Get out of UK commercial property

By Associate Editor David Stevenson Feb 01, 2010

David Stevenson

Share with
friends:

Comments (12) Print this article

Last week brought great news for fans of offices, shops and warehouses.

Sales of UK commercial property doubled in 2009’s fourth quarter compared with the year before, according to Property Data (PD). Property funds snapped up £3.3bn of new assets in what was dubbed the “return of the institutions” by PD’s Mark Pickering. And 41% of buyers of British commercial bricks and mortar came from overseas.

So does this raft of stats mean UK commercial property has really turned the corner, and it’s time to pile back in? Actually, no it doesn’t...

Sell out of commercial property now

From mid-2007 to mid-2009, UK commercial property was a horror story. Prices plunged by almost 45%, according to the Investment Property Databank. But over the last six months, there’s been a near-10% rebound in average valuations. Investors are getting more confident about the sector, says the Investment Management Association. There’s bullish talk about City office rents rising again.

It’s not just investment types who are feeling perkier. Two weeks ago, Britain’s biggest property developer Land Securities said it was soon starting a £655m London West End building spree, which will include the largest Oxford St development in 40 years. It’s the first such scheme to be launched since the credit crunch kicked in.

That’s confidence for you. And at face value, it could all be enough to get you buying property stocks again.

But don’t. Much of the recent hubris may prove to be a false dawn. In fact, you should be selling out of commercial property right now, not buying in. Here’s why.

Consumers face a tough 2010

The institutions may be splashing their cash around, but consumers aren’t. Despite all the upbeat talk we heard from retailers about surging shop sales over the festive period, harsh reality has now hit.

UK high street sales fell at their fastest rate for five months in January, says the latest report from the Confederation of British Industry. And the gloom is set to stick around for ages. The survey “reinforces the heightened concerns over the strength and sustainability of the recovery”, says Howard Archer at IHS Global Insight. “Households face still very challenging conditions… high unemployment, low earnings growth, high debt levels, January’s VAT hike and the prospect of further fiscal tightening ahead that will very likely include further tax hikes”.

Whoever wins the election – another uncertainty – the huge hole in our state coffers will need re-filling. If we’re all paying more tax, we’ll have less to spend in the shops. Add in the prospect of higher interest rates as inflation rises, which we recently discussed in our free daily investment email, and ‘disposable’ incomes will be squeezed on several different fronts.

This will put more strain on already cash-strapped retailers. In many cases, it will push them closer to the financial brink.

These days, most property companies are called Reits (Real estate investment trusts). But having a different name doesn’t stop landlords such as Land Securities and its peers from being hurt if more of their tenants have trouble paying their rent bills in full. And tenant problems aren’t likely to be confined just to the retail sector.


Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: When will house prices bottom out - and how will you know?

  • Why UK property prices are going to fall 50%
  • When it will be time to get back in and buy up half price property

Why corporate bankruptcies are likely to keep rising

Last week there was a chilling warning from R3, the professional body of the insolvency brigade. The UK has just about, growing at a measly 0.1%, emerged from recession. You might think this would be good for commercial property values. But it’s more likely the reverse. R3 expects the number of companies going bust this year to jump by 23% compared to 2009. And corporate bankruptcies are likely to keep rising for a long time.

Why the rise? Because so far, many creditors haven’t pulled the plug on near-insolvent debtors, because they’d have recouped very little from a forced liquidation. But even a slight pick up in the economy would persuade creditors to get more aggressive about collecting the cash they’re owed. They’d now have a better chance of getting more of their money back, even if their debtors went bust.

If creditors start playing hardball, that’ll push more companies to the wall. And lots of tenants going bust would be bad news for landlords. Obviously, it would hurt their rental income stream. But on top of that, it would create more vacant office, shop and warehouse space. And when empty buildings aren’t earning income, their valuation in landlords’ books has to be reduced. So property companies’ net asset values (NAVs) get a haircut.

In addition, more damage is done to a Reit’s NAV if its properties are financed, even partly, by ‘gearing’. That’s just another term for buying buildings with borrowed money. And as anyone with a fair-sized home loan knows, the amount of equity in a house moves up and down much faster than property prices.

The Bank of England has basically been rigging the market

There is another factor that can push up property values – a drop in yields. If investors are prepared to accept a lower yield when they buy a building, it means – assuming the income stays the same – the price of that building will increase. It’s a key part of the property bulls’ case. They point out that the difference between property yields and gilt returns is higher than the long-run average. So they expect property yields to fall, driving up prices.

Trouble is, the reverse is also true. Rising yields mean property prices fall. And gilt yields are artificially low right now because the Bank of England has basically been rigging the market. As Tim Price puts it in his Price Report newsletter, “the government has butchered the price mechanism by effectively forcing the Bank of England to buy gilts direct from the Treasury – the process known as quantitative easing. The Bank has become the buyer of Gilts of both first and last resort, crowding out many institutional investors.” But when this price-fixing finishes, as it will very soon, gilt yields will rise again. So yields on higher-risk properties won’t look anything like as appealing. If they start climbing again, down will go property values.

