The easiest way to bet on a falling euro

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek May 17, 2010

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (22) Print this article

The big story in Britain last week was the fact that Gordon Brown finally relinquished power to a new management team. And for the British people, it was very good news indeed.

The bad news is that, for the rest of the world and investors in general, Britain's election is something of a sideshow. The plight of Europe remains the story hogging all the financial headlines, and has been a key factor in last week's widespread sell-offs.

To be more exact, investors are fretting over exactly how long it will take before Greece is forced to admit defeat in repaying its debts, and what that will mean for the euro and the rest of Europe.

The short answer is – nothing good...

The Greek rescue package is not enough

Recommended reading

How to play Europe with minimal risk
Four of Europe's most solid stocks
How to take cover as Europe implodes

When Europe's leaders finally shook hands on a Greek bail-out deal last Monday morning, they must have thought they'd hit those evil 'speculators' right where it hurt.

The rescue package, agreed hurriedly over the weekend, was described as €750bn-worth of "shock and awe", in the ridiculously gung-ho language of the financial world. And the markets rebounded sharply for, oh, at least a day.

But anyone watching the reaction of the euro would have realised that it wasn't enough. After a short-lived rally, it ended the day no higher than it had begun. And it spent the rest of the week plumbing fresh depths, hitting a 14-month low against the dollar on Friday.

The markets followed rapidly as they twigged that the bailout package wasn't a solution. The problem in Europe is that there isn't enough "shock" or indeed, "awe" in the world to deal with its debt crisis.

For one thing, plenty of important eurozone figures still don't seem to 'get it'. As The Sunday Times reports, Olli Rehn, Europe's economic and monetary affairs commissioner, said that the €750bn loan mechanism should "be made so unattractive that no EU leader will resort to it."

I applaud Rehn's concerns about 'moral hazard' – the danger that if other profligate states see Greece being bailed out painlessly, then they'll be less inclined to put their house in order.

Greece can't repay its debts

But there's a problem here. Greece simply can't repay its debts. As German paper Die Tageszeitung puts it (translation courtesy of Spiegel Online): "Some euro states are already caught in the debt trap. Greece has already been hit by the 'interest' effect. The country can only pay the interest on its loans by taking out more loans… at some point the only thing left will be insolvency."

So it's all very well talking about moral hazard now, but it's too late for that. Greece got away with macro-economic murder for years, and it's too late to try to turn it into a model eurozone citizen now.

If Greece wants to at least keep rolling over its debt in the short-term, it will be forced to resort to this €750bn 'crisis mechanism', whether it wants to or not. But as John Mauldin puts it, "at the end of the day, Greece will just have more debt." And at some point, some of the people who have loaned that money to Greece, be it the European taxpayer or the European banking system, are going to end up losing it.


Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: When will house prices bottom out - and how will you know?

  • Why UK property prices are going to fall 50%
  • When it will be time to get back in and buy up half price property

So if Europe's leaders had really wanted to get ahead of this crisis, they should have been talking about realistic propositions for Greece restructuring its debt (i.e. paying back less than it owes, probably over a longer period of time.) That way the market could have started to price in the worst-case scenario with a bit more clarity.

But as it stands, investors don't know what to think. They're pretty sure that anyone holding parcels of Greek debt when the music stops will get stung. Beyond that, their imaginations can run riot. Will Spanish debtors be next? Will a country try to break away? Or will the whole of Europe move closer to political union, learning to live with a currency that's closer to the drachma than to the deutschemark?

Under the circumstances, you can see why the euro has tanked.

A weak euro is bad news for Britain's recovery

That leads to another big problem. A weak euro may seem like good news for German exporters. It makes their goods cheaper on the world market. Trouble is, the weak euro is just a symptom of a weak eurozone. As countries across the eurozone try to force through austerity packages, their consumers will buy less. Given that Germany exports 60% of its goods to Europe, that can't be good for their economy. As Die Tageszeitung puts it: "The EU could, therefore, be facing a double-dip recession."

In turn, that just means a weaker euro. And in case you're wondering, a weak eurozone economy combined with a plunging euro would also put paid to all those hopes of a manufacturing-led British recovery too.

