Markets can't ignore the real economy for much longer

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Oct 15, 2009

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (1) Print this article

Traders in Wall Street cheered and clapped as the Dow breached 10,000 yesterday.

Not so long ago, they were casually shrugging and sitting on their hands as it stormed past 14,000. But that was in another era, before the Great Recession. Now we're in the Great Recovery, and the mere feat of getting back to five figures on the Dow is worthy of applause.

So what's coming next? 11,000 or 9,000?

Yesterday's news demonstrated very well the vast disconnect between the financial economy and the 'real' economy. Of course, they're all part of the same thing, which means that one can't disconnect from the other for very long. The big question right now is, will the real economy catch up with the financial one? Or will the financial world be dragged back to grim reality?

Where did JPMorgan's money come from?

Let's have a look. One reason for the market's jubilation was third quarter results from JPMorgan Chase. The bank hammered analysts' estimates by churning out $3.6bn in net income for the three months to 30 September.

Guess where the money came from. Was it the credit card unit? Of course not. Your average man and woman in the street are either paying off their credit cards, or have already defaulted. That particular unit made a $700m loss. Debt write-offs are rising, accounting for 10.3% of outstanding balances. And as Ian King points out in The Times, the picture is deteriorating, not improving. JPMorgan chief executive Jamie Dimon reckons credit card losses could be "north of $1bn the first and second quarter."

What about other forms of consumer lending? Forget it. That division had a net loss of $1bn, worse than last year. It now expects write-offs to hit $3.8bn, compared to earlier provisions for around $2bn. Total retail loans outstanding fell by 3% - in other words, people repaid more than they borrowed. And corporate lending has fallen too.

No, the lion's share of the money came from investment banking where profits more than doubled due to heavy trading in the fixed income markets and a flurry of corporate deals. And it's little wonder – given that the third quarter was the best ever for many capital markets around the world – that it's made a lot of money. The group made $1.3bn from trading on its own account – a figure which it warned will fall sharply "as markets normalise" in coming quarters. It also was able to "write up" various once-toxic securities by $400m.


Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: When will house prices bottom out - and how will you know?

  • Why UK property prices are going to fall 50%
  • When it will be time to get back in and buy up half price property


The problem with the Western financial system

Now bear in mind that JPMorgan, of all the banks in the West, is one of the ones that handled the financial crisis most adeptly. But as Lex points out in the FT, "JPMorgan's fundamental problem is an overexposure to arguably one of the big themes of the next decade: the deleveraging of western households and companies after years of extension… anything to do with lending to consumers or companies, by JPMorgan's own admission, looks grim indeed."

And this is pretty much the problem with the entire Western financial system. It's all very well for a financial company to make decent profits when markets have an unusually good quarter. But while markets can detach from the underlying economy for periods of time, they do, in the end, depend on the underlying performance of the companies within them. And that, in turn, depends on the health of the real economy.

If consumer credit – and therefore spending – is falling, and company borrowing – and therefore spending – is falling too, then companies can only boost their profits by cutting costs. That'll do nicely for a short while. It could certainly be more than enough to make this third quarter earnings season look very good indeed to investors with low expectations. But after that, you need sales to pick up, and some sign that companies are planning to expand and invest.

However, if consumers are still picking up the pieces from being made redundant, and fretting about repaying their debts, then that's easier said than done. Particularly as the boost that consumers have had from lower prices and lower interest repayments looks as though it might be reaching an end.

For example, the price of crude oil has been shooting up again, helped by a weak dollar and, no doubt, the amount of money sloshing around the markets. A high petrol price both here and in the US is not great for consumer sentiment – some analysts have even blamed the spike in oil prices for causing the crash in 2008. We wouldn't go that far, but another oil price spike certainly wouldn't help consumers.

Where investors should be putting their money now

I wouldn't short the Dow from here – there's too much risk it could go higher as more companies beat low-ball expectations. But in terms of investing over the longer term, as the comments in Lex suggest, investors would be better to look to 'emerging' (or as David Fuller on Fullermoney calls them, "progressing") markets, rather than rebounding Western ones. My colleague Cris Sholto Heaton keeps an eye on events in Asia in his free weekly email, MoneyWeek Asia – if you don't already get it, sign up for MoneyWeek Asia here.

Just before we go, a reminder about the World MoneyShow, coming to London at the end of this month. It's a convenient way to get to hear from investment experts from across the world, including the likes of Marc Faber of the Gloom, Boom and Doom report. I'll be there too, along with Paul Hill and Dominic Frisby from the MoneyWeek team. The show takes place at the Queen Elizabeth II conference centre on Friday 30 and Saturday 31 October – I hope you'll come along. Find out more about the World MoneyShow here.

Our recommended article for today

The next moves in the commodities markets

Along with gold's big bull run, many commodities have been making large moves lately, says Lee Lowell. Here, he looks at where commodities are headed next, and how you should play them.

Comments (1)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. David

    (16 October 2009, 09:34AM)  Complain about this comment

    Markets can remain irrational longer than a person can remain solvent, yes they can ignore the realities of the real economy, especially when one considers the wall of cash that has found its way into the stockmarkets via banks using taxpayers money to buy stocks and bonds, which was supposed to be used to lend to sound businesses and individuals, and most from the printing presses as well!!!

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>