All in all, not a pretty picture for commercial property – or the sector’s share prices. Yet the FTSE Reit index has almost doubled from its lows of early March last year, and has outperformed the overall market by 20% in the process.

If you still hold some Reits, now looks like a good time to sell them.

Our recommended article for today

Two ways to profit from nostalgia

With many of the brands of yesterday still around, there's money in nostalgia. Here, Tom Bulford tips two stocks that should profit from fond memories of a bygone age: Two ways to profit from nostalgia.

Comments (12)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Bob Roberts

    (01 February 2010, 12:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    If the BOE/Treasury 'price-fixing' mentioned in the article finishes and gilt-yields start rising will it mean that only commercial property falls or will it mean that residential property will fall also?

  • 2. berkskiwi

    (01 February 2010, 12:50PM)  Complain about this comment

    We all thought residential property would fall 20% in 2009 and it's gone up by 5-10%. You'd be much better off putting your money into commercial property than in the bank. Yes, commercial property could possibly drop in value, but it is almost certain that the value of money in the bank will drop at a faster rate. So if Money Week are saying get out of commercial property, what should we get into.....let me guess.....gold!

  • 3. D Sugar

    (01 February 2010, 01:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    All property values are strongly supported by the Government and BoE. Never bet against the central bank.

    Money week always overlooks this. Constantly bearish on houses and commerial real estate. Anyone following their forecasts (buy gold, avoid property and shares) has lost money.

  • 4. Alex

    (01 February 2010, 02:04PM)  Complain about this comment

    I like moneyweek alot, but have to agree, commercial property funds offer good value at present, my favourites are admittedly non-UK based..... Raven Russia, Ciref, Alfa Pyrenees, Deutsche Land.....but they offer an excellent yield at present and in the case of Raven a very solid business model warehouses in Russia. ( I said Warehouses.... ;-)

  • 5. LetsGoa

    (01 February 2010, 02:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    @D Sugar

    Moneyweek does us a service by mantaing their bearish stance.
    Government inspired growth won't last forever and will be a drag on our economy in the future (you have to pay interest on the borrowing!)

    Gold has ended higher every year for over a decade, so how could you have lost money?

  • 6. Alex

    (01 February 2010, 02:31PM)  Complain about this comment

    You can have lost money on Gold because it doesn't pay any dividends.

    If you factor in reinvested dividends, over the long term stocks are a far better investment.

    Gold hit $850 for a few sessions in 1980, yet here we are 30 years later, and gold is at $1089 ......up a whopping 28% over 30 years .....erm don't spend it all at once.

    That's 30 years with zero dividend yield in the meantime.

    To give you an idea, £100 invested in a blue chip stock paying a 5% dividend yield over the same time, with the dividend reinvested, would give you a 452% gain......that's assuming no capital growth in the stock....which of course there would have been.





  • 7. LetsGoa

    (01 February 2010, 03:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    I Don't think MoneyWeek was recommending buying gold at the 1980 top.

    Shares & Property are in a long bear market, why would you want swim against the tide?

    Buying Gold might not be as fun as holding the latest Hi-Tech share, but at least when shares dividends are in double figures, and PE ratios are in single digits you'll be able to feast on them!


  • 8. Gregg

    (01 February 2010, 04:44PM)  Complain about this comment

    Regarding commercial property. 6 years ago my wife and I sold our house to buy a business. After 2 years of trying to find a pub etc.. we gave up as it was obvious that the beer-tie arrangement was the worst possible business arrangement in the entire history of the planet. However for 6 years we have been receiving "business properties for sale" email alerts from various business transfer agents. Many Pubs and other "retails' that sold for £150,000 + just 2 years ago are now sale again for £FREE of any ingoing. We will continue to get these alerts because we now realise that when we see these "retails" ingoing start to increase we will be at the other end of the depression.

  • 9. EE

    (01 February 2010, 09:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ Alex
    I have took a look at the Blue Chip Value Fund

    http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:BLU
    In 90s the price was 6 and after 20 years the price is 3
    Are you really sure about your Blue Chip strategy?

  • 10. paul woodman

    (03 February 2010, 12:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    You have over looked the most important thing. Investing in com. property today is not the same as 1960 today property loses value due to the high M and E content which need to be upgraded and replaced. I have said for 10 years that all com. property companies should put aside part of the rent to cover this cost, putting aside refurbishment and other costs.

  • 11. PJM

    (18 February 2010, 09:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    In 1994 I purchased a Commercial Property for £65000- 3 years ago it was worth £450,000 but the value has since slipped back to £350,000. It has been let to a Tenant since I purchased it- the current rent is £18000 pa and I calculate the total rent paid to me in just over 15 years is circa £170,000 with outlay of perhaps £25000 for maintenance, Insurance etc - nothing like "Bricks and Mortar" in my opinion.

  • 12. steve

    (03 March 2010, 05:22PM)  Complain about this comment

    would u say it is a gud time by a property now or would u hold on a few months to see if prices fall im looking to have this property for 5 years

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>