Not even QE can pump up the British housing market

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Nov 09, 2010

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (20) Print this article

The new improved batch of quantitative easing (QE2) has been pushing up asset prices almost across the board.

Stock markets took a breather yesterday as the dollar bounced against the euro, as fears continue to grow over Ireland's debt woes. But gold continued to rise.

However, there's one market that it seems not even QE2 can pump up.

And that's the British housing market.

Both supply and demand for houses are falling

House prices are falling at their fastest rate in around 18 months, according to the latest survey from the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Rics). In October, 55% of estate agents surveyed said house prices had fallen in the past three months. Just 4% reckoned they had risen. That's a much gloomier result than September's, and also worse than economists had expected.

It bodes ill for house prices in general, as the chart below (thanks to my colleague David Stevenson) demonstrates. It compares the annual change in house prices on the Nationwide index, with the Rics survey results.

The whole market seems to be going into suspended animation. This is normally a time of year when sales pick up after the summer lull. But the number of buyer enquiries dropped for the fifth month in a row. And it's not just the buyer side. The number of new properties coming to market is also slowing down.

So it's perhaps little wonder that the number of completed sales fell to 15.2 per surveyor in the three months to October, from 16.7 last month. That's barely a sale a week. It's the worst level of sales seen since June 2009. And "with both supply and demand falling, transaction activity is set to remain at relatively flat levels for the foreseeable future," said Rics spokesman Jeremy Leaf.

Now it's worth remembering that sales have been pretty poor ever since the credit crunch kicked off. Prices recovered rapidly after the Bank of England (BoE) effectively bailed out any struggling homeowners by slashing the bank rate (or the 'base' rate as we used to call it). But actual sales have been trogging along at less than half the level they were pre-crisis.

However, recent data has shown sales deteriorating even further. Just 47,474 new loans for house purchase were written in September compared to 55,761 the year before, according to BoE figures.

So what exactly is causing this renewed caution?

Rics is pinning the blame for the slump on the continued lack of easy access to home loans. However, I'm not sure this can be the whole story. It's been difficult to get a home loan ever since the credit crunch kicked off.


Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: Don't be fooled - house prices will fall again!

  • Why UK property prices are set to collapse by 30%
  • When it will be time to get back in and buy up dirt cheap property

If anything, it should be very slightly easier now to get a loan. Sure, things haven't improved much. But according to financial website Moneyfacts, the proportion of home loans requiring at least a 25% deposit has fallen from 66% last year to 51% now.

What it seems to come down to is a simple case of stalemate. Most 'forced' sellers have already been shaken out of the market following the crunch. Those who are left might 'want' to sell, but they don't necessarily 'need' to.

As Charles Puxley of estate agency Jackson-Stops Staff said in the Rics report, there are "few motivated buyers and also not nearly as many motivated sellers as there should be. We are in for a frustrating winter with vendors' expectations of value very unlikely to be met."

In other words, both buyers and sellers can afford to play the waiting game. The employment market is hardly buzzing, so fewer people need to move for work. If the direction of house prices is uncertain, there's no psychological pressure on would-be buyers to buy. But if sellers are still convinced that they should be able to double their money on their home sale, then they can stubbornly dig in their heels too – for now at least.

My betting is that sellers will have to give way first. A would-be buyer is never forced to buy a house – they can always choose to rent instead. But sellers face a number of potential hazards ahead. The big threat is that interest rates rise more rapidly than anyone expects, and householders get hammered that way.

What's next for house prices?

It's easy to forget, but we're in a very precarious situation here. If the economy recovers, rates will have to rise. But if we end up in stagflation or deflation, then unemployment will probably pick up, and that will hurt the housing market too. And with new, sensible lending rules being proposed by the FSA (see my colleague Merryn Somerset Webb's blog for more on this), we're unlikely to see another lending boom in the near future.

We recently had a group of property experts in to chat about the housing market over a bottle of wine. They gave their five-year forecasts for house prices – you can read the story from MoneyWeek magazine here: What next for property prices? If you're not already a subscriber, get your first three copies free here.

Follow John on Twitter

Our recommended article for today

How to ride the quantitative easing bandwagon

Quantitative easing may not revive the economy, but it could give investors a thrilling ride as it inflates little bubbles everywhere. Just be careful what you buy. Merryn Somerset Webb explains how to join in the fun without losing too much when it all goes wrong.

Comments (20)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Tikka

    (09 November 2010, 11:04AM)  Complain about this comment

    I think stalemate is right. I'm a FTB buying now as I've waited 2 years and sellers haven't budged. I can't put my life on hold any longer, and rents are prohibitively high. It is all to easy to imagine the drop when rates do eventually rise and it will be painful when I see my deposit evaporate, but I'm hoping that buying somewhere for the long-term will mean that when I do eventually want to sell after ten years or so, inflation will have made up any losses. It is not a happy choice to make though. How did housing in this country get in such a mess?

