The housing market's final props could soon collapse

By MoneyWeek editor-in-chief Merryn Somerset Webb Dec 05, 2011

Merryn Somerset-Webb

Share with
friends:

Comments (35) Print this article

I spent the early part of Wednesday evening in one of Edinburgh's smartest restaurants, Oloroso.

Sadly, I wasn't there to eat. I was there to film for a BBC Panorama programme on the way the crisis in the eurozone is affecting us all.

My job was to make the whole thing visual by writing the big numbers in pink eyeliner on the window, in front of the twinkling Christmas lights of George Street. You probably think that sounds easy. You are wrong.

But my problems with the eyeliner were nothing compared to the problems with the numbers. After all, who can possibly know what the crisis will end up costing us?

Sir Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England, put it rather vaguely in the Bank's last inflation report at 1% or so of GDP. Capital Economics reckons things are a bit worse: it has got UK GDP losing around 1.3% if there is no disorderly break up, and 3% if there is. And Capital Economics' money is on something closer to the latter than the former.

So you can, I think, assume the losses to us to be being anything from £15bn upwards (£15bn being around 1% of what our GDP is thought to be).

However, the real difficulty with figuring out the impact of Europe on the UK is separating their bad news from our own bad news. You see, the UK doesn't need Europe to help it back into recession. We can do that all by ourselves.

In his autumn statement, the chancellor made it clear that our economy is going to grow slowly for at least two years (and probably five), while our public debt is caught in an unpleasant upward spiral. We have the kind of debt levels that inhibit growth. But, with no real attempt at proper austerity, we can't cut debt enough to allow the growth needed to pay off the borrowing. Nasty.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek

  • FREE! - our award-winning weekly magazine, delivered to your door for the next 3 weeks.

  • FREE! - access to the entire website, including the very latest MoneyWeek articles.

  • FREE! - our punchy daily investment email, 'Money Morning', with our insights and commentary on the day's financial news.


At the same time, the odds of another credit crunch are pretty high, or so the Bank's Financial Stability Report suggested this week. Our banks have been busy weaning themselves off the government support chucked at them post-Lehmans, which has already made them pretty tight with their loans. Now they have what Capital Economics calls a "tough refinancing schedule ahead". They have to find something in the region of £140bn of funding next year at a time when the costs of funding are rising.

All this means that they are likely, once again, to cut their lending volumes and to raise the price of the loans they do offer.

The Bank of England, says Capital, has already noticed that "some banks may be starting to pass on higher funding costs to businesses through higher prices" – and says the same is happening with mortgage lending.

You will have noticed, by now, that the eyeliner was something of a pink herring – just a roundabout way of getting back to one of my favourite subjects: house prices.

I said a few weeks ago that only two things were holding up UK house prices in the face of collapsing consumer incomes: forbearance on the part of the banks (changing the terms of mortgages and so on to prevent people ending up being in arrears) and ultra-low mortgage costs.

This week, the scale of the forbearance in the market became clear. According to the Financial Services Authority, 5-8% of all UK mortgages would be in arrears if the banks weren't scrabbling around looking for ways to prevent it happening. But I can't see that number being allowed to go much higher.

And what of mortgage rates? If forbearance is so huge at a time when rates are at their lowest for 300 years, what happens when the costs of a mortgage rise? If you were hoping that 2011 was the last year of falling house prices, I suspect you will find next year deeply disappointing.

• This article was first published in the Financial Times

Comments (35)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Neil

    (05 December 2011, 02:19PM)  Complain about this comment

    Thank you Merryn. Very insightful.

  • 2. MLR

    (05 December 2011, 02:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    Re the headline, wasn't MoneyWeek saying that last Christmas? And the one before too, actually?

    I've been profiting nicely by trading housebuilder BDEV throughout 2010 & 2011, and I intend to keep doing so. Your constant doom and gloom predictions for the housing market ignore the very simple truth that the UK is a tiny island, and London is just about the most sought-after city in the world for foreign homebuyers.

    MoneyWeek also won't acknowledge that UK house prices have already fallen about 20% in real terms since the global recession. If you're looking for a crash, that's as close as you'll get...

