Why the stock market rally could run out of cash

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Feb 22, 2010

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (5) Print this article

Since the start of 2010, the world's stock markets have taken more abuse than an unwary aide at 10 Downing Street.

From fears over a Greek default and the collapse of the euro, to worries over tightening monetary policy in China and even the US, the warning signs are coming thick and fast that the end of the party is drawing near.

Yet the market's not ready to give up the ghost yet. Investors seem to have taken last week's gentle hike in one Federal Reserve interest rate as a sign that things are getting back to normal.

To the bulls, it's good news however you look at it. On the one hand, it's not a particularly strenuous tightening measure, and the Fed says it has no plans to up other rates soon. On the other hand, the fact that the central bank felt it could spring a surprise like this at all suggests Ben Bernanke is confident in the future.

But we wouldn't be so sure about that...

Money printing has done little to kick-start the economy

Stock markets seem to have recovered their poise. The initial shock over the Fed hiking its 'discount' rate (Interest rates are rising in the US) from 0.5% to 0.75% has given way to new optimism. Yes, rates are rising. But it's a 'technical' move. And the Fed has no plans to raise rates soon. And it's good that it can even think about getting back to normal anyway.

But the trouble is that monetary conditions are nowhere near normal. The Fed has been printing money like mad. Yet there's still little sign that all the money printing has actually done much to kick-start the broader economy.

In fact, Jamie Dannhauser of Lombard Street Research argued earlier this month that the rally in markets hasn't been down to "excess liquidity" being pumped into them at all. He points out that the money supplies in the US, Europe and Japan have been "at best, flat." In other words, all the pumping isn't actually getting money into the 'real' economy.

He says that the rebound has been purely down to investors breathing a sigh of relief. The world didn't end, and so stocks have rebounded. That's not to say that slashing interest rates hasn't had any effect. Near-zero rates have boosted share and other asset prices because they make cash seem unattractive compared to almost anything else. "Investors fled to cash in the wake of the Lehman debacle (i.e. demand to hold money rocketed); as panic ebbed away, investors found themselves sitting on spare cash and subsequently rebalanced their portfolios in favour of risky assets."

Banks have become black holes

The trouble is, says Dannhauser, that this can't last. If the money supply isn't expanding, then at some point, the rally will simply run out of cash to fuel it. "A sustainable bull market requires consistent growth in the supply of money… without growth in the money stock, any 'excess' cash will quickly be used up and the rally will stall."


Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: When will house prices bottom out - and how will you know?

  • Why UK property prices are going to fall 50%
  • When it will be time to get back in and buy up half price property


And we seem to be approaching that position. In January, the Bank of America/Merrill Lynch fund manager survey showed that "cash ratios are exceptionally low". They're not quite as low as they were at the stock market peak in October 2007. But back then, says Dannhauser, money supply was still growing at double-digit rates. Now the M3 broad money supply in the US for example, is shrinking rapidly, falling by 5.6% over the past three months or so.

MoneyWeek regular James Ferguson has been pointing out the threat posed by the shrinking money supply for months. If you're a regular reader, you'll know James's arguments by now. If not, you can refresh your memory here.

The short version is that despite the best efforts of the central banks and government, banks are reluctant to lend. For one thing, their current and potential dodgy debts are too high. So what they really want to do is offload risky assets (such as home loans), not take more on. And on top of this, regulators are tightening up on rules governing how much capital banks have to hold on to, which is also forcing them to be more cautious.

In effect, the banks have become black holes, sucking in whatever money the government can throw at them. "The basic point," says Dannhauser, "is that while banks continue to deleverage and money supplies move sideways, risk assets remain extremely vulnerable to a change in risk appetite."

Why we're betting on the dollar to keep rising

When that happens, whatever the trigger, then investors will run to the safest havens they know. And the fact that the US has even hinted at higher interest rates, suggests that the dollar will be one of those havens during the next spasm of fear.

So we'd be betting on the dollar continuing to strengthen this year, regardless of the longer-term picture for the currency (for more on how high it might go, see my colleague Dominic Frisby's piece from last week: The euro's plunge shows why you should hold gold). The euro meanwhile is likely to remain under pressure as more twists and turns appear over the Greek saga.

As for sterling – after last week's grim news on the public sector deficit for January, the picture for the pound is looking increasingly grim. It's going to become more and more vulnerable to bad news on the political or economic front. And if traders decide at any point that the euro is more the currency of Germany than that of Greece, then they may well shift their gaze to sterling. As Dominic noted last week, it's another reason to hold on to gold.

Our recommended article for today

One small-cap tech stock to keep an eye on

The market for mobile phones in developed countries is saturated. But in Africa and Latin America, it's a different story. Tom Bulford looks at one company that hopes to cash in on the growth of mobile internet in emerging markets.

Comments (5)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. dr ray

    (22 February 2010, 11:33AM)  Complain about this comment

    Surely a shrinking money supply and a rising dollar are bad news for gold. How do you support the stance taken by all the moneyweek contributors on the advice to buy gold

  • 2. Stephen B

    (22 February 2010, 11:36AM)  Complain about this comment

    I suppose the main question would be: why would governments stop printing money anyhow? It allows them to bolster their electability by keeping money circulating, as well as according with a longer-term strategy of cutting debts through inflation. The main problem is that the banks are choosing not to lend, but there are already plans to create state-owned banks which will provide loans to businesses, following the German model. I agree with the gold argument, but the dollar is no safe haven, and it may have enjoyed its bounce.

  • 3. Bob Roberts

    (22 February 2010, 12:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    Let me guess, all this will happen in 2014 - the markets will keep rising until them and anyone who does not invest will lose out just as they lost out on houses and the market rebound.

    I have been a big fan of Moneyweek for years but I am getting pretty fed up reading all these doom and gloom 'next week, next month, next year' articles. Every time I believe them I wake up the next morning and hear that the markets have risen again and again and again....

    They will just keep on printing, eroding savings and inflating us out of this disaster so perhaps the thing to do is to jump on the bandwagon for now... as much as it pains me to say that!?

  • 4. Stocks72

    (22 February 2010, 08:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree with Bod Roberts´s comments. Moneyweek with this article is too pessimistic , we know that the industrial production and exports are increasing in the USA. This is a signal of economic recovery and that the stockmarkets party will not end too soon. The direction of stockmarkets are also given by some emerging markets such as Brazil.

  • 5. IJ

    (23 February 2010, 10:49AM)  Complain about this comment

    I too find this commentary excessively negative, and overly general. Among the asset classes that tend to get pilloried on this site (banks, corporate bonds), there is value to be found, and one doesn't even need to be particularly bullish to see it. For example, if you're bullish on the dollar, then there is plenty of short-maturity USD-denominated EM corporate debt that offers yields still in high single digits with minimal default risk. Not what they were, but a lot better than what you get in USD cash.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>