  • 2. Robert

    (09 November 2010, 11:14AM)  Complain about this comment

    Any chance we can see Dominic Frisby's House Price/Gold chart again in the not too distant future?

  • 3. Peter

    (09 November 2010, 11:26AM)  Complain about this comment

    "Most 'forced' sellers have already been shaken out of the market following the crunch"....ah when did this happen? This country has yet to feel the real pain of recession. Low interest rates and a delay to fiscal retrenchment (a result of the election) have delayed the inevitable pain. As a property owner I would love to think the 'panicked' selling is behind us...but sadly I think there are a significant number of people out there who will be forced into selling once the spending cuts and tax increases (VAT) are implemented, and interest rates start to tick up. My fourth catalyst would have been inflation...but that is already here.

  • 4. Chris

    (09 November 2010, 11:31AM)  Complain about this comment

    Prices are going to crash - I think this is clear now. Maybe by 50% or so. Borrowing money to lose it is plain stupid. Credit availability is not the issue in my view. I have the cash in the bank and would buy in a heartbeat if I thought that prices were going to rise again. It will not happen - not in my lifetime. The game is over.

  • 5. Andy

    (09 November 2010, 12:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    Chris, of course prices will rise again in your lifetime (although of course I don't know how old you are). Peaks and troughs in the market are completely natural.

    Yes at the moment we are heading into a trough with prices set to fall big time. Looks like a pretty deep trough too the way the evidence is stacking up.

    But in a few years time - maybe 5 years, maybe 10 years, maybe 15 (who knows) prices will rise again you can be sure of that.

    All the market data tells us at the moment is that now is not the right time to be buying a house - unless you enjoy loosing money that is.

  • 6. Bertha Vanation

    (09 November 2010, 01:38PM)  Complain about this comment

    Andy @ 5

    The only thing that has underwritten the past 50 or so years of prosperity has been cheap plentiful energy, principally oil. Those days are gone and with them rising asset prices such as property. The nominal price might rise if we get hyperinflation but the real prices will steadily decline & then stabilise.

    We are facing a totally new paradigm within the next decade so I'm afraid to say that the game really is up for house prices.

  • 7. ricardo

    (09 November 2010, 04:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    Bertha, right on the money. If you're lucky enough to have substantial oil/gas reserves under your property then it may increase in value, otherwise as you say, we're in a whole new game. I guess the deal is that if you're buying a home that you're going to live and die in then there is no right price. If, instead, you're going into property as an investment vehicle then perhaps you should think about going to see a shrink first.

  • 8. Roberto Birquet

    (09 November 2010, 04:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    Sensible comments all round. When I studied economics I often found the widespread belief in efficient free markets as quite naive, but I was definitely in the (tiny) minority. The housing market of the past few years has convinced me I was right. There was little evidence of rational "economic man" - or woman.

    "It's all about supply and demand", or "It's different this time", or the best; "never mind the yield [it reached 2.5pc in Dublin 2006], it's all about capital appreciation." Of course, the theory of efficient markets is that rational people follow pricing information to make profits, and the yield is that pricing information. And it was screaming "Sell!", and everyone was rushing to buy. Hopefully, falling animal spirits will bring sanity but how long will we wait? Those spirits are not dead. Just listen to the amount of sellers saying "derisible offer". Even though the offers are greater than the 2004 bubble prices.

  • 9. David

    (09 November 2010, 04:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    Re: animal spirits -- buyer style.

    I know of a man who borrowed roughly 5 times his salary to buy a semi a few years back and is now trying to sell at a profit.

    Who is likely to buy ? Surely not someone on roughly the same income as the seller ? After all, there can't be many 5x mortgages available these days.

    Maybe a richer person will make an offer. The trouble is, the house is rather ordinary -- not the sort of place people on higher incomes usually want. I understand the property has been on the market for nearly a year, yet the price has not been reduced by a single penny.

    What does Economics 101 say about situations like this ?


  • 10. bubbleblower

    (09 November 2010, 06:44PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hi! I live in Spain. My uncle started selling his 150m2 flat near San Sebastian for 440.000€ at the end of 2006. He sold it in october this year for 312.000. Unemplyment in the area reaching 9%. House prices never fall, of course, only asking prices. LOL

  • 11. Andy

    (09 November 2010, 09:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    Bertha, you seem to have missed my point.

    I was not saying that house prices will not fall. I happen to think that all the evidence suggests that there is going to be a big, big drop in house prices - so I totally agree with you on that point.

    It's just that once house prices have fallen to a sustainable level then at some point they will surely start to rise again. No-one knows when this will happen, whether in 5 0r 20 years, but rise again they will whatever the cause (last time it was easy credit).

    Us humans are greedy creatures and that's just the natural cycle of things I'm afraid, and at the end of the day you can't change human nature.

