Should you buy a property to protect against inflation?

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Dec 21, 2010

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (38) Print this article

People are starting to get worried about inflation.

Consumer price index (CPI) inflation – the official measure – is sitting at 3.3%. But the most recent survey from the Bank of England showed that people believe inflation is more like 3.9%. And they reckon it will stay at that level for the next 12 months.

That's the highest expectations have been since 2008. In February, consumers thought inflation would be just 2.5% over the next 12 months. The big danger with expectations is that they may become reality, as people demand higher wages to match, and companies push up prices as a result.

So are we going to see interest rates rising soon? The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) reckons so. In fact, the CBI reckons that the Bank will start hiking rates within the next six months. But are they right? And if inflation is set to head higher, how best can you protect yourself?

The Bank of England has given up on inflation

The Bank of England just doesn't seem interested in the level of the Consumer Price Index anymore. It's been well above the target rate of 2% for the whole of this year. Only one Monetary Policy Committee member is calling for higher interest rates – Andrew Sentance – and he's been widely criticised because of it.

This has led some pundits to suggest that the Bank may no longer really be targeting CPI. Jim Leaviss of M&G reckons that the Bank of England has "moved away from pure-inflation targeting to more of a 'dual-mandate'." In other words, it worries about the economy as a whole, rather than simple price stability.

To be fair, the Bank can easily make the argument that it is still trying to hit its target. After all, if interest rates rise by much – perhaps at all – then anyone with a home loan is going to feel the pinch. That would cut into consumer spending, which would ultimately be deflationary.

That is, assuming that wages don't rise to match. And as my colleague Merryn Somerset Webb pointed out on her blog last week, this is the indicator that you really have to watch. What happens to CPI will be of secondary importance to the bank over the next year. Mervyn King and his colleagues will be much more worried about wages.

For as long as consumers feel that they need to absorb any rises in their cost of living, rather than pass it on to their employer, there won't be a threat of a wage-price spiral. But as soon as people start to demand higher wages, and employers feel forced to pay them, then you run the risk of over-heating.

The housing market is still not looking healthy

The other area of the economy that the Bank will be watching of course, is the housing market. And that's not looking too healthy. Gross lending to buy residential properties came in at £11.1bn in November. That was down 5% on October, and 10% year-on-year. This is shaping up to be the worst second half for home loans since 2000, according to the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML).

In estate agent speak, the figures apparently reinforce the impression of a 'flat market'. It seems that a market where prices are falling at anything less than a double-digit rate is a 'flat market'.

Meanwhile, approvals for loans to buy new houses remain hovering around the 45,000 mark. You can get more details and charts on the general state of the housing market here. But in historical terms, this is a pretty low number, and it's been around that level for most of this year.

And next year, net lending (ie the amount of money dished out minus the amount paid back by householders) is expected to come in at £6bn. That's even less than we saw this year, and compares to a peak of £110bn in 2006, when there was plenty of 'equity withdrawal' as people used their homes as cash machines.

So there's no sign that the market will pick up any time soon – quite the reverse, in fact.

Isn't property a decent hedge against inflation?

But if inflation is set to rise, then shouldn't you be buying a property? Preferably as soon as possible? After all, inflation is good for 'real' assets. And property has acted as a decent inflation hedge over the very long term, according to figures from Capital Economics. Since 1970, if you'd bought and held the average house for 20 years before selling, then your real capital growth would "always have been positive", apart from the 20-year period ending in 1993/94.

Over five- and ten-year periods, it becomes less of a sure thing. But property investors by and large always say they're in it for "the long term". So is now a good time to buy?

Probably not, reckons Paul Diggle of Capital Economics. The trouble is that house prices just now are starting from a point where they are rather over-valued. If you ignore the house price boom of the early-to-mid 2000s as being primarily the result of a credit-induced bubble, then the long-term real growth rate (ie after inflation) of house prices comes in at around 2.25% a year. On that basis, says Diggle, real house prices "look to be something like 20% too high relative to trend."

This also leaves prices very vulnerable if the Bank does feel forced to raise rates due to rising inflation. And then there's the threat of any further rise in unemployment due to public spending cuts. Factoring all that in, the risk / reward outlook is pretty unappealing. "Residential property is currently a poor prospect for those looking for decent real terms capital gains over anything less than the very long run," says Diggle.

