The biggest obstacle to Britain’s recovery – the housing market

By Phil Oakley Aug 16, 2012

Phil Oakley

Share with
friends:

Comments (35) Print this article

If you were to ask me to name the biggest obstacle standing in the way of a healthy UK economy, it’s simple – it’s the housing market. Regular readers will know our view on house prices. They are too high and need to come down – a lot.

High house prices, far from being a good thing, are stopping the economy from getting back on track. They suck money away from wealth-creating projects. They increase the cost of living, and make the UK an expensive place to do business.

This will not change as long as the government and the Bank of England do everything they can to keep prices high.

Why are they doing this? It’s because high house prices are the main thing keeping the UK’s frail banking system afloat. A fresh crash in property prices would push up bad loans and hurt banks’ balance sheets.

The banks know this and are using the slack that’s been cut for them to build more buffers so they can cope with a day of reckoning. The trouble is, one of the best ways to do this is to cut back on lending.

This means that good businesses that could create wealth and more jobs don’t get the funds they need. Either that, or any finance on offer costs too much.

So no matter how painful it would be, we need houses to fall sharply in price.

Where next for UK house prices?

So far, that doesn’t seem to be happening. House price indices show a market that is stagnant in most regions (though not all – see my colleague Matthew Partridge’s recent analysis to find out how far house prices have fallen in your area), rather than collapsing.

Are the government’s policies are working? We don’t think so. The latest survey data suggests to us that the UK housing market is like a tyre with a slow puncture. You can keep putting air into it for a while, but no matter what you do, eventually it’s going to go down a lot.

The latest housing survey from the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Rics)  is a good barometer of what’s really going on in the market. Unlike house price indices from the likes of the Halifax or Nationwide, the monthly Rics survey is a measure of sentiment.

It talks to people on the ground – the surveyors and estate agents – to find out what’s happening and what’s likely to happen in the market. It’s usually a good read.

What July’s survey says is that surveyors are seeing more weakness in the market – with the exception of London, which remains driven by other factors. More surveyors saw prices fall than rise in July, and more of them were in the ‘prices falling’ camp than was the case in June.

The size of the falls is so far not alarming, with most surveyors seeing price falls of 0-2%. This is consistent with most house price data. But there are some concerning bits of data.

The net balance of newly agreed sales fell to a four-year low. That’s quite striking, given that four years ago the financial crisis was at its height. Meanwhile - and perhaps unsurprisingly - expectations for sales levels and prices for the next year have become more pessimistic.


  Property Report

'Don't be fooled... house prices will fall again'

A MoneyWeek special report opens the lid on the UK and US property market, revealing what's really going on, how it affects house prices, and what you can do to profit from this.

A must read for anyone interested in the property market

 


One of the best parts about the Rics report, though, is that it contains lots of comments from individual surveyors. Have a read of these and you begin to get a better understanding of what’s happening out there.

Apart from the well-publicised shortage of mortgage finance and the high demand for rental properties, the market is stagnating because buyers are increasingly not willing to meet sellers’ asking prices. Choice quotes from the survey on this topic include:

 “Vendor price expectations are still at an unrealistically high level.” – Anthony Webb FRICS, Cobham, Surrey.

The key to the market is agreeing with the vendor a realistic marketing price.” – Geoffrey Holden FRICS, Brighton.

The difference between seller expectations and buyers' perception of value is a serious issue.” – Peter Mountain FRICS, Lincolnshire.

This gap between sellers’ dreams and buyers’ financial limitations has been the most critical factor in the state of the UK property market for the last four years at least.

Sellers don’t have to drop prices, because most aren’t being forced to move. And buyers can’t afford to raise their bids, because mortgage finance is short. So there’s still a stalemate in many areas.

So far, there’s little sign of a rising supply of properties, on the scale that might trigger a full-blown crash. Average stock levels per surveyor have not changed much during the last year.

Unsold housing stock per surveyor

Unsold housing stock per surveyor

Source: Rics

Cheap money, mortgage forbearance schemes and government meddling are keeping lots of distressed borrowers in their homes for now. This can continue for as long as interest rates are low, but how long can that last?

