Commercial property is still a 'sell'

By Associate Editor David Stevenson Aug 06, 2010

David Stevenson

Share with
friends:

Comments (5) Print this article

The banks' results have dominated the news flow on the stock market this week.

Britain's lenders have been queuing up to tell us how much more money they've been making recently. Yesterday it was Barclays' turn to announce a 29% hike in first-half profits.

After all the problems the sector has suffered, it's no surprise that this has taken up most of the available column inches.

But in the background, there have been plenty of other companies reporting their results too. Including in one area that's very closely tied to banking.

Trouble is, the news here isn't quite so good. And it's likely to get even worse...

Recommended reading

The stock market doesn't believe property prices will recover

As you may already know, we've not been keen on commercial property in this country for a long time.

There was huge price bubble in 2005 and 2006, just before the UK's property companies turned themselves into REITs (real estate investment trusts). That was supposed to be great for investors because of the tax benefits. REITs avoid capital gains and income tax if they pay out most of their income to their shareholders.

Unfortunately, the onset of REIT status at the start of 2007 also marked the top of the commercial property market. Since then, shareholders in quoted REITs have lost almost two-thirds of their money. Despite a bounce from the March 2009 lows, investors in the sector have actually made no capital gains since 1993. Very painful.

But hang on, you might be saying. Hasn't there been a pick up in commercial property prices recently, particularly in hotspots like the City? And if that keeps on going, won't it work its way into REIT share values at some stage?

Well, you'd be right that there's been an upturn in some parts of the office market. But the problem for REIT shareholders is that this has done little or nothing for the sector's stock prices overall. That's partly because of other problems in the commercial property market. I'll come to them in a minute.

But the most obvious message is that the stock market doesn't believe property prices as a whole are set for a sustained recovery. Indeed, reading between the lines of what leading player British Land had to say yesterday, another downturn in REIT share prices might not be too far away.

British Land is the biggest landlord in the City. Yet despite the upbeat chat by property market cheerleaders about a shortage of prime Central London office space – which is supposed to drive rents and values much higher – it hasn't really happened.

Valuations of property in the City and the West End only nudged up by around 2.4% on average in the three months to 30 June on the back of a similar increase in rents. And that was the good news. Retail property values climbed by less than 1%, while rents actually dropped.

We should be worried about the looming 'double dip'

And this is likely to be about as good as it gets. Commercial property prices are closely linked to what's happening in the wider economy. And the outlook there is none too bright at all. British Land boss Chris Grigg – who's not in the business of talking things down – is concerned about "a more uncertain economic outlook".

We'd say he's right to be worried. As we wrote in MoneyWeek magazine recently, it's quite possible that we'll see a double-dip, both here and in the US: Is Britain in for a double dip recession? (If you're not already a subscriber, get your first three copies free here.)

And a 'double dip' will mean less demand for office space. Potentially savage state spending cutbacks will mean hundreds of thousands of public sector workers being laid off, while the government will be keen to dispose of any underused and unwanted buildings. That will hurt even the 'strong' areas of Central London.

As for retail property prospects, just look at what Simon Wolfson, CEO of fashion chain Next, said this week. He's seen "a noticeable cooling in retail demand in recent months". And he reckons "second-half consumer spending will be more restrained as spending cuts and tax rises take effect".

This could well signal the end of the line for already cash-strapped storekeepers. In turn, that could mean more empty sites, rents falling further and lower valuations.

Yet… might there be one last hope for commercial property? After all interest rates are ultra-low right now – the Bank of England kept the bank rate at its record low of 0.5% yesterday. So won't investors be looking for the rather better yields that bricks and mortar offer?

Steer clear – commercial property prices are expected to fall

Not according to Capital Economics' Kelvin Davidson. He points out that nearly two-thirds of the respondents to the REITA property survey expect to see rising yields over the next 12-24 months. In other words, they expect prices to fall. And so they'll be happy to sit on their hands (and their money) until they see more bargains hit the market.

