Is Zimbabwe the next emerging market dynamo?

By Associate Editor David Stevenson Aug 20, 2010

David Stevenson

Share with
friends:

Comments (25) Print this article

This week we learnt that China is about to overtake Japan and become the world's second biggest economy.

Who'd have expected that 20 years ago? Not many people, from my memory.

China is a classic case of what can happen when an emerging economy really takes off. And it has spurred investors everywhere to try and unearth the next big thing amid the ranks of 'frontier' markets.

And you can't get much more frontier than Zimbabwe. It's had the most horrific economic problems. Yet one of the UK's top fund managers is starting to invest in the country.

So is this the real deal? Or will Zimbabwe still be a basket case come 2030? Let's take a look...

Zimbabwe: a world leader in hyperinflation

Mention Zimbabwe to almost all investors and you'll probably get a very negative reaction. And that would be no surprise at all. It's an African state that's gone horribly wrong - and then some.

Now I'm not going to attempt even a potted political history here. That's not what Money Morning is about. But this quote from the independent Zimbabwean economist Vince Musewe, writing in MoneyWeb, just about sums it up.

After Zimbabwe got its independence in 1980, "in our naiveté we assumed we'd witness the rise and rise of a liberal and democratic social economy", he says. "With an educated populace, our expectations were that we'd inevitably become the 'intellectual' capital of Southern Africa, if not Africa. How wrong we were!".

To cut a long story short, the economy became a total disaster area. The government mismanaged things badly. The 'land grab' from white farmers ten years ago led to a collapse in food production. GDP and exports slumped, while unemployment hit a staggering 80%. The country got involved in the war in the Congo, which proved terribly expensive. And the whole place has been riddled with corruption.

Indeed the only area where Zimbabwe actually became a world leader was in its inflation rate. Or to be more precise, its hyperinflation rate.

The country had long had a nasty inflation problem. But when the government started minting money by the ton to pay its bills, the rate really took off. It reached over 100% a year in 2001. Yet the printing presses were simply cranked up even more. Arrears owed to the IMF, salary payments for public workers and soldiers - they were all paid for by simply producing more and more banknotes.

Of course, this doesn't create any more wealth. It just pushes up prices. By December 2008, the cost of living was rising at "6.5 quindecillion novemdecillion %" a year, according to Wikipedia. I'll take their word for it - but in practice, it means prices were doubling every 1.3 days.

That puts the problems of Bank of England governor Mervyn King, who's wrestling with the UK's cost of living rising at just over 3% a year, right into perspective.

Why would anyone invest in Zimbabwe?

In fact, Zimbabwe seems like it's been on a completely different planet. So why on earth, you're probably asking, would anyone want to invest good money in a country like this? Surely there's no point in even thinking about such a place?

Well, here's the surprising bit. The outlook for the country is gradually picking up. Just over a year ago, the government stopped printing the Zimbabwean dollar. Zimbabwe now allows trade in the US$ and the euro, sterling, South African rand and Botswana's pula. Inflation actually fell below zero within weeks of the move.

Sure, the inflation danger hasn't gone away. And there are still "smart" economic sanctions in place. Without getting into the politics, President Mugabe doesn't have a good reputation on the human rights front.

But the economy is starting to recover. Civil servants are being paid again, which has meant schools and hospitals could re-open. There are plans for a privatisation programme. And the economy is backed by significant mineral wealth that's yet to be exploited. It could yet realise those hopes of 30 years ago.

Now we've heard this sort of thing before about Zimbabwe. At the end of last year it was described as the "ultimate recovery story" by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in The Telegraph. Yet the economy is still hugely dependent on imports to survive.

But this month, another reason for eyeing Zimbabwe has just appeared. Top fund manager Neil Woodford has just used over £15m of the money he manages for Invesco Perpetual, to buy a near-30% stake in a Zimbabwean firm called Masawara (LN: MASA).

The group invests in the country's agro-chemical, insurance and property sectors. It's also planning to move into oil, mining and agriculture, as well as buy privatised assets. Masawara has just floated on London's AIM market at 50p/share - the shares were trading at 54p yesterday, and 59,000 changed hands according to Bloomberg.

Should you invest in Zimbabwe?

So what should private investors make of all this? And should they follow Woodford by buying into Zimbabwe?