Mauldin reckons that "the euro is on its way to parity with the dollar." He's far from alone in that prediction, especially after last week. But I see no reason to disagree. We suggested shorting the euro against the dollar at the start of this year, and it's been a winning move so far. It seems likely to continue, though as usual, if you're spread betting, be careful and watch out for volatile moves and unexpected government intervention. If you don't have a spread betting account and fancy trying your hand, you can find a provider here.

The easiest way to bet on a falling euro

But if you're looking for a less risky way to bet on the euro falling, you could do worse than simply buy gold. There are still many sceptics on the yellow metal around – which is a good sign – but I think it's fair to say that this latest bout of fear over paper money has given gold a new spring in its step.

The gold price hit new records in euros and dollars last week. And if you need any more convincing that its 'safe haven' properties are starting to tempt investors, try this: "The Austrian Mint… sold more gold in the two weeks from April 26th than in the entire first quarter of the year because of soaring demand in Europe," reported Reuters last week.

Apparently, demand came "exclusively from Europe" said the mint's marketing director Kerry Tattersall. "That's a clear sign that there is panic buying because of concerns about Greece and the euro… Currently we don't have anything in stock. We sell our entire daily production immediately."

It's enough to make you want to run to your nearest bullion dealer.

Our recommended article for today

Three funds to ride out Europe's crisis

The ECB is practising quantitative easing in all but name. So what should an investor do? Stock up on assets with good global franchises and solid balance sheets, says Merryn Somerset Webb. Here, she tips three funds to do just that.

Comments (22)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Roger

    (17 May 2010, 11:02AM)  Complain about this comment

    Do you have to make constant party political snipes in your emails? This incessant Labour-bashing is petty and irritating. Not all your readers are Tories, and if you stopped to think about the cause of this financial crisis - the banking sector - you would realise that the fault lies not with the previous government but with the some of the people who you're trying to appeal to with your political point-scoring. Drop the politics and stick to economics, or we'll drop you.

  • 2. CBQ

    (17 May 2010, 11:19AM)  Complain about this comment

    It's surely not a political point to say Britain is better off without Gordon Browen at the helm.

    It's just a statement of fact,

    Look at what he did to the economy over the last 13 years. A Chancellor who actually believed it is possible to get rid of economic cycles (or boom and bust as he called them).

    It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic.

  • 3. david

    (17 May 2010, 11:28AM)  Complain about this comment

    The snips at the labour party are objective. They were living in denile, trying to hang onto power by fiddling the books and kidding the uk masses. If you 'roger' voted for labour then you are in some way to blame for the mess we are in. Like when gordon brown sold off the uk's gold at $200 an onze - he was a muppet!!. I have mates who work in the city and saw the sub prime disaster happenig 18 months before it did. How comes labour did not see it ?? - they have retarded intellect. Communist/socialst views are great on paper but dont work in the real work. Survival of the fittest works, we should not have bailed out the banks or reduced the interest rates to 0.5. The forrest needs to burn before new trees can grow. You cannot buy your way out of dept and labour were creating poverty for our children with enormous interest payment. ps I don't vote

  • 4. Peter Kellow

    (17 May 2010, 12:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    Stop this bickering.

    But it is all John's fault for saying Cleggeron will be better than Brown. Jesus! Do we have memories that short. Some of us had to try and survive during the last Tory government. There is nothing to suggest this one will be any better. It won't be

    The whole lot, ConLib and Labour, are still under the sway of a bankrupt neoliberalism. Thatcherism casts a long shadow, but they are still trying to use it as a light

  • 5. Stocks72

    (17 May 2010, 12:26PM)  Complain about this comment

    Moneyweek has been insisting on buying gold, but it forgot just one thing, in connection with the rescue package for the Greece, the ECB can be forced to sell gold soon.I have already said some times here, the gold invertors will burn their fingers until the end of this year.

    As for Euro, hopefully, it can rise in near future again,otherwise we will see a strong yuan.

  • 6. Roger

    (17 May 2010, 01:11PM)  Complain about this comment

    John - if you think that letting the banks fail would have got us out of this mess, then you are deluded. Think it through.

