What housebuilders' share prices say about the property market

By Dominic Frisby Dec 16, 2009

Dominic Frisby

Comments (35) Print this article

Housebuilders point to a fall in the property market

Get set for the next leg down in the housing market.

It's right around the corner. A number of leading indicators, including auction prices, housebuilders' share prices, and buyer inquiries, suggest that this year's rally is already petering out.

And the downturn could get nasty…

Why 2010 will be a grim year for property

I have written before about how the performance of the house builders' stocks such as Barratt and Taylor Wimpey can tell you which way the housing market is heading (Watch out: the housing market is about to turn back down).

Both here and in the US, they led the housing market up through the '90s and '00s. Then, by between six months and a year, they led it down again in the latter part of the decade.

In early November I noted that, despite the fact that the stock market continued to rally through September and October, by early September the rally in the builders' stocks had stalled. If that peak was not challenged, I suggested, we might start to see signs of the next leg down in housing within just a few months.

The stock market has continued to rally into December. But that late-August / early-September high in the builders has not been even slightly tested. In fact, the builders have been falling.

And now, right on cue, we are starting to see signs that the momentum in the housing market's recent rally is starting to fade.

First let me show you a chart of the builders since August. Taylor Wimpey (orange), Berkeley Group (red), and Bovis (yellow) all made their highs for the year in late August. Barratt (black) and Persimmon (blue) followed in early September. Since then they are markedly lower.

Now let's look at some of the signs of falling momentum in the housing market itself.

First, asking prices are falling. Recent data from Rightmove shows that asking prices this month have fallen by 2.2%. That's the third month in a row of falling prices. This is despite estate agents reporting the lowest average stock for sale in 21 months. Even the supposedly invulnerable high-end property market has been hit, with asking prices in Kensington and Chelsea down 5% this past month. With London driving this year's house price gains, a loss of momentum in the capital would, surely, have a national impact.

With interest rate cuts no longer an option, what weapons remain for the government to prop up the market?

There are many other signs of a slowdown

There are other signs of falling momentum too. The rate of growth in new buyer inquiries is slowing, according to yesterday's Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Rics) housing market survey. Since a high of 66% in June, the net balance of surveyors reporting rising, rather than falling inquiries, has declined, reaching 28% in November.

Action over at the auction houses also indicates a faltering rally. The Fathom/Zoopla Auction Price Index for November showed that the median auctioned property sold at a discount of 22% to the conventional market, up from 18% in October.

There do seem to be more mortgage products coming to market, but lending is still tight. For example, First Direct's heavily-touted new tracker mortgage looks to be a very appealing product, but it requires a 35% deposit. On the average Nationwide home (costing around £160,000), that means the buyer has to stump up some £56,000 in deposit. That's a lot of cash for the average UK home buyer to come up with, particularly in a recession. And he better make sure he has a good credit history.


Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: When will house prices bottom out - and how will you know?

  • Why UK property prices are going to fall 50%
  • When it will be time to get back in and buy up half price property

But the real threat is higher interest rates

But the real threat to this house price rally is lying in wait further down the road. It's higher rates.

There has been a surprisingly low level of forced selling so far in this recession. This is due both to low repayment rates on mortgages, and as Melissa Kidd at Lombard Street Research puts it, a certain amount of "forbearance" on the part of lenders. This has kept the supply of property to the market down. But with prices stabilizing, as Kidd points out, how long will this "forbearance" last? If lenders start to think they can recoup their costs on repossessions, they might be less understanding of people who have run into payment problems.

Meanwhile, there has been demand for housing from buyers with good credit histories and healthy deposits, which has kept prices up. But the supply of such buyers is not inexhaustible. There is a far greater supply of people just managing to get by thanks to low rates. If asking prices are already falling on current low inventory levels, what will happen when the supply of houses for sale goes up?

Some of the threat lies in 'discount tracker' rate mortgages negotiated pre-credit crunch. Many of those who negotiated mortgages three to five years ago are now paying far less on a monthly basis than they would need to rent the equivalent home. You might have heard of the couple with a £200,000 discount tracker mortgage who are paying nothing. Cheltenham and Gloucester even offered a mortgage at more than 1% below the base rate. Those in this situation will not want to sell out of property (and pay higher rental costs, why would they?); nor will they want to move up the property ladder and face the higher costs of a new mortgage. So they are staying put. This, also, has contributed to the lack of supply to market.