  • 3. FC

    (05 December 2011, 04:29PM)  Complain about this comment

    @2 MLR If the market had been free from incessant meddling, it would have crashed long ago. The 20% fall in real terms you refer to is only meaningful if incomes have gone up 20%, which they clearly haven't. The truth is that banks will either fail or need to be bailed out (again) if there is a house price crash, and that's why prices are being propped up. Banks are walking the tightrope... they have to raise mortgage rates to price in the the risk of default, but in so doing they run the risk of pricing in their own demise. What a shame.

  • 4. HL

    (06 December 2011, 11:47AM)  Complain about this comment

    Clearly, MLR is of the Little (very, very little) Britain persuasion. His is an oft-encountered attitude among a certain type of Briton (perhaps that should be Brit or even just B, since we are talking smallness here).

    Over and over we have been told that this country of 62 million people, this G-7 member with its vast capital city, its spreading fields and its rolling hills, is "tiny" or "little" and therefore house prices must rise forever.

    Ireland is even littler, yet house prices have fallen heavily. Australia is enormous, yet house prices have risen there.

    For heaven's sake let us stop pretending that our tiny, nay minuscule size has anything to do with house prices.

  • 5. Badger

    (06 December 2011, 11:48AM)  Complain about this comment

    Couldn't agree more with the article. The politicos and pressure groups waffle on about building more houses but that's totally irrelevant. You can build as many houses as you like, but if people can't afford them, what's the point? There has to be a return to the old days of 3.5x mortgages being the rule and if you can't afford something based on that, tough. The banks are so exposed that they simply can't lend anything until they know just how far out the tide has gone - but at the same time the government is putting pressure on them to lend, and in other areas to keep wage inflation down - and also artificiailly sustaining asset prices - all three policies in conflict with each other.

    It'll be interesting to see what blows first.

  • 6. hjordan

    (06 December 2011, 12:04PM)  Complain about this comment

    Until first-time buyers can buy a reasonable small flat or starter home for £30,000 to £50,000 there is no real "market", with people moving up the ladder. And some employment stability would help.

  • 7. PB

    (06 December 2011, 12:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    The Finance Bill 2011 allows for some benefits on Stamp Duty on multiple purchase of properties, in that if you buy more than one property, freehold, the total cost of all properties is divided by the number of properties and the average price paid is what the Revenue accept as the Stamp Duty thresh hold. That means, you buy 3 properties for say 540000, the average is 180000, so duty is paid at 1% on each property, unlike the 3% payeable on the total amalgamated value prior to this Bill.

  • 8. HL

    (06 December 2011, 12:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    Spot on, Badger. It was easy credit that drove house prices to their present unaffordable heights. Make that credit more expensive, or insist on a 3.5x limit, and the whole tottering edifice will collapse.

    Many years ago, 2.5x mortgages were the norm and, in those days, fewer women went out to work so there was often only one income to base a mortgage on.

    Today, we are told that something should be done to "kick-start" the housing market -- in other words, to make houses even MORE unaffordable. Insanity.

  • 9. PB

    (06 December 2011, 12:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    Sorry, but couldn't get the whole message through in one comment! Property price fluctuations are always relative. If you intend on living in the property for the next 30 years, does it really matter what happens in the short term? If you let the property and can see a high return, and pay off the property in 5 or 10 years, you then own an asset which you wouldn't have had had you not speculated in the first place.
    Where price downturns really hurt is first time buyers, people who can't afford the mortgage repayments, and landlords who over stretch their financial spending. But I don't believe it hurts everybody.

  • 10. dan w

    (06 December 2011, 12:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    would MW be willing to calculate how much london home owners have profited by ignoring its annual call to sell property each year since the magazine started? i strongly suspect not.

    of course average UK property prices are unlikely to rise any time soon (though there is no such location as 'the UK' for property - every locality is different).

    but the same restricted access to mortgages that drives this is overwhelming the stagnant income effect to create a rental boom at present for BTL owners. strangely, MW has never got round to reporting this massive feature of UK household finances ...

    MW: great writing on some issues, but like us all, also has strong biases and blind spots.

  • 11. Carkus

    (06 December 2011, 12:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    The whole foundation of the current financial mess at least in terms of the private individual is the rising price of property and the refinancing that has lead to. Why is everyone so obsessed with their own house price rising? The only way anyone would actually benefit from this is when they die. Otherwise, we all need a home! Its now gone so far that the only options are a catastrophic implosion of the market and the pain that will result or a shift away from private ownership back to renting. Sadly, I think B is the only paletable choice.