The Bank of England can’t print money to manipulate the bond markets forever. The scale of its existing holdings of gilts is already stretching credibility, which is why we see a bond market correction or currency problem – or both – eventually resulting from this policy.

The end result will be the same – higher interest rates and lower house prices. As far as we are concerned, the sooner this happens, the sooner the UK economy can recover.

Recommended video

Tim Bennett looks at some of the most popular house price surveys and explains the differences between them, how they work, and how useful they are as a guide to house prices.

• Watch all of Tim's video tutorials here

Comments (35)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Steven Clarke

    (16 August 2012, 03:37PM)  Complain about this comment

    Listen to your colleague Merryn,

    Introduce a Land Value Tax, reduce existing taxes.

    House and land prices will come down, real wealth-creating activities will be much more viable due to reduced taxation and greater supply of land for development, and people will have more disposable income due to reduced housing costs and lower taxes.

    We'd have a much more German or Swiss economy. Stable house prices, and focussed on earning our way in the world rather than rent-seeking.

  • 2. Nick

    (17 August 2012, 08:50AM)  Complain about this comment

    The inevitable cannot be avoided..
    The goverment/BoE are wasting time and money into supporting a failed house market and the same time opportunities for growth are lost.

    You need also to mention that these same policies have an impact on companies which have to put their profit into the pension funds (so they can support the losses that BoE creates through QE and low IR policy) instead of investing profits into R&D and jobs.

    What needs to be done?

    -Fight inflation and increase IR
    -Stop goverment/BoE interfering and supporting the failed house market
    -LVT for any properties above 2mill and for any 2nd/3rd/etc properties.
    -Stop the Landbanking.

  • 3. Roy

    (17 August 2012, 09:10AM)  Complain about this comment

    At last some common sense and I my self am a home owner.!
    The only reason houses have not corrected is because governments have been propping them up with unreal interest rates, while the savers suffer.

    The only reason this is happening is because the governments cannot afford for another write-down in the banking industry
    as this would cause them to fully nationalize them and thus add the losses to an already over balanced UK economy.

    but the inevitable will happen sooner or later and houses will fall
    END OFF

  • 4. DLF75

    (17 August 2012, 11:27AM)  Complain about this comment

    Am I missing something? Wouldn't higher interest rates and lower house prices mean a similar level of mortgage repayments for people moving home?

    As an aside, London may as well be a seperate country at the moment, bog standard 3 bed Victorian terraces going for £500,000 in the cheapest bits of zone 2/3.
    Would love to hear the prognosis for "ordinary" London prices.

  • 5. jasonS

    (17 August 2012, 11:34AM)  Complain about this comment

    This can't continue. The gov are hoping they can keep house prices inflated long enough that they will eventually seem 'correct' due to time and inflation. This won't work. Borrowing costs are going to rise, mortgage rates will rise, house prices will plummet, unemployment will rise, we will lose AAA rating and the UK, along with several EU countries will default. There is no recovery anywhere in the World. Faith in paper assets is declining. 1930's here we come, except this time with huge sovereign debts and defaults. Grow food, pay off debts, buy gold and silver and sit things out... Ponzi scheme nearing collapse.

  • 6. Phil

    (17 August 2012, 12:08PM)  Complain about this comment

    This can easily continue for another 10 years or more - a drawn out process of gradual, nominal falls, masking great real-terms falls.

    Of course, real-terms falls are only useful if your wages rise in real terms, but a recent Guardian article suggests the opposite has been the case.

    It's time to throw in the the towel and accept permanently high house prices, and either buy if you can afford it, or campaign for better terms for tenants and fair rents.

  • 7. Dyadco

    (17 August 2012, 12:08PM)  Complain about this comment

    House prices will eventually correct to being fair value.

    However, for so many people, real estate throughout their entire lives has always increased in value, so they cannot comprehend why house prices have to fall.

    I don't see that further taxation in an economy that is one of the highest taxed in the world will do anything apart from add further expense to people's lives.

    There is no doubt that EVENTUALLY mortgage rates will rise, but with an economy that is this fragile, it is not a issue for some time yet. Also, the banks are loving having cheap money to play with.

