Banks are pulling back from property - expect prices to fall

By Matthew Partridge Aug 31, 2012

Matthew Partridge

Share with
friends:

Comments (36) Print this article

One of the most important drivers of the UK's property market is borrowers’ access to credit.

In essence, the more money people can borrow, the more they’ll spend on houses. As long as first-time buyers can get cheap mortgages and homeowners can remortgage their property, house prices will stay high.

But if this starts to change, prices will fall.

So the latest lending data from the Bank of England looks supportive of house prices. Both the number of loans approved, and their total value, grew in July compared to the month before.

However, if you take a closer look, the picture is far less rosy. There is also plenty of other evidence to suggest that banks are in fact quietly making it harder, not easier, to take out loans. Here’s why things still look ugly for UK property.

Lending was up on the month – but has slid on the year

Three groups measure mortgage approvals: the British Bankers’ Association (BBA), the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) and the Bank of England (BoE).

Where next for UK house prices?

Of the three, the BoE data is the most reliable. Unlike the BBA data it covers the whole market. Also, in contrast to the CML data, it is seasonally adjusted (so it accounts for the fact that more houses are sold at certain times of year than others). It also contains a lot of detail that the other two series don’t include.

In June, the total value of new mortgages fell by 11% in one month to £10.6bn. While July’s data show an increase in both the number of approvals and the total value, this was far less than June’s fall. Indeed, July’s lending figure of £10.9bn is still among the weakest seen in the past 12 months.

The total number of approvals tells a similar story. The July figure of 88,363 was up on June’s 83,604. However, it was still 9% less than May’s figure. More worryingly, it’s the second-lowest figure seen since records began in 1998.

Compared to last year, the total number of loans was down 14%, while the total value was down 8%. In other words, the overall picture is very weak.


  Property Report

'Don't be fooled... house prices will fall again'

A MoneyWeek special report opens the lid on the UK and US property market, revealing what's really going on, how it affects house prices, and what you can do to profit from this.

A must read for anyone interested in the property market

 


Banks are cutting back on deals and raising rates

And it doesn’t look like things will pick up. Comparison website MoneySupermarket.com reckons that lenders are cutting down on the number of deals on offer. The number of mortgages requiring only a 10% deposit, has fallen by over a quarter during the last year.

The number of 95% loan-to-value deals has fallen even more – plunging by 43% in six months. Overall, the number of products available to first-time buyers has dropped by 31% since this time in 2011.

The reduced supply of loans is not the only sign that banks are trying to lower their exposure to property. Even those who can get a loan may find that they end up paying more. The BoE data shows that banks are continuing to raise rates on the loans that they do approve. The average effective rate on new fixed loans went up in July for the eighth successive month to 3.21%, while the overall rate is higher than it has been for a year, at 3.82%.

Judging from recent activity, August’s figures will be even higher. Nationwide, the largest lender in the UK has hiked rates on new mortgages. This will make fixed rate mortgages 30 basis points (0.3%) dearer, while tracker mortgages will go up by 0.2%.

Santander, another significant player, is going further. Its standard floating mortgage will be going up by 50bps – to 4.74%. It has also hinted that these rates could go even higher in the near future.

The fact that banks are cutting back is especially significant given the pressure that they are under to lend more. Indeed, Matthew Pointon of Capital Economics suggests that, far from boosting lending, the BoE’s attempts to link banks’ access to cheap capital to mortgage loans (via the ‘Funding for Lending’ scheme) may be masking the true extent of the collapse. Indeed, he now thinks that the best-case scenario is for lending conditions to stay the same, rather than for a loosening.

All in all, it’s another clear sign to stay away from the property market. After all, if the banks are so worried about further falls in house prices that they are willing to risk criticism from the government and the Bank of England, something is clearly wrong.

Recommended video

Tim Bennett looks at some of the most popular house price surveys and explains the differences between them, how they work, and how useful they are as a guide to house prices.

• Watch all of Tim's video tutorials here

Comments (36)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. NeutronWarp9

    (31 August 2012, 04:52PM)  Complain about this comment

    I suspect 'young Matthew' will receive a flurry of abuse for this piece but time will tell whether he is right or not. Certainly his logic regarding easy lending leading to higher prices and vice versa makes total sense to me.
    Surely from a purely cyclical view point, London's boom period must also come to an end one day? Or, perhaps, once safe haven status is no longer required, and the UK govt introduce a mansion tax, wealthy foreign nationals will continue to retain a residence in London to avoid the oppressive summer heat in more exotic climes?
    As for the lower strata London housing market, perhaps we could use the planning system to promote demand/development elsewhere? Or now that the Olympic site has been developed, following on from the nearby Millenium Dome site, perhaps there is another adjacent area screaming out for buckets of public money to be spent on it?

