Green sales dive – but should we care?

By Senior Writer Eoin Gleeson Sep 05, 2008

Eoin Gleeson

Share with
friends:

Comments (0) Print this article

Whole Foods organic supermarket

Cash-strapped consumers are cutting back on organic produce.

Organic food producers are feeling the effects of the downturn as hard-up consumers turn to cheaper alternatives. But, as Eoin Gleeson reports, there is some upside to the adverse economic climate. And the environment could benefit as a result. 

Aren't we all green now?

Far from it. Over the last ten years, sales of organic food have risen tenfold, establishing a £1.3bn industry that has made a number of its advocates – from Hugh Fernley-Whittingstall to Sheherazade Goldsmith – minor celebrities. But as the recession kicks in it seems that we are having a collective change of heart. The latest figures from market research company TNS tracking the shopping habits of 25,000 British households show that sales of organic produce are falling fast – down by nearly a fifth from their all-time peak in February. The will to pay heavy taxes to finance environmental projects also seems to be evaporating. In May, seven out of ten people told polling company Opinium that they were not prepared to pay more tax to fund projects to curb climate change. And less than a year since the papers were plastered with pictures of David Cameron self-consciously cycling to Westminster, the Tory party is back-tracking on plans to tax four-wheel drives.

Why don't we care any more?

We can't afford to. "The chilly economic climate" has "frozen the shoots of environmentalism", says Alice Thomson in The Sunday Times. Green living "is increasingly being seen as a luxury". The population is also getting wary of Government "greenwashing" – using climate change as an excuse to raise taxes for non-green projects. And so they should be. According to the Taxpayer's Alliance, even after taking into account the cost of maintaining the roads, the Exchequer netted £24.2bn from its various green levies on waste, motoring and energy consumption – around £800 per household. Yet the price of the damage to the environment by British emissions in 2007 was just £4.6bn, according to a formula devised by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

What next?

The organic food industry is being forced into a serious rethink. As shown by the failure of US organic super­chain Whole Foods (which has racked up losses of £9.2m in Britain in the past year), the public isn't prepared to pay much of a premium for organic food these days – even in Kensington, where the firm has its flagship store. Instead, we're trading down to Tesco and then to Lidl. The result? Organic farmers are quitting in droves as "customers abandon the sector en masse", says Juliette Jowit in The Guardian.

Being green isn't going to disappear completely: the instability of the global oil supply means Gordon Brown is unlikely to drop his grand plans to make Britain the "Saudi Arabia of wind power", no matter how much public discontent or disbelief it fosters. (Note that 70% of Britons think there is no chance of the UK hitting its target of generating a fifth of its energy from wind, wave and other forms of power by 2020.) And people are unlikely to turn away from recycling or cycling simply because they don't hit our wallets much. But we can expect a host of green initiatives – measures to tax cars, flights and finance more recycling through stealth taxes – will be abandoned as voters force governments to prioritise thrift over the "luxury" of a green lifestyle.

Is this bad news for the environment?

Yes and no. To a degree the recession is doing environmentalists' work for them. With fewer people moving house, fewer new washing machines and fridges are leaving the shops. At the same time, planes have been grounded and people are leaving cars at home to take the train to work. Congestion on British motorways dropped 12% in the first six months of this year. In America, the price of a gallon of petrol is fuelling demand for a new breed of electric cars. These trends will all soon go global as the US recession translates into global slowdown. The fact is, says Sean O'Grady in The Independent on Sunday, that "restraining economic growth is the surest way of reducing congestion, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming". With people not being able to fly to Europe on holiday, or drive their car to work, what difference does it make that we are eating a little less organic produce?

And when the economic crisis passes?

We'll be back to our old tricks, says O'Grady. The urge to enjoy the fruits of hard work, "is an irrepressible part of the human condition". But it might not be feeling rich again that refocuses our attention on such things as alternative energy. Instead, it will be a newly-rising oil price. That will remind us that we have to replace 40% of our electricity capacity in the next eight years, and that we can't run an oil-dependent economy forever. The organic food craze might not come back, but the drive to find a solid source of sustainable energy most certainly will.

Just how green is organic food?

According to a study by the Department of Environment last year, much organic food – from tomatoes to chicken and milk – actually does more harm than good. Organic milk requires 80% more land to produce and creates almost double the amount of substances that could lead to acidic soil and eutrophication (the pollution of water courses with excess nutrients). It also generates a lot more carbon dioxide than conventional methods – 1.23kg per litre, compared with 1.06kg per litre. The longer growing time for organic chickens means 25% more energy is used in the process. Add it all up, and it seems that in some ways turning our back on the environment is just the thing to do if we want to be greener.

Comments (0)

Share with
friends:

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>