Three reasons why gold may be due a correction

By Dominic Frisby Jun 21, 2010

Dominic Frisby

Share with
friends:

Comments (24) Print this article

After moving above $1,260 an ounce on Friday afternoon, gold closed the week at $1,256. It's a new record.

And it's no surprise.

Governments and central banks have between them created an environment of negative real rates. For example, retail price index inflation in the UK is above 5%. Yet the Bank of England has kept the bank rate at 0.5%. By the time they've paid tax, savers need to find a bank that pays more than 7%, just to keep up.

The result is that savers are being mugged by policy-makers. Money in the bank is losing its purchasing power, as the people in charge attempt to devalue the currency. Watching your savings shrink by the day isn't much fun. So people are being driven to find a more effective store of value.

Is it any wonder people are flocking to gold?

Recommended reading

What's driven the gold price to new dollar highs?

Higher interest rates are inevitable sooner or later. But, as long as this environment of negative real rates continues, gold will continue to rise. Many – myself included – have been looking for a sizeable correction in the market in order to get repositioned. You normally get one or two a year. But, since late 2008, even the slightest sell-off has quickly been met with buying. A lot of people want to get into this market.

It's worth noting that much of the rally we have seen over the past fortnight has largely been a function of dollar weakness. In euros and pounds, gold is trading a few pennies below the highs made on 7 June. So it's not that big a landmark. But looking at the bigger picture, gold, a currency in itself, is rising against all fiat currencies, as policy-makers worldwide debase them.

However, there are some divergences that suggest gold might soon suffer some sort of correction.

Three signs that gold may be due a correction

Firstly, June, July and August are typically weak months for gold. The summer often sees one of the best entry-points (i.e. a low) of the year.

Secondly, even after the rally of the past few weeks, gold stocks are still trading below the highs of December 2009 and March 2008. That could simply mean that the stocks are currently a better opportunity than the metal. But that divergence can often indicate impending nastiness. It certainly did in the spring of 2008.

Thirdly, gold's highs are also unconfirmed by silver, which, at $19 an ounce, is still 10% or so off the March 2008 high of $21.50.

Now, I'm not too concerned about silver's comparative weakness. Typically, the ratio between gold and silver falls during good times and rises during the bad. For example, between 2003 and 2007, when credit markets were at their most buoyant, the ratio fell from 80 to 45 (so it would have taken 45 ounces of silver to buy an ounce of gold). In other words, silver was rising in price faster than gold.

This happens because, unlike gold, silver is as much an industrial metal as it is a monetary one. Its comparative surge in price was due to the fact that this was a booming period of speculation. Silver does well in such an environment.


Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: When will house prices bottom out - and how will you know?

  • Why UK property prices are going to fall 50%
  • When it will be time to get back in and buy up half price property

What the gold/silver ratio can tell us about the wider economy

However, in periods of credit tightening, the ratio between gold and silver rises, as deflationary pressures cause money to move from speculative assets to stores of wealth. During the bust of 2008, that ratio quickly went from 48 to almost 85. In other words, silver slid in price much more quickly than gold.

Indeed some experts like to use this ratio as an indicator of impending stress or buoyancy in the credit markets. A move above 70 would tell us there's more trouble coming.

The chart below shows the ratio between gold and silver over the last ten years. As you can see, a clear uptrend has been in place since late 2006.

The ratio is useful as a guide to tell us when to move your gold into silver (above 80 on the ratio) and when to move your silver back into gold (below 50). But the current ratio of 65 is not necessarily warning of an impending correction in the gold price.

All in all, while the evidence is not conclusive, I'm not a buyer of gold here. I don't like to buy at all-time highs. But nor am I selling. We may see some sort of summer pull-back, particularly if stock markets turn back down. But, longer term, this bull market has further go.

Our recommended article for today

Two medical pioneers heading for the spotlight

These two small-cap companies are at the forefront of medical technology. They have underperformed for years, but now things could be looking up for them both, says Tom Bulford.

Comments (24)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. mat jackson

    (21 June 2010, 11:08AM)  Complain about this comment

    Unconvinced that it will just be a correction- gold yields nothing other than an increase in its own value (if it continues so to do), so the only inflation hedge is if the price continues to rise.
    A negative 7% may feel harsh from the banks, but buying gold now and then seeing it at $700 in a year's time is far harsher - and with such a long bull run, there will be a lot of sellers when the tide turns.
    Hubble bubble toil and trouble....

