The gold bubble is yet to come

By MoneyWeek Editor-in-chief Merryn Somerset Webb Nov 27, 2009

Merryn Somerset-Webb

Comments (4) Print this article

Is there a bubble in the gold market? Must be, says one reader. Just turn on the TV during the day and you'll see hours and hours of ads from agencies offering to buy gold from you – pop it in an envelope, send it off, and next thing you know you'll get back an envelope full of cash.

But this mild level of public interest is not evidence of a bubble, not least because it invites people to sell, not buy, gold. It's more a sign of a growing awareness of gold, which adds weight to the idea, suggested this week by Société Générale's Dylan Grice, that we're in the boom stage of a possible Kindleberger cycle for gold.

We've written on this many times before – the cycle comes in five stages.

• First the 'displacement' – a big change of some sort.

• Second the 'boom' – when a convincing story about the asset in question begins to gain traction.

• Then comes 'euphoria' – where greed takes over and everyone piles in.

• Next comes 'crisis' – insiders sell, prices fall, a rush to the exit kicks off and the real misery starts.

• Finally we have 'revulsion' – when no one will touch said asset class with a barge pole.

Gold has had its displacement (a financial crisis followed by an epidemic of money-printing), and it now seems that a nice story explaining why it should keep rising in price is gaining hold (see nearly every issue of MoneyWeek over the past five years for details on this).

Grice has added to the story with a neat valuation idea (which sounds silly but is, as he points out, no more so than the stupid "market cap to clicks" metrics we used in the tech bubble).

If you look at what gold price it would take for every US dollar issued to be backed by America's holdings of gold, you will have an idea of where the gold price might end up, he says.

So what is this price? $6,300 an ounce. Sounds ridiculous, doesn't it? But that's bubbles for you. They are, by definition, ridiculous.

Not all fund managers are much into gold. Even those who are tend to be loath to suggest holding more than 5% of a portfolio in anything precious-metal related.

That's why we like Sebastian Lyon and his Personal Assets Trust. Not only does he hold around 10% of the portfolio in gold, but in the fund's most recent Interim Management Report he reserves the right to raise his "holding of the virtuous metal". But Sebastian and his investment trust (with a TER of 1.1%) reflect our thinking in more than just his gold holdings.

If I were to recommend one fund that pretty much sums up the way we would invest just now, this is it. Personal Asset Trust is well out of financials and cyclicals, and mainly in strong international stocks (Nestlé being a good example), which can provide the "dividend certainty in the difficult economic environment" its managers expect over the next few years.

Makes sense to us.

Comments (4)

Comments

  • 1. Michael Lewis

    (26 November 2009, 05:01PM)  Complain about this comment

    I don't understand why these funds get recommended. A 1.1 % cost for what? Like the fund at Troy, Gold (10%) + some divi paying blue chips. Anyone with an online broker account could build that themselves at minimal cost, buying stocks monthly.
    I noticed he had no corporate bonds or Japanese stocks, two other asset classes that moneyweek always seem to recommend. The former, I can't for the life of me understand why, when we have inflation about to smack us in the face. I have to agree with Jim Rogers, right now, I think there are probably other commodities with more upside than Gold.

  • 2. Matthew

    (27 November 2009, 01:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    Would be interested to learn what commodities & reasons

  • 3. Michael Lewis

    (27 November 2009, 02:51PM)  Complain about this comment

    "Would be interested to learn what commodities & reasons"

    A recent quote from Jim Rogers:

    "If you want to buy precious metal, I'd rather buy silver or palladium. Both are very depressed. I continue to be more optimistic about agriculture than some other commodities"

    I had to laugh when MoneyWeek sugested Sugar (via SUGA.L ETF) a few weeks back - this was after months and months of a run up in the sugar price. A day late and a dollar short.

    Cocoa certainly is another commodity that run up nicely, in part due to concerns about stability in the Ivory Ghost.

    Some commodities will go up, some down. Perhaps thats why we have an article once month "Months of gains ahead for commodities" followed by the next month "Commodities are flying too high".

  • 4. Jules

    (10 December 2009, 01:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    "I had to laugh when MoneyWeek suggested Sugar..."

    Michael, you selectively quote from the legend, Jim Rogers, and I wouldn't take issue with anything he says, but you've conveniently overlooked the fact that he's also bullish about Sugar!

Commenting is now closed on this article.