Three signs that the stock market rally is on borrowed time

By Associate Editor David Stevenson Oct 29, 2010

David Stevenson

Share with
friends:

Comments (23) Print this article

Yesterday was another 'risk on' day in the stock market. The FTSE 100 rose 0.6% as investors' nerves were calmed by a lower US dollar. When this falls, most other assets rise.

This week, though, there's been a wobble about QE2 - the next round of quantitative easing, aka money printing. Market rumours are that the US Federal Reserve will now print less money than had been expected.

For global share prices, that was seen as bad news. Wall Street and the City want more, as Dominic Frisby talked about yesterday.

But just how much QE hype is baked into stock values? The answer is worrying. Let's have a look...

US sentiment indicators point to a drop

In stock markets (as in life) anticipation is often better than reality.

So on the basis of the stock market rally after the last QE bout, maybe it's no great shock to see share prices climb on both sides of the Atlantic in the hope of plenty more. That's even though we still don't know how it will all play out in kick-starting the US economy.

But this hasn't stopped Joe Public getting very excited about what the Fed may or may not announce at its meeting next week. And there's a great way of gauging this. Each week, the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) Sentiment Survey measures the percentage of individual investors who are bullish, bearish, and neutral on the stock market for the next six months.

If we subtract the 'bear' from the 'bull' reading, we get a net balance of market optimists. And history shows that the higher this balance rises, the further the market has climbed into dangerous territory. In other words, the keener private punters are on the US market, the closer it is to a big drop.

And when the US market sneezes…

What's more, the US and UK stock markets tend to move in lock step. What starts in the States soon rubs off over here. That means this AAII survey is as good a guide for the FTSE 100 as it is for the Dow Jones and the S&P 500 indices.

The blue line on the chart below shows the percentage of bullish respondents in the latest AAII survey, minus the proportion of bears. The red line is the FTSE 100 index. The 'bulls-bears' balance has now hit +30. That's the highest level for more than three years, going right back to 2007's market peaks.

Whenever the net balance has risen as high as this, the message for the overall market has been clear. It's time to take cover - the average FTSE 100 fall has been around 17% in quite short order. Despite all the QE hype, history tells us that this is a time to be very wary.


Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: Don't be fooled - house prices will fall again!

  • Why UK property prices are set to collapse by 30%
  • When it will be time to get back in and buy up dirt cheap property

Investors may be all spent out

In addition, investors are getting through their spare cash. The next chart again has the FTSE 100 in red. This time it's compared with the monthly change in sterling and money market deposits (in purple).

Note that the latter is displayed in ten-month moving average format. That may sound complex, but in essence it smoothes out the volatile monthly numbers. I've used it as a proxy for how much of investors' money is sitting around waiting to go into stock or bond markets.

Cash balances were actually built up during the market's recovery between 2003 and 2007, and topped out during the 2008/early 2009 crash. But since then, money market funds have been ploughed into the markets. Indeed, the cash change has now gone negative, meaning liquidity is being consumed. This doesn't bode well for stocks.

Meanwhile, US money market funds show a similar picture. But as ordinary American investors have been piling into the market, whose shares have they been buying? Here's the really scary bit I mentioned earlier. In the US, there's been a mega-boom… in 'insider' selling.

And insiders are bailing out too

What's this? First, it isn't to be confused with insider dealing, where people get locked up for using privileged information to make illegal profits. In the US, the term 'insiders' is used to describe directors, key employees and large shareholders. They can trade at certain times provided they don't do so using "material non-public" knowledge.

I'm not going to get stuck into too much compliance stuff here. But clearly, legal insiders will still have a head start when it comes to knowing how a business is really doing. So when these insiders deal - as with directors in the UK - it's well worth noting what they do.

And right now, "insider selling is as high as we have ever seen", says Alan Newman - many thanks for this - in his Crosscurrents newsletter. Further, he calculates the ratio of insider selling to buying is a terrifying 3,177 shares sold compared with each share bought.

This "frantic dumping" shows just where "the true value for corporate insiders lies", says Alan - "in cashing out their own shares. Their actions speak volumes for the veracity of the current rally".

How investors should react

All in all, then, the market omens aren't looking good. So what can you do to protect your own money? Despite our concerns, there are still some investments we reckon are worthwhile holding (and I'm not just talking about gold!).

We look at several in one of our latest subscriber-only articles - it's well worth a look. I can't run through them here - that wouldn't be fair to subscribers. But if you are one of the latter you can read the article here - if you'd like to become one, get your first three copies of MoneyWeek magazine free here, plus instant access to everything on the website.

Our recommended article for today

The best play on renewable energy

'Alternative' energy is all well and good, but it can be unreliable - if the wind doesn't blow, the lights don't come on. But 'grid-scale' power storage is evolving rapidly. And that will change the economics of the industry, says Nick Hanna. Here, he tips the best way to invest.

