Hugo Chavez, RIP

By Bill Bonner Mar 08, 2013

Bill Bonner.

Share with
friends:

Comments (6) Print this article

Today, we struggle to hold back tears. Another major world leader has bit the dust. Venezuela's big man died. Some bleak corner of Hell took him in on Wednesday, if not before.

Hugo Chavez was such a great entertainer, he was bigger than life; real life was too small for him. He had to stretch the truth out to bend the real world into a larger, more fantastic shape to puff it up with hot air, until it could hold him.

In real life, people go about their business, taking what fortune sends their way and doing their best with it. That stage was much too restricted for Chavez. He aimed to play a more important role under a much bigger proscenium arch. Naturally, he took up politics, the refuge of all fantasists, and tried to overthrow the lawful Venezuelan government; he landed in jail.

The authorities let him out after a couple of years. He went right back to his mischief. A few years later and he was elected president of the country. But even that wasn't enough. He conspired to twist the nation's constitution to make himself 'president for life', which, in an act of divine mercy towards the Venezuelan people, ended this week.

Chavez was a great showman. He kept TV audiences entertained for hours, concocting a larger-than-life fairy tale about how terrible the foreign capitalists were and how his Bolivarian revolution was setting things straight. Alas, his lines were written by hacks; perhaps he wrote them himself. It took a real A-list actor to deliver his speeches with a straight face. The idea of a 21st century socialism, for example, that he claimed to have invented himself, was so transparently hollow and self-serving that a lesser thespian would have been laughed off stage.

Chavez followed in a long South American tradition of crowd-pleasing strongmen. Like Peron, Castro and Melgarejo, he was not only a leader the masses could adore, he was also one they deserved.

Mariano Melgarejo has been largely forgotten. But he was one of the great standup guys of Bolivian politics. Like Chavez, he attempted a coup d'etat in 1854 against the legitimate dictatorship of the time. He was captured. He was tried and found guilty. That should have been the end of him, but he came out with a convincing argument for clemency, that he was drunk at the time and not responsible for his actions.

Melgarejo was pardoned by President Belzu. A few years later, just to show his gratitude, Melgarejo murdered the president himself. Then came a real tour-de-force of political theatre, illustrating not only Melgarejo's magisterial stage presence but also the masses' deep attachment to their leaders.

A crowd had gathered in front of the presidential palace demanding the return of Belzu. "Viva Belzu", they chanted.

Melgarejo appeared on the balcony. He had the dead body brought out and displayed to the crowd.

"Who lives now?" he asked them.

"Viva Melgarejo", they replied.


DR banner

Receive Bill Bonner's free daily email 'The Daily Reckoning' straight to your inbox


Having whacked his rival, Melgarejo soon became perhaps the most disastrous leader in the history of South America, a hotly contested title. He is said to have signed the Treaty of Ayacucho with Brazil, in which he traded millions of acres of Bolivian territory for a "magnificent white horse".

In 1870, France and Germany went to war. Hearing reports of the German assault on Paris, Melgarejo rushed to defend the City of Lights. He reputedly could not locate it on a map, but he was fascinated by what he had heard of it. So, he told his army to march to Europe. His military commanders informed him that they had no means to cross the Atlantic Ocean. Melgarejo replied, "Don't be stupid! We will take a short cut through the brush!"

That was the sort of Bolivarian tradition to which Chavez was heir.

But Melgarejo was hardly the only legator. Chavez learned from Juan Peron too. Argentina had been one of the richest countries in the world, in the early 20th century. You can see the residue of it here today – broad, tree-lined avenues... and beautiful beaux arts, belle époque and arts nouveaux private buildings and public monuments (the Argentinians were great admirers of the French too!)

Now, Argentina is way down the list of the world's richest countries. Today, it is number 54 on the CIA Factbook list, with Trinidad and Tobago, Equatorial Guinea and Greece far ahead of it. That, along with periodic financial crises, massive strikes, disappearances, and pointless wars, is the legacy given Argentina by Peron and his Peronist successors.

You'd think the gauchos and the portenos would have had enough of it by now. But they still elect Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, the Peronist candidate just as they voted for Chavez in Venezuela despite an economic record worthy of Mariano Melgarejo. That's what makes the masses so attractive to leaders like Chavez – they are incredibly stupid.