If it's some sort of inflation protection you're after, we'd be more inclined to stick with the stalwarts of high-yielding blue chips and gold. And you can learn what our Roundtable experts think about the inflation / deflation debate in the Christmas issue of MoneyWeek magazine, which comes out a day early this week, on Thursday rather than Friday. If you're not already a subscriber, get your first three copies free here.

Our recommended article for today

A small-cap manufacturer on the road to recovery

Latest figures show that the UK's manufacturing sector is bouncing back from recession faster than anticipated. Here, Tom Bulford picks one small-cap firm that took a battering, but which is now staging a recovery.

Comments (38)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. nvp

    (21 December 2010, 11:27AM)  Complain about this comment

    property as an investment ?..........its certainly become a dirty word eh ?

    at least dinner parties are less boring now... as I used to fall asleep listening to "Asset acquisitions timed to perfection" from egotistical amateur property investors

    I bought at top of market in 2007 as my wife was going to kill me if we spent another year in rental.......mea culpa and I just have to wear it

    at least everyone views property as a place to live again .............assuming you can keep up the mortgage payments when interest rates rise next year

    i'll stick to trading forex.....thanks very much

    NVP

  • 2. jubbyjubber

    (21 December 2010, 11:29AM)  Complain about this comment

    Rates will fly up if inflation is really coming our way, that will destroy anything left in the US housing market stone dead, and the only thing holding the UK's Housing market up is the 400 year low in interest out Retirees and savers we are currently enjoying ...Good luck with that theory.

  • 3. Velocity

    (21 December 2010, 12:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    "...as safe as houses"

    That saying's for the dustbin as deflation (of the credit/debt bubble) lays waste to housing prices both sides of the Atlantic.

    I'm with 'NVP' posting above, Forex for me too and short everything financial

  • 4. Alex

    (21 December 2010, 12:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    First point. Wages. In the 1970s wages rose with inflation due to an organised round of annual wage negotiatons, that largely no longer exists, so a wage spiral is far less possibe/likely.

    If the above did occur as you imply then of course your second point that house prices are high would very rapidly be undone because rising wages would soon push up house prices, which would infact act as an excellent inflation hedge. Although this is unlikely, you are contradicting yourself with arguments 1 and 2.

    Final point, gold as an inflation hedge? We had relativelty high inflation throughout the 1980's and early 90's....during that period gold went from $850 to $300 nominal....some inflation hedge.

  • 5. Critic Al Rick

    (21 December 2010, 01:04PM)  Complain about this comment

    John, very interesting article. Most of it confirms my suspicions regarding buying a house at the moment. We could be a long way off that being prudent!

    Are wages really likely to increase, given the economic circumstances? I don't think so; it would make Britain less competitive in global markets; the result being more unemployment; downward spiral!

    No! As I see it, 'the good times are over' and people have got to adjust (downwards) to meet the new era of austerity.

    The main casualties will be those that can't adjust suitably; furthermore, further inflation would well and truly hit them.

    Watch this space, as they say!

  • 6. Etienne

    (21 December 2010, 01:11PM)  Complain about this comment

    You don’t mention that if you hedge inflation by buying a bigger house to live in yourself then you won’t pay capital gains tax on the increase in price.

    Almost anything else you buy the government will take 18% of the increase price… even if that increase is just keeping up with inflation and there is no real-terms gain at all.

    For a few years house prices will fall in real terms but they will go up again eventually. Ont the other hand I'd bet the government won't be taking any less than 18% capital gains tax for a long, long time.

    PS. No wonder the government loves inflation – they get to tax us on price rises when there isn’t even a real terms gain in value!

  • 7. DC88

    (21 December 2010, 01:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    What are that fundamentals that give investment in land a real return? This has always puzzled me. I can think of three:
    1. Increasing population.
    2. An increase in the proportion of the population who can afford land.
    3. A mis-calculation of inflation caused by focusing on consumer goods which are becoming from decade to decade through improved technology.