  • 12. Paul Claireaux

    (06 December 2011, 12:22PM)  Complain about this comment

    MSW has called the crash for some time and so have I. And I’ll stay in rented property until prices cool relative to earnings. Despite a c20% real terms fall (2008) this ratio remains above 1989 levels. So I don’t think we’re done just yet! UK house prices have been saved by our preference for variable rate mortgages – now at historic lows. Americans hold a lot of fixed rate mortgages which became unaffordable as the recession bit. Their market is down 50%+ in some states. The BOE cannot stop SVRs from rising as the cost of lending between banks rises. So we’ll soon start testing the affordability of our mortgage stock with more normal interest rates. House prices are “Sticky” on the way down as people hold on to old 2007 valuations saying “I’ll sell when things get back to normal” But prices in 2004-2007were NOT normal. They were in outer space and we have no rocket to return them there against the current economic gravity? I may be wrong – but I wouldn’t bet my house on it!

  • 13. Cliff Hanger

    (06 December 2011, 12:38PM)  Complain about this comment

    MLR,

    In response to your 'Tiny overcrowded island' remark, just one word for you:

    Japan!

  • 14. Roberto Birquet

    (06 December 2011, 01:31PM)  Complain about this comment

    Only two things were holding up UK house prices in the face of collapsing consumer incomes: forbearance on the part of the banks (changing the mortgage terms and so on to prevent people ending up being in arrears) and ultra-low mortgage costs.
    --------------
    The third thing holding up prices (or more accurately stopping houses being sold) is sellers continuing and irrational in the Adam smith sense refusal to accept best offers. Sellers have the irrational attachment to prices at the high end of a bubble. They refuse to believe it is a bubble, and that those prices were somehow down to "supply and demand" fundamentals. This popular misconception of supply and demand seems not to teach Merryn and others that self-regulating free market economics is bogus, because the assumptions underlying it (we are all rational economic beings with access to perfect information) simply do not exist.
    And that means slow attrition on prices declines before a crisis event and sudden plunge.

  • 15. JAW

    (06 December 2011, 01:40PM)  Complain about this comment

    Property price movements are caused by a plethora of interconnected factors, but there are unmistakable signs that they are now aligning in a downward spiral.

    Government redundancies begin seriously in 2012, more government austerity measures, zero growth, credit crunch phase 2 intensifies, mortgages difficult to get and rates increasing, low numbers of new builds, wage stagnation, UK population increasing by 250,000 a year, increasing numbers of single occupant houses, increasing numbers of forced sellers, seller resistance to taking equity losses finally beginning to break down.

    Property auctions often give an early warning of house price movements... currently only about 60-65% of properties at auction are selling and barely achieving their very low guide price or reserve. Down from 85% sales achieved pre-2007. The trend is seriously downwards!

    How much will house prices fall in 2011? A guess... 15 %. If the Eurozone implodes.. 20 to 25 %.

    Merryn is right this time.

  • 16. Andrew

    (06 December 2011, 01:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    I have recently returned from Greece and intended to make a cash purchase of a house. Still, the agents insist all is well and busy and everything is rosy in the property garden. In my opinion property prices (with certain exceptions) are 40% over value. So I intend to rent this year and buy after I have witnessed the inevitable crash. Agents politicians banks, they are all blinkered, some would say they are lying.

  • 17. Mombers

    (06 December 2011, 03:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    A prop that might well have to get kicked out is the ridiculously favourable tax treatment of residential. There is no property tax, compared to 0.6% in Manhattan and even higher in many other countries. So Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani who owns the £140m penthouse at One Hyde Park would pay a property tax bill of £828k if his pad was in New York, as opposed to c. £2k in council tax (although I'm not sure if he's even paying that...). Not sure how long it is politically palatable for non-residents to get tax free access to the best land in the country, protected by the taxpayers police and planning laws. Him owning this flat creates no jobs and raises no tax revenue (it's registered offshore so no SDLT will ever be paid on it again.
    If you look at Italy, Greece and Ireland, all of their bailouts have involved imposing a property tax. It cannot be avoided or evaded, so offers good security to whoever is stumping up the bailout cash.

