Will the gold standard ever make a comeback?

By Dominic Frisby Apr 13, 2011

Dominic Frisby

Share with
friends:

Comments (32) Print this article

What we use as money today is either issued by governments, or created by banks through the issuance of debt. The status of money is protected by the law – we must use what we use as money – and by the fact that taxes are levied in this money.

But underneath it all, there's nothing there – nothing tangible anyway. It's just a law, a man-made law. It's not even a proper promise. The writing you see on a £20 sterling note – 'I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of twenty pounds' – is in effect a promise to pay something that doesn't exist. It's a great big load of old baloney.

Modern money is a man-made phenomenon, responsible in my view – though rarely held culpable – for many of the economic problems the world faces today.

But nature has provided an alternative.

What is money for?

Broadly speaking, money has two main uses. One is as a medium of exchange. The other is as a store of wealth. (You might find other characteristics in an economics textbook, but these are the crucial ones.)

Our modern fiat system of money is a quite brilliant medium of exchange. Thanks to the internet, you can buy almost anything anywhere in the world and pay the seller instantly. Short of a single global currency that eliminates the need for foreign exchange, it's hard to see how you can improve on modern money as a medium of exchange.

But it's a rotten store of wealth. Every year it buys you less and less.

Here's a chart from a House of Commons paper that I'm fond of posting. It shows the purchasing power of the pound since 1713.

This is why anyone with money to save and invest tends to buy anything 'real' that they can, from houses, to stocks, to fine art. They're all far better stores of wealth than cash. In fact, owning assets has been the only way to keep up with inflation.

But the trouble is, more and more people pile into an asset-class as they see it rise. Then they pile in with leverage (borrowed money). And that's how we end up with these wretched boom-bust cycles.

All because modern money fails in its second purpose – to be a store of wealth.

Could we return to the gold standard?

Gold has, of course, proved to be a wonderful store of wealth. It lasts pretty much forever. And it buys you as much as it ever did – as much energy, clothing, bread and meat as it did 50, 500 or even 5,000 years ago. It's why, in this era of negative real interest rates (ie rates are negative once you adjust for inflation), more and more people are choosing gold as a means to store their wealth.

But as a medium of exchange, it's been found wanting.

From about 1700 on, people began to prefer to use paper certificates representing gold – which eventually became bank notes – in the marketplace to gold itself.

And the chances of my going to Tesco's some time in the not-too-distant future and doing my weekly shop with a gold sovereign are, at best, remote.

But that doesn't mean gold won't be used again as a medium of exchange. Digital gold currencies – where ownership of gold safely stored in vaults is transferred digitally, just as ordinary fiat-money transactions take place today – are already starting to be used across the net. In theory at least, digital gold has the potential to become as good a form of exchange as any other digital currency.

So gold has re-emerged as a reliable store of wealth. And it is starting to re-emerge as a currency. It's certainly not impossible – in fact to my mind it's probable – that it will eventually regain some kind of 'official' currency status at some stage.

In fact, since gold was at $500 an ounce, I've been arguing that a return to some kind of gold standard is not just possible, but likely. I have been branded mad, insane, lunatic, barking and a lot worse (although many of those same people are now emailing and phoning me up asking how to buy gold).


MoneyWeek Trader logo

Claim your FREE report: The six-step game-plan for
spread betting profits


There's just enough gold to go round

But there is one commonly cited argument against all this. And that is that the world could never again use gold as money, because there isn't enough of it to go round.

But there is. There is just as much gold per person as there always has been. In fact there is more.

Cast your eye over the following chart, which Nick Laird of Sharelynx has prepared for me. (Thank you, Nick, once again.) The black line shows world population growth, and the yellow line shows annual global gold production since 1500.

You can see the remarkable correlation. Annual gold production and world population growth rise very much in proportion to one another.


Over the last 300 years, there has been an average of about ¾ of an ounce of gold produced for every new member of the population. This has at times gone as high as two ounces. And over the last decade it has stood at around an ounce.

The next chart shows cumulative world gold production against world population. The correlation is even more apparent.

At the bottom in the blue line, we see ounces of gold per person in the world. There is more gold per person than there has ever been. But, at just ¾ an ounce per person, it is still extremely rare, so that gold has value.

With gold supply growing at virtually the same rate as world population, you can see why gold keeps its purchasing power over millennia, unlike modern fiat currencies, the increasing supply of which dwarfs population growth. Gold is very much a natural form of money. Which is why it's the only currency in history that has never disappeared. Which is just one more point to add to your ever-increasing list of reasons to own gold.

Our recommended article for today

Don't trust the government with your pension

The latest government pension reforms could dash any hopes you had of retiring comfortably. But there are ways to avoid squandering your money. Bengt Saelensminde explains how to avoid the government's pension scam.