  • 7. IJ

    (17 May 2010, 01:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    While no fan of Brown, I would agree that the UK's problems run deeper than Brown and New Labour.

    But a bigger gripe I have is the sheer disdain MW appears to show for Europe. What makes you so sure you're the ones who "get it"? Reading MW on the subject, you'd think that the entire continent is made up of half-wits and 3-year olds. There are phenomenal brains on the other side of the argument, at the ECB, at the IMF et al, who I'll wager have a deeper understanding of the crisis than do MW or John Mauldin and who yet don't see Europe and the euro's demise as a foregone conslusion. You're entitled to your view, shared by the entire British media, but how about at least giving some space to the other side of the argument?

    Secondly, why does a weaker Euro somehow equate to its demise? Let's not forget the € has traded as low as $0.8. Then too, the consensus was that it wouldn't survive, and the consensus was wrong.

  • 8. Mike

    (17 May 2010, 02:35PM)  Complain about this comment

    What a lot of nonsense you talk Roger - spending more money than you have coming in is the shortest route to the poor house. The banking sector didn't cause the current crisis - it was lack of regulation caused by politicians who wanted the taxes from bank profits to fund their tax and spend fiscal programs. To draw an analogy - if you put a child in a sweet shop don't be surprised if they gorge themselves until they are ill. The fault lies squarely with the Labour Government. They could have regulated properly and didn't.

  • 9. Alex

    (17 May 2010, 02:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    Actually the banking crises was triggered by a piece of rather daft, rather obscure accounting legislation brought in ( and rapidly repealed ) by the US SEC called FAS 157, we adopted it in the UK and Europe because we all have to follow the lead of the US in market legislation.

    Having said that Gordon Brown was an appalling PM and a terrible chancellor.

  • 10. Alex

    (17 May 2010, 03:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    I have a theory, 'Roger'.....you are infact Gordon Brown posting under a pseudonym aren't you?

  • 11. dogFM

    (17 May 2010, 03:28PM)  Complain about this comment

    Alex - you're onto him. I wondered what he'd do once he'd retired now we know. Sign in to forums incognito & still hold the party line :)

  • 12. Stephen B

    (17 May 2010, 03:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree with Jim O'Neill on the euro that it may have had its devaluation, and it might be time to take the winnings from this trade.
    When something becomes taken for granted, the contrarian in me tells me to get out (for the time being at least).

  • 13. Alex

    (17 May 2010, 04:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree with you Stephen. The time to short the Euro was 2 months ago when many analysts were in all seriouness forecasting 1.60 at the mid-year target for the Euro/$ fx rate. Now with everyone forecasting parity it's looking like a fading trade.

    A contrarian FX trade right now would be to do the opposite to a recent recommendation on here and short the Loonie versus the $ with a target rate of 1.10 ....I think a tumble in China would/will hit perceptions of the Canadian economy rather hard, and at almost parity to the $ I think the Loonie has had it's run.

  • 14. IJ

    (17 May 2010, 04:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree with Stephen and Alex too. One would feel a right mug shorting the Euro now and being wrong. I don't trade currencies, but how about shorting the Yen instead... against just about anything? Doesn't Japan have its own mountain of debt, severe structural weaknesses? Yet the currency has been pretty strong of late, perceived as a safe haven which is surely wrong. You'd think at least there's limited downside

  • 15. Roberto Birquet

    (17 May 2010, 07:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    This politics is boring me too. The snips at the labour party are not objective, but subjective - by definition.
    If 'roger' voted for labour, you areto blame for the mess we are in....Maybe Roger did not take damned awful decisions as many people in the Free Market did. Buying houses at 7x salaries etc. Maybe that was you.
    And this one is really boring me: Like when gordon brown sold off the uk's gold at $200 an onze - muppet!!.... Thatcher sold the family silver, used our petroleum reserves to pay for unemployment. We could go on!

  • 16. julian

    (17 May 2010, 07:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    Mike is nearly right. People like Roger are to blame for the financial crisis. To paraphrase an old labour poster campaign, "Roger caused Britain's debt crisis. By (presumably)voting labour he helped ensure that Britain went from a surplus to a 12% deficit in 13 years".