    But lets be realistic here. The banks are fully aware of the realignment of property prices to their historic mean, thus the requirement for 30% + deposits. Take it as an indication of how much further the prices can fall.

  • 8. The Tache

    (17 August 2012, 12:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    While I agree with the gist of the article and comments, the only thing I would say is the UK won't directly default on its bonds because we have the option of the CTR+P economy. What the £ will be worth by then is another matter.

  • 9. Eddie

    (17 August 2012, 01:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    House prices have tripled in the last 15 years - which is nuts. It's alright for some - the greedy babyboomers who bought a house in the 1970s which is now worth a million; but for many if not most people, and the healtha nd wellbeing wider society, and the young generation, high house prices (10 or 15 times the average salary) are bonkers.

    Factors we need to address include: too much mass immigration; too many breaks for buy-to-let landlords; too many foreign investors buying UK property to get money out of the Eurozone; Bank of England and government policies aimed at propping up house prices (as stated) because it will make people feel rich and start spending again.

    Prices need to halve. And perhaps we can have restrictions on who can buy - or rent council houses.

    Reduce the population rather than build on green field sites, and free up empty property too.

  • 10. Graham

    (17 August 2012, 01:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    What the article forgets to mention is the forth coming crash will probably catch more people than what the original crash would have caught if it was simply let to run it's own course; as a lot of people put their mortgages on fixed rate, thinking interest rates were going to shoot up, but they never did. Those mortgage terms will probably come to an end at the time interest rates shoot up.

  • 11. JAW

    (17 August 2012, 01:38PM)  Complain about this comment

    Phil Oakley hasn't done the maths when he says that the biggest obstacle to Britain's recovery is the housing market.

    If house prices were to drop 10% this would only inject about £350M into the economy, based on lower mortgage payments for 0.5 million new buyers per year. Existing mortgagees would be unaffected. A 20% drop would inject £700M, a 30% drop £1.02B. Recent increases in rail fares and student loans wipe all that out. The Deficit is adding to UK Debt interest service payments faster than that.

    What is the biggest obstacle? Lack of confidence. The socialist redistributive economic model is seriously flawed. The ever increasing tax and spend has left most consumers with insufficient to live on, while the non-productive recipients of benefits grow numerous enough to threaten riots at any hint of cuts. Tax and spend has now reached a critical level, shrinking the economy, leading to a lack of confidence in the future for wealth creating businesses.

  • 12. Dave

    (17 August 2012, 01:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    But wasn't the Olympics nice?

  • 13. Tom O'Neill

    (17 August 2012, 02:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    My own experience (looking to buy in London) is that supply and quality are in a race to the bottom, and prices are far too high - I could buy, but I refuse to. One of the things I notice is how much decent quality starter-flat stock in good areas has been snapped up by BTL investors and is rented out at rents well above fair value, but manageable by daddy's boys and girls. I feel sorry for youngsters looking for their first property.

    Oh, and Dave gets a gold medal for his comment! :-)

  • 14. LERENARD

    (17 August 2012, 02:34PM)  Complain about this comment

    There is a saying that property speculation has never done any economy any good and there is ample evidence of this around the world. The UK economy has been hooked on the narcotic of rising house prices for a long time. Enacting anti property speculation measures is easier said than done as there would be massive opposition from those who influence government policy the most. There will be no change under the present bunch.

  • 15. Orb

    (17 August 2012, 02:41PM)  Complain about this comment

    DLF75 @4, you are right about the repayments being roughly the same, but that 25% deposit will be SO much easier to save for, making banksters more willing to pimp mortgages with such juicy LTVs.

    Dyadco @7, mortgage rates will eventually rise? Do some homework and compare tracker rates from 5 years ago to those available today - they have ALREADY risen substantially.

    Eddie @9, 'greedy babyboomer'? It's their fault? Salary multiples as the single, most important house price factor? Breaks for BTL landlords (who have to pay market prices for properties)? Have you ever been one with a bad tenant? Prices need to halve? Elligible buyer statuses? Reduce the population? Won't the best leave first?