  • 8. John (Chichester)

    (21 December 2010, 01:44PM)  Complain about this comment

    The SP of a number of builders shares lows running from July through to November. In the case of PSN it has retraced just 17% of its overall fall from its 2007 highs to 2008 lows. Only a 3 weeks ago it had retraced just 13%.

    So whilst the property market may have further to fall to hit (and maybe go below) its long term trend line to touch 2.5 x average earnings has the market view of builders' shares reached its bottom?

    Reduced affordability on the back of 2011 tax increases and fears of hikes in interest rates will prevail. House sales are likely to falter at that time and scare stock market investors away.

    As interest rates start to show signs of rising (and the Euro weakening) so the pound will strengthen and overseas investors will sell their property investments and realise gains.

    As the property market tumbles that will be the time to buy in!

  • 9. khards

    (21 December 2010, 01:55PM)  Complain about this comment

    Capital gains are one thing and rental yields are another.

    Won't high inflation increase rental yield?

    If you have a rental yield of 5% on an asset that is devaluing at 5% you in fact a 0% yield.

    Another thing if you are paying rent that is an expense.

    I am not saying rush out and buy a property, but just remember that investment properties are attract rental income.

  • 10. N Black

    (21 December 2010, 02:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    Still plenty of people pouring their cash into residential property. And many are just leaving them empty.

    The claim that property prices double every ten years is still taken as Gospel by many.

    Only time will tell...but you will always own an asset which is in demand with UK property, its very tangible and cheap to insure...unlike gold in a safety deposit box

  • 11. Househunter

    (21 December 2010, 02:29PM)  Complain about this comment

    Thing is you can't live in gold or a high yielding blue chip...

    That has to be factored into account when considering the property argument if you are talking about owner occupiers (buy-to-let is a different case).

    We've sold and are now having to rent. The choice is terrible, cost is high and if we could find somewhere to buy at a price I already consider overpriced, a repayment mortgage would still be cheaper than renting it.

    Factor in the pleasure derived from owning it, the potential to improve somewhere and the fact that any falls are likely to reflected in the next home we bought too, and buying doesn't look so daft.

    I'm sure prices will fall but if I could find a flat I liked to move to now, I'd buy it.

  • 12. John (Chichester)

    (21 December 2010, 02:40PM)  Complain about this comment

    Correction to the first sentence of my previous post:

    'The SP of a number of builders shares lows running from July through to November.'

    should read:

    The SP of a number of builders shares is only just above lows running from July through to November.

  • 13. Alex

    (21 December 2010, 02:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    Househunter. I sympathise. I own a house, because I own it I've had a nice fireplace installed, had it decorated, made it mine, I enjoy owning it.

    Also even accounting for the interest foregone on the money I put down as a deposit, I'm £640 a month better off with a mortgage than I would be renting. Every month that 'profit' versus renting is accruing, and offsetting any notional fall in the price of my house. Which frankly I couln't give a monkeys about as I have no intention of selling it as I need somewhere to live.

    You'll find that because the vast majority of owners are in exactly this position that no matter how much the posters on here want prices to crash, interest rate rises or not, they aren't going to. I'd consider selling for a handsome profit, but for a loss? Why on earth should I?

  • 14. John (Chichester)

    (21 December 2010, 02:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    I would also like to add that builders and property shares will rally well ahead of any tangible improvement in the property market.

    I'm planning on investing (over probably a 2 - 3 year period) in shares, taking profits to then catch the property market for real. I would hope for a return of a multiple of 4 or 5 in shares over that period...

    ...well that's the plan anyway!

  • 15. Private House Sales

    (21 December 2010, 02:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    With inflation above the interest rate you can see why investing in property may appear to be an attractive option. However, in the current market injecting your cash into property to protect against inflation is still a big risk as there remains to be a lot of uncertainty.

    Key factors that should be taken into consideration are:

    - Property prices may drop again and currently there are no real signs of prices increasing.

    - The property market is still not very liquid and while you may get a better return than a savings account if you cannot access it then opportunity cost should be reviewed.