  • 2. Atchman

    (21 June 2010, 11:48AM)  Complain about this comment

    The ole 'gold in a bubble' argument eh? When they stop debasing currencies be sure and get back to me Ill be happy to discuss 'the bubble' then.

    Dominic, If I ever meet you I owe you a pint to say thanks for the great junior tips over the years - GORO and GBB.V were both stella!

  • 3. gs

    (21 June 2010, 11:59AM)  Complain about this comment

    I would have thought this merited a mention today? http://www.cnbc.com/id/37818810

    The diversification of cash rich nations reserves into non treasury/dollar assets is for me a far more interesting and permanent driver of the gold price for this generation than any of the historical inflation, weak dollar etc theories. It is also extremely relevant that the ongoing migration of (real) wealth eastwards is putting capital in the hands of people for whom owning gold is a far more deep rooted cultural aspiration and expression of status/wealth.

  • 4. Krass

    (21 June 2010, 01:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    The game has already changed! With expansion of the austerity measures across Europe, US eventually following suit and China letting the yuan trading higher the concept for debasing of western currencies doesn’t fit to the real world situation any more. The gold might be heading for a prolonged and serious correction, just like the oil did not long ago.

  • 5. philip

    (21 June 2010, 01:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    A good report I read was of the opinion that far from Gold being in a bubble it was currencies that were in a bubble.
    You can`t print Gold.

  • 6. DemiGod

    (21 June 2010, 03:01PM)  Complain about this comment

    If gold starts to properly slip, we will need to buy food - and I don't mean shares in water or the like. The worlds western currencies have already been heavily devalued. My £ buys so little at that I have stopped shopping in retail outlets.

    We just need another 9/11 or similar and regulations will be tightened, certain trades may even be temporarily banned. Germany recently banned short selling on German exchanges, England used anti-terror legislation against Iceland to freeze assets.

    If gold falls in the long term it means one of two things: the system that places value on it falls and that is a big pack of cards to fall or things are in full on recovery. The latter seems highly unlikely at the moment. Just imagine a week where you cannot access your bank or share funds, they have been suspended under anti-terror laws, then the following week you can gain access but your money is different.

  • 7. Keith P

    (21 June 2010, 04:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    Not much to say while we wait for the Budget? Do a piece on gold!
    From last week's 'gold is about to go ballistic, look at the graph', to this week's "watch out for the correction'. It doesn't matter what you write or how inconsistent you are. We all love reading about gold! Personally I'm holding on to mine til 2013, regardless. The Euro might have disappeared by then and paper won't seem attractive to anyone..

  • 8. gs

    (21 June 2010, 04:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    Krass - would you care to expand on your comments above. Seems like you have a high level of conviction and I would be interested to know/understand more. No one can argue that austerity is the new stimulus (in Europe anyway) and I accept that this weakens the inflation/debasement elements of the gold story. However, I have always felt that those elements were only a part of the (much bigger) gold story as mentioned in my previous post. Cheers

  • 9. Supermarine Blues

    (21 June 2010, 04:53PM)  Complain about this comment

    Keith P,

    That's how Fleet Street Publications can always claimed it called the market correctly; publish occasionally contradictory articles and one's gotta be right!

  • 10. Rogerthelodger

    (21 June 2010, 05:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    Regardless of circumstances, i cannot bring myself to purchase an asset that does not produce income. Moreover, i know investors who have held physical gold for yonks and even if they sold now would still have lost out re a decent equity investment.
    So, because of this and the fact that i believe( hope) the global debt crisis will slowly inflate away, i leave gold for the speculators.
    This way, by not buying gold even though it increases , i might lose out on a bit of profit, but if i sell income producing assets to buy gold now and it drops, i lose money. Not very daring, but a bird in the hand etc.

  • 11. Miah

    (21 June 2010, 05:28PM)  Complain about this comment

    This article contradicts everything he's been telling us about gold for the last few months.

    I agree with comment 9

  • 12. Lumino

    (21 June 2010, 06:17PM)  Complain about this comment

    I wonder if Dominic's conversations around the dinner table involve anything other than gold?

    If not, he should avoid Come Dine With Me.

    If so, maybe he could use some of that alternative subject matter in his articles instead of trying to convince himself and us every week that the tea leaves without any question point to gold going up/down/sideways...

    The sad truth is that he doesn't know which way it's going and neither does anyone else. It's amusing to read the wisdoms of those who think they do, but it's wearing a bit thin after all these months.

  • 13. Screwloose

    (21 June 2010, 06:31PM)  Complain about this comment


    It's easy to see gold's going down a bit - JPM and GS have been touting it! It always does after they do that - and they've built up a huge short position to take advantage.