  • 2. 1331

    (31 August 2012, 06:17PM)  Complain about this comment

    Unfortunately house prices in my area of London are at all time highs. Prices seem to go up in increments of £100,000's. Lending has been tight for several years, yet this has not affected prices.

  • 3. nick

    (31 August 2012, 09:28PM)  Complain about this comment

    @2. Unfortunately for you large parts of London must be excluded from any discussion of the "UK" property market. With a lack of jobs elsewhere in the country a lot of young people are migrating to the capital and all are looking to rent, putting pressure on the bottom end of the market, plus a significant number of foreigners are looking for a safe country to park their cash and plumping for London property and they are unaffected by bank lending.

    Can't see any reason for prices in the capital fall this side of a fix for the euro crisis or a complete collapse in the economy.

  • 4. drotar

    (31 August 2012, 09:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    Have you ever heard about Herengracht Index?

  • 5. Boris MacDonut

    (01 September 2012, 12:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    Of the UK's 26 million houses only 11 million are mortgaged and 1.3 million of those are BTL's. So only 39% of homes require bank lending . I am not clear how existing homeowners re-mortgaging affects HP's. None of the main HP indexes factors in re-mortgages or the"valuations" made to justify the lending.
    Nationwide ,the favoured index of the doom-monger ,reported a 1.3% price rise last month.Most recent reports have been about how mortgages have not been cheaper since 2003, so some banks are cashing in by raising rates a bit.

  • 6. Boris MacDonut

    (02 September 2012, 07:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    The poll of polls suggests HP's up 6% by 2016. Santander's problems are due to overexposure to bankrupt Spain and struggling Brazil not the vagaries of their Uk mortgage loans.

  • 7. Steve

    (03 September 2012, 11:30AM)  Complain about this comment

    Houses prices may be up by 6% by 2016 but what will fiat money be worth at that stage? I expect that the government will allow the value of fiat money to fall such that the fiat-value of house prices remains the same/a bit higher, even though the real value of house prices (and more importantly to them) government debt has fallen - possibly significantly.

  • 8. Ed Dixon

    (03 September 2012, 12:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    There is no UK housing market. There is Prime Central London, The South East Commuter Market and everywhere else. The three markets are now almost entirely unrelated and the low transaction levels show that at last people are basing their housing decisions on what they need and can afford, not what they think the house will be worth in 5 years time.

    The prevailing theories of the last 20 years that house prices could only ever go up are almost as stupid and criminal as the policies that suggest GCSE and A level pass rates should always climb.

  • 9. Donald

    (03 September 2012, 12:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    There is a great deception going on. Our banks are deeply, deeply, deeply into their fractional reserves - I believe through an insider that it was down to 3% at one stage - slightly better now that the BoE has poured so much (printed) money into the system - the (private) banks pay, what is it now, 0.25% interest on this money and then lend it to us at around 5%. Daylight robbery of the general public. Furthermore, a large amount of this money is not lent out, but is used to improve their fractional reserve ratios. And there is a charade (by you lot, the media) to cover this up. Very sad - you should be exposing it.

  • 10. Phil

    (03 September 2012, 01:39PM)  Complain about this comment

    ' As long as first-time buyers can get cheap mortgages and homeowners can remortgage their property, house prices will stay high.

    But if this starts to change, prices will fall.'

    If only it were that simple. Have you been asleep for the past 5 years?

  • 11. Stephen Griffiths

    (03 September 2012, 02:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    Agree wholeheartedly with those that comment on the differences between London and the rest of the country. It's been creeping up slowly but in the southwest I'm starting to hear friends comment on their change in status now on a regular basis. Regular middle class families now 'treading water', dipping into overdrafts every month, dropping holiday plans, looking for the cheapest possible cars to run. They are also looking at children reaching university age in 2-3 years time and acknowledging that they can't afford to send them at a cost of 9K a year. Many are already on interest only mortgages. The fear is really starting to bite out here. Everything can't keep rising in price in tandem. Breaking point is approaching fast. Mass defaults on rentals and mortgages are a distinct and real possibility. The BoE simply postponed a US style crash in the UK. It's still coming.