    To quote Dyadco, "Let's be realistic here".

    Personally, I agree with JAW: how can it be right that dependant citizens are automatically entitled to a better life than those who have to pay their way? However I think the EZ issues are a far greater factor in our current economic affairs.

  • 16. Critic Al Rick

    (17 August 2012, 02:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    The BIGGEST obstacle to Britain's recovery ...

    - Parasites (rich, poor and intermediate)

    The 'I expect something for nothing/next to nothing' culture.

    End of.

  • 17. Whig

    (17 August 2012, 04:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    The prognosis is truly awful. House prices will fall in real terms, perhaps over ten years but maybe less. Wages will fall in real terms as well though so at the end of the period houses will still be unaffordable. Based on the past thirty years there's no reason to think we'll increase supply either.

  • 18. Rich

    (17 August 2012, 06:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    DLF75 - I assume interest rates WILL go up. I see that I have 2 options.

    1. Buy now, pay a high price. Repayments will start low but then rise with rates. I'll be in my house watching prices fall, struggling to make the higher repayments, losing sleep.

    2. Wait until rates go up, then buy. Prices will have fallen as people cannot afford to make their payments. My initial repayments will be high but having paid a lower price for the house, still affordable. At least then I'll be sitting on a better possibility of capital gain or on the possibility of repayments going down over the long term, reducing my repayments further.

    I prefer option 2. I'm hoping the govt can't afford to keep meddling.

  • 19. Rich

    (17 August 2012, 06:11PM)  Complain about this comment

    Good point Orb, when interest rates rise & prices fall, my 6-digit deposit will give me a lower LTV too! Sounds great, when will it happen..?

  • 20. Orb

    (17 August 2012, 08:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    Rich, my guess would be VERY slowly - like 7 to 20+ years. And I don't expect it will be so much as nominal prices drop as inflation and currency debasement will erode the real value. That's the political choice, and I tend to agree with what Stratfor reckon: it's politics that drives the world, NOT rationality.

    "I think we're turning Japanese, I really think so!" Lucky Icelanders.

    Problem is, I'm not getting any younger.

  • 21. John

    (18 August 2012, 08:28AM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree with Phil, prices have to come down.
    However, whilst BTL and investment in property is still encouraged both morally and by tax breaks as a valid way of saving for retirement, or just making a living, the present situation will continue.
    Yes, interest rates are too low, but when they rise again the same obsession we have with property will continue and get worse.
    A distinction has to be made between real wealth in the economy and property prices which are illusional and should be treated as such.
    A parallel can be drawn between the use of Qat in the middle east, where a high proportion of economic output and food production area is wasted on this narcotic weed. Housing in UK has a similar effect on our economy.

  • 22. Peter Kellow

    (18 August 2012, 10:53AM)  Complain about this comment

    The argument that house prices need to fall to save the British economy is like the argument that Europe needs full political integration to save the euro

    Both are entirely correct logically. The conclusions?

    Europe will never have full political integration. Thus the euro will fail

    British house prices will not go down. Thus the British economy will go down the pan

    In case you had not notices the British economy is not run for the benefit of businesses, pensions, the people. It is run for the benefit of the banks.

    You are all going to get screwed to save the bankrupt banks. Unless there is a revolution in the streets that is how it will be

  • 23. malcolm

    (18 August 2012, 12:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    The current 'issue' with house prices is one of simple supply and demand. Demand is weak due to mortgage availabilty and supply is static due to structural issues - limited land supply, planning regulations etc.

    It really does'nt matter what an individual thinks is the right price - collectively the market disagrees and backs it up with trading at current prevailing prices.

    If mortgage availablity increased I bet house prices would (at least in the short term) rise. The only way to get them down is to reduce the cost of land - and this will only be achieved by providing more..

  • 24. Critic Al Rick

    (18 August 2012, 02:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ 22. Peter

    The definition of 'democracy' requires update to:

    - government by the Banksters for the Banksters

    Some people would actually have us believe that government policy over the past few decades has been to primarily favour the large voting block of the Baby Boomer Generation. Talk about 'Divide and Rule'! Talk about naive!