    They let it rise last week; the futures trade was very light and they could easily have capped it - but they deliberately let it set a record close to suck in the last of the victims.

    This week is a big UST sales week, so the Fed will fund them to "adjust" the gold price right before the auctions' end at 1300 EDT. It'll get bashed all week into options expiry day and then it'll recover next week.

    Play them at their own game; wait until they have bashed it down $30 on the day and buy the dip.

  • 14. trader

    (21 June 2010, 08:17PM)  Complain about this comment

    I think he's saying longer-term up. Short-term correction.

    Which is exactly what has happened today. Good call.

    Some of the above comments are a bit harsh.

  • 15. Supermarine Blues

    (21 June 2010, 08:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    ...but fair.

    I don't think anyone (chartist or otherwise) really expects an unbroken parabola to the peak & crash. So of course there will be tests and corrections.

    So the headline's perhaps a tad sensationalist for a statement of the bleedin' ovvious.

    Or maybe I'm just uncharitable. Bah, humbug!

  • 16. Going Long

    (21 June 2010, 10:51PM)  Complain about this comment

    For all of you that want gold to go to 700, me to so I can buy even more. Problem is we will not see that price again. I also suggest before you paper bugs laugh at the gold bugs study history, Google dow/gold ratio, understand that a gallon of gas is cheaper today than in 1965 (based on real money). Also understand what naked short selling is, understand that there is 100x the paper gold for every ounce of real gold, if nothing else research how much gold there is if divided up for every man, women and child on earth (this number will scare you). After you have spent at least 2 or 3 weeks studying up on this then come back and give details to support you bearish analysis. If you do not want to take the time to do the research then put your head back in the sand and go to your happy place. I only wish I knew what I know now 3 or 4 years ago. Other things to Google would be K-Wave, Dollar Bubble, real interest rate, credit contraction, and deflation.

  • 17. Going Long

    (21 June 2010, 10:53PM)  Complain about this comment

    And No, gold and silver are not investments they are insurance, against both inflation and deflation because they are real money. Good luck for those that look into the above, this stuff is addictive.

  • 18. eating gold for lunch

    (21 June 2010, 11:38PM)  Complain about this comment

    What happens after everyone who would want to go long on gold has done so?

  • 19. Timbo

    (22 June 2010, 02:27AM)  Complain about this comment

    Strange how all the gold charts you see only go back 10 years or so. If you were to have bought gold in 1980 then you'd still be nursing a loss today. It's just another metal to be bought and sold when the time is right - no need to get so emotive about it.

  • 20. Supermarine Blues

    (22 June 2010, 02:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    Going Long makes some great points in a suitably humourous way.

    It IS a bit addictive.

    IIRC, Nigel Lawson once stood up in a budget and said he disbelieved in the 'long-wave cycle'. I knew then the man was an idiot. Admittedly, the theories have been refined somewhat since then.

    Topical, if a bit O/T!

  • 21. stocks72

    (22 June 2010, 07:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    Correction in gold price.. this is not some thing new, I have been telling the whole time here that many gold investors will burn their fingers this year. What I do not understand is the fact that Dominic was recommending the whole time gold, now he is doing the opposite, I think he wants to buy gold, doesn´t he ??

  • 22. Goldilocks

    (23 June 2010, 04:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    Is the market really being manipulated the way Screwloose says it is? (comment 13) The movements so far this week are just as predicted.

  • 23. Screwloose

    (24 June 2010, 01:46AM)  Complain about this comment

    @Goldilocks

    Unfortunately; "Da Boyz" the ever-predictable, Fed-funded manipulators infesting the COMEX gold futures market in NY are one of gold and silver's perennial nuisances.

    They can't exert total control over the ultimate price; but they can resist a rising market by short-selling huge numbers of futures contracts between themselves and that's also how they cause those sudden, if temporary, drops on the quieter days.

    The regulators seem remarkably ineffectual in dealing with their dominant market position; but they are not invincible and have been over-run in the past.

    Google "Andrew Maguire" and "GATA" for more info - though take some of it with a pinch of salt.

    Dominic is one of the best gold commentators out there - right up there with Ed Steer. He knows why things happen - even if he can't say so explicitly.

  • 24. Supermarine Blues

    (24 June 2010, 11:23AM)  Complain about this comment

    Thanks for the reminder, Goldilocks - I'd lost track of the Andrew Maguire case after his 'little accident'.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>