What happens when rates go up?

But what happens when rates go up, be it because of mortgages resetting, or the Bank of England bumping up base rates? Some will be able to handle it. Some will have saved for the event. But others won't have.

Of course, it 's possible we could be in this low interest environment for many years to come. Raising rates is not something the Bank will do lightly. But the coming year will be tough one. On the one hand, inflation is rising. The Bank had expected this, but it will start to look bad if inflation continues to rise and rates are kept at current levels. And on the other hand, thanks to our excess debt levels, general borrowing costs may be forced higher across the economy as investors refuse to buy government debt without getting a far better yield on it.

Even with just slightly higher rates, we could easily see a scenario which is the reverse of today: just as today's inventory levels are 'artificially' low, for the reasons explained above, tomorrow's inventory numbers could quickly become 'artificially' high as people rush to sell. What price the average house then?

One thing's for sure, investors in house builders' stocks have already decided that the best of the rally has come and gone. And if history is anything to go buy, we'll soon see that reflected in the wider housing market.

Our recommended article for today

Could next year be the year of the dollar?

The dollar is fraught with problems. And none of them will vanish in the months ahead. Yet the dollar will soar in 2010, says Alexander Green. Here's why.

Comments (35)

Comments

  • 1. Mike

    (16 December 2009, 11:18AM)  Complain about this comment

    Good balanced article. I sold at end of 2006 to wait for a drop in prices. The target drop has been slower coming than anticipated and as you intimate (rates might not go up quickly) prices may not drop quickly in 2010 but drop they will.
    Well written articles like this are very useful. Please keep them coming.

  • 2. Terence

    (16 December 2009, 11:36AM)  Complain about this comment

    Good article well written.
    I sold our house in Feb 2008 and got a very good price and went into the rental market to wait and see what happens.
    In Sussex there has been very little movement in prices, but the rental market has gone sky high. In the last 6 months house's have gone up from £1250 pcm to £1500 pcm and they are only on the web sites for a maximum of 1 week before being taken. For every house available there are 4 people trying to get it. There seems to be a lot of money around for housing in Sussex.

  • 3. Chris

    (16 December 2009, 11:47AM)  Complain about this comment

    Still loads of egg dripping off faces at Moneyweek, Housepricecrash, Capital Economics and all other worshippers of the bluntest of blunt instruments, the HPER.

    Two sell-to-renters still waiting for reality to match their hopes and expectations. It will be a long wait, I'm afraid. Interest rates aren't going anywhere fast and if there is another soft spot the BoE will print more money.

  • 4. Michael Lewis

    (16 December 2009, 11:52AM)  Complain about this comment

    Like the other Mike, I too sold to rent. Whilst I have some sympathy for Chris, I'm afraid I agree with the article too.The fact is, if you sold house for sterling and converted to other assets or currencies, you are up 10-30% already. If rates don't go up - you'll be up even more. Gold (in sterling terms) will definitely rise if UK rates don't rise. So sell to rent holders of non sterling assets will benefit. If rates do rise, then sterling will go up (though I think slightly b/c of all the QE) but house prices will come down. It will take time, but I think it just requires patience. Housing will come down in real value. It simply has to, there isn't the credit to keep it where some people would like it to be.

  • 5. iain b

    (16 December 2009, 12:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    Well done boys (sell to rent)you timed it well.

    I think your comments would be more appropriate if you were professional property people making money from a portfolio of emotionally 'detached'properties.

    Dont lose sight of the fact that your home (owned or LONG TERM RENTED) is more than just a financial investment ... memories / time spent / kids growing up etc.

    Mines gone up ,down,sideways over the long haul but it's tangibility has remained constant.

    Prices always will go up and down,at least until they cahnge the banking system ... rising prices then equity release,then interest rates increasing etc are along side income tax,the only means at the banks and govt's disposal to transfer wealth significantly.

    Debt in terms of illusionary fiat currency swapped for repossesed tangible land/property.Price drops to the bank dont really matter.For them it is a ,win win,.