Comments (32)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Gerald

    (13 April 2011, 11:20AM)  Complain about this comment

    Dear Dominic,
    Re: Gold
    In your article of today, you are only identifying the Gold 'officially' registered on the London Markets & the World Gold Council, not the Thousands of Tonnes sitting in Security Wharehouses, mostly in the Far East.
    Does Russia declare all of its Gold or China - I doubt it
    I assume if ALL the Gold was declared, the price would fall.
    regards
    Gerald

  • 2. Nick Roads

    (13 April 2011, 11:25AM)  Complain about this comment

    Not sure there is any relevance in the chart showing gold produced matchs growth in population.

    In fact it shows that one of the problems with Gold is there is a chance (slim I accept) that someone one day will find vast quantities of it they can cheaply extract. That would destroy the value of Gold and any paper currency it might be underpinning by nearly any measure.

    Yes - Gold can be used as a store of wealth but as your article says so can many other things. Why not another rare metal if its such a good idea to use Gold as a currency.

    At the end of the day Gold remains a useless piece of bling best suited for people who obsess about protecting and/or showing off their wealth.


  • 3. Rupert Richardson - Gold junkie!

    (13 April 2011, 11:43AM)  Complain about this comment

    Ah! what a wonderful idea! i HOPE you are proved right. i FEAR that bankers & polititians will fight you tooth & nail. They perceive that they can control currency (a chimaera) & can't control gold. And, above all, they REALLY want control. A tough fight, but i wish you well.

  • 4. Williams

    (13 April 2011, 11:51AM)  Complain about this comment

    Gold by its very nature is nevertheless limited and limiting investments in urgently needed government-sponsored large-scale infrastructure projects to gold availability would paralyse development. Wealth is social capital: transportation, power supply, water management, communications, machine-tools, education, medical care, etc. Reducing economics to monetary fetishism (gold or paper) is usury.

  • 5. iain

    (13 April 2011, 12:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    Good report Dominic.A better situation than the one we have but still flawed as it doesn't deal with the root problem which is man's(or woman's) greed.Banks and intitutions would look to gather and hoard an ever increasing percentage just like old Ulrich in the bond film.

    FIAT currency is actually best but definately not in it's current form.We should completely abolish interest (nationalise every bank into one single bank which charges only modest fees for banking services and get rid of fancy dan investment schemes which really only serve the operator),and make fractional reserve lending a capital crime for which the death penalty is imposed

    The colonial scrip worked in the colonies.No interest and just enough in circulation to cover the amount of goods and services required.

    The real reason for the US war of independence.

  • 6. Cooldude

    (13 April 2011, 12:20PM)  Complain about this comment

    Great article Dominic. Unbacked paper currencies are failing as they have always done before. It's because politicians don't have the discipline to stop printing and central banks play along with it. Unfortunately the present situation will get much worse before there will be a demand for sound money. As for another metal to fulfill this role Silver has an even longer history as a monetary metal. Hugo Salinas Price introduced a method of introducing a Silver pound at the Cheviott Sound Money Conference to compete with the existing paper currency. Great idea but not politically correct.

  • 7. Cooldude

    (13 April 2011, 12:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    Great article Dominic. Unfortunately politicians are too used to the ease of the printing press even if it devalues our money. Silver has also historically been a sound currency holding its value. Hugo Salinas Price delivered a brilliant essay at the Cheviott Sound Money Conference where he gave a detailed presentation on the introduction of a Silver pound in competition with the paper one. Great idea to have competing forms of legal currency.

  • 8. David

    (13 April 2011, 12:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    Good article; as an aside though is Gold following the population growth or is everything following oil production. Have a look at the charts for oil production, population, food, gold, etc..

  • 9. Alex

    (13 April 2011, 01:17PM)  Complain about this comment

    You suffer from a strange, even bizzare myopia when it comes to the historic and far longer tradition of using Silver as a coinage/store of value from the Chinese, to the Roman, Persian, Spanish, Dutch empires. It was only the British empire that briefly bought in a gold based currency.

    Even the term Sterling refers to a note promising to pay a pound of Silver, NOT gold to the bearer of the note.

  • 10. Roberto Birquet

    (13 April 2011, 01:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    At the end of the day Gold remains a useless piece of bling best suited for people who obsess about protecting and/or showing off their wealth.
    ---------------
    Is paper that is used for money a useless object?
    Money whether gold or otherwise is not useless, as it used as money. Without money, we would be left with barter. I'm not sure how long the developed globalised markets would last if I had to purchase a cow with 2.2 pigs.

    Would that not mean a 0.8 of dead pig left in my account? What to do with that? And how would I send payment?