  • 12. Homeowner

    (09 November 2010, 09:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    House prices will never crash - just stay about the same that's all. Us homeowners will never sell at less than what we paid for our properties and so if we're not selling at a loss then there's no chance you can buy at your fairytale 'pound shop' prices. The market will just stagnate that's all. Those of us that own houses will just stay put and live in them. Those that don't own houses will just continue to rent.

  • 13. dr ray

    (09 November 2010, 09:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    Homeowner,
    What happens when you die?
    More than 1% of the population die every year and the percentage among homeowners must be much more than this as young people neither die or own houses in large numbers.

  • 14. steve

    (09 November 2010, 09:56PM)  Complain about this comment

    Intriged by the idea of the house price/gold chart, I have looked into the figures.
    In November 2007, the average UK house cost £183,351 (Land Registry figure); gold was US$800/oz; £1=2.061US$ and so gold was £388/oz. So, the average house was worth 472.6 oz of gold.
    In Sept 2010, the average UK house cost £166,769; gold was US$1280/oz; £1=1.5629U$ and so gold was £819/oz. The average house was worth 203.6 oz of gold.
    Therefore, from Nov 2007 to Sept 2010, the average UK house fell by 9% in £sterling, but it has fallen by 57% if measured in gold.
    To put this another way round, if in Nov 07 you were in a position to buy the average UK house for £183,351 but instead invested the money in buying 472.6 oz gold, then by Sept 10 that gold would be worth £387,000. This is 2.32 times the Sept 10 value of the average house!
    Note that this arises out of a combination of the rise in value of gold and the fall in value of sterling over that period.

  • 15. Velocity

    (09 November 2010, 10:40PM)  Complain about this comment

    Steve,

    My compliments on your maths. Now do the same with stock markets priced in Gold since 2000. You'll find shares have lost between 35-60% yet the Hedge and Pension Funds still think shares are a "good" investment!

    Even our fiat money is crumbling but all around us everyone's so positive. Surely we're the toffs still partying it up oblivious while Rome burns!!!

    Say 'Goodbye' to the era of 40 years of credit (debt). At least Rome was built on rock, our generation has been living it up on IOU's

  • 16. Property Match (UK)

    (10 November 2010, 09:19AM)  Complain about this comment

    Home loans ought to require a minimum of a 25% deposit in all cases, following the recent major economic turmoil and most people should understand that such a margin is prudent. One reason for the crash was that this rule was not being followed by banks and building societies.

    Supply is unlikely to return until sellers are forced into having to move and also become realistic about lower market prices, which are as a result of the economics.

    Demand is unlikely to pick up until asking prices become realistic and then only when buyers feel confident that prices have stabilised.

    My new proposal to increase activity in the faltering housing market is to introduce what I call Set-price Selling. It replaces the traditional market appraisal and estate agents would need to re-train to provide new valuations in place of market appraisals. Full details are available from the writer.

    Peter Hendry, a surveyor with 30 years in mortgage valuations and estate agency.

  • 17. MrGreedy

    (10 November 2010, 09:27AM)  Complain about this comment

    Velocity, you mention that shares have fallen 35-60% in ten years and you sound surprised that someone says they are a good investment. Why is it a bad investment to buy something that is cheap? Are you saying that shares were only a good investment when they were over-priced. I don't share your logic. The further the stock market falls, the more I buy.

  • 18. steve

    (10 November 2010, 10:17AM)  Complain about this comment

    Its about looking at the value of things in comparison to other assets as opposed to the 'value' of a paper currency which is being devalued by QE printing and inflation being misrepresented by the the way in which the CPI index is calculated.
    If an investor bought a FTSE 100 index-linked accumulation fund (with low charges) in January 2003, then it would have increased by about 81% by today - but valued in gold, the investment would have decreased by 53%. If rather than buying the index-linked tracked in Jan 2003 they had bought gold, that gold would have increased by 280% by today. And using the gold they could buy 2.1 times the current value of the index tracker fund.
    Ah, the benefit of hindsight!
    By the way, if the investor had bought the index-linked tracker in March 2009 at the recent lows of the FTSE, they would be better off than if they had invested in gold in March 2009. However, not sure if the same will hold true at today's FTSE prices.

  • 19. david

    (10 November 2010, 08:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    to predict what will happen you have to look at past.economic crisis is like bushfire crisis in australia,when it happens everyone knows what the problem is and everyone knows what the solution is, but within a year or two its all forgotten

  • 20. Peter Cooper

    (14 November 2010, 06:09AM)  Complain about this comment

    Could it not be that house prices have gone too high? Jeremy Grantham said earlier this year that Oz and UK housing is 50% overvalued, see: http://www.arabianmoney.net/global-economics/2010/06/16/housing-an-obvious-investment-bubble-in-the-uk-and-australia/

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>