Consumer prices rise faster in Caracas than even in Buenos Aires. Money changes hands on the black market at many times the official rate. The power goes out, too. Despite being one of the world's top oil producers, supplies are so tight, people are urged to take 'socialist showers' to conserve energy. And the murder rate is among the highest in the world, so high that even people from Baltimore are afraid to go there.

He made their lives more miserable, but the masses still loved him. Hugo Chavez paid for their affection. He took $100m in annual oil revenues and spread it around. Realising that it would go farther in poor neighbourhoods than in rich ones, he built his popular support on cash and claptrap.

And now he is gone. The performances have come to an end. The show's over.

"Now he belongs to the ages", said Secretary of War Stanton, when Abe Lincoln died. Now Chavez belongs to the ages too, like Peron and Melgarejo.

Good riddance.

• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it, sign up to the email list here .

Information in The Daily Reckoning is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. The Daily Reckoning is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Customer services: 020 7633 3600. Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do FSA number: 1152 34

Comments (6)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. K V Ramani

    (09 March 2013, 06:54AM)  Complain about this comment

    Et tu, Brute? Wish you hadn't joined hands with the MSM to spit on a dead man's grave.

    Chavez was elected by popular vote to lead Venezuela. He did not steal elections by rigging electronic voting machines or with the help of crooked judges. If he chose to experiment with his brand of political economics in 'his' country, it was his right to do so. As it has been the right of every ruler in every country, including that of US presidents whose experiments have had tragic consequences right around the world. Given your impartiality, hope we can count on your equally flattering obituaries for one of them when the time comes.

  • 2. John Smith

    (09 March 2013, 06:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hugo Chavez is the most popular leader that Venezuela has ever had. He improved the lives of millions of Venezuelans as all the indicators show. Especially those who are not in a position to keep making money out of money.
    The Venezuelans aren't fools. They know a good thing when they see it. That is why they kept electing him time and time again. They were lucky to have him and knew it.
    Hugo Chavez will never be forgotten by Venezuela or the World.

  • 3. kingwowns

    (10 March 2013, 01:39AM)  Complain about this comment

    You write intelligently Bill, and I guess it's not your fault you drink from the same poisoned well that is US media bias when it comes to Chavez. Try another of your countrymen, BBC Newsnight reporter Greg Palast for an alternative view...

    http://www.gregpalast.com/vaya-con-dios-hugo-chavez-mi-amigo/#more-7874

  • 4. Anthony Rawdon, Cape Town

    (10 March 2013, 02:59AM)  Complain about this comment

    Bang on the money as usual Bill. Have just finished fuming at that hateful leftist anti-British bitch Jasmin Alibai-Brown that the marxist-run BBC keeps inviting on to its panel discussions. She said much the same nonsense as (the appropriately numbered No 1 and No 2 above), i.e. that he had closed the wealth gap, and that in the marxist mindset trumps everything else. No mention of the legal and constitutional abuses, thievery, and demagoguery involved in getting there. No mention of the enormous 5-fold increase in the murder rate. Under his watch Venezuela went from being one of the safer Caribbean littoral countries to one of the most violent. But you wouldn't know about that from watching the BBC, (or listening to No 1 and No 2) so kudos to you for bringing it up. She (and No 1 and No 2) no doubt had they been around in the 1930's would have praised Joe Stalin for achieving much the same results by similar methods.

  • 5. K V Ramani

    (10 March 2013, 04:30AM)  Complain about this comment

    Oh well, No. 4, neither of us was around in the 1930s, so let's leave speculation aside. Here are some hard numbers (Jan/Feb 2013): GDP growth - Venezuela 5.48%, UK 0.3%, US 1.6%; Debt:GDP ratio - Venezuela 45.5%, UK 85%, US 101.6%; Current account - Venezuela 8.6%, UK -1.9%, US -3.1%; Unemployment - Venezuela 5.9%, UK 7.8%, US 7.7%. As for murder rates, the BBC doesn't do body counts from Anglo-American wars around the world, so you can't be blamed.

  • 6. Boris MacDonut

    (10 March 2013, 10:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    What a yankee twit. Chavez was one of ther most successfula nd weel liked politicians of the last two decades. Give the World a referendum and ask them who they favour Chavez or Georgy Porgy Dubya Bush. the Latino will win by a landslide and the Yanks will still seek to undermine his name. People wonder why the USof A is not respected. It is due to childish outbursts like those of Billy Bonner.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>