  • 12. Bruce Banner

    (03 September 2012, 03:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    More drivel about House prices dropping, by Moneyweek. How many times have you been wrong? This article looks like it's been written by Alan Partridge!

  • 13. Paul

    (03 September 2012, 04:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    The problem with house prices is that people in this country think they're normal and have a vested interest to see them hold their price. Price declines would be hard to stomach for mortgage holders and so many want to get on the ladder since it's been drilled into them that property is the be all and end all. Bubbles are pervasive until suddenly they're not. It's v difficult to find people who believe they are overpriced. The economy desperately needs lower house prices.

    The rubber hits the road when they're no longer servicable even at record low interest rates. That happens when the economy has been sufficiently hollowed out via capital misallocation on a grand scale. Finally the game can't be continued as #11 alludes to. I agree with #7 - the government and BofE plan is to keep nominal prices high while values collapse. That way, people keep paying the mortgages blissfully unaware the value is siphoned off. It's all about protecting the banks at all costs.

  • 14. Stephen Griffiths

    (03 September 2012, 04:42PM)  Complain about this comment

    Paul...totally agree. Dominic Frisby's helpful chart on house prices vs gold helpfully illustrated this. House prices appear not to have dropped in fiat money but against gold it looks more like a typical collapse. The government and BoE are talking a great game about warding off inflation whilst quietly gutting the purchasing power of the pound. Hence I can't afford a cup of coffee when I go out anymore but hey...at least my house hasn't lost "value"!

  • 15. Let London Tremble

    (03 September 2012, 08:41PM)  Complain about this comment

    Matthew Partridge is right and to add a few more observations: London won't be a safe haven for the foreign elite for long. Why? Simple: austerity hasn't even kicked in yet, plenty of angry young unemployed spoiling for a justified fight, rioters are only in hibernation, 2012's jubilee/olympic feel-good prop to the economy is ending, London's prime locations are too close to the filth and fury of the cheated underclasses, double-dip recession still lurks menacingly. Let london tremble...

  • 16. Alec

    (03 September 2012, 08:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    The government and the BoE will do whatever it takes to keep the housing bubble inflated unlike the USA where it was allowed to crash and they now have growth and a recovery. The UK will soldier on for the next 10 years in the hope that something might turn up.

  • 17. Paul King

    (04 September 2012, 12:30AM)  Complain about this comment

    Stephen.. Agreed. I recall reading some BofE MPC minutes discussing the need for negative real interest rates of about 7% for 10 years to halve the debt! If I remember right, they were confident it could be controlled because wage-push inflation was unlikely; people are so frightened they won't ask for a pay rise - they're happy just to have a job.

    The result is inflation in things we need and deflation against gold (disinflation in fiat terms) in things we own. Everyone can see that... go to the supermarket and notice how sizes are shrinking to mask the rise - and retailers are skinning themselves to hold prices down.

    This can't go on much longer and it's my contention that when it finally breaks the central planners won't be able to get the genie back in the bottle. They've been very lucky so far... the numbers are so big the public is paralysed with incomprehension and they're totally ignorant to what money and currency really are - but they'll learn fast...alas too late.

  • 18. Stephen Griffiths

    (04 September 2012, 10:23AM)  Complain about this comment

    Worth noting too for those that hold housing stock and hope to see rising prices again as a result of inflation. They NEED wage-push inflation. At 5 times salary multiples the average person can't afford the average house...or at least the banks won't lend them the money. Meanwhile inflation of everything else is taking ever increasing chunks out of people's wages and pushing housing affordability in the wrong direction. Either house prices have to come down or wages have to rise before we get anything like a recovery in the housing market.

  • 19. Stephen Griffiths

    (04 September 2012, 11:03AM)  Complain about this comment

    I think we'll see mass defaults long before wages rise to make housing affordable. If you can't afford a house and you can't afford to rent and the government is too feckless to build enough housing to match demand...squatting is the only option.

    The timely shutting of that door is a frightening portent of both what the government see coming and what they intend to do about it. They had better prepare for 21st century British shantytowns in the home counties. We're heading for 'third' world status. Utterly disgraceful that the last two governments have BOTH driven this country into poverty to protect the dung-pile of incompetence and greed known as banking! I fear 'Let London Tremble' may be right. There's a tidal wave of anger building.

  • 20. Paul

    (04 September 2012, 01:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    This game has been going on since 1694! This time, they were so greedy they broke the system.

    Fractional reserve banking was first back-stopped by central banks, then protected by legal tender laws and finally deposit insurance. But I think this time, problems are so big they're running out of road.

