The last hurrah for the European Union

By Bengt Saelensminde Oct 19, 2012

Bengt Saelensminde

Share with
friends:

Comments (10) Print this article

Alfred Nobel was the archetypal Victorian industrialist. His invention of dynamite and his very successful armament business made him fantastically wealthy. But he paid a huge price for it. His own brother was killed in an explosion at his factory. And later poor old Alfred came to feel like he’d betrayed humanity. Before he died, he became mournful of his Frankenstein-like creation. And to put the record straight he bequeathed to the world annual Nobel prizes.

My fellow Norwegians were awarded the task of selecting the most important prize candidate – that for the peace prize. And there have been some controversial choices. I have to confess, I was a little taken aback when Obama won the peace prize in 2009. What exactly had he done to foster peace around the globe?

But now we seem to have gone from the sublime to the ridiculous. A week ago, the peace prize was awarded to the EU. Yes that European Union.

Now, the fact that Nobel bequeathed this prize to a person, not an institution, is one thing. But to award it to a body like the EU just seems crazy – especially now that the whole project is wreaking havoc across southern Europe.

And get this... yesterday, it was decided that not one, but three people will travel to Norway to accept the coveted prize. Yes, that just about sums up the EU – they can’t even nominate someone to pick up a prize.

The EU could wreck your savings

Like so many things, the EU started off with all the best intentions in the world. At heart, it was about free trade. And that is a fantastic thing. Had the prize been awarded back in the seventies, then perhaps it would have made some sort of sense. I mean, at a time when the Cold War was raging, an institution fostering peace through trade may well have deserved a peace prize.

But today the EU has morphed into an undemocratic behemoth whose actions are causing violence, factions and misery throughout Europe. Adopting the common currency was a leap too far. But nobody will admit it. Not even in the face of the economic havoc it is causing. And that’s something that will surely only get worse, until the thing disintegrates in bitter acrimony.


Special report

An exclusive report from The Right Side
"Bankrupt Britain?"


Now, I have no doubt that the authorities can carry on patching up the system for years. I mean, look how long it took for another bad idea to finally be kicked out – communism. But I really do fear that this whole project could disintegrate. And now, more than ever, I’m glad just that my fellow Norwegians have remained outside the EU. Well done them.

Still what were they thinking? Is the prize some sort of endorsement? Or perhaps the last hurrah...

How to escape the downfall

The saddest thing about the EU is its inability to change. Without a process of accountability, there’s no way of weeding out bad ideas. In fact, bad ideas turn into disastrous ideas – as we will one day see when the euro regime finally collapses.

But we mustn’t become too absorbed about things we cannot control. Yes, we need to be aware of the dangers out there. But at the same time, we carry on.

This is yet another good example of why, here at The Right Side, we’re big fans of emerging market investing. Many of the emerging markets are themselves setting up free trade areas. It’s all about commerce – about growth. Something that the EU was fond of in its day.

So if you haven’t done so, you should sign up to the new weekly emerging market letter from MoneyWeek. It’s called The New World. It’s completely free. And its mission is to bring you the most exciting investment stories outside the UK. Right now they are writing about two new free trade areas that could be every bit as successful as Europe in the 60s and 70s. You should get involved – sign up free here.

I also wanted to let you know that I’ve got another emerging market investment theme for you next week – stay tuned for that.

And if you missed the news on my Brazilian oil explorer, then take a look here. Again, that’s another potentially fantastic prospect far away from the dangers of the bloated West.

• This article is taken from the free investment email The Right side. Sign up to The Right Side here.

Important Information
Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. Past performance and forecasts are not reliable indicators of future results. Commissions, fees and other charges can reduce returns from investments. Profits from share dealing are a form of income and subject to taxation. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future. Please note that there will be no follow up to recommendations in The Right Side.

Managing Editor: Frank Hemsley. The Right Side is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd.

Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. FSA No 115234. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do

The New World is an unregulated product published by MoneyWeek.

Comments (10)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Peter Kellow

    (19 October 2012, 03:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    What are they going to do with the prize money? Bail out another bank?

  • 2. JREwing

    (19 October 2012, 04:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    Noble's bad conscience would be funny if it wasn't so tragic. If Noble had not invented dynamite, someone else would have done it. And traditionally, human beings have not needed sophisticated weapons to slaughter other humans. Just check how many the Mongols slaughtered in Persia alone in the 13th century. All they had were bows, arrows and swords. One could give another thousand examples like that (the Huns in the late Roman Empire is another example that stands out). If anything, nuclear weapons have made those kinds of events almost impossible due to the risk of total obliteration for both sides.

  • 3. JimW

    (20 October 2012, 06:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    I think the noble peace prize is going down the path of being irrelevant if it carries on like this.

    Awarding it to Obama when he's only been president for such a short time, for me, doesn't make sense. And now the EU, what is going on.

    How about Gordon Brown for preserving the peace by not taking us into the EU?

  • 4. Hissing Sid

    (21 October 2012, 02:55PM)  Complain about this comment

    Nobel Peace Prize in my mind was given to those that deservedly undertook good causes and who's mission was for the good of the cause. I am sorry but "what a load of baloney."

  • 5. Boris MacDonut

    (21 October 2012, 05:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    The prize is for peace not economics. The EU has been, and will remain, a massive force for good in the World. It has helped preserve the peace among the great powers of Europe that has lasted since 1945. It offers a form of leadership in the World that is a more popular vision than the militaristic one proffered by the USA and the distrusted state monopolies if China. Far more nations want to join the EU than seek to huddle under the wings of the other two superpowers. The EU will conquer the World with its benign progressive outlook. The USA is failing badly.
    Europeans deaths in war pre-EU; 50 million, post EU; fewer than 20,000. The Nobel commitee are totally correct.

  • 6. Boris MacDonut

    (21 October 2012, 05:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    .......and those 50 million were just between 1914 and 1945. Europe had torn itself to shreds at least 5 times prior to that. Norway of course is in a tiny minority of nations wishing to stand aloof from one of the greatest experiments in human history......usually due to a desire not share its good fortune.

  • 7. Keith

    (24 October 2012, 07:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    It was NATO that kept the peace in Europe since 1945. If they had notbeen there the USSR couldhave overwhelmed Europe with no problem.
    The EU is probably the most inefficient and undemocratic institution in the Western world and the Bilderbergers are quite prepared to bring every member government to its knees to save the euro.


  • 8. Boris MacDonut

    (25 October 2012, 01:36PM)  Complain about this comment

    #7 Keith. NATO was/is a power bloc to rival the USSR, efectively an extra European threat. The EU has contributed hugely to peace between Germany, France, Italy, the UK, Poland, Belgium, Austria, Spain..........

  • 9. Maconchy

    (31 October 2012, 04:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree with Boris. The EU is also a prime guarantor of the continuing independence (as far as that it is possible in this inter-dependent world) of the smaller states in particular. From the collapse of Poland-Lithuania in the late 18th century until 1989 Europe was dominated by big countries. Now countries from Ireland to Slovakia and from Finland to Bulgaria need no longer fear being incorporated into their larger neighbours. In addition the EU has contributed to the lessening of tensions between North and South in Ireland by helping to diminish the economic disparities. Far too often the EU is used as a convenient scapegoat.

  • 10. Le Brit

    (24 November 2012, 10:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    Mr MacDonut a load of tosh again, Uncle Sam's Marshall Plan kept Europe afloat and in peace in the early post war years before the EU was even dreamt of. The support US provided through NATO allowed Europe to develop economically, create the EEC and keep war with Russia off the agenda so the prize should go to a nation ------yes the USA for keeping Europe at peace for nearly 70 years.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>