    ATB

    Iain

  • 6. Rich

    (16 December 2009, 12:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    Interesting article but as I've come to realise in the financial markets, there are always two views. I subscribe to George Soros' idea that we should all try to acknowledge how little we really know, and how much is always uncertain. The problem is it seems to be human nature to yearn for certainty. I suspect that for the majority, seeking to predict less and react more is the more correct strategy. Dominic this year was predicting another signifcant leg down in the stock markets at various points. It is extremely difficult to predict correctly. Is the Fed re-inflating the bubbles (including property) to pop more spectacularly..in 6 months, 1 year, 3 years?? If it was Paul Volcker rather than Ben Bernanke as the Fed Chairman we could perhaps anticipate aggressive interest rate tightening but with Mr Bernanke? Predictions are very hard to make.

  • 7. Clive

    (16 December 2009, 12:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    @2. Terence. I live in a pleasant part of Sussex yet the rental property next door has gone unlet for well over six months. Previous tenants skipped owing money. 2009 was a completely artificial year with ultra low interest rates and redundancy payments keeoing people temporarily afloat. Both are now vanishing (the BoE may keep base rates low, but lenders aren't - unless I'm missing current offers of 1-2%) and 2010 will see the true impact of the property recession. The unemployed solicitor who lives near to me presents the perfect example, having gone through cautious optimism, to poverty and despair (£64 pw income support) to now selling up.

  • 8. Clive

    (16 December 2009, 12:31PM)  Complain about this comment

    @2. Terence. I live in a pleasant part of Sussex yet the rental property next door has gone unlet for well over six months. Previous tenants skipped owing money. 2009 was a completely artificial year with ultra low interest rates and redundancy payments keeoing people temporarily afloat. Both are now vanishing (the BoE may keep base rates low, but lenders aren't - unless I'm missing current offers of 1-2%) and 2010 will see the true impact of the property recession. The unemployed solicitor who lives near to me presents the perfect example, having gone through cautious optimism, to poverty and despair (£64 pw income support) to now selling up.

  • 9. Jessica

    (16 December 2009, 12:45PM)  Complain about this comment

    Please tell us about Gold and Silver! Or where else to put money!
    Urgent!

  • 10. NVP

    (16 December 2009, 12:52PM)  Complain about this comment

    interesting comments all round !

    2 things.....

    trying to take the contrarian view you could consider property cheap at the moment and money will get pumped into it if other markets now start to fall or stutter....however theres a large difference between a house and commodity or equity futures...and this view probably pertains to top end london market where properties are more commoditised.......Falling GBP wont help the appetite from overseas buyers though (unless mortgaging in GBP) so pays your money and takes your choice

    Property is a very segmented market so broad brush views can be misleading......however having tried to argue that prices will hold in some areas - on reflection I am now struggling !

    NVP

  • 11. Regina

    (16 December 2009, 12:52PM)  Complain about this comment

    Sold to rent? Daft morelike. Should have got base rate tracker (+0.99). I'am paying 2K PA interest - when renting would be costing me 8-9K PA. So if rates are kept low for another 2+ years I'am laughing. Even then rates would need increase to 5% for me to be losing. can't see that happening for a long time.

  • 12. NVP

    (16 December 2009, 12:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    I also live in West Sussex and have seen most properties now get moved off the shelves that are not being offered at ludicrous (2007) levels....theres nothing there and nobody seems anxious to dump prices yet...also the grey army probably still have enough money to ride out the anticipated 2010 falls before they have to cash in their well heeled (and unmortgaged) £600k+ properties for smaller things....although I note that the Equity release market is becoming very tight so that Avenue is drying up forcing a few more sales intothe open in 2010......

    NVP

  • 13. jp

    (16 December 2009, 01:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    We really need to get away from this "investment" idea. It's a huge tax-free gift - no wonder everyone is eager to show how ner-ner-ne-ner-ner they are . Tax gains from home sales as income - this is what happens to other forms. If houses competed on a level playing field with other investments (as in Europe) we would see more people rent, invest capital elsewhere - and not fear unemployment or moving jobs so much. Those writers on about "memories of kids in garden" implying this can only be done in a house they rent from their mortgagees must have the 200 million odd inhabitants of mainland Europe amazed at the British sense of true well-being. I'm not a great socialist (at all), but we provide those with capital a tax-free gift and wonder that we have a whole industry of vested interest behind it. Remember the hullaballoo in the press about the bridge sold for silly money due to the tax-free income granted by King George. How outdated and outrageous this was. Indeed.

