What the panic in Cyprus means for your money

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Mar 22, 2013

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (28) Print this article

Queues at ATMs in Cyprus © Getty Images

Serious damage has been done to the banking system

The nice thing about being a member of the European Union is that you always get a second chance.

If you vote one way, and the Europeans don’t like it, they’ll tell you; they’ll give you another chance to vote the ‘right’ way.

Of course, this does rather undermine local democracy somewhat. But that’s all part of the price of being one big happy European family. Didn’t you realise that?

Anyway, now it’s the turn of Cyprus to go back to the drawing board. Having ditched its original plan to tax savings to secure a bail-out, the Cypriots have been told to come up with a new deal by Monday.

Or else…

How Cyprus ended up here

A quick recap of the Cyprus story so far.

Cyprus needs a bail-out. It needs €17bn. But the ‘troika’ (Europe’s big bail-out committee) is only willing to lend it €10bn, because they know Cyprus could never pay back the whole €17bn. Even €10bn will be a push, but we can at least pretend it’s feasible.

So Cyprus needed to raise the extra from somewhere else fast. That’s where the bright idea of taxing bank deposits came from. Everyone with less than €100,000 in the bank was set to lose 6.75%. More than that would be taxed at 9.9%.

Great idea. Except of course that it tore up pretty much every unwritten rule about bank deposit security, and was an open invitation to bank runs across the eurozone.

As the queues formed in front of the cash machines, Cypriot politicians had a rapid rethink. They rejected the bail-out deal out of hand, without a single pro-vote.

That left everyone floundering around. The Russians don’t seem willing to help much, despite the Kremlin’s outrage and all the money they’re said to have on the island. And if the Russians aren’t willing to pay, that leaves two options: Cyprus leaves the eurozone, or the bail-out deal is renegotiated.

No one really wants Cyprus to leave the eurozone. As Die Zelt editor Josef Joffe notes in the FT this morning, Cyprus itself is just “a tiny sliver of the EU economy”.

But given the backdrop, if it leaves the euro now, you could see “millions of panicked savers start a run on their banks from Lisbon to Athens”. That in turn would unleash “a broad-scale attack by the markets. Auf Wiedersehen, euro.”

Cypriot citizens also realise full well that returning to the Cypriot pound would be a lot more damaging to their savings than even a 10% ‘haircut’. Any new currency would plunge in value against the euro - that might be good for the tourist industry, but the resulting social unrest probably wouldn’t be.

So quitting the euro isn’t an easy option. But as far as Germany is concerned, neither is giving Cyprus a no-strings attached handout. If it does that, everyone from Greece to Italy will want one. As Joffe puts it, Germany will be left “bleeding for the greater good forever”.

So it’s back to the drawing board for Cyprus. The European Central Bank (ECB) has threatened - once again - to pull the plug on Cyprus’s banks on Monday if it doesn’t come up with a plan.

At the moment, ECB emergency funding is the only thing keeping those banks open. So a deposit tax would be the least of savers’ worries if that happens.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


What this means for markets

So what’s likely to happen? And what does it all mean for your money?

In terms of the actual outcome, this is too close to call. It’s very hard to work out exactly what’s going on in policymakers’ minds.

A cynic might argue that this is just a cleverly-played, high-stakes negotiating game. You present everyone involved - the public, the troika, other politicians - with an utterly outrageous opening deal. And it doesn’t get much more outrageous than saying you’re going to take money that people thought was insured against loss.

As a result, whatever you end up with seems moderate by comparison. Chastened by the prospect of how bad things could have been, everyone involved walks away poorer, but feeling they’ve been let off the hook somehow.

But given the risks involved, it’s hard to believe this was deliberate. Regardless of what deal is reached, serious damage has been done to the banking system.

Why would anyone in Cyprus keep a significant amount of money in the bank now? They’ve seen how vulnerable the system is. When the banks re-open, a lot of people will be keen to get all their money out. Even if some sort of control is imposed to prevent that - as seems likely - it could get very messy.

It also damages faith in the rest of the European system, even at the margins. For example, if I’m travelling in Europe, I rarely bother getting hold of euros before I go. I just assume I’ll be able to get some from a cash machine when I land in the airport. I’ll not be doing that for the foreseeable future.

And for anyone assuming that a deal will get done because it ‘has’ to: it’s worth remembering that there was a point last year when almost all of us thought that Greece was going to walk out of the euro.

If Europe wants a test case to see just how to cope with a euro exit, Cyprus is the place to do it.

The bottom line: stick to your plan

So far, markets are taking this in their stride. The euro has fallen, but no one is pricing in another Lehman Brothers. If Cyprus does leave the euro, you can expect more panic. But even then, I’d bet there are a lot of people ready to ‘buy the dips’ on this one.