And as for people buying commercial property on borrowed money, take a look at this scary chart from Capital Economics.

Net lending to property has actually turned negative – i.e. as a group, borrowers are repaying their loans to the banks, rather than taking out increasing sums of money. This could be the case for a while – the last time it happened, in 1991, it took five years for the net commercial property lending to start expanding again.

What does this mean for investors? It looks pretty clear to us. Don't be tempted by the massive plunge in the sector's share prices over the last three and half years – there's plenty more bad news on the way for commercial property stocks. If you want income, the defensive high-yield shares we keep tipping look a much better bet: Four cheap, high-yielding defensive stocks.

Our recommended article for today

Five biotech takeover targets

One of the easiest ways for big pharmaceutical companies to build up their drug pipelines is to buy successful smaller biotech firms. Here, Marc Lichtenfeld picks five stocks that look like promising targets for the drug majors.

Comments (5)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Michael Wolff

    (06 August 2010, 12:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    Commercial property prices could be further impacted if government embraced a policy of "Work at Home".

    The UK public sector could achieve £15bn - £20bn annual operational savings within two years by taking a strategic view on “Work at Home”. This amounts to 20% of fully associated employment costs and the deployment of 1.8 – 2.4m employees. For the same cuts, this saves up to 500,000 redundancies.

    Work at Home is a tried and tested organisational model enabled by cloud-based computing and telephony systems. It is fully secure, highly flexible and capitalises on the existing broadband infrastructure.

    Most work currently performed in an office environment can now be done from home. Home workers are generally 20% more productive than office workers.

    Benefits

    - 20% cost savings
    - improved productivity
    - significant carbon savings
    - reduction in the use of transport infrastructure
    - improved health of workers
    - increased resilience to disaster threats

  • 2. JAW

    (06 August 2010, 01:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    Commercial property companies are parasitical upon the business community. Collectively they now control most of the high street and business areas of towns and cities and for that near monopolistic stranglehold they exact the maximum rent that productive commerce and manufacturing can bear.

    Competition between property companies to increase portfolio size pushed up the price of commercial property during the boom years.

    Only legislation can reduce the growth of REITs, eg tax capital gains the same as individuals. We need to have more business owner occupiers in the UK, say 75 - 80 %, similar to the 70% owner occupiers of houses.

    Planning restrictions mean that commercial property is limited in the UK and whoever controls it can exact a disproportionate share in the wealth creation of the nation. It cannot be left to free market forces, or to investment exploitation, otherwise we will all suffer from diminution of GDP, profits and wages.

  • 3. maxd

    (06 August 2010, 07:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    "second-half consumer spending will be more restrained as spending cuts and tax rises take effect"

    With the VAT increase in Jan 2H10 spending will be up as people pull forwards big ticket purchases.

    1H11 on the other hand will be miserable.

  • 4. Tiny Tim

    (06 August 2010, 08:52PM)  Complain about this comment

    @Michael Wolff

    I think home working is the way forward in the next few years. Office based employees could definitely do 2-3 days at home - possibly more but there still needs to be some office time for team meetings etc. We do need a faster broadband network to achieve this - probably best to spend the money from road building on this instead. We still need to remove non-jobs from the civil service and other areas rather than just getting them to work from home though.

  • 5. carol

    (17 August 2010, 10:41PM)  Complain about this comment

    Retail space is ridiculously expensive on the high street compared to gross retail sales generated. People just don't shop on the high street the way they did due to the proliferation of superstores, internet shopping,etc The way commercial real estate owners continue to raise rents and our government continues to raise rates you would think that the high street was booming.

    There are 12 empty shops on our high street today. Five years ago there wasn't an empty shop and you had to pay dearly to take over anyone's lease. Today surviving retailers would probably pay you to take over their leases if you were fool enough to do it and to ad insult to injury, VAT rises yet again.

    Solution, increase the amount retailers can sell to 150,000 GBP per year before VAT kicks in or eliminate business rates, they will thrive. As a nation of shopkeepers we were stronger.
    God save the small retailer.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>