Comments (23)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. SH

    (29 October 2010, 12:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    Good article, thanks David. Add to this that ICI in the US reported the 25th consecutive week of equity fund net outflows recently. Makes you wonder how many folk are left bouncing these stocks back and forth waiting for helicopter Ben's freshly minted cash. Retail investors out. Directors out. Makes me wary.
    Although the fact retail seems to have run to bond funds makes me very wary of those too! Very foggy outlook right now, dance very close to the door methinks...

  • 2. James

    (29 October 2010, 02:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    Let's put this latest prediction into perspective: back in July this year John stepek predicted further mighty falls when the FTSE 100 hit 4800, it then had it's sharpest rally this year crushing the bears and leaving those in cash looking forlornly at the markets. Back in March 2009, MW as a whole suggested we dump the kitchen sink and sell out - possibly the worst advice ever given the once in a generation rally that followed last year. MW as a whole has been banging the 'double dip' drum during the whole of 2010 and has been proved consistently incorrect - just look at the latest UK GDP numbers - twice consensus forecasts! Earnings of blue chips this year have consistently beaten expectations and are still doing so - even BA is back in profit! The bears have been crushed and the bulls are in charge this year. When you bang the bearish drum for long enough though, you will of course be right in the end.... Possibly 2011?

  • 3. Mike

    (29 October 2010, 03:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    James does indeed have a point.

    What happened after that death cross thingy that we were reading about earlier in the year. Carnage?

    I would like to see fantasy portfolios for each Money Week contributor, showing where they would have their fantasy money and when they would get out.

  • 4. Atchman

    (29 October 2010, 04:26PM)  Complain about this comment

    I guess in fairness to MW, their articles are 'fundmentals' focused and despite any QE inspired, algo driven rally madness in stocks of largely bankrupt companies these are at the end of the day reasonble grounds for concern. I personally have not been taking part in much of the rally madness since 2009 and am green with envy for those who did. Still having said all that, short lived gains in stocks will not make you rich in the long run unless you are a good and nimble trader. In the long run those who buy value stocks at discount and sell them when they are overbought tend to do best. I would be seller at these levels despite the confidence one might have gained from the 'new normal' of the QE epoch.

  • 5. IJ

    (29 October 2010, 04:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree with comments 2 and 3. Those who have been taking MW's advice are not in the market, those who are in the market have not been taking MW's advice. Surely neither group is likely to heed MW's advice now, so who exactly is this aimed at? Why not just stop trying to call the market and focus instead on individual investment opportunities. Calling the market is a mug's game, plus MW's market calls are ALWAYS highly consensual and therefore add no value. Everyone is expecting a correction now. I am not knocking the whole publication (there is some good stuff in it), but at the editorial level it's wrong time and again.

  • 6. IJ

    (29 October 2010, 05:04PM)  Complain about this comment

    Atchman - you can't divorce "fundamentals" from the QE, algo driven madness etc that you talk about. Do you think your "value" stocks would be worth much today either if governments hadn't acted as they did in 2008? There seems to be this idea that there is somehow a natural order to markets that has been violated in recent years. I'm not sure how accurate that is. Markets are a manmade construct, they have always been manipulated and affected by govenments to some degree or other. We always have to worry about whether, for example, some government somewhere is going to whack a huge tax on a sector somewhere that will hurt our investments. I'm really not sure I'm a big fan of the Fed either. But what can I do about it? All I can do is accept that the Fed is part of the "fundamentals" and deal with its actions as best I can. I think MW and many others are letting moral principles cloud their investment judgments. Markets and investing are amoral.

  • 7. Roger

    (30 October 2010, 11:24AM)  Complain about this comment

    Glad to see the "hedge fund guru" short selling China lose a few billion should he dare to hold his positions until now.

    The other little bears, good luck, put money where mouth is.

  • 8. Clive

    (30 October 2010, 05:26PM)  Complain about this comment

    "If we subtract the 'bear' from the 'bull' reading, we get a net balance of market optimists. And history shows that the higher this balance rises, the further the market has climbed into dangerous territory"

    I would suggest this is rubbish.

    Let's assume a period (not now) when the economy was doing nicely, so was inflation, no threat of wars etc etc. Bulls would clearly be predominant, yet you claim "bulls-bears" - which would almost certainly be a high value - would suggest a crash.

    Funny how you never apply your own rationale to the gold price, but keep banging on how it's the answer to everythin.

  • 9. Jim

    (31 October 2010, 07:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    I think MW is in one of those positions where either you report on something that may be important and then get hassle because it didn't go as reported. Or they do not report it and get blamed for not reporting on it.

    I wonder if this insider selling is maybe because they need the money, to forestall foreclosure perhaps?

    Another reason is that they may have had the shares for a particular reason and told they couldn't sell them for a specified period until now. I remember an RBS employee commenting on there shares they had earned and the restrictions on selling them.

  • 10. Jim

    (31 October 2010, 07:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    I think MW is in one of those positions where either you report on something that may be important and then get hassle because it didn't go as reported. Or they do not report it and get blamed for not reporting on it.

    I wonder if this insider selling is maybe because they need the money, to forestall foreclosure perhaps?

    Another reason is that they may have had the shares for a particular reason and told they couldn't sell them for a specified period until now. I remember an RBS employee commenting on there shares they had earned and the restrictions on selling them.

