Print this article
Time and time again, Europe solves its debt problems and every time they don’t get solved at all.
Italian bond yields are edging back up. And Greece is negotiating a default. They want to avoid a naked, noisy default, so they are dressing it up as 'voluntary' or ‘soft’. But they can’t disguise the fact that Greece has bills it can’t pay. On the 20 March it needs to come up with 14.4 billion euros, followed by billions more in the months following. That is more than 6% of national GDP. It would be as though the US had to pay a trillion dollars.
Where’s the money to come from? The European Central Bank? The IMF? The Germans? Maybe. But little by little, even the fixers are beginning to realise that this is a problem that can’t be fixed with Band-Aids and bail-outs. Greece has too much debt. About €100bn worth of it will have to go away or the country will never be solvent.
In the German magazine Der Spiegel: “When it comes to Greece, it’s clear that it’s hopeless. It would be better for the country to finally leave the euro and transform its foreign debts to drachma, than to constantly beg for new aid and set itself up for lasting charity”.
The fixers and the fixees are meeting, trying to figure out who takes the loss. It is a little like a divorce. If they can get everyone to cooperate, the whole thing will go fairly smoothly. If not, it could be a disaster. The resulting tussle could bring down not just Greek debt, but the debt of Italy, Spain and even France.
Across all OECD countries, public debt-to-GDP ratios now average 100%. This leaves them all vulnerable. At 5% interest, they have to devote one 20th of their output to servicing old debt. If they have tax revenues of 20% of GDP, it means that a quarter of their revenues must be used to cover the debt. If interest rates don’t rise, they can hold on. But if they are still running deficits larger than their growth rates, the situation is hopeless.
In America, for example, the deficit – in terms of GDP – is increasing at three times the rate of the economy beneath it.
Already, most of the big banks in Europe and America are probably insolvent. Without artificial support from the authorities they would probably be unable to survive a crisis. Trouble is, the authorities have no real support to give. Most of the nations of the developed world are insolvent too. They can shuffle along now but could not survive a run on their bonds.
The great hope of the feds around the world is that they can stave off a crisis – by supplying beaucoup cash to the banks who use much of the money to buy the feds’ bonds. The longer they can prevent a day of reckoning, the more likely these debtors will be able to grow their way out of trouble.
But debt suppresses growth. When debt-to-GDP levels rise to over 90%, growth declines, sharply.
Wait, there is more. Even before debt became such a big problem, real growth had already begun to disappear from the developed world. There has been none in Japan for the last 20 years and almost no real growth in the US private sector for the last ten years. In Europe, grosso modo, the story is similar. And in America, all the glories of technology, capitalism, financial engineering and democracy have been unable to add a single penny to the average working man’s hourly wages over the last 40 years.
Receive Bill Bonners free Daily email 'The Daily Reckoning' straight to your inbox
Why? Nobody knows for sure. We have a two-part hypothesis:
• Zombification - The process of decline was described by Professor Mansur Olson of the University of Maryland. Special interests and lobbyists manage to subvert the political system so as to get favours for themselves. These giveaways and privileges cost money and lower output. The economy gradually becomes less dynamic and less able to increase wealth.
Another professor, Meghnad Desai, from the London School of Economics, says western capitalism has gone “geriatric”. “Dynamic capitalism, with its energy, innovation and sheer greed for growth has moved east,” he says.
A geriatric, zombified economy cannot produce real growth.
• Declining marginal utility of oil - A modern economy is the fruit of oil. But the oil-burning machines that make the economy so productive were almost all invented before we were born, and put into service, in the developed countries, after WWII. Since the ‘70s, improvements in the machinery have been incremental and insufficient to offset the rising costs of oil.
If these hypotheses are correct, there will be no significant growth in the developed world – not until the zombies are thrown out and/or a new technological breakthrough dramatically increases productivity.
And more thoughts
• We were suspicious of the recent improvement in the unemployment numbers. And of the news that consumers were going into debt to shop, again. The data were inconsistent with the “Great Correction.”
Besides, US bond yields have kept going down, with the ten-year US note reaching a yield of only 1.87% last week. Bonds were confirming the Great Correction, in other words.
David Rosenberg explains:
Everyone focuses so much on the “headline” data points that they miss what is happening beneath the surface. In actuality, the jobs market in the U.S. remains in horrible shape. It has now been 30 months since the recession officially ended, and the labour force has contracted by nearly 1 million — 170,000 in just the past two months! This is unprecedented and is not about aging boomers dropping out of the workforce since they are being forced to try to extend their careers because they so desperately need the income as an antidote to the lost wealth endured by two bubbles that burst barely eight years apart.
This phenomenon speaks to throngs of discouraged people withdrawing from the work force. What is normal — the average of the past nine recoveries — is that by now, 3.5 million folks have entered the labour force to find a job because opportunity abounds. That is missing this time around, and now we see the Challenger data suggesting a drop in hirings, the JOLTS data showing a pickup in firings and the NFIB survey pointing to a renewed decline in job openings.
The labour force participation rate was 65.7% when the recession ended, and today it is 64% — this is totally weird and explains why the unemployment rate is now a meaningless statistic — it is really closer to 12% than the posted 8.5%. And it is this weak labour market that explains why it is that during this recovery, real median incomes are down 5.1% which, by the way, is even more profound than the 3.2% drop during the recession itself (according to a new Sentier Research report).
• At the Washington Post, Jonathan Turley, gives us: 10 reasons the U.S. is no longer the land of the free.
• Don't miss Bill's next Daily Reckoning. To receive the next article straight into your inbox as soon as he's written it,
sign up to the email list here .
Published in
European economy
| More
articles
by
Bill Bonner
Related articles
-
By Matthew Lynn, May 25, 2012
-
By Bill Bonner, May 24, 2012
FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment email
Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.