  • 16. Ellen

    (21 December 2010, 03:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    Inflation is certainly a problem right now and interest rates are being held artificially low to protect the most exposed to the credit bubble over the past few years. But how long can this go on for. The longer it goes on, potentially the more casualties there will be with pumped up prices of assets being based on low interest rates. That is why extremely tight lending is so necessary. I would say the Bank of England is putting off the inevitable and inflation is going to have to be brought down even if interest rates have to rise. The combination of low interest rates and high inflation is creating asset bubbles all over the place and not just in housing.

  • 17. steve

    (21 December 2010, 03:51PM)  Complain about this comment

    All depends what and where. A 2 bed new build property in Edinburgh City is on the market for 110k and yielding 5-6%. Thats not a bad investment if you have the cash and dont need to borrow. Your property wont go bust, will still be there in 10y time and be worth much more than it is today. Can the same be said of the UK stock market ? Furthermore, i dont think there is any 1m City in Europe where 2 bed new build is that Cheap !

  • 18. Alex

    (21 December 2010, 04:20PM)  Complain about this comment

    Totally agree Steve, I still think that the old addage of having 1/3 in equities, 1/3 in property, and 1/3 in bonds holds true. Pity that MW allergy to property as an asset class blinds them to this logic.

  • 19. gs

    (21 December 2010, 05:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    To the Editor,

    Is it possible that someone could research and write an article recounting what the first few years of Japan's oft quoted "lost decade" was actually like in real time rather than on reflection?

    The moniker "lost decade" conjures up all manner of horrors yet from what I can make out it started in very similar fashion to what we are currently experiencing in the West. (I raise this in the context of the above article and comments since I believe Japan's property "crash" was actually a series of seemingly small YoY losses that when all told added up to a rather ugly circa 50% or more fall.) Like many, I see nothing to suggest strength in the UK property market going forward, but equally with zero rates etc a rapid crash seems equally improbable. Perhaps a Japan esque series of declines may be the future?

  • 20. Tony

    (21 December 2010, 05:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    Dont forget though, the property market is still linked to peoples wages, if we do get property price rises during a big inflation period and peoples wages do not increase in line with the inflation, then people will simply not be able to afford the properties and buying will slow down even more...
    First time buyers have no chance now!

    Its just a big mess thanks to the keynesian economists (ponzi scheme). If inflation kicks in they will have to raise rates, if they raise rates the economy will die...
    The crash continues, im in gold and silver!

  • 21. Critic Al Rick

    (21 December 2010, 05:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    8. John (Chichester)

    I echo your synopsis of the situation regarding the foreseeable future of house prices and stock market.

    But I would have thought the best time to buy a house would not be while prices were tumbling but rather when they had truly bottomed out; I doubt that won't be for quite a time. The difficulty, of course, is knowing precisely when they have bottomed out!

    13. Alex

    I don't blame you, you sit tight and ride it out!

    As the market bottoms, I only hope we can find a property we like where the vendor is willing to accept bottom price!

    16. Ellen

    I agree with your sentiments entirely; it could have been me speaking!

    17. steve

    Frankly, I doubt whether house prices (inflation excepted) will be any higher than at peak in 10 yrs time; furthermore, it wouldn't surprise me if they hadn't bottomed out in much less than 10 yrs time! I hope I'm proved wrong!


  • 22. Alec

    (21 December 2010, 06:46PM)  Complain about this comment

    The BoE is in the business of creating inflation - the more the better! After all they were responsible for the debt bubble they created in early 2000/2003 by reducing interest rates to ingratiate themselves to Greenspan and the Fed. This is exactly the time they should have been increasing rates. The rest is history, 130% interest only mortgages, liar loans, drive-by valuations, reckless lending,reckless borrowing, property used as ATM machines etc.
    No wonder they want inflation and an artificial housing market.

  • 23. Critic Al Rick

    (21 December 2010, 07:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    20. Tony

    You have scared me!

    You may have bought into gold & silver at a good time.


    Somebody; please tell me if it is no too late to be prudent to buy into gold & silver now, and the best way to do it!!

  • 24. Roberto Birquet

    (21 December 2010, 08:38PM)  Complain about this comment

    DC88
    increasing population is not a determinant of demand, only of volume sales. They are not the same. Demand is a map of volumes and prices -not just of volumes:economics 101. You can have a huge jump in the population of Bangladesh, but as long as people have little money, prices in Bangladesh are unlikely to rise much.

