Why burgers make me think of Russia

By Bengt Saelensminde Jul 30, 2012

Bengt Saelensminde

Share with
friends:

Comments (12) Print this article

What drives the value of a currency?

Interest rates used to be considered the main driver – the higher the rate (after inflation), the higher the currency. And it makes sense. Investors will invest where cash earns most interest. And that demand should move the price (exchange rate) up.

But in recent times this theory seems to have been lost on the investoriat.

These days we see many of the strongest currencies in the world paying precious little to investors. In many ways this is a product of the flight to safety – the Swiss franc for instance. We’ve even seen the pound bounce despite economic policies that would normally prove fatal.

It’s not just interest rates that determine relative currency valuations. Prices do too. Economists call the theory 'purchase power parity' (PPP). And I’d like to explain how we can use it to spot undervalued currencies. In fact I’ll point to one deeply undervalued currency today.

The importance of the Big Mac

It’s based on the idea that a similar basket of goods should cost the same amount of money wherever you go. If the goods are cheaper in one country, then that country should be able to export the goods to other countries at a profit. Thus demand for its currency goes up... and so the price of its basket of goods gets dearer. Indeed, over the long-run, prices tend towards parity.

Though the theory bears the typical hallmarks of an economist’s illusion, there’s undoubtedly some basic sense to it.

My favourite PPP currency indicator is the Big Mac index (BMI). Quite an appropriate acronym for a burger index I think you’ll agree!

The Economist magazine publishes the figures annually. It shows the $US value of a Big Mac across the globe. And to my mind, it’s an important, as well as fascinating indicator.

The good thing about a Big Mac is its uniformity – no need for a committee to assess what an international shopping basket might look like. Just look at Big Macs!

The following chart shows the index. You should just about make out the price of the Big Mac on the right hand side of the chart (in blue). The further down the chart you go, the cheaper you’ll get a Big Mac – and – perhaps, the more undervalued the currency...

The Big Mac Index (BMI)

The Economist's Big Mac Index

Source: The Economist

This year, the Economist has put together quite a useful graphic. You’ll notice the lollipop layout. Basically, the light blue blob shows the pre financial crisis (2007) price of a Big Mac. And the dark blob shows us its price today. It shows – in Big Mac terms – how the currencies have fared during these post-crisis years.

Just to put things in context, the red line running through the centre is the price of a Big Mac in the USA... $4.33.

The index suggests that currencies to the right of the red line are overvalued, while those on the left are undervalued.


Special report

An exclusive report from The Right Side
"Bankrupt Britain?"


Twice the growth at half the price

The first interesting point to note is that back in 2007, the index told us that the euro was about 20% overvalued. If you’d have used burgers as a basis for shorting the euro, you’d have done well. For those of you looking for the euro to fall to parity with the dollar, I can tell you it already has. Well, in terms of Big Macs it has!

The next thing of note is that many of the emerging market currencies have strengthened. Just look at Brazil – a Big Mac will cost you around 15% more than in the States. The currencies of Indonesia, China and Hong Kong are moving closer to parity with the dollar. This is in line with my long term view. In fact, I expect things to accelerate as soon as dollar concerns come back after the presidential election.

But there’s an exception that I want to home in on. And that is the Russian rouble.

Pre crisis, the rouble looked undervalued. And today it looks even more undervalued. I think it’s fair to say that Russia is pretty much unloved. Few investors have the stomach to put their money into Russia. Russian equities are trading on a price/earnings (PE) ratio of around five or six times, yet you’ll find European markets on double that. And that’s despite the fact that Europe is stagnating... and here’s Russia putting in a very respectable 3.5% rise in GDP this year.

When you think about it, much of the West is buckling under the crushing weight of an untenable welfare state. Yet Russia has made far fewer promises to its electorate.

A cheap way to buy Russian

I am still a believer in Russia. I think the political risks are overstated, while in the West they’re considerably understated.

I previously tipped a cost-effective way of getting exposure to Russian equities. And that was via the JP Morgan Russia investment trust. Unfortunately, the trust hasn’t performed well since I mentioned it. The price has drifted from £6.72 to just under £5 today. I guess we were a little early into that one.

But to me, this looks like a bargain. You’re getting twice the growth of Europe at half the price. And what’s more, there’s a nice hedge against socio-political fall-out from a crumbling West.

With the price of a Russian Big Mac coming in at around half its American equivalent, there’s good reason to suspect the rouble is undervalued. If you buy Russian stocks today, you’ll not only get the benefit of a rising Russian market, you’ll also get the boost from any currency gain.

Of course Russia could remain unloved – its stocks as well as its currency. But surely not forever!

• This article is taken from the free investment email The Right side. Sign up to The Right Side here.

Important Information
Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. Past performance and forecasts are not reliable indicators of future results. Commissions, fees and other charges can reduce returns from investments. Profits from share dealing are a form of income and subject to taxation. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future. Please note that there will be no follow up to recommendations in The Right Side.