  • 14. bernie

    (16 December 2009, 01:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    i agree with most of the article, but i would never sel to rent in the hope of buying later at a lower price. there is such a wide range of reasons for house prices to rise and fall and all the time you are out of the market and your money kept safe in government bonds or saving accounts, with the low intrest rates , the rent will be eating into the capital.
    All that said Ibelieve that house prices are still a good 40% over valued it is just a matter of will they fall that far or will they stagnate untill wages catch up. price watching is likely to be a long term hobby

  • 15. Clive

    (16 December 2009, 02:01PM)  Complain about this comment

    @12. NVP. Have you viewed many homes owned by the 'grey army' recently? I viewed a few last year (5-7,00k) and was shocked by the poor state of repair most were in. Many pensioners, it seems, are asset rich but cash poor. McCarthy & Stone are on a building spree in my area and are touting hard for business. We may actually see the grey army first in as causes of the second wave crash, as they finally wake up to the fact that if they want to release capital, now maybe their last opportunity.

  • 16. Bidin'matime

    (16 December 2009, 02:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    We sold to rent in 2005 and have never looked back. It has changed our outlook on life - no longer tied to one plot of ground, no longer wound up with all the DIY that comes with owning a house.

    And we get to rent a house we couldnt afford to buy, while house prices fall by more than the fall in value of our equity.

    I know most people couldnt get that far outside their comfort zone, but I've never regretted it and I know that we shall be no worse off when the time comes to buy back in. You only need to look at the ratio of prices to earnings to be sure that prices simply cannot return to their silly days any time soon.

  • 17. Geoffrey

    (16 December 2009, 02:52PM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree with comment : 'Property is a very segmented market so broad brush views can be misleading'. But what puzzled me about the article was the apparently irrelevant opening starting stuff about builders' shares. Whatever the past correlations between builders' shares falling and house prices falling, it's hard to see a causal connection. If builders' shares fall, the likelihood is that fewer houses will be built; this can hardly put downward pressure on house prices. Wider factors in the economy are likely to explain both falling share values for builders and falling house prices. However, I do like the sense the article conveys of how much harm could be done to the recovery of the housing market, and the economy in general, by rising interest rates. The question is : how likely is it that rates will rise ? Not very, I think.

  • 18. Steve

    (16 December 2009, 03:11PM)  Complain about this comment

    "I do like the sense the article conveys of how much harm could be done to the recovery of the housing market"

    What? Can you please explain why you think rising prices means a recovery? It's hardly a recovery for 50% of the people involved in the transaction is it? To me a recovery will be when sales volumes are back to normal - meaning people can move house and get on with their lives, increased mobility in the labour market, increased levels of first-time buyers, etc. To that extent it is very clear that higher prices hinder a housing market recovery.

  • 19. Michael Lewis

    (16 December 2009, 03:22PM)  Complain about this comment

    @11 - daft? No, you locked into a Sterling asset. No thanks. Just leaving money in AUD, do nothing, I've made 20% and then of course I invested in dividend paying AUD stocks. Repeat for NZD, Gold, Silver, Sugar and Cocoa.
    The point is a house worth 500K may be worth 550K in 2 years time and property bears would claim victory. Of course, sterling could be down 50, 60% against a range of commodities, 30% down against a range of other assets, but that would be ignored.

  • 20. Novice

    (16 December 2009, 03:56PM)  Complain about this comment

    I sold a property in Spain last March and managed to loose all of 100.000 euros. Was however more fortunate with the exchange rate and the bulk of the money now back in UK Sterling, translates to a total loss about £15.000.

    That is when the Spanish tax people decide to pay me back over 6.000 euro retained at the point of sale because I'm a foreigner there, [though both my parents are Spanish] to ensure I haven't made a profit.

    Moral of the story think very very carefully about buying that place in the Sun. They'll screw you at every turn possible,
    taking the cash over, then bringing it back again, and every gap in between That said next year will probably see give away prices in Spain, though Sterling at current lows should now be a minus factor.