    Gold is a stor of value - essentially an unofficial currency. But the fact it is unofficial means it cannot be watered down. You may find a huge store of gold (damn unlikely), but central banks can print more money with a simple switch.

  • 11. Notts2Oxon20 Will

    (13 April 2011, 01:39PM)  Complain about this comment

    Fixed/limited currency rigidities and lack of adapatability doom them in the end as exporter/importer imbalances automatically creat inflationary/deflationary destabilising pressures respectively.

    It's mad to give up monetary sovereigntyas in the Euro but even madder not to use it for public purposes such as guaranteeing full employment jobs at decent living minimum wages.

    Money is a legal/social construct, a tool and can and should be used for the benefit of all the many, not the few.

  • 12. ricardo

    (13 April 2011, 01:40PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ Nick Roads

    "Why not another rare metal if its such a good idea to use Gold as a currency. "

    Well, people do buy Platinum, and diamonds, and Art, and fine Wine as other stores of wealth. But Gold & Silver are seen as the norm, and the de-facto standard against which fiat currencies are measured.

    And, as Roberto eloquently points out, trading cows and pigs isn't a very practical approach in this day and age. But good luck with that. Let us know how you get on.

  • 13. Trevor

    (13 April 2011, 02:11PM)  Complain about this comment

    Timely article Dominic, however i found Gold easy to buy but harder to sell.Some dealers will only buy if you bought from them in the first place, others will not quote a price over the phone and still others will not buy at all.Is there anywhere in the midlands where you can get a fair price.I have bullion sovereigns.Perhaps other people have had similar problems and can make suggestions.

  • 14. Kieran

    (13 April 2011, 02:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    Nick Roads says ......

    "In fact it shows that one of the problems with Gold is there is a chance (slim I accept) that someone one day will find vast quantities of it they can cheaply extract. That would destroy the value of Gold and any paper currency it might be underpinning by nearly any measure."

    So Nick, you admit that the above is unlikely to happen...... now ask yourself how likely is it that successive chancellors will devalue our paper currency?

    Looking at the two probabilities one is highly unlikely, the other is highly likely.

    Heavy elements (due to how they are created) are far more scarce in the universe than light elements.

    To be honest I don't think I've ever seen a worse argument on why people should avoid gold.

  • 15. Beta Adjusted

    (13 April 2011, 03:08PM)  Complain about this comment

    Very interesting. A basic question: is there a website plotting the long-term price of every resource against gold? obviously tech etc. did not exist 500 years ago but then there were equivalents. How have commodities fared against gold? clearly production has increased resulting in commodity deflation until recently, but then so has population. It would be nice to be able to view *everything* in terms of the value of gold, in order to ascertain what upside may remain. CPI/RPI inflation is too crude ...

  • 16. SteveO

    (13 April 2011, 03:42PM)  Complain about this comment

    Should the quantity of gold not be linked to both the increase in population plus the increase in wealth per capita? It seems to me that the graph produced implies a stagnant economy throughout human history with no generation of wealth.

  • 17. Charles Cooper

    (13 April 2011, 04:26PM)  Complain about this comment

    A most interesting article. I live in Greece and it is quite apparent that Greece will have to devalue or default. In all probability both would be best. The Euro should be free floated against the original constituent currencies and that the Euro should then be backed by gold. This would also have the advantage of saving the face of Euro politicians. Given what Mr Bernanke is doing to the dollar we are in need of a reserve currency that is trustworthy. The Eurozone could then devalue or revalue as appropriate and the Germany could bail out its own banks sovereign losses rather than paying for feckless Greek pensioners. The situation in Greece is only going to deteriorate until some final financial catastrophe brings about a European (and world) financial tsunami. It would be better to take positive action ahead of that event and create a major gold backed currency in the process. Regards Charles

  • 18. Alex

    (13 April 2011, 05:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    @Trevor. If you are able to get a train down to London for the day I can recommend an excellent, discrete coin dealer near Liverpool Street who will quote over the phone, although you'll get spot when you turn up. They will buy if you haven't bought the coins there, and IMO offer one of the best services in terms of quoting prices very close to spot that I have come across.

    They will pay either in cash, electronic or cheque.

    There are various places that offer to buy coins by post, but I really don't like the idea of that.

  • 19. Mary

    (13 April 2011, 07:28PM)  Complain about this comment

    can anyone recommend a gold/silver promissery note that pays interest please

  • 20. Beta Adjusted

    (14 April 2011, 05:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    lol no. All the promisory notes I know pay negative real interest rates. Except physical gold and silver which pay 0% ...