    The suffering they've caused is intolerable and with government support and a gaggle of nobel laureates to justify and endorse pouring more petrol on to the bonfire, it's doesn't look like they'll stop, let alone actually prosecute anyone.

    However, in a way I'm glad it's come to this... else we may have had a another 300 years of servitude and of wealth being transferred upwards.














  • 21. Boris MacDonut

    (04 September 2012, 07:01PM)  Complain about this comment

    #18 S Griffiths. Are you for real? The cost of a house has beena t 5 times salry multiples since at least 1975. In what way is that a problem? FYI. House prices will fall a tiny bit,wages will rise to fill the void.
    #19 This is a new level of doom to suggest shantytowns in the home counties. I do ageee that the banking world is a dung-pile of greed but I do not believe it will end in tears. The upshot of this turmoil will be a modest restraining of fatcat pay and a passing of their debt pile to Joe public by a decade long sleight of hand that makes it difficult to motivate any opposition wirth a fig.

  • 22. Manabana

    (05 September 2012, 01:39PM)  Complain about this comment

    I've followed MoneyWeek's opinions on house prices for many years, and I'm beginning to doubt their sanity. House prices are on par in London and other parts of the country with boom prices in 2007. Prices are way above 2003 and miles above 1999. There is massive demand for housing and quite a limited supply. Houses are not a product line, that some marketing team at Tesco will decide to cut prices on, or a vehicle that is depreciating with use and new model competition. Every homeowner will decide for themselves the price they want to sell at . The question MoneyWeek needs to answer is, Why would anyone decide to sell their house for less than it was worth the previous year?

  • 23. Paul

    (05 September 2012, 05:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    #22 You're right.. there's no reason until the trend turns... then people have to get ahead of the curve. Usually this snowball grows because people default on mortgages and the banks sell the inventory. Thanks to rule changes made in 2008 they can mark-to-fantasy and not realise the losses yet... With ever-decreasing equity some people would decide to declare bankruptcy rather than pay 200K for a house now worth 100K, even though they were happy to pay before prices declined. We live in a world of housing uber-optimism so it seems hard to imagine the reverse. I think if sentiment does change, it'll feed on itself. That's generally how cycles work, particularly with bubbles the size of our housing market bubble. We have record low interest rates, government-backed lending schemes, zombie banks happy to allow mortage holders to tread water, mark-to-model accounting and prices are flat or slightly declining!!

  • 24. Paul

    (05 September 2012, 05:19PM)  Complain about this comment

    ...I don't see reckless credit-practices, 125% mortgages over 35 years at 6 times earnings, teaser rates enabled by securitized investment products, coming back any time soon. You're right about demand... there lots of it out there - everyone I speak to believes, even now, with almost religious fervour, that you should own a house at just about any cost. And look around - people who could, have - they borrowed to the max just to get on the ladder for fear of prices disappearing into the distance. The demand is there but they're simply not affordable by any rational measure. The fact that people are pouring earnings into inflated housing, means there's less money for discretionary spending. Remember, it's not that they borrowed some existing savings and now they're paying it back so there's no net loss to the economy, Their hard work is swapped to pay the interest on and extinquish credit, created out of thin air.

  • 25. Paul

    (05 September 2012, 05:20PM)  Complain about this comment

    ...The truth is, most people don't understand fractional reserve banking and central banking etc. They see resilient house prices and they think it reaffirms their belief that these crazy valuations are, in fact, normal. But you tell me.. when in history has the masses been right about things like this... ever? They're always the ones on the hook.

    These fiscal and economic policies are destroying the real economy - we need low house prices. It is becoming harder and harder for the real economy to support our housing market. How can house prices stay so strong with this backdrop. They will no doubt stay high until sentiment catches up with reality. When that happens who knows? But one thing is for sure... they are converging trends.

  • 26. Let London Tremble

    (05 September 2012, 08:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ 21 What does 'doom' really mean? For the greedy rich multiple property owners, it means a house price crash. For most of us FTBs, it's very good news indeed. So who writes the free press like The Evening Standard when it says 'super rich flock from overseas to buy in prime London' paying £65,000,000 for an apartment at 1, Hyde Park (£140 million last year)? I suspect people like you Boris. Note my previous comment @15 for my observations of London's property market.

  • 27. Phil

    (05 September 2012, 10:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    Agree with Manabana - demand for London property is higher than ever, in some areas (e.g. Barbican) 2007 prices look cheap, and properties are going under offer within days of going on the market.