Obviously, I wouldn’t hold any big short-term spread bets over the weekend, as you never know what’s going to happen. These things tend to go right to the deadline.

But I wouldn’t make any big changes to your investment plans on the basis of Cyprus. Stick to what you’re doing: drip-feeding money into cheap stocks, diversifying out of sterling, and keeping a bit of cash to hand to capitalise on any opportunities.

The more important aspect of Cyprus is what it says about what happens when governments and banking systems go bust. In short, no one’s money is safe, and there are no risk-free havens.

• This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .

Follow John on Twitter || Google+ John Stepek

Our recommended articles for today

Could Britain go the way of Cyprus?

SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
To secure a bail-out, Cyprus proposed raiding savers' bank accounts. Could it happen here? And how can you protect your money? John Stepek reports..

This is a very serious threat to your bank

A war is raging in cyberspace as criminals launch wave after wave of attacks on banks and businesses around the world. Tom Bulford looks at the threat we’re facing, and the companies working to counter it.

Comments (28)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Gerry Burne

    (22 March 2013, 11:01AM)  Complain about this comment

    An utterly brilliant and concise analysis of what is going on and what to do (or not to do) about it.
    The world is a better place for people like you able to tell the truth in a waay that our political leaders find to be impossible.

  • 2. Chester

    (22 March 2013, 11:03AM)  Complain about this comment

    This is a Bear Sterns moment for the Euro - not quite Lehmans just yet, but it's in plain view

    As usual, idiot politicians and Euro officials have not joined up the dots of consequence, which are likely to accelerate the collapse of the Euro structure. Capital controls may minimise the effect of a bank run in Cyprus, but not ebbing confidence in bankrupt European banks and the Euro elsewhere. As money quietly flows out of the system in core countries, the Lehman moment draws ever closer

    One beneficiary to this flow will the Sterling, despite it's fundamental weakness. Holding US$ should be another winner

  • 3. Eddiegeorge

    (22 March 2013, 11:22AM)  Complain about this comment

    Isn't it strange how all the tax havens and low tax domiciles, except Switzerland, seem to be in no end of trouble. Countries which exercised discipline, collected taxes, ran low deficits and absorbed deflation are largely in very good competitive order, and now are expected to bail out the spendthrifts and layabouts. There is little doubt that the Cyprus bank problems can also be laid at blatant fraud, theft, lack of oversight and bank ineptitude. Despite that the banksters keep on trousering millions of stolen funds on an annual basis and not one has gone to jail yet. If you don't want to pay tax, just arrange a small demo and make sure CNN is there to air the massive rejection of the proposal, by next week the tax plan is shelved and the begging bowl is out again. Democracy has certainly got us into a strange and unsustainable situation.

  • 4. Neil Greystones

    (22 March 2013, 11:54AM)  Complain about this comment

    Brilliant review and analysis. It's time to buy GOLD! And keep it in the cellar... cash held by bankers the world over is now not yours or at least not all of it. Isn't it extraordinary how things have changed? People across the world work hard, get paid, lend their money to banks of their choosing for safe keeping and somehow those same banks now believe some of that loan is theirs. Imagine the reverse. Your personal circumstances change, you lose your job or suffer illness and can't work. What to do? Just tell the lender of your mortgage you have a problem and now 10% of the loan they gave you is cancelled to offset the time you can't pay the monthly charges. And those circumstances are not your fault. Try telling the same story if you'd become hooked on gambling and lost a great deal of money! Strange days indeed.

  • 5. Colin Selig-Smith

    (22 March 2013, 12:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    I don't see how Cypriot banks can survive this. Even with capital controls in place it just makes the train crash a little slower.

    @4 Neil Greystones

    When you put your money in to a bank account. It becomes the bank's money, it is no longer your money. You have invested in the bank and received a book keeping entry and if you are very astute, some interest on your investment, in return.

    When the governments (not banks) take bank deposits they are not taking your money, you already gave that away, they are taking the bank's investors investment.

    I hope this clarifies the nature of your bank accounts for you.

    Normally shareholders and boldholders would be wiped out first but in this case, the risk of CDS triggering means it's easier to take the depositors investments.

  • 6. Romford Dave

    (22 March 2013, 12:44PM)  Complain about this comment

    Perhaps the idiot politicians and Euro officials have finally joined up the dots Chester and want to see how lex monetae pans out compared to the lax monetae deployed over here.

    As for your call on sterling, it's a gift from the Gods to make one last bale before the Sun sets on it, maybe forever......