    You only have to check history. Low population Ireland saw prices rise by 500% in 10 years to 2007, while large population Japan saw prices fall. So what could have caused that? Easy. Access to money. It's money that pays for high-priced housing, not more people with little extra money. Japan's bank would not lend, Irish ones did, so prices went the way they did. Next for UK house prices? That depends on the banks. What do you think?

  • 25. Roberto Birquet

    (21 December 2010, 08:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    Its just a big mess thanks to the keynesian economists (ponzi scheme). If inflation kicks in they will have to raise rates, if they raise rates the economy will die...
    The crash continues, im in gold and silver!
    -------------------
    Tony, how has Keynes to be blamed for Ponzi-ism? You don't know do you. Just making it up. Keynes explained that bubbles are due to people not being rational, unlike neoclassical economists claim. And the Ponzi experience was evidence in his favour. Do some research before printing such ignorant remarks.

  • 26. Ellen

    (21 December 2010, 09:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    Roberto, its a little unfair to assume Tony knows nothing about economics because he is more of an Adam Smith kind of a guy. I saw Gordon Brown in his head to head with Cameron and Clegg describing how good it was to create phantom money and in his words 'blow it through the economy' creating wealth and employment. He was referring to QE.

    In the distant recesses of my mind I remember learning of the anatomy of an economy as CIGs+E-I, which of course is Consumption + Investment + Gov Spending +Exports - Imports. Blowing money through the economy is a great idea if it were not for I (imports) which blows it all straight out of the country creating wealth and employment in China.

    Blowing money through the economy also makes us expensive and uncompetitive. We have much bigger fish to fry than over priced semi detached houses in the suburbs.

  • 27. sell house quickly

    (21 December 2010, 10:22PM)  Complain about this comment

    Property does not protect against inflation. In fact, over shorter period it has sometimes lost value vs. inflation too.

    sell house quickly sell property quickly sell property fast sell property quick

  • 28. Roberto Birquet

    (21 December 2010, 10:42PM)  Complain about this comment

    Yes, Ellen, but Gordon Brown only switched to Keynes AFTER the Ponzi scheme blew up. He supported Smith prior tothat. The money printing - most actively pursued by Bernanke Friedman - also came AFTER the Ponzi economy blew up. It is fair to point out that Keynes warned that bubbles occur when people's "animal spirits" get carried away. A Keynesian response would have been to raise interest rates and possibly taxes in 2003-07 in order to dampen those spirits. He called for govt spending and low interest rates only if the animal spirits went excessively the other way.

    Tony can be an Adam Smith kind of guy without misrepresenting other economists. That way is intellectual anarchy. Keynes only came to this present crisis AFTER the bust. No blame can be put on him for the years: 2001-07 - the bubble years.

  • 29. Ellen

    (21 December 2010, 10:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    Sell house quickly - obviously a personal agenda going on here. I think prices are going to continue to fall but I don't think its good for the majority of people to sell unless there is a second reason - maybe downsizing, schools or re-location.

    Housing is a commodity and a lifestyle.

  • 30. Tony

    (21 December 2010, 11:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    This whole fiat currency system was never going to work, as soon as Nixon ended the bretton woods agreement in 1971 it was destined to fail and we are pretty close to the end. Just take a look at the money supply expansion graph since 1971 it has been massively increased (inflation) ever since its a joke. The political temptation for the governments to debase and inflate the money supply is just to great and look were it has got us. As for the last couple of years it has just gone up vertically, more money has been created out of thin air in the last few years than has ever existed! Now if that money gets into circulation its game over.

    Watch this video and you will see why i think the whole system is a ponzi scheme and so do others: http://blog.mises.org/13912/uk-parliament-speech-invokes-mises-institute-re-honest-money-and-sound-banking/

  • 31. Tony

    (21 December 2010, 11:45PM)  Complain about this comment

    Also for anyone reading who doubts austrian economics rather than keynesian just watch the 'Peter Schiff was right' (austrian) on you tube he predicted the whole scandal in detail before it happened. Then watch 'Bernanke was wrong' (keynesian) i am sorry but benanke was clueless about all this. But everyone still listens to him??