  • 21. Trevor

    (15 April 2011, 05:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    Alex, thanks for the reply, could you please give me a phone No. or an name, if its allowed.I'm heading to London for my 70th Birthday in a few weeks. Regards, Trevor

  • 22. Lefty Goldblatt

    (15 April 2011, 07:52PM)  Complain about this comment

    should money simpl;y be thought of as a "token of labour" ?

    the value is manipulated by the production of fake tokens.

    financial engineering allows tokens of labour to be created before the work has been carried out to earn them (i.e. credit)

    so now we all have to buckle down and "earn" the tokens all currently held by the moneyed elites.

    serfdom anyone?


  • 23. Matthew

    (16 April 2011, 11:54AM)  Complain about this comment

    The amount of gold per head of population may have stayed broadly constant over time, but I suspect that the distribution of wealth between the extremes of rich and poor during the era of paper currencies has not; to switch to some form of gold backed global currency system now would simply lock in those imbalances.

  • 24. Margaret

    (16 April 2011, 05:38PM)  Complain about this comment

    Great article on gold at last. Not sure about the relevance of the charts. 3/4 oz per person...ooooops...I just bought 1kg, so does that mean I have increased the price?
    How about some articles about the price manipulation and dumping of gold by major banks?
    It's true that gold could be the future currency. For all the skeptics, it's unbielevable BUT it's probable, right?
    Remember that past US currency till 1971 was backed by gold/silver and since then it became this fiat currency.
    Show the big players that the masses can outsmart them for once...Gold/silver too overthrow governments, central banks and wall street.

  • 25. jrj90620

    (16 April 2011, 05:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    I think gold was used in the past since there wasn't the technology to instantly find the price of a basket of commodities.No reason to use only gold backed currency.Tie it to a basket of commodities.

  • 26. Margaret

    (16 April 2011, 05:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    jrj90620, I agree, but I cannot just go and buy physical oil barrels for example, even though I would like to own some oil investments. I refuse to trade papers for the same reason that gold exploration/production companies prices may not necessarily increase in price (they could be heavly in debt, etc..).
    Physical gold/silver was used in the past 2,400 years where a pattern continually repeated in which governmemts debased and diluted their money supply until a point where the masses reverted to these precious metals.

  • 27. Damocles

    (17 April 2011, 06:35AM)  Complain about this comment

    Having purchased large quantities of Silver and smaller quantities of gold as a store of wealth 4 years ago I cannot think of a single alternative investment I could have made that would have returned the gains experienced these metals are truly a store of wealth and to suggest otherwise is pure folly.

    Those with negative comments regarding these metals quite obviously missed the boat

  • 28. Lets be Frank

    (17 April 2011, 11:34PM)  Complain about this comment

    Over thousands of years of human history, every fiat currency has failed. EVERY SINGLE ONE.

    What do people return to? Gold and Silver.

    Why would anyone think that the fools who brought us the financial crisis can resist the pull of history?

  • 29. Attila

    (18 April 2011, 07:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    Well done, Dominic! Your articles are the main reason of my Moneyweek subscription. May I recommend another contrarian article to you: http://www.professorfekete.com/articles%5CAEFTheDeepCauseOfTheGreatFinancialCrisis.pdf
    A crucial thought from this article: "The Great Depression of the 1930’s, in particular, the unprecedented world-wide unemployment was caused by the decision of the victorious Entente powers to return to the gold standard after World War I, BUT without allowing the clearing house of the gold standard, the international bill market, to make a comeback." This is a TRUE lesson from history. If some of our politicians were able to learn from it, much of the pain and suffering coming our way could be avoided. The chances are we'll be back on gold standard in a few decades anyway, but with a lot of pain and suffering caused by ignorance.

  • 30. Jack

    (21 April 2011, 10:15AM)  Complain about this comment


    Take a look at 'Gold and Silver as Monetary Metals.' published in World Economics Volume 7, Number 2, 2006, pages 133 to 144.

  • 31. Jack

    (21 April 2011, 10:19AM)  Complain about this comment


    See 'Gold and Silver as Monetary Metals' published in World Economics, volume 7, Number 2, 2006, pages 133 to 144.

  • 32. Roly

    (22 April 2011, 03:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    A very interesting curve Dominic, I was in the not enough of it camp. No inflation at all in the gold economy! I think there is an argument to be made though that humanity has increased productivity throughout its history although nothing like as much as governments and each new generation likes to fancy. So purely philosophically now I am not sure a gold standard is ideal either actually.

    I am late to the thread but I wanted to note that another perspective on gold that can be worth taking I think is the 'cost', principally in labour but also energy, that it takes to dig up. The fact that it is not easy to 'produce' of course adds to it's stability and utility as a medium of exchange. It might also guide us on what might be a sensible valuation. All is relative of course to (us) gold bugs.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>