How to cope with the market's mood swings

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Jul 22, 2010

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (6) Print this article

Ben Bernanke disappointed markets yesterday.

The chairman of the Federal Reserve was pretty cagey about the prospects of any further quantitative easing (QE) or any other form of looser monetary policy. In his six-monthly written testimony to Congress, he said: "we remain prepared to take further policy action as needed."

However, he also reckoned that US GDP growth would pick up from between 3% and 3.5% this year, to 3.5% to 4.5% next year.

Markets slid. The Dow ended the day down more than 100 points.

But wait a minute. Isn't it good news that Bernanke thinks the economy is going to grow faster?

Not really. Not from the point of view of the markets in any case...

Recommended reading

Bad news is good news again for markets

The fact that Bernanke isn't planning to splurge more money any time soon disappointed investors yesterday. As Paul Ashworth of Capital Economics put it: "We suspect that equity markets were looking for a bit more than Bernanke or the FOMC [Federal Open Market Committee] is willing to offer."

For stock markets, we seem to be back in the "bad news is good news" mode. Bad economic news means that the Fed ends up under pressure to pump even more cheap money into the markets. So people buy in, anticipating further QE-inspired gains.

If Bernanke instead sticks to his script of economic recovery, then that means no more cheap money for now. Hence yesterday's deflated market.

But at least the economy's getting better, eh? Well, again we'd take that with a pinch of salt. Bernanke and central bankers in general aren't known for posting gloomy outlooks until it's blindingly clear that we're all in trouble.

We suspect the economic data will continue to deteriorate. And that Bernanke will be digging out his tool box to find new ways to try to prop it up before too long.

But with the market swinging from high to low, dependent largely on central bankers' actions and forecasts, then what can the average investor do with their money?

The markets have divided investors: what can you do?

My colleague Dominic Frisby noted yesterday that these are what he describes as "traders' markets". And Jeremy Grantham of US fund manager GMO makes much the same point in his latest quarterly update.

Grantham describes what we're in as a "fearful, speculative market." On the one hand, everyone knows that Bernanke "clearly belongs to the old Greenspan put camp". In other words, he'll keep interest rates low for as long as he can.

That's good news for the more short-term players in the market. "In such a world, aggressive hedge funds can leverage easily, and in their drive to make money, will emphasise more aggressive or speculative investments."

However, it takes more than low rates to help an economy recover (it could even be damaging, though that's a discussion for another day). And if you're an ordinary investor, then low rates "merely produce a feeling… somewhere between dejection and desperation."


Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: When will house prices bottom out - and how will you know?

  • Why UK property prices are going to fall 50%
  • When it will be time to get back in and buy up half price property

You might recognise this feeling yourself. British savers can't get a real return (that is, after accounting for inflation) on their savings anymore. Particularly not now that National Savings & Investments has pulled its index-linked savings certificates. (For more on this, and what to do about it, see my colleague Ruth Jackson's piece here: The sneaky way to beat inflation today).

So if you stick your money in the bank, with inflation where it is just now, you're certain to lose money. Trouble is, everything else you can invest in carries the risk of losing much more. We've been tipping big, blue-chip dividend payers as a good investment for months now. And if you're talking about your retirement fund, money that you're not going to need for ten years or more, then I think that's a good bet, as I'll explain later.

But if you're trying to save towards some relatively short-term goal, where you need the money on a specific date, and can't afford to take big losses, then stocks just aren't suitable. They're too risky for your house deposit, or your private school fees fund.

So the current market is a tussle between these two camps. For the aggressive end of the market, low rates are like a triple espresso. They're fired up on cheap money and moral hazard, and ready to trade. For the conservative end, fearful for the economy, their savings, and their jobs, low rates act more like a fistful of valium. They feel helpless and desperate for a safe place to put their money.

Stick with defensive blue chips for the long run

How do you invest amid this turmoil? Simple. Ignore the noise, and look at what's cheap. As Grantham points out, all the risky stuff, such as small caps and highly indebted companies – the sort of thing that the aggressive, short-term investors like – has been outperforming. The stocks that more conservative investors tend to favour – the high quality blue chips in other words – haven't done so well.

And it's possible that they'll continue to underperform for some time. But if we're wrong, and this recovery is genuine and the only way is up from here, then that'll be good news for big companies along with the others. Profits and sales will go up.

If we're right, and we're heading into another slump, then most shares will suffer, but defensives will bear up a lot better than the riskier stuff. At a recent Roundtable, we had a group of investment experts tip their top stocks for volatile times – subscribers can read it here: 13 stocks to protect your wealth in volatile markets. If you're not already a subscriber, get your first three copies free here.

Our recommended article for today

The 'invisible' penny share fuelling China's growth

This small-cap engineering firm exports specialist equipment for power stations, with a lot of its business going to China. It has been around for nearly 200 years, yet it is 'invisible' to most investors, says Tom Bulford.

Comments (6)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Jim

    (22 July 2010, 11:36AM)  Complain about this comment

    I suspect that Bernanke is playing it safe.

    No matter what he says someone is going to react to it, so he has to "sound" upbeat otherwise... repercussions!

  • 2. James

    (22 July 2010, 12:53PM)  Complain about this comment

    The problem with moving into defensive stocks is that it is based on two underlying assumptions:

    1. They will pay a decent divident
    2. Any short-term dive in price will be recovered over the long-term
    3. The combination of the two will make a decent return after inflation and tax

    I wont go into detail on inflation and tax but if they pay, say, a 5% dividend and the markets tank indiscrimnately by 30% including defensives - where does that leave the value of savings? One could be looking at a number of years of effectively negative returns before recovering back to the original valation even if the dividend is paid consistently. That's not the 7% "medium term" return pension companies use to provide likely valuations at point of retirment. Might as well buy another guitar and earn my pension by busking on the street.

  • 3. ricardo

    (22 July 2010, 01:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    James, You could equally well base the case for Higher-yielding big cap defensives on these two assumptions :-

    1. They will pay a dividend that beats inflation and any savings rate that you could get from any bank over the long term.

    2. Any short-term dive in price will hold up pretty well compared to the rest of the market.

    3. The combination of points 1 & 2 will make a decent return over the long term.

  • 4. chris

    (22 July 2010, 03:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    Perhaps lots those "defensives" are not such good companies to invest into then ? And why would you assume small companies are risky ? If you can't cope with "mood swings", you should not be investing.

  • 5. Rogerthebodger

    (22 July 2010, 05:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    Volatility brings opportunity

  • 6. Allen

    (29 September 2010, 10:28AM)  Complain about this comment

    Nice blog...I appreciate you for the details...

    http://www.bullrally.com/

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>