Managing Editor: Frank Hemsley. The Right Side is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd.

Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. FSA No 115234. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do

Comments (12)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Dick Turpin

    (30 July 2012, 05:55PM)  Complain about this comment

    Why not go to your local bureau de change and buy 200 roubles a month, ok you pay 3% premium but no management fees, no losses on the fund, no bid offer spread, and you can't lose 100% of your cash. When the pound goes round the U bend sell your roubles back and pocket the difference. The more you can keep the fund/finance industry ouy of your investments the better off you will be.

  • 2. Frugal Investor

    (30 July 2012, 06:04PM)  Complain about this comment

    Well Bengt,
    Having tasted Big Macs in various countries I can tell you they are not consistant. I understand your philosophy by comparing like for like but the inconsistancy in the product must affect the price at point of sale.
    The same applies to KFC as well!

  • 3. alPo

    (30 July 2012, 07:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    Im afraid BIGmac index makes BIGmistake here at least in short and mid term run. You should also check GDP and export structure, demographic and money base. Picture is awful, despite high oil prices rouble has lost around 15% from February and expected to loose another 10-30% by EoY.
    Official GDP figures suspected to be manipulated heavily, which is partly confirmed by recent forecast from IMF. So beware those muddy waters.

  • 4. IJ

    (31 July 2012, 12:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    Agree Russia looks cheap, especially at current oil prices, but there are a few problems. 1) the oil price - never has the link been stronger, especially with a budget that now balances at $115/bbl of Brent vs $40 at the apex of the bull run in 2006-07. 2) oil & gas stocks make the index look cheaper than it is. They could be a value trap and are only slightly cheaper than global peers. 3) The domestic stocks that everyone wants and would benefit from stronger rouble are not all that cheap. 4) the good companies are outright expensive commanding a big scarcity premium. 5) technicals are awful. All in all, it may be good value here but i reckon there'll be an opportunity to buy about 20-30% lower.

  • 5. fufflevalve

    (31 July 2012, 02:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    Why no comment on South Africa as an alternative to Russia?

  • 6. Boris MacDonut

    (31 July 2012, 06:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    Yippee our fast food is now a bit cheaper. The French sell lager in MacDonalds, as do the Italians. How much more civilised.
    Bengt, the main Big Mac fact is that no two nations with a MacDonalds have ever gone to war. With the attendant risks of any war(physically and economically) that is a very important point.

  • 7. IJ

    (01 August 2012, 11:15AM)  Complain about this comment

    That's an interesting stat Boris, but I'm afraid it's wrong. I give you one: Russia and Georgia both have McDonald's, but it didn't prevent them from going to war (albeit briefly) in 2008.

  • 8. Boris MacDonut

    (05 August 2012, 11:39PM)  Complain about this comment

    '#7 IJ. Good point. But most of the fighting was in South Ossetia where there is no Macdonalds and it was more a brief conflict than a war. Lasting barely 4 days and with fewer than 1,000 lives lost the theory needs tweaking to say only 1,000 people have ever died in conflicts where both sides have a Macdonalds. Not great for the 1,000 but a good record next to those nations denied the delight of a BigMac.

  • 9. John Adam

    (06 August 2012, 05:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    Sorry, but this statement displays some cheek:

    'I previously tipped a cost-effective way of getting exposure to Russian equities. And that was via the JP Morgan Russia investment trust. Unfortunately, the trust hasn’t performed well since I mentioned it. The price has drifted from £6.72 to just under £5 today. I guess we were a little early into that one.

    But to me, this looks like a bargain. You’re getting twice the growth of Europe at half the price.

    Translation: 'I was quite spectacularly wrong and anyone who listened to me would have lost about 25%. But I'll give the same advice another go cos statistically I have less chance of being wrong again. Go on, you know you want to!'

  • 10. John Adam

    (06 August 2012, 05:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    So basically, you voiced an opinion, on the Morgan Stanley fund, that anyone who listened would have lost around 25% on. And now you have the cheek to repeat it on the basis that having been spectacularly wrong once you are statistically more likely to be right now :-) That's quite a pair you have sir!

  • 11. bengt

    (10 August 2012, 11:51PM)  Complain about this comment

    Crikey John,

    I must have done something to upset you in another life.

    But as investor's we're generally neither wrong, or right. It's just a matter of timing.

    For me, I'm an advocate of JPM's russia fund. I'm very confident that it'll do me well over 20 years, or so. I don't see any harm in re-iterating that.

    I think to judge it, and my performance over such a short period is a little unfair.

    Bengt

  • 12. Alan

    (29 August 2012, 03:40PM)  Complain about this comment

    What about the rest of Eastern Europe and Turkey? I have a feeling a trust like the Baring Emerging Europe gives you some other useful European periphery cover. On a 20-year view, Turkey has got to be on the verge of being a major power again and the likes of Poland are not as heavily invested into the Euro project.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>