Of course, the Invesco Perpetual star player doesn't get it right all the time. He's backed a few wrong horses, and clearly Zimbabwe is a high risk and controversial bet that could yet go very awry.

But Woodford is no short-term punter. He's a long-run income fund investor who can sniff out a real bargain, and is prepared to give it enough time to be recognised by the rest of the market. So when he put that amount of money into somewhere as offbeat as Zimbabwe, it's enough to make me think it's worth doing likewise.

To repeat, this would be a high risk, long-term investment. It would be sensible to keep it as a relatively small part of your portfolio. But over several years it could pay off incredibly well. Remember China.

If you feel like following Woodford, but don't like the idea of Masawara, alternatively there's LonZim (LN: LZM). This deals in hotels, pharma distribution and electronic payment services, and is planning to invest in a wide spectrum of businesses in the country.

And just before I go, here at MoneyWeek we're celebrating a bit of a milestone - it's our 500th issue this week. Our editor-in-chief, Merryn Somerset Webb, takes a look at prospects for the economy over the longer term - her conclusions may surprise you. If you're not already a subscriber, you can find out what you've been missing, and get your first three issues free here.

Our recommended article for today

Two junior miners poised to hit the big time

These two junior mining companies could be global powerhouses of the future, says Tom Bulford. Both have made significant discoveries - and more importantly, have struck big partnership deals with larger rivals. Tom takes a look at their prospects here.

Comments (25)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. steven

    (20 August 2010, 11:01AM)  Complain about this comment

    A diversified portfolio should the largest proportion of its investments in the country in which the investor expects to be using the money, due to the currency risks.
    MoneyWeek, please would you provide more articles discussing investment ideas in the UK. Ideally most of your articles!

  • 2. Michael Lewis

    (20 August 2010, 11:14AM)  Complain about this comment

    @steven - don't you think that given the money printing that Mervyn King is now doing (funnily enough a small step on the round to Zimbabwe) , most of us would prefer to see articles on how to get rid of our Sterling ... until that idiot resigns or is ultimately fired, we are saddled with a weak currency

  • 3. Bob

    (20 August 2010, 01:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    I think even suggesting investing in a country ruled by Mugabe is just immoral.

  • 4. Peter Stanton

    (20 August 2010, 01:11PM)  Complain about this comment

    Dear David Stevenson,

    If you continue to print such advice I shall stop reading this site.

    Robert Mugabe is a despotic pig who murders and starves his own people.
    How can you even consider making money out of other peoples suffering beggars belief.

    This is what I call the UGLY side of capitalism.

    I sincerely hope that people move to remove this monster, not support him.

    Peter Stanton - Amsterdam

    PS: I feel this article should be removed from this site - anyone agree?

  • 5. Pete

    (20 August 2010, 01:50PM)  Complain about this comment

    Interesting comments against this article. So the people of Zimbabwe not only have to put up with Mugabe, but also outside investors who are too proud and media-led and so refuse the urgent investment this struggling country needs.

  • 6. Bharti

    (20 August 2010, 02:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    You have to be either desperate or insane to think of suggesting to invent in Zimbabwe unless you have a 100 year horizon. China and India are not to be compared with Zimbabwe or any other African country for that matter.

  • 7. John M

    (20 August 2010, 02:50PM)  Complain about this comment

    The 2009 Government of National Unity was a big step in the right direction, however much Mugabe and his henchmen subvert it. Morgan Tsvangirai as Prime Minister has made a difference and deserves our support. Aid is not what's needed; always leads to corruption and undermines local enterprise.
    The best help we can give is investment in viable businesses which create employment. I suggest African Consolidated Resources plc. listed on AIM as AFCR.
    Mugabe will die some day (as we all will!).

  • 8. Peter Stanton

    (20 August 2010, 02:50PM)  Complain about this comment

    5. Pete

    Pete do you really suppose that ANY investment in Zimbabwe will benifit it's people??

    The only benificiaries will be Mugabe & his henchmen topping up their Swiis bank accounts.

    Get real Pete, of course Zimbabwe needs investment. But first let the world come together to stop the monster Mugabe & his corrupt regime.

  • 9. Dilip

    (20 August 2010, 03:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree with John M, there have been changes within Zimbabwe and one way assist the people in Zimbabwe is to actually invest in comnpanes there.

    Furthermore are despots from Zimbabwe any worse than those that exist in other parts of the world? China's human rights records is hardy gleaming is it, yet I do not see anyone asking for any articles on the Chinese economy to be deleted.

