Print this article
There's a lot of pressure on financial commentators around this time of year. We're expected to tell people what will happen over the next 12 months, despite mostly having no idea. This January comes with a heavier burden than usual. It's also the start of a new decade, so we're expected to make a stab at guessing what will happen over the next ten years.
On the plus side, looking back over my own record, I can see that I have, so far, been better at long-term than short-term forecasting.
I spent almost all of the noughties as a bear on equities and a bull on commodities – gold in particular. I strongly favoured emerging markets over developed markets most of the time, and I spent the second half of the decade as a property bear.
All those calls worked out in the end – but not without a fair amount of short-term pain. It didn't feel good hating equities during the bull market of 2003-07, and it certainly didn't feel good being a property bear from 2004 onwards.
It also didn't feel great last year. I expected a spring bounce in property and equity prices, but, while the actual outcome now makes sense in hindsight, given the scale of the government's intervention, I never expected the bounces to last quite so long.
So what next? My best guess for 2010 has to be that we'll start well and end badly.
Stockbrokers are always talking up the equity market as a discounting mechanism: it isn't pricing in what's going on right now, they say, but what's going to happen next. However, right now, the equity market may have priced in the wrong thing: a fast V-shaped recovery rather than growth driven by an unsustainable fiscal boost (cash for clunkers and the like), combined with a low-interest-rate environment.
If so, all the stocks that shocked us with their brilliant performances in 2009 (think banks, retailers and so on) might soon be shocking us with similarly miserable performances.
It is perfectly normal for markets to rally 50% or so (as they have since last March) and then collapse back down again as investors come to their senses about the real state of the economy. It has happened over and over again in poor Japan in the last 20 years, for example.
And it doesn't take much looking to see what might bring investors to their senses.
Take the retail numbers, for instance. Christmas might have looked OK, but remember what we are comparing this year's sales with: sales around Christmas 2008, a year when we couldn't really be certain that the banks holding our current accounts could hang on past Hogmanay.
If things were really so much better this year, surely we would have spent not a little more, but massively more than last year?
We should also be cutting back on – rather than ratcheting up – our shoplifting. A report out from the British Consortium of Retailers this week suggested that losses caused by shoplifters rose by more than 30% last year – something that hardly suggests a nation in the grip of a recovery.
All in all, it is getting harder and harder to see anything other than a period in which growth is held back by miserable, deleveraging consumers (we are now saving more as a percentage of our disposable incomes than we have for over a decade, for example); rising taxes; a state of semi-crisis in the public finances; and an ongoing scarcity of credit.
Note that while our banks are less likely to collapse than they were, their underlying problems are little different to those of 2008.
Marks & Spencer's Stuart Rose says "you'd be a fool if you didn't think it was going to get harder." It doesn't seem to be a state of affairs that can support a rising market for long.
So that's the bad news. What about the good?
At some point, hopefully soon, the markets will fall back to reflect all these factors. They might fall so far that they will actually be cheap. Then, a real sustainable long-term bull market will finally be able to begin.
So I am very much hoping to be a proper bull by the end of the year – either because I've been proven totally wrong about the challenges facing the UK (and global) economy and everything turns out to be just fine, or because I have been proven totally right. I'm then hoping to stay a bull for much of the rest of this decade.
Meanwhile, if you don't quite believe the bear case, or if you just want to be invested without worrying about markets as a whole, you should take a cautious approach. Even if I believed in the 'V', I'd be taking profits on anything that did well last year and reallocating money into dividend-paying defensives.
At the end of last year, I suggested a couple of funds that can give you exposure to these: the Personal Assets Trust and the Edinburgh Investment Trust. Both still look good. They'll give you upside if the market keeps rising, with limited downside if it does not – and, most probably, a reasonable income either way.
• This article was first published in the Financial Times
Published in
Stock markets
| More
articles
by
Merryn Somerset Webb
Related articles
-
By Merryn Somerset Webb, Feb 09, 2012
-
By David Stevenson, Feb 06, 2012
-
By Matthew Lynn, Feb 03, 2012
-
By Dominic Frisby, Feb 01, 2012
FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment email
Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.