    Getting back to topic - what indeed would happen if ALL UK property transactions were taxed as profit?

  • 21. John

    (16 December 2009, 04:38PM)  Complain about this comment

    Supply and demand tempered by the variant of human psychology is still the chief economic principle determining house prices. There is enormous pent-up demand caused by increasing population and inward immigration, increasing divorce-separation rates and an ageing population leading to more single occupancy, increasing personal wealth leading to the natural desire for greater living space, the individuals and companies who buy-to-let distorting market prices. Against this is the resistance of sellers to enter a falling market or lower sale price, a severe reduction in mortgage availability, a relative collapse of new house building, planning restrictions, affordability, and buyers opportunistically waiting for even lower prices. How the two sides of the equation will balance in 2010 is the question? The answer is that they are balanced and prices will not move very much in the near future. But as soon as one of the negatives is eased pent-up demand will lead to higher prices again.

  • 22. Bob

    (16 December 2009, 04:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    I believe UK house prices are still ridiculously over-priced but am amazed why it is taking so long for a fall in prices.

    In the US prices fell rapidly and constantly over a number of years. Spain has been similar and Eire's crash, once it started, has seen prices halve in price I think.

    So why is the UK going throug these minor drops... some kind of ledge and then a rise... before another drop down? Can someone xplain this to me please? Why aren't we seeing UK house prices crashing like in the US where they too have low interest rates?

  • 23. Np

    (16 December 2009, 04:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    Pent up demand John? There's pent up demand to buy a Ferrari, but very few can actually AFFORD one. All your reasoning is typical EA nonsense. You are an EA and I claim my £5.
    The economy is off to hell in a handcart, taking the housing market with it. Houses will be as cheap as chips in a few years, and I'm waiting. And it will affect all areas, London, Sussex, everywhere.

  • 24. Steve

    (16 December 2009, 05:08PM)  Complain about this comment

    Pent up demand.? Are you serious? Demand is money, or in terms of housing, mostly the availability of credit. Cheap credit kept being extended during the boom, which is why house prices went up. I get bored of saying this, but from 1995-2005 I lived in Newcastle during which time the population actually went down and te number of house/flats went up. So did prices drop because of supply? No. They went up 200% because of easy credit.

    The number of houses demanded at the present time is a function of price. And the number is half the number of normal sales volumes. That means prices are above equilibrium, with a massive pent-up supply, given that one million less homes have been sold over the last two years because of the lack of demand(in the form of credit) at today's price.

  • 25. Steve

    (16 December 2009, 05:08PM)  Complain about this comment

    Prices will fall eventually, but the near zero interest rates and softly softly approach of the courts towards repossessions have enabled supply to become temporarily elastic. This, combined with the bullish attitude of most homeowners (in thinking that house prices automatically go up 10% a year because that's what they've done for so many years) is propping up the market as vendors are waiting for the market to improve(sic). This reality will be tested shortly when prices stagnate and any one of higher interest rates, stagnating prices, more repossessions, will trigger the next leg down; probably within the next few months.

    Demand is not desire, but even the desire to own property (as an investment rather than somewhere to live) will disappear when prices start falling again. Then we will see proper falls.

  • 26. Rayrus

    (16 December 2009, 05:26PM)  Complain about this comment

    Ray.
    A very useful article - I had contemplated buying some Builders' equity but, on this information, decided to put it off until next year !

  • 27. Chris

    (16 December 2009, 06:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    No pent up demand?

    Of course there is.

    50% lower than normal transactions plus increasing population and households plus a "natural" desire to upgrade when you can plus lack of new build plus silly planning rules plus signs of more competition in the mortgage market.

    = pent up demand

    (I won't mention unemployment plateauing as I know that is a step too far).

    As I said earlier, it will be long wait.

    And as for the usual platitudes about homeowners being in it for a fast buck and believing that prices can only ever go up.

    = Nonsense.

    Most people want a house to make a home and if it ends up being a sound investment so much the better. Get over it.

  • 28. Duncan

    (16 December 2009, 07:33PM)  Complain about this comment

    Perhaps one of the reasons there isn't "Pent Up Demand" is the high Price / (yearly) Rent ratio - approximately 40 on the property I am currently renting.

