner. Last week, he caught on to what we’ve been saying for months. Growth is slowing down. And there’s no guarantee it will speed up again in our lifetimes. He’s not sure why; no one is. But he cites the work of Robert Gordon of Northwestern University who challenges the notion that economic growth is forever.

Maybe it isn’t.

What we noticed is that despite the most fertile ground for growth in the history of the human race, GDP growth rates have declined for the last 50 years. Our bet is that it is because the marginal utility of energy inputs is in decline. But that’s a big subject. Too big for today.

Mr Wolf says he is convinced that Mr Gordon is right, that developed economies simply won’t grow like they used to. “Get used to it”, he says.

But Mr Wolf has some difficult adapting to himself. He doesn’t seem to notice that this analysis undermines almost everything he’s written in the last five years. He has urged governments to stimulate their economies so their rates of growth would go up. They need faster GDP increases so they ‘grow out of’ high debt levels.

But the evidence presented by Mr Gordon, cited by Mr Wolf himself, suggests that the decline in real growth cannot be reversed by economic or monetary policies.


DR banner

Receive Bill Bonner's free daily email 'The Daily Reckoning' straight to your inbox


If this is so (and we think it is), then inciting governments to run up debt in a vain attempt to boost growth rates is like increasing the dosage of a known poison in the erroneous belief that it will cure snoring.

But then, if growth is doomed to decline, what can the meddlers do? If you can’t grow your way out, what can do you?

Not much. That is the conclusion of Mr Wolf’s column in today’s Financial Times. According to a study of debt-larded governments, done by the IMF, when an economy’s private sector is lowering its own debt, it is very difficult for the government to do the same.

Because the private sector’s sales and income revenue is also the public sector’s tax revenue. In a period of contraction, in the private sector, tax revenues go down, which puts the feds’ budget into serious deficit. That is, roughly, the situation in which all the world’s major developed countries find themselves.

It is also the situation in which Britain found itself in the inter-war period – 1919-1939, and in which Japan has been stuck for the last 22 years.

The UK went at the problem like the Tea Party claims to want to. It ran a budget surplus and took an axe – Geddes Axe – named after the man who headed the budget cutting commission, to spending.

But this austerity approach didn’t work. GDP barely grew. Unemployment remained at high levels. Eventually, the UK went off the gold standard, the very thing it was trying to avoid. This allowed it to devalue its debts and reduce its wage levels, which eventually helped sort things out. In effect, it defaulted. It went broke.

Japan has stuck with the stimulus approach. The government sells bonds to finance large deficits. The central bank buys the bonds. Interest rates are at zero. The money flows. Business goes on. And an ever-larger portion of the country’s real wealth is consumed by the Japanese feds – most of it on benefits to retired people.

Japan’s debt burden grows larger, not smaller with the final, explosive debt reckoning still to come.

The lesson from all this is what we knew all along. You can’t really get rich by borrowing and spending. And you can’t expect policy tricks to miraculously relieve you of an oversized debt burden.

Debts are to be suffered, not erased. The only question is: who suffers? The borrower? The lender? Or everybody else?

• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, sign up to the email list here .

Information in The Daily Reckoning is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. The Daily Reckoning is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Customer services: 020 7633 3600. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do FSA number: 1152 34

Comments (2)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Paulent

    (11 October 2012, 08:39AM)  Complain about this comment

    A couple of points:

    - re growth rates in last 50 yrs - don't forget impact of WW2. I guess in 1952 we were mostly still at a pretty low base.

    - re stimuli - has anyone put any thought into which types of spend have the greatest/least multiplier? (insofar as any of us still have any discretionary income). e.g. £1 which will immediately disappear untaxed out of the country to, say, Monaco or the Caymans may be less helpful than spend on low-income local suppliers who will presumably recycle it. Too many people wishing to stop that train of thought, I suspect.

  • 2. Boris MacDonut

    (11 October 2012, 04:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    #1 Paulent. Surely the last 50 years began in October 1962.So growth between 1945 and 1962 would not come into it.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>