  • 18. Roberto Birquet

    (06 December 2011, 03:41PM)  Complain about this comment

    RMLR
    MoneyWeek also won't acknowledge that UK house prices have already fallen about 20% in real terms
    -----
    The three main indices had prices at about £194k on average (I do not count the irrelevant Rightmove asking price survey). They now average £162k. That is a nominal 16.5% fall. A real terms fall would include aggregate inflation, which is close to 15%, making the real fall some 30%.
    However, incomes have not kept up, and have risen in nominal terms by less than 10%, leaving less money available for housing; so I'd put real price falls so far at 20-25%. Looking at 2007 yields showed prices needed to fall by 40-50%, and such calculations have become skewed by emergency interest rates. It’d be better to dump those rates, and see what happens in a real market.
    The super low rates and the lending criteria are profiting landlords at the expense of families. Were prices allowed to fall by 20%, the market would find a new equilibrium, rather than its continuing zombie state.

  • 19. DF

    (06 December 2011, 04:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    Property bulls like to talk about pent-up demand for property due to population density or demographic factors that will prevent a fall in prices. This is a complete red-herring. Almost all us DEMAND a better, larger property in a nicer area etc. This is true whether we are in a boom or recession. The reason we can't necessarily have it is due to affordability. Affordability is governed by availability of credit and the costs of servicing it. We credit is loose, prices rise. This happens quickly because transactions increase. When credit is tight, prices fall. This happens very slowly because transactions drop away to nothing. These have always been the facts of the housing market. It's not rocket science.

  • 20. Nigel Watson

    (06 December 2011, 04:26PM)  Complain about this comment

    MLR
    You have made the classic mistake of confusing effective with potential demand. Immigrants add to potential demand, but not to effective demand (demand backed up by an ability to pay) Housing demand is driven by the pricer and availability of mortgage debt.

    Watch this video: http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/12707426/housing-economics

    Twitter: NigelWatson6

  • 21. Caveman

    (06 December 2011, 06:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    DF and Nigel Watson

    Both of you highlight the simple reason why the housing market is likely to fall significantly. Well said.

  • 22. Andrew M

    (06 December 2011, 07:08PM)  Complain about this comment

    Look at the yield and the P/E ratio. If you compare renting vs buying, the gross yield is 4%-6% depending on the area (at least in London). Prices have fallen a little bit, but at the same time rents have skyrocketed. Knight Frank claim that prime London rents are up 27% in just two years. In many areas it's now cheaper to buy than to rent, given how low interest rates are. Even a 5-year fix costs well under 4% if you have a bit of deposit.

  • 23. Whig

    (06 December 2011, 07:59PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hi MLR,

    let me guess - you think this time it's different. There won't be a price crash because you don't want it to happen. Oh and there not making any more land... got to lob that old chestnut in.

    Rents are holding up - true. But rents never got as crazy as house prices did they ? This tells us that the soaring prices was about the availability of cheap credit - not true demand.

    However much you think your properties are worth - you try selling them at that price.

    You CAN'T buck the market!

  • 24. MB

    (06 December 2011, 08:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    Thank you Nigel Watson for the link to that video - stay with it if you've not seen it before because in its rather wooden way it sums up how the average man in the street thinks with all his misconceptions corrected. Demand does not drive house prices: it's the availability of credit to pay those house prices. When the market is such that friends have to club together to buy a property, the market is ready to burst. In the 1720s we had the South Sea Bubble - this is just the latest of many and it will burst.

  • 25. Jolliffesguy

    (06 December 2011, 09:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    I have noticed in the Lancashire area of the UK prices seem to have bombed especially in the terrace property market. It's amazing what you can buy a property for compared to a couple of years ago, although this is the low end of the market.
    Some properties are boarded up which can be a bit detracting to purchasers.
    In this same area I note that many properties are going to auction - a biasely high number it seems, compared to others regions of the UK, but if I'm wrong then I stand to be corrected, fair enough!
    Supply certainly seems to outstrip supply there.

  • 26. nomad

    (06 December 2011, 10:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    Msw, late response, enjoyed article,on the subject of lending limits on use of remortgage cash would help,no cars ,no hols ,plastic surgery etc.,
    Improvments only,only a muppet spends a 'gain' b4 it's in the bank ,
    On the broader issue reliance on your home for wealth makes you lazy . Never forget folks treesdont grow to the sky.