  • 7. Neil Greystones

    (22 March 2013, 12:53PM)  Complain about this comment

    4Colin Selig-Smith
    Oh yes, you are correct. I think it's called 'setting off'. It's in the small print apparently. The problem is, very few people know this. I remember opening my first savings account when I was 16 with my first pay-cheque. No one at the Bank explained that I was in the process of giving away my money and that I might not get it all back! We once trusted banks because they were trustworthy. Even although at that time the 'setting off' small print existed, they didn't use it. Not any more. In the recent past, something changed. Such was the recklessness of banks, there wasn't even any money left deposited to 'set off'! It's time the 'setting off' small print was made BIG PRINT.

  • 8. Steve

    (22 March 2013, 01:28PM)  Complain about this comment

    I have had a look at the Barclays Current Account terms & conditions to see exactly where they say that the money deposited with them is owned by them and the individual only has a book-keeping entry (an IOU). I know it works that way, but the terms do not say it anywhere. The closest they get to it is in the set-off clause which starts "If we owe you money on a current, savings or other account under this agreement or another agreement with us, ..."; however, this relates to the point mentioned in previous posts. Where does it actually say that bank depositors are agreeing that the bank now owns their money? If it's not there, the bank has no right to it (though I am sure the government would find a way to say that they do, if it came to that). Can anyone else find this point in their bank's terms & conditions? People are being grossly misled if it is not even in the contract when you read it.

  • 9. Ellen

    (22 March 2013, 02:29PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ 5, Colin Selig-Smith. You have it on the button. I don't fully understand swaps, or just to what extent they effect financial products, but I suspect they, alone, could melt down the financial system if they were to start to unravel.

    I suspect there isn't enough money in the world to pay out on these swaps if sovereign defaults started so in Cyprus we have deposit account holders paying what is a bondholders liability. And here, Osborne won't contemplate quantifying losses on the banks mortgage book, preferring to bamboozle people with his schemes to get them to take on the banks past mistakes.

  • 10. Badger Bill

    (22 March 2013, 02:51PM)  Complain about this comment

    Everyone in Greece knows that their Banks were only being used to chunnel huge amounts of German funding through to Switzerland, where it still is, but they can't get it back, not to Greece, nor Germany. Tough! Banks are simply machines. Blaming them gets you nowhere.
    Cyprus is nice and small, with the additional advantage of being UK "end of empire" stuff too , hence the RAF flying out tons of cash which must appeal to the EU Comecom lot, we always will be the bad guys............. ever since we won the war. Be good!

  • 11. FrostyA1

    (22 March 2013, 04:28PM)  Complain about this comment

    Sound Advice John as ever!.
    Med States (&Port.) are in melt-down because they rely on latterly collapsed Tourism, the first market to take a kicking in hard times as a dodgy non-necessity.
    With the Euro still held artificially high this year, Tourism & association represents a complete `bummer` for N/European spenders & investors= Sun & Suicide? or Storms & Suffer ?, they`ll pick the latter while quietly unloading every over-valued E. for a tired D. or a P., or anything making reasonable sense on the Stock-Markets...F.

  • 12. NeutronWarp9

    (22 March 2013, 06:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    Who are the idiots? The politicians who wield power and live in their cocooned world or the apathetic, ignorant public who let them?
    Cyprus can never pay its debts off and in truth neither can Spain or Portugal.

  • 13. peregrinus

    (22 March 2013, 10:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    12@NeutronWarp9 "Cyprus can never pay its debts off and in truth neither can Spain or Portugal". Neither can the UK. End of. Simples

  • 14. Aff

    (22 March 2013, 11:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    Cyprus should just leave the Euro, not until they break free can a recovery begin

  • 15. azazel

    (23 March 2013, 07:35AM)  Complain about this comment

    Why gold is not much higher is a mystery to me. Why people have their wealth in bank accounts is another mystery when gold and silver are still available at reasonable prices.

  • 16. Boris MacDonut

    (23 March 2013, 11:32AM)  Complain about this comment

    #13 Peregrinus. You a re correct. But the important point here is that the UK is much better placed to service its debt ,than are Spain and the likes of Cyprus.

  • 17. Boris MacDonut

    (23 March 2013, 11:32AM)  Complain about this comment

    #13 Peregrinus. You a re correct. But the important point here is that the UK is much better placed to service its debt ,than are Spain and the likes of Cyprus.

  • 18. Peter George

    (23 March 2013, 04:52PM)  Complain about this comment

    An excellent summary of the situation.

    I must admit that I am confused, are the leaders of the EU barking mad or just plain stupid. Or are they controlling the situation step by step and causing a crisis in each country one at a time? The purpose of the latter strategy would be to bring in a one world government.

    Democracy is being attached on all fronts as never before. It is difficult to know who the villains are.

  • 19. Boris MacDonut

    (23 March 2013, 04:55PM)  Complain about this comment

    There is an elemnt of the EU being miffed at Cyprus' attempt to become a tax haven for the Russkis. They want the Russians to use the EU haven of choice in Luxembourg.