    With sterling weak, and London seen as a safe haven, this can carry on for many years yet.

    Sorry bears, but you had your crash in 2008-2010. We're back in the next boom now. I'd love to see London prices crash so I can trade up, but unless there's a trigger, it's just not going to happen.

  • 28. Let London Tremble

    (06 September 2012, 07:11AM)  Complain about this comment

    @27
    See @15.

  • 29. Phil

    (06 September 2012, 01:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    @28

    I agree that only a complete breakdown in law and order will dent London house prices.

    Trouble is, crashy types have been calling the top for London for 10 years now, yet prices (and rents in some areas) have almost doubled in that time.

  • 30. Let London Tremble

    (06 September 2012, 07:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    @29
    Look at Spain and Greece-borrowing to the hilt 'till it all started crashing down. I keep hearing that the UK can fall back on QE, but really QE is just borrowing from ourselves. Very silly and risky. England is in Europe and does 40% of its business there. Our property bubble is so over-expanded it's riskier than that of the US. A few more riots, banking scandals etc and the huge underworld of the oppressed will unleash it's rage on the super rich. They'll have nothing to lose but their chains and nothing to eat but the rich...

  • 31. Manabana

    (06 September 2012, 11:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    I'm not some crazy housing bull, I would love a house price crash, I've been renting in London for 6 years now and I have decided its time to buy. HERE'S WHY..I pay £1,300 per month rent on a 3 bed terraced, of which I have no rights, I have to put up with property inspections, chavvy neighbours, traffic, inability to do any improvements without written permission. Buying is scary but remaining as a tenant for the next few years with a growing family is a nightmare.
    @28 There will not be riots in London, the lessons were learnt and harsh sentences handed out. London is becoming a police state, the people will be dealt with an iron fist if they step out of line.

  • 32. Eco Nomics

    (07 September 2012, 02:55PM)  Complain about this comment

    Paul and Stephen spot on with your analysis, makes sense to me.

  • 33. Let London Tremble

    (07 September 2012, 08:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    @31 The simple fact that the riots happened in such a threatening and violent way implies that there exists suppressed anger not seen for years. The mainstream media reported it as thugs stealing trainers and TVs but that was just cunning and clever news coverage. A rioter interviewed on bbc's newsnight explained that he woke up to the news and another banker was being charged with fraud over £millions, or a flat in Knightsbridge went for £140,000,000 etc. 'Look at our role models', he said,'and you'll see why we did it'.

  • 34. Critic Al Rick

    (08 September 2012, 02:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hi Let London Tremble

    Quote:
    'Look at our role models', he said, 'and you'll see why we did it'.

    Exactly. I'm a great believer in the examples being set at the so-called top end of society (including those strategically placed on pedestals by them) being replicated down throughout the tiers of society.

    It also appears to me that another fairly widespread complimentary phenomenon of human nature is to go down to the behaviour of, what I call, the Lowest Common Denominator.

    By inference and perceived quirk, the so-called *top* end of society harbours the seeds of the *Lowest* Common Denominators.

    The biggest wreckers and pillagers within society are the very seeds of the LCDs.

  • 35. Let London Tremble

    (10 September 2012, 08:48AM)  Complain about this comment

    @34 Very eloquent indeed, Critic Al Rick. Just to be clear about your point, what you're saying is that it's a jungle out there and it would be wholly justified for the lower tiers of society to react to the higher tiers in a reciprical manner. Thus, if the super rich act (through exploitative financial ways) in a way that threatens your life and livelihood, then it would be appropriate to threaten the lives and livelihood of the super rich. That's what the rioters and, coming soon, the trade unions will be doing. What's astonishing is that it has taken this long to happen.

  • 36. Critic Al Rick

    (14 September 2012, 12:43AM)  Complain about this comment

    @ 35. LLT

    No, I am not saying that any anti-social behaviour is justified. I am saying that a lot of the behaviour of the so-called elite is anti-social. And I am saying that a lot of people when wronged have to retaliate and being cowards turn on those more vulnerable than themselves.

    By the time this retaliation has rippled through to the bottom of society the direction of the retaliation can only reverse and the nature of the vulnerability has, by necessity, to change; usually to property.

    Thus far the recent riots have been quelled but the non-violent destruction and pillaging in the downward direction ensues. Like you say there will be a lot of pressure building-up at the bottom; and one day it's going to explode again, only more vehemently.

    What people throughout society need to realise is that they have a common enemy - the super rich aided and abetted by treacherous politicians.



Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>