  • 27. expert007

    (06 December 2011, 10:42PM)  Complain about this comment

    Anyone who thinks property prices will significantly drop is wrong for the following reasons:

    1) negative real interest rates means low carry cost for hard assets
    2) there are still asymetric supply and demand characteristics in the UK property market
    3) faith in paper assets is reducing, increasing demand for income producing investments like buy to let
    4) long term inflation protection is becoming more significant with more rounds of QE
    5) the UK government will always backstop the property market

    Property is the best place to invest right now (even better than gold but i'm long that as well)

  • 28. NeutronWarp9

    (06 December 2011, 11:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    Rather simplistic and trite text book reasoning there 'expert'007.
    The rest of the book would state property is lumpy, relatively hard to transfer, and requires buyers and sellers to represent a market.
    Some areas of the country are property goldmines and jolly hockey sticks to you if you hold assets there. Most of the rest is ordinary joe functional housing, dependent on employment and sufficient income to support the local economy.
    Most property ownership is long-term in nature and once the big bad wolf in the form of higher interest rates and austerity measures bite the little piggies will squeal, the banks will kick them out of their brick houses and there is certainly no spare govt money to create a happy ending to this story.

  • 29. MB

    (06 December 2011, 11:36PM)  Complain about this comment

    28expert007...erm, are you sure that the government will "backstop" the property market? They didn't in the crash of the early 70s or the one that came in 88/9 and lasted until 1995. The reason the previous lot of wastrels encouraged the banks to lend on mortgages to keep the bubble inflated was because they didn't want an HP crash and subsequent economic downturn prior to the election; they were very dishonest and wrote cheques for projects in the northeast they knew there was no money for, to garner votes: I don't trust this lot either - they know that the boom was built on debt and will hold interest rates low until the money has run out, which is soon, and they’re trying to hold the inevitable back as long as poss so they can look as good as they can for as long as they can. After that it's tin hats all round. As Warren Buffett said: "Whenever anyone tells you 'this time it’s different' or 'it's a new paradigm', you must always, under all circumstances, take cover".(sic)

  • 30. steve

    (07 December 2011, 07:34AM)  Complain about this comment

    For how many years now has Merrynn predicted a property crash ?

    In 2008 i bought a London investment flat for 200k, resales in 2011 are at 250k and i have a nice income with a 5.5% yield....

    For how many years now has Merrynn predicted a Japan Boom ?

    If you had followed her advice you must sit on at teast a 50% loss

    This lady has it wong time and time again



  • 31. Sibley

    (07 December 2011, 08:46AM)  Complain about this comment

    Bang on the money - or lack of it! Homeowners are in for a real shock next year, as prices plummet. Here in Maidstone they're already down nearly 10% YOY

  • 32. Paul Claireaux

    (07 December 2011, 09:37AM)  Complain about this comment

    To Nigel Watson.
    Many thanks for that link - a wonderful way to communicate.
    You've inspired me to use xtranormal to help communicate elements of my book due out next year.

    Great stuff. innit.

    Who are xtranormal's competitors ? Their voices are OK and robotic works well but i'd be keen to find one with a slightly clearer translation of script to voice.

  • 33. Rupert

    (07 December 2011, 10:55AM)  Complain about this comment

    I can't but suspect there a lot of potential buy -to-let investors here hoping the prices will drop so they can get back in again - despite all the social handwringing. I'm one.

    And also quite a few who have been taking Moneyweek's advice and are kicking themselves. I'm one.

    Like the boy who cried wolf, they will right one day and then it will be 'we told you so'!

    Til then, let's carry on blaming the markets for not doing what they are told to!

  • 34. Mick A

    (08 December 2011, 05:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    Roll on realism, when interest rates rise to their correct levels, then we'll see how the housing market reacts to a realistic and natural way of life. Repossessions will be rife, with a flood of unaffordable houses hitting the market and being sold at realistic prices by the Banks and Building Societies. Only then will housing once again become affordable - this time is not far off - the sooner it arrives, life in Britain will begin to become normal and realistic for the younger generation- this is written by an 'old git' - 68 years

  • 35. Nanyang Parkway

    (23 February 2012, 02:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    The argument that HP's remain steady owing to the UK's size is refuted by Japan, despite negligible interest rates persisting since the mid 1990s.


    Secondly, no government has 'backstopped' the property market directly, although you could argue that it is doing so via bank interventions in 2008, moral suasion to emphasis bank forbearance, and QE. In any case, having used those tools, the UK govt. has no genuine resources left at its disposal to backstop anything.

    Re Japanese real and nominal interbank rates - see http://greshams-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Japan-Real-Interest-Rate-Graph.png?5cc8a3

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>