  • 25. Alec

    (18 August 2012, 08:56PM)  Complain about this comment

    Why do you think banks and building societies are calling for 40% plus deposits for mortgages. Simple, they have finally accepted the houses and properties are 30% plus overpriced. They are going to make jolly sure they are not left with even more toxic debts. This time it's the punter who will end up in negative equity!

  • 26. Boris MacDonut

    (21 August 2012, 06:41PM)  Complain about this comment

    This is just twaddle. It is simply wrong.

  • 27. Critic Al Rick

    (21 August 2012, 08:38PM)  Complain about this comment

    Boris, the fact that high housing costs are a big obstacle to Britain's recovery is not twaddle.

    The trouble is it's a catch 22 situation; we're eventually stuffed if they remain high and we're quickly stuffed if they crash. We're stuffed even more if inflation is successfully encouraged to run riot. But the sooner housing costs are considerably reduced the sooner we can possibly begin to recover. Pity they weren't allowed to crash from 2008 - that would have been the route of greatest damage limitation (to the majority), albeit horrendous enough.

    And whatever happens the Public Sector won't be immune.

  • 28. jack

    (22 August 2012, 08:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    With the goverment falsely keeping house prices high everyone paying more for their English castles, taxes increasing, fuel price hikes (9% on gas, what a joke), wage reductions, whats next? cos i dont think the normal person can take much more!
    WHATS NEXT????
    PENSIONS, whos paying into that , who can afford to and in 20 years time there is the start of the next crisis!
    All they care about is the next vote and their nice expences!
    House prices need to drop now to be able to save us in the future.

  • 29. Roy

    (22 August 2012, 08:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    Houses are a by-product of a healthy economy, not the other way round.
    If you have full time employment and job security, and a healthy economy, then the confidence to take on along term debt and pay it all off will increase.
    This is what would give the BANKS more confidence .

    Stimulus for homebuyers at the moment is only suckering in the unwary to purchase property in a failing world economy
    BUYER BEWARE!

    A fall in house prices in line with wages is what is called for and is inevitable.

    Demand for houses was created by cheep money together with unreal interest rates and a dollar saturated markets,
    an illusion made in the USA to stave off natural accruing recessions Instead it has made matters worse.

  • 30. Roy

    (22 August 2012, 09:31PM)  Complain about this comment

    kicking the can down the road!

  • 31. jack

    (23 August 2012, 08:23AM)  Complain about this comment

    we all seen it happening and we let Gordon Brown lead us into this mess!

    Greed is a terrible thing!

  • 32. Roy

    (23 August 2012, 01:52PM)  Complain about this comment

    All governments should have caps put on spending, so they never get into this situation again.Recessions are natural part of a healthy economy and putting them off to buy votes is just plain crazy!!
    Balance your books!!
    Stop wasting our money

  • 33. La La Land

    (23 August 2012, 03:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    Being a Baby Boomers and worked when women were still 3rd class citizens - low wages/ male dominated - divorced before women got a good deal - SO - although I do have a small house I have next to no pension and little savings - under £11,000 . Call me greedy if you like but I only got here by being Mrs Frugal and not smoking, drinking and buying designer handbags. Am I in a minority or just part of the silent majority?

    Yes house prices are too high and the Government is letting down people like me who did not cause the crisis with encouraging inflation and and low interest rates but they can't do anything about it as it's the Commercial Property Bubble that will destroy the Banks even more that the Domestic Property Bubble.

    Still good news I might just have secured a part time job at minimum wage.

  • 34. Boris MacDonut

    (24 August 2012, 08:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    #33 Lalaland. Good for you. Will you spend your largesse on fags, booze or handbags?

  • 35. David Baker

    (11 October 2012, 11:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    It seems to me, having read the ONS on house prices for July 2012 that house prices, in fact, seem to be rising. This seems contrary to the facts that RMBS market is v.poor, unemployment rising and lending low - with this information I can only conclude I am missing information and propose a hypothesis: I propose the government itself, with some of the money from QE is THE main buyer of houses throughout England, this could be through shell companies, via housing associations, local authorities etc. These houses are then rented out to the populous.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>