The authorities’ monopoly on rigging the market

By Bill Bonner Jul 31, 2012

Bill Bonner.

Share with
friends:

Comments (5) Print this article

News from London is that they are going to throw the book at the Libor rate fixers. The insiders are facing jail time. 

The Telegraph has the story:

Bankers found to have rigged Libor could face jail after the SFO said it will look to bring criminal charges against those who attempted to manipulate the world’s key borrowing rate.

David Green QC, director of the SFO, said existing legislation could be used to bring criminal actions against banks implicated in the Libor rigging scandal.

Mr Green did not specify the precise charges that could be brought but it is possible bankers found guilty of manipulation could receive prison sentences of up to 10 years.

This doesn’t seem fair. After all, the bankers were only replacing one artificial rate with another. What’s the harm in that? Some people gained. Some lost. Net, the financial damage was probably offset by the financial benefit. The winners were happy. Losers are always unhappy.

Besides, isn’t it all a game? Isn’t it all in good fun? Why make a federal case of it?

But the authorities are indignant. If there’s any interest rate manipulation to be done, they say to each other, we’ll do it ourselves. They were justifiably upset, in other words. Rigging the market - like police protection, gambling, drugs and alcohol - is something over which the federales claim a monopoly. And they are not above using force - even lethal force, if necessary - to protect their turf.

That is what four bankers in Iran discovered yesterday. The New York Times reports:

In the first sentences to be handed down, an Iranian court ordered the death penalty for four people in the fraud that was uncovered in a network of Iranian banks last year, Iranian state media reported on Monday.

This is clearly a case of over-reaction. If leading bankers can’t fiddle their customers - and the public - the whole system will come to a screeching stop. After all, the world’s leading bankers are those who work for the Fed and the ECB, both of whom are engaged in a bamboozle of Biblical proportions.


DR banner

Receive Bill Bonner's free daily email 'The Daily Reckoning' straight to your inbox


In Europe, Mario Draghi, formerly with Goldman Sachs and the World Bank and now head of the European Central Bank, is determined to fix the rate at which European nations and their banks can borrow.

Last week he said he would do “whatever it takes” to save the euro. We know what that means; he will print as much as necessary to protect the banks and the sovereign borrowers from getting what they deserve. And that means keeping their borrowing costs down.

The borrowers’ real problem is that they are insolvent. They cannot pay their debts. Draghi treats the matter as a liquidity problem; he knows he cannot make them solvent. So, he lends them more money - on easy terms. Perhaps if he lends them enough for a long enough time, they will recover. Never explained is how making them even less solvent will help them to their feet. Nor has much thought been given to how they will ever get up, with all this new debt weight added to their burdens; nor to what will happen when investors realize that the system is cockeyed and doomed.

Meanwhile, in the USA, the price of borrowing - the interest rate - is no more freely determined than it is in Europe, in London, or in Iran. In fact, we know no interest rate scales in the financial world that give an honest reading. Instead, they give the measure that has been given to them by the fixers, with some latitude for mistakes and imprecision.

The Libor rate is supposed to be a simple average of ten rates proposed by London banks for uncollateralised loans. Until recently, the fixers pushed it one way or the other according to their desires. But the Fed shoves interest rates around too. It tells the banks how much they can lend and how much cash they must keep in their vaults. It sets the rate - by simple declaration - on the short end of the yield curve. Farther out, it has more work to do, including buying long-dated bonds itself, if necessary, in order to lower mortgage rates. Whether the shove is direct and blunt, or glancing, or with a knock-on effect, the result is the same: rates are pushed in the direction Mr Central Banker wants, not the direction Mr Market had in mind.

Not that there’s anything wrong with this in principle. The market gods seem to be aiming for entertainment. And the comic climax of all this is bound to be a side-splitter.

But when the end comes, again as a matter of principle, we hope all the fixers will get fixed in the same way. Put them all in front of firing squads - or let them all go free. It’s all the same to us. As long as it’s fair.

• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, sign up to the email list here .

Information in The Daily Reckoning is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. The Daily Reckoning is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Customer services: 020 7633 3600. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do FSA number: 1152 34

Comments (5)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. SJH

    (31 July 2012, 06:40PM)  Complain about this comment

    The Serious Fraud Office is called the Serious Farce Office by most British newspapers.

    All that the SFO has said is that they are considering charges.
    Top bankers will have incorrect charges, or no charges, levelled at them and the chances of any being fined, or jailed, are extremely remote.

    The fact that the big banks are major contributors to political party funding, and the fact that big banks give many directorships to retired British politicians is purely a coincidence.

    One or two small fry might be eventually prosecuted, but don't hold your breath waiting for the big fish to be jailed.

    It won't happen!

  • 2. Critic Al Rick

    (31 July 2012, 11:36PM)  Complain about this comment

    It's not only the economy that's rigged in favour of the richest; it's the law, too.

  • 3. LERENARD

    (01 August 2012, 12:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    There will be two phases in the SFO's investigation: 1. Search for the guilty 2. Punishment of the innocent. Thus it has always been....and so it shall always be.

  • 4. robin

    (01 August 2012, 01:29PM)  Complain about this comment

    Wow, the cynicism in this article and the comments...is any of it any good?

    The question, I think, is 'does the banking community have a mandate to fix the libor rate to their own advantage?'. And the answer, based on their own declarations that there is a supposed chinese wall between the investment group and the people responsible , is that they don't. Therefore what they have done is commit fraud.

    I think we should punish them. The tone has to be set at some point; why not here? Yes, so its a little unfair on those who thought there was no punishment for these 'little white lies'. Its fraud though.. end of story.

    Also CPI is a fraud as well. We should get rid of it and arrest gordon brown. That will set the proper tone going forward.

  • 5. Anaesthetic

    (01 August 2012, 05:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    If the rule of law won`t punish ALL those in fraudulent rate fixing,

    then maybe WE should.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>