    And what about countries with megalomaniacs like GW Bush and Bliar? What about their human rights records?

    I think David Stevenson is correct in giving out his professional opinion especially contrarian and controversial ones like this. Theres no need for it to be deleted.

  • 10. Zimbo

    (20 August 2010, 03:53PM)  Complain about this comment

    Very interesting topic.

    I live in Zim, and the green shoots are everywhere. The Zimbabwe Investment Agency, (under the MDC ) would delight in seeing this column. Our country is in a delicate position right now, one half of govt trying to open up to the world because they need the money to revive the economy, and the other half, thinks that's a great plan to further enhance their exploitation. However not all investment is directly benefiting Mr Mugabe's regime, in fact it's critical that we do get investment in areas under the oppositions control. So invest, but diligently. There are fantastic deals out there in the communications and mining sector's and even a little company called Zimplow (the 1st company to provide a share dividend since dollarisation). Old Mutual is offering a money market account at 9.55% interest. Contact the ZIA for advice if need be, but help get Zimbabwe back on her feet and feel the benefit yourselves. My money is where my mouth is!

  • 11. Jeff

    (20 August 2010, 08:44PM)  Complain about this comment

    1 Please ignore objections to this article on moral grounds. I found it interesting & relevant. Those who do not can wait for the next article.

    2 I also disagree with the request only for articles on UK investments. I am amongst the 50%+ of the UK population who would like to retire abroad & I certainly don't want these plans scuppered by depreciation of the pound over the next 20 years. My house is already one big asset in valued sterling & I therefore want less than 10% of my share portfolio dependent on the UK economy.

  • 12. CKP

    (20 August 2010, 11:28PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hmm, contrarianism as an extreme sport!
    But why the IPO on AIM? Surely if it's such a great investment opportunity at low valuations then it wouldn't be difficult to raise finance by ringing up a few investment banks and asking for some sofa change. Also 95% of the £54 million market cap is held by Invesco and FMI - not much liquidity then. Mr Woodford has a history of doing canny short term trades, so if enough people buy into the Zimbabwe recovery hype he will probably offload and bag a quick profit. Finally, the VAST MAJORITY of AIM IPO stocks tank shortly after listing, wiping out overenthusiastic private investors, wait for the fall and buy in later.

  • 13. Jerry Marshall

    (21 August 2010, 10:32AM)  Complain about this comment

    I lead an organisation called Transformational Business Network, a network of business people who use business to bring sustainable solutions to poverty. We have members going out to Zim, including Zimbabwean exiles, looking at investment opportunities. Their conclusion is that there are opportunities in (for example) agricultural processing that with a good interim team and some cash could become very productive very quickly to the benefit of local people.

  • 14. Faler

    (21 August 2010, 10:32AM)  Complain about this comment

    Zimbabwe has plenty of potential but because of all of Mugabe's censorship anti-foreign media, we don't get a clear picture of the real opportunity or risk. Until Mugabe is out of the picture, l don't think it safe investing. A few years back lots of foreign investors lost their businesses & properties when Mugabe kicked them out the country, and this never made the news.
    Investing in Zimbabwe or any other African country is good but it will take time to see your investment grow.

  • 15. David

    (21 August 2010, 10:53AM)  Complain about this comment

    Well done Money week for the article on Zimbabwe and what nonsense some of you above are saying about not investing in Zim. The way to help is to create trade, it is the best distribution of wealth in the world. Zim was and can be again the "bread basket" of Africa.

  • 16. Matthew

    (21 August 2010, 11:46AM)  Complain about this comment

    Anyone thinking of investing in Zimbabwe should do some research into the historical and political background of the country. The political risk is enormous, as there are historical issues that are unresolved, in particular the expropriation of farmland from black Africans in the colonial era, which means that there are 6 million people on the communal lands that have too little land to live comfortably. This will remain a cause of political instability, particularly if climate changes continue to make this land even less productive.

    Anyone that is thinking of putting their money in investments in the country should have a good grasp of the facts, otherwise you may invest in a fantasy.

    There is a detailed essay on Zimbabwe here: http://www.swans.com/library/art8/elich004.html

  • 17. nvp

    (22 August 2010, 08:32AM)  Complain about this comment

    Put my money in Zimbabwe ?

    thats up there with telling us to sell yen recently.....

