Brace yourself: markets have further to fall

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Aug 31, 2010

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (7) Print this article

The City may have shut up shop yesterday for the Bank Holiday, but it was business as usual elsewhere in the world.

And investors weren't in a cheery mood at all.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average has been unable to leave the 10,000 level behind since it first crossed it back in 1999.

And it looks like the Dow could be seeing 10,000 again any day now.

Global markets had another bad day yesterday

US markets had another bad day yesterday. The Dow is down more than 4% for August so far. That's despite all the current merger & acquisition (M&A) activity – although my colleague David Stevenson has already pointed out why this 'boom' may be overhyped.

Stock markets in Asia followed America lower this morning. And the yen just keeps getting stronger, despite efforts by Japan's central bankers to talk it down.

Yesterday, the Bank of Japan decided to pump more money into the economy. But markets saw the stimulus as being more about political gesturing, than a serious attempt to weaken the Japanese currency. Japan's current prime minister, Naoto Kan, is under pressure from within his own party. So the feeling is that he has to be seen to be 'doing something' to help Japan's exporters, and by extension, the rest of the economy. As a result, sceptical investors effectively ignored the added stimulus, in favour of piling into the 'safe haven' of the yen.

The threat of a double-dip is hanging over the markets

So what's worrying the markets? Well, the same thing that's been on everyone's minds for most of the year – the spectre of a double-dip. Yesterday, the focus of fear was the US consumer. In July, consumer spending rose by 0.4%, stronger-than-expected. Why would that depress the market?

Because it doesn't look sustainable. Spending rose by more than incomes. In July, US household incomes rose by an average 0.2%. That was lower than the 0.3% expected. And more importantly, after you adjust for inflation, and for taxes, US consumers' spending power actually fell by 0.1%. That was the first decline seen since January.

As economist Joshua Shapiro put it in the Financial Times, the spending is being fuelled by government benefits, and by consumers dipping into their savings. Indeed, the savings rate fell from 6.2% in June to 5.9% last month.

"Neither of these is a sustainable source of spending increases, which ultimately must be financed by private sector job growth and consequent gains in wages and salaries."

And the big worry is that private sector job growth doesn't seem to be anywhere on the horizon. Investors are particularly nervy this week ahead of the US monthly non-farm payrolls data on Friday. This will show the overall state of employment in the US. And it's not likely to be pretty, given how weak the weekly jobless claims data has been recently.

Worse still, US housing is undergoing a double dip, which is hammering employment in the sector once again. As the FT notes, "construction and associated businesses were among the hardest hit sectors in the recession, accounting for about 3m of the 6.6m jobs lost after the collapse of the housing bubble in 2006."

And yet the declines are continuing, with nearly 120,000 jobs lost in the sector in the three months to the end of July. Even in 1980, construction accounted for about 6% of overall US employment. Now it accounts for just 5.1% of private sector jobs.

Government stimulus is coming to an end

Until recently, markets would have taken a lot of this bad news in their stride. After all, a weak economy means the central bankers start oiling up their printing presses. The promise of low rates and money pumping are usually enough to put a spring in the step of investors.

But it may not be that easy. The fear among investors now is that central bankers may be reaching a point where they can't do much more to bail out stock markets. For one thing, they've already done a great deal. Interest rates are near enough zero in most developed economies. And trillions of dollars have been thrown at the problem. If that can't inspire a lasting recovery, then what can?

Perhaps more importantly, central bankers no longer seem to have carte blanche to do what they want. Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke may be happy to follow in the footsteps of his predecessor Alan Greenspan. But others on the interest-rate setting Federal Open Market Committee are less gung-ho.

As former Fed Vice Chairman Alan Blinder pointed out last week: "If it were just Ben Bernanke acting on his own, some further action might be closer." But "he has some significant resistance from within the FOMC."

What investors can do

What can investors do about this? Well, we'd be surprised if there isn't another bout of quantitative easing at some point. But there's also likely to be another deflationary scare – that's arguably what we're seeing now – before the printing presses are manned again. We'd stick with the high-quality dividend-paying blue-chips for now, and keep a good bit of powder dry for when the markets fall further.

Meanwhile, as stocks slide, yields on US Treasuries and other 'safe' government debt continue to tumble to Japanese-style levels (yields fall as prices climb). This week, James Ferguson and Dr Peter Warburton debate whether or not there's a bubble in government bonds in the next issue MoneyWeek magazine, out on Friday. If you're not already a subscriber, get your first three copies free here.

Our recommended article for today

Profit from reforms to financial advisers

New rules mean that Independent Financial Advisers must soon meet higher standards of training and qualification. That could play right into the hands of this London-listed penny share, says Tom Bulford.

Comments (7)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Nigel Freer

    (31 August 2010, 11:30AM)  Complain about this comment

    Very interesting article, thanks. However it would help put this in perspective if you could give us your best guess as to what will happen to interest rates over the next, say, 2 years

  • 2. P.Eastwood

    (31 August 2010, 12:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    Get out of stocks unless you want a heart attack! Even if you are making money its worth is depreciating by the minute. The financial markets are so unstable because of quantitative easing that no sensible person can consider pouring money into the bottomless pit of stocks and shares.

  • 3. Pete

    (31 August 2010, 12:36PM)  Complain about this comment

    P. Eastwood, I hope you haven't frightened too many people. Depreciating by the minute? Surely they are becoming better value then. QE devalues the currency, so why sell assets to get cash where it's impossible to keep up with inflation at the moment. And many big cap stocks have a yield of 6% or more - you won't get that at any building society.

  • 4. Franco

    (31 August 2010, 12:36PM)  Complain about this comment

    it is funny that the best performing economy is the Communist one in China. Perhaps we should revise our predudices and start learning again Stearing a bus must be better than keeping our hands off and living by the law of the jungle.

  • 5. DC

    (31 August 2010, 01:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    China's economy is no longer run on Communist principles. It is an extremely competitive environment where almost everyone is working very hard and a few people are becoming very wealthy while others struggle to earn enough to pay their rent.

    They are re-creating the bourgeois class that was killed off (literately) in the Cultural Revolution in the 60's.

  • 6. ricardo

    (31 August 2010, 03:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    P. Eastwood : Are you completely mad ? Get out of stocks and get into what exactly ? Paper.

    Your argument is completely on its head. I'd get into big cap - big market - high yielding stocks that, over time, will only rise in value (against paper money) if I were you. Unless you want a heart attack !

  • 7. Nick

    (01 September 2010, 11:04AM)  Complain about this comment

    Well going by todays move, the overt persimisom displayed in the article is a buy for the professionals - ala Buffet.

    At what point is the author of article going to say this is wrong. Are we just building for then next led lower?

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>