  • 11. Beta adjusted

    (01 November 2010, 02:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    Clive, totally wrong. Markets often do best when the economy is in a down-cycle and worst when the economy is at the peak of its cycle. The market is generally anticipatory and if you look at relevant charts of market performance vs interest rates, gdp growth etc. you will see this. However, they are not *perfectly* anticipatory, plenty were concerned in 2006 and 2007 and what about the internet stock bubble? markets can be irrational as can people.

  • 12. Beta adjusted

    (01 November 2010, 02:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    and IJ, what happened to long-term investing? MW has done remarkably well with a longer-term track record. I can say with a high level of conviction that if there is no QE2 announced by the fed markets will tank, on the other hand, if we get a 'shock and awe' package then markets will probably rally due to inflationary fears. The point is there is no way of assessing what the FED will do next. In the next few months there is no visibility. But over time, value-investing has worked time-and-time again due to structural inefficiencies (including that the market overpays for growth). Unfortunately near-term speculation over what the cost of capital is favours randomness (or nobody)

  • 13. IJ

    (01 November 2010, 04:37PM)  Complain about this comment

    Beta Adjusted - you may be surprised to hear I'm no fan of speculation or day trading. I favour stocks that trade on low multiples, pay dividends, with (ideally) growth as a free option. But my time horizon is a couple of years. That's because I have reservations about my ability to assess the long-term. The way I see it, to borrow from Keynes, just as in the long run we'll be dead, the terminal value of most companies we know today, "value" stock or not, is probably zero. It's very hard to tell, no? On the other hand, I completely disagree with your point re assessing the Fed's action. Why's it so hard? To me, based on recent history, what Bernanke says and does, the political cycle, and a cultural intolerance for economic pain in the US, it's clear that the Fed will print... and print more if necessary. I think that's an easier call to make than what the long-term value of a Vodafone or an Intel is - the latter involves far more guesswork.

  • 14. James

    (04 November 2010, 05:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    Speaking of stock market predictions, I wonder how professional investor Paul Hill's wager is doing?

    Quote:
    “I'm prepared to wager that, by autumn, the FTSE 100 will be trading in the 4,250-4,750 range”.

    http://www.moneyweek.com/investment-advice/share-tip-of-the-week-a-well-positioned-broker-47514.aspx

  • 15. nifty tips

    (23 September 2011, 11:12AM)  Complain about this comment

    It was a awe-inspiring post and it has a significant meaning and thanks for sharing the information.Would love to read your next post too......
    Regards
    nifty tips

  • 16. share market tips

    (24 September 2011, 07:10AM)  Complain about this comment

    I absolutely adore reading your blog posts, the variety of writing is smashing.

    This blog as usual was educational, I have had to bookmark your site and subscribe to your feed in i feed.

    Your theme looks lovely.Thanks for sharing.

    Share Market Tips

  • 17. commodity tips

    (24 September 2011, 09:22AM)  Complain about this comment

    I absolutely adore reading your blog posts, the variety of writing is smashing.

    This blog as usual was educational, I have had to bookmark your site and subscribe to your feed in i feed.

    Your theme looks lovely.Thanks for sharing.

    Commodity Tips

  • 18. commodity tips

    (24 September 2011, 09:38AM)  Complain about this comment



    I absolutely adore reading your blog posts, the variety of writing is smashing.

    This blog as usual was educational, I have had to bookmark your site and subscribe to your feed in i feed.

    Your theme looks lovely.Thanks for sharing.

    Commodity Tips

  • 19. stock market

    (24 September 2011, 11:02AM)  Complain about this comment

    very good post, i was really searching for this topic as i wanted this topic to understand completely and it is also very rare in internet that is why it was very difficult to understand

    thank you for sharing this.

    Regard

    Stock Market

  • 20. stock market

    (24 September 2011, 11:03AM)  Complain about this comment

    very good post, i was really searching for this topic as i wanted this topic to understand completely and it is also very rare in internet that is why it was very difficult to understand

    thank you for sharing this.

    Regard

    Stock Market

  • 21. indian stock market tips

    (24 September 2011, 11:21AM)  Complain about this comment

    I read your post . it was amazing.Your thought process is wonderful.The way you tell about things is awesome. They are inspiring and helpful.Thanks for sharing your information and views.
    indian stock market tips

  • 22. indian stock market tips

    (24 September 2011, 11:28AM)  Complain about this comment

    I read your post . it was amazing.Your thought process is wonderful.The way you tell about things is awesome. They are inspiring and helpful.Thanks for sharing your information and views.
    indian stock market tips

  • 23. commodity tips

    (10 December 2011, 05:36AM)  Complain about this comment

    Thanks for all. I have understand your stuff previous to and you are just too magnificent.I actually like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you are stating and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still care for to keep it
    sensible. I can not wait to read far more from you. This is actually a tremendous site.
    Regards: Commodity Tips Very efficiently written post. It will be valuable to everyone who uses it, as well as myself. Keep doing what you are doing looking forward to more posts.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>