  • 20. Colin Selig-Smith

    (23 March 2013, 07:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    @8 Steve

    It doesn't need to say it in the terms and conditions, it's the law. Most people think a bank account is a bailment; that the bank holds their money for them. They couldn't be more wrong. It isn't how banks function at all. Not only is the money you give them, no longer yours. Banks don't even have the money you gave them at all. They loaned it out to someone else.

    The legal case which defined the relationship is Carr vs Carr in 1811.

    When you put your money into a bank, you become a creditor just like a bond holder. Historically you would have had a superior claim on bank assets than bond holders in the event of the bank failure but that all changed with Cyprus. Now not only are depositors taking the haircut first, the interest paid on the account is normally abysmal, certainly not commensurate with the risk, which has just dramatically increased.

    Bank accounts have turned from very bad into very very bad investments.

  • 21. Colin Selig-Smith

    (23 March 2013, 07:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    @9 Ellen

    A CDS is as simple as it's name suggests. It swaps the risk of default on an asset like a bond, with someone else. You might buy one as insurance against a country or institution defaulting on a bond. The problem is you don't have to own the asset in order to buy some insurance on it. So it can be a bet as well as insurance.

    The issuers though are effectively betting they will never have to pay out. How do you pay out on 250 billion Euros worth of Greek bonds? You don't. You go bankrupt, and so the cascade of bankruptcies begins.
    This is why the monetary authorities made sure that the 90% haircut that Greek bondholders took was defined as voluntary and not a default.

  • 22. Steve

    (23 March 2013, 08:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    @21 Colin,

    Thanks for the information. It is worse than I realised. I found the details on the Carr case in a Cobden Centre article. This went on to quote a judge in later case who said:

    "Money, when paid into a bank, ceases altogether to be the money of the principal; it is by then the money of the banker, who is bound to return an equivalent by paying a similar sum to that deposited with him when he is asked for it. The money paid into a banker’s is money known by the principal to be placed there for the purpose of being under the control of the banker; it is then the banker’s money; he is known to deal with it as his own. ... The money placed in custody of a banker is, to all intents and purposes, the money of the banker, to do with it as he pleases; he is guilty of no breach of trust in employing it; he is not answerable to the principal if he puts it into jeopardy."

    Quite astonishing. The Cobden article is at http://www.cobdencentre.org/tag/carr-v-carr-1811/#

  • 23. Boris MacDonut

    (23 March 2013, 10:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    #22 Steve. Blimey, it's worse than we thought. As a lot of the money paid into banks is by employer's, it only really becomes ours once we withdraw it. Effectively making the banks our paymasters.We literally work for the banks.

  • 24. Colin Selig-Smith

    (24 March 2013, 08:11PM)  Complain about this comment

    @23 Boris.

    Precisely.

    It gets better though. I mentioned in a previous post that our money is leveraged. It's leveraged 30:1 on cash in the UK, in the EU ratios are still higher; more like 50:1. So in Cyprus, the banks there may have tens or more like hundreds of billions in deposits and loans... They have only 1/50th or most likely far less, of that in cash.

    Which means only the first 2% of depositors are going to get their money on Tuesday, when they try to take it all out. At which point the bank closes it's doors and all the rest will be left with an accounting entry in a bankrupt bank.

  • 25. Changing Man

    (25 March 2013, 04:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    It may also be worth checking whether the cash held by your stockbroking service is "on deposit" or "client money"? My ISA trading account at Selftrade is on deposit (as they have become a bank) so has £85k protection only. Client money in contrast is "ring-fenced" and held in trust so is ( hopefully) protected in full in the event of broker failure. Perhaps cash is safer with a broker than a bank?

  • 26. smlaing

    (25 March 2013, 09:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    Of course markets take it in their stride. They get their money hand to them monthly at virtual no cost to the tune of $85b. No chance of confiscation for them.

    As for the minions, it was always coming. History is littered with examples. They know the next crisis is coming and the ability of nations to meet new bail out interest payments does not exist, they have to now find the money elsewhere........Ah, I know....Assets. Theres trillions sitting on deposit, in pensions and mutual funds. And, as in the past, when their money is taken they'll moan and grumble but will come to accept it & see it as nothing more than a bad investment.

    Of course, the smart money will have gone long ago.

  • 27. oldlimey

    (26 March 2013, 01:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    Client money held in trust by a broker is presumably not held as bundles of notes. Where do the trustees place it? In a bank?

  • 28. Changing Man

    (26 March 2013, 10:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    I understand that client money is spread around a number of banks so that none has more than 20% of the total. If client money is aggregated into one account then I suspect it is effectively no more secure? We need a broker or lawyer to answer this I imagine?

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>