  • 17. Roberto Birquet

    (17 May 2010, 07:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    note to Mike and other hear nothing, see nothing I don't want to: David Cameron 2006 on light regulation of the banks and the success of the City:
    Conservative decisions' when the Tories were in government. It proved that 'light regulation' and 'low regulation' were 'keys to success'.
    2007 speech at the LSE: 'The debate is now settled.' 'Liberalism' had prevailed. The left's silly idea that markets required tight regulation had been thoroughly discredited. 'The result? The world economy more stable than for a generation.'...hugely sophisticated financial markets match funds with ideas better than ever before'.
    Indeed! And now we have him. All is well!

  • 18. John72

    (18 May 2010, 10:11AM)  Complain about this comment

    I believe it is to late too be telling people to short the euro now - this trade is dead.

    Roger, (Gordon) I agree that letting the banks fail would not necessarily have gotten us out of this mess, however, the weak banks should have been allowed to go the path of least resistance. The government should not prop up industry, be it banks, or cars. I have to subsidise a weak car industry with my taxes and I have to subsidise weak banks with my taxes. It's bad enough having to pay salaries for pointless government jobs.
    Let supply and demand dictate who survives and who fails. You've probably read this before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cliff_Clavin
    Governments have a responsibility to certain industries & sectors such as defence and education, not banks & cars. The feeble turn to the government with every whim and their agony aunt is now out of power.

  • 19. hutch

    (20 May 2010, 11:45AM)  Complain about this comment

    The problem lies with the last Labour government not doing what it was elected to do, and that is govern and regulate. The bankers are equally to blame, but governments must do what they are there for and govern! I get slightly annoyed to hear MP's saying that we should have less state intervention, and let the markets decide. Capitalism is like Liberalism if taken to the Nth degree it will self destruct......and that is just what happened. I'm no lover of governments interviening in eveything......the problem is they intervene in the trivia and leave serious matters to "someone else" and that is why we now find ourselves in this mess.

  • 20. Nigel

    (20 May 2010, 09:19PM)  Complain about this comment

    I remember the election in 1979 won my Margaret Thatcher. Two leaflets dropped through my door, one from the Tories and one from Labour. The Tories leaflet said what they were going to do, the labour leaflet merely slagged off the conservatives. Regrettably, the conservatives have recently started to do more of this, but Labour have not changed - they rarely say what they are going to do, but spend hours trying to tell you what the other parties are going to do. Individuals in Money week are perfectly entitled to express a view, be it political or not.

    Labour told captains of industry they had been deceived (i.e. that they are stupid, they then told us that the conservatives budget didn't add up (i.e that the conservatives are stupid) and finally they then have to tell us what the policies of the other parties are (impying we the electorate are stupid). Unfortunately for labour, we are not stupid - they lost.

  • 21. Magi

    (22 May 2010, 01:01AM)  Complain about this comment

    Well Gordon well and truly cooked his goose with his encounter
    with gillian duffy, when she asked him about all the immigrants
    coming into the uk, he said well we may have a million coming in,
    but there is also a million leaving, except he failed to mention that
    that the million coming in were economic immigrants and the people
    leaving were the ones with the money. His replies to her questions
    were truly pathetic and patronizing. We had a glimpse of the real
    Gordon that day and it showed what a nasty piece of work he is.

  • 22. mike

    (22 May 2010, 09:53AM)  Complain about this comment

    Some things do strike me about this party political debate, a conserative government in the US allowed companies to sell mortgages knowing full well they were never going to be repaid. A labour government from the UK acted in exactly the same way,to suggest that that these governments did not know for at least the last last two years what was going to come now and in the future is naive.
    Once they started to realise what had happened it was to late and it was damage limitation, would Gordon Brown honestly bother himself to post on this site I think not, much like Gorge Bush they will both be immune from financial hardships that face millions of unemployed people and the millions more to come.
    The financial system we live in relies on boom and bust economies, we expanded to fast to much to quickly with false credit and a minority made a lot of money.
    The worst is yet to come.......

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>