    I would buy it tomorrow if prices fell back to 2002 levels,
    but for now have to accept that while renting is O.K. to buy it would be way out of my price range.

  • 29. Steve

    (16 December 2009, 08:35PM)  Complain about this comment

    50% lower than normal transactions = pent up demand

    You are Comical Ali and I claim my five euros

    You'd make a great shopkeeper - if your non-perishable produce was selling at half the rate you were buying it in at then you'd no doubt keep the price the same and start stockpiling the surplus (and ignoring the attendant costs of doing so) because it's worth loadsamoney. Genius.

    There's a million empty houses in this Country mate - why's that? Oh that's right, they're a store of value - a hedge against anything from unemployment to inflation cos house prices only go up, supply and demand innit. Well no actually - there's no need for them as houses, that's why they're empty. They haven't been demolished because people think they're a store of value. Think again.

  • 30. Chris

    (16 December 2009, 09:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    Steve,

    I think you are missing my point. Transactions are low because of a lack of sellers not of potential buyers.

    Far from stockpiling I am keeping my stock low and preserving my prices and margins, with very low stockholding costs. That's genius and I'll have my 5 Euros back.

    We could probably all fit in the housing stock of London if he wanted or had to. The number of empty houses is irrelevant if they are not the right houses in the right locations.

    Just because you want something to happen doesn't mean it will, particularly when the central banks are doing all they can to support asset prices.

    Could house prices fall? Of course they could, but I wouldn't bet my five Euros on it.



  • 31. Steve

    (16 December 2009, 09:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    Chris,

    If there's a shortage of sellers at the moment then houses should be snapped up in record time then?

    Try looking for the data. Go to www.home.co.uk and search for property price trends in an area over the last three years, e.g. http://www.home.co.uk/guides/time_on_market_report.htm?location=newcastle_upon_tyne&all=1

    The number of houses on the market at the moment is close to the long-term average and the average time on the market is at least twice as long as normal.

    Houses aren't selling quickly - that's why volumes are small - because demand is weak - it has absolutely nothing to do with a lack of sellers

    People are hoarding houses because they think that house prices just rise automatically so it's worth holding on to them. That's wishful thinking

  • 32. Steve

    (16 December 2009, 09:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    Can this situation carry on? Only if prices carry on rising - when they stop, even the most stupid of people realise that there's no point hanging on to a spare house (given that yields are so low). Demand will fall off further with stagnation as the drivers of highly leveraged house purchasing, fear and greed, disappear. Stagnation will cause a crash - it always does following price rises, regardless of interest rates, etc.

  • 33. chasbmw

    (17 December 2009, 11:55AM)  Complain about this comment

    post the election, the bills will start to have to be paid, this will result in increasing unemployment as central and local govt staff levels are reduced with consequent reductions in economic activity.
    The no of houses on the market is reduced because many potential vendors ar choosing to rent out properties at very low yields of sub 4%, looks good compared to bank rates and property always remains a good store of value! In the future when interest rates increase, as they will and mortgages reset to realistic rates, then the whole house of cards will come falling down again.

  • 34. jp

    (17 December 2009, 01:26PM)  Complain about this comment

    The lack of supply on the market is very complicated. Many won't/can't sell since they will reset to a higher mortgage they can't afford - those people won't get much for their savings either so might well be spending the cash (as we've seen). Other sellers are simply on strike - not willing or able to sell at a lower price. When Sterling rises (due to a reversal of QE) the foreign buyers will also dry up. Add to this the fact that we won't be able to inflate out of debt since 4/5ths of it is inflation-linked, then the only way is to pay the debt off.... by lots of cuts. That'll mean jobs will HAVE to go somewhere. And that will mean those holding back selling will have little choice

  • 35. Oliver Darraugh

    (09 January 2010, 04:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    The Financial Services Authority has said that it will impose a package of measures aimed at those companies who buy rent back homes to those homeowners in a vulnerable position. They say top priority is protecting homeowners who may be pressurised into selling their homes thinking they are able to rent them back for as long as they want, when in fact this is generally not true.

Commenting is now closed on this article.