  • 32. Tony

    (21 December 2010, 11:46PM)  Complain about this comment

    I am not misrepresenting anyone. Keynes,fractional reserve banking system and the Fed (privately owned banking cartel) are the reasons why the economy is a ponzi scheme, you will see how it ends. The Fed creates money out of thin air and lends it out and collects it back plus interest unreal...Where do you think inflation comes from?

    The 2001-7 bubble was created by Mr Greenspan artificially lowering interest rates to blow a massive credit bubble, if it was a free market and the market itself was allowed to set interest rates none of this would have happened, so the keynesian system was in place well before the mega bubble. Who profits from the bailouts? The Fed.

    We need to return to sound money backed by Gold.

  • 33. Tony

    (22 December 2010, 12:12AM)  Complain about this comment

    History is on my side. No fiat paper money ponzi has ever survived in the history of the world. Gold has been money for 5000 years.

    So in my opinion dont buy a house to protect against inflation buy gold, while you still can.

  • 34. Donald Riley

    (22 December 2010, 08:42AM)  Complain about this comment

    buya "property" to protect against "inflation".
    The inflation measure is bogus because it does not include land
    prices, a nasty item which should be in every MPC members
    monthly shopping basket. It rose sharply during the great BOOM,
    now its falling like in Japan for nearly 2 decades. Measured against any real commodity or even a Mars bar or the swiss franc, it shows a big fall. So we are actually in a deflationary spiral despite the rise in banana prices, ie we are a south
    american banana republic with our junta making out in Afghanistan that we are a world power.
    Interest rates ? Even the Kremlin now leaves them to the market.
    Here the MPC apparatchiks keep base rate low to prop up the
    trillion poundproperty debts which the banks hold and so save
    them from destined bankruptcy. There needs to be real competition in interest rates. UK property as protection in the real world? Only if you are a skilled operator .
    world
    in interest rates

  • 35. Geoff

    (22 December 2010, 09:29AM)  Complain about this comment

    A close associate has just managed to sell an inherited average house in Birmingham for £160K after being gazumped downwards for £5K on the offer price. The similar houses on in the area at last years prices were £190K and obviously not selling. If you want to sell in a falling market you have got to discount.

    All MW articles regarding property have been right for this location and the agent said they were getting a lot of it. You saved the agony of holding out for a better price next year and we took the hit to get out and into gold.

    Loved the article on the three stages of the gold bull run and related house prices.

    Top drawer!

    Keep the detailed buy sell indicators on gold/inflation/net ir, rolling out please.

    Best Regards

  • 36. Alex

    (22 December 2010, 09:54AM)  Complain about this comment

    Just a point of note for the 'gold bugs', it was always silver not gold that was used as a currency in the ancient world. The use of gold as a currency only came to be in the British Empire. Even the term Sterling refers to an amount of silver though, not gold.

    Interesting anecdotes on house prices, I own a house an I'd be delighted to see them fall 15-20% in nominal terms over the next couple of years, mainly because I wish to expand my family and need a larger house!

  • 37. Fraser

    (23 December 2010, 09:05AM)  Complain about this comment

    Im 23, been looking to buy a house since 2007 and found an article on this website saying house prices are soon to drop 20-40% in the next 5 years, I also care across an article saying the ftse100 should be below 5000 by next september. They were right on one, and I was waiting on house prices to drop.

    Living in the Scottish Borders house prices have gone up in real tearms the past 12 months, Iv put in a few offers at about 10% below the fixed/asking price and all have been rejected and others have bought the property of a better price. Having watched this happen for over a year I have now decided to build a house. Hopfully this way if houses were to fall the savings I will have made on building will equal eachother out. Now just waiting on BP announcing its divi and the ftse dropping a few hundread points from here (short opened this morning).

  • 38. Alex

    (23 December 2010, 01:45PM)  Complain about this comment

    I wish you the best with both Fraser, if you can get your hands on a suitable plot then self build is definitely the way to go. It's getting the plot that's the rub, as ( certainly down South ) all that happens is estate agents value the theoretical house that can be built on the plot ( e.g. 4 beds ), estimate the likely build cost ( easty to do ), then subtract one from the other arriving at the often scandelous plot value.

    I'm not sure I'd be shorting BP, but you never know.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>