    NVP

  • 18. shola

    (22 August 2010, 05:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    This is an excellent, unbiased, objective assessment of the economic situation in Zimbabwe, Keep up the good work as there is need to help the people of Zimbabwe through job creation

  • 19. Fenala

    (23 August 2010, 11:04AM)  Complain about this comment

    The question of investing investing in Zimbabwe will certainly be overshadowed at the moment by its leadership. However, that aside (and I think it is quite a large thing for a lot of people to put aside) can Zimbabwe really compare to India and China?
    India and China have grown on an industrial basis, quite recognisable in this country as we have done the same in our economic history. African growth tends to come more from their exploitation of natural resources such as minerals. The patern will surely be very different? I would also be interested in seeing what other sucess stories there have been from this incredibly varied continent.

  • 20. Geoff

    (23 August 2010, 11:52AM)  Complain about this comment

    as another Zimbo seeking to encourage carefully placed DFI into Zimbabwe I am concerned by the strong anti-investment sentiment shown by some posters.

    Ignoring this country and the opportunities it offers is to consign its population to the wastebasket of society. The key to all of this is knowing/having the right people on the ground to work through the maze and ensure the investment goes where it is supposed to.

  • 21. John

    (24 August 2010, 09:50AM)  Complain about this comment

    I wonder how many of these posters who are so incensed at the idea of investing in Zim have or have had a Barclays bank account?

    It's not about dodging a country that has an awful leader, it's about dodging the investments that help to fund this. I'm not giving the green light to pump money in wildly but there are good people with honorable intentions in Zim who are trying to build a brighter future.

  • 22. Bob the builder

    (24 August 2010, 02:37PM)  Complain about this comment

    Get real people! This is a mag for money, about money, making money and all things money. There is nothing imoral regarding this article just as there is nothing wrong with articles on investing in Iran, Iraq, Afgan, India or China.

    Let the chips fall where they may...

  • 23. Peter B

    (24 August 2010, 04:33PM)  Complain about this comment

    The wealth of a country has nothing to do with politicians or tyrants - it is measured by the natural resources of fossil-fuel, minerals, farming & fishing, and the ability of it's people. We have seen the depletion (destruction ?) of the coal mining industry, total lack of support for manufacturing, fishing quotas that keep boats in harbour when fish are plentiful & send them out when fish are scarce, farmers being paid to 'set-aside' and to destroy good food. THEN we have the utter arrogance to take the moral high ground against the sweat-shops of India, the industrialisation of China, the lack of financial sense of Japan, and the inflation and tyranny of Zimbabwe.
    I keep a $100 trillion Zim banknote in my wallet to remind me of how irresponsible money-printing can be. We may be paying down (printing down) our debts but the money is not coming from sustainable sources.
    Good luck Zimbabwe.

  • 24. VINEY

    (05 September 2010, 03:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    Why buy into this company when you can buy direct though international brokers into the Zimabwe stock exchange,eg you can buy into TA HOLDINGS at 20 us cents per share instead of 54 pence a share in Masawara.The commercial property they have will be full of debt.The main Zimbabwean guy behind this is Singai Mutasa who is a big boy in Zanu pf and the BEE.So only he and his crowd will benefit from this.

    I 100% agree that investors should invest in Zimbabwe but please make sure who and what you invest in,as everyone agrees that Zimbabwe's economy will move forward.You are hearing from some sectors within zanu , that overseas investors are buying into Zim at discounted prices and they do not like that.

    Do not give ZANU THE SATIFACTION OF TAKING MORE MONEY FOR FREE,I HOPE THIS SHARE DROPS TO 0.05 PENCE PER SHARE.

  • 25. MIke H

    (15 January 2012, 12:58AM)  Complain about this comment

    Eveything will change. Timing is of the essence ethically The time will come one day when Z wakes up to a new politics and a new leader. I saw Zimbabwe taking off some 20 years ago and there was movement for example in the clothing industry with the US (I myself helped develop many relationships) The time will return and developments happening now between Zimbabwe and some of the BRIC countries (maybe just 'talk and small steps' now) will take off soon. Mark my words I personally do not have money but if I had it, this is where I would place 33% of my ten year investments. I would expect to see a sharp up at some stage followed by a smaller sharp fall and a return to the highpoint a year later followed by fast investment and sustained growth.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>