How will gold perform in 2012?

By Dominic Frisby Jan 18, 2012

Dominic Frisby

Share with
friends:

Comments (15) Print this article

The institutional gold price forecasts for the year ahead are finally in.

We have the London Bullion Market Association's (LBMA) annual forecasting competition, the Thomson Reuters GFMS annual gold survey, and the PriceWaterhouseCoopers 2012 Gold Price Report.

So let's take a look at what the professionals think gold is going to do in 2012.

The consensus for gold next year is 'gently bullish'

The LBMA's forecast is always entertaining: 26 'players' in the world of gold and silver predict a high, a low and an average price for the year.

The LBMA's forecasts tend towards the conservative. Unlike the wilder calls of independent newsletter-writers and commentators you find in the darker reaches of the web, these contestants mostly work for 'sensible' banks.

So rather than attention-seeking mavericks, we have 'backside-covering' company men. Their forecasts reflect that. And if there's one consistent trend I've noted in the years that I've been following these forecasts, it's that they usually underestimate how well gold is going to perform.

For example, in 2011, it outperformed the average price forecast by $115 (8% or so). The most bullish forecast was for a high of $1,850 from bullion dealer Ross Norman of Sharps Pixley. Gold went to $1,920 in the end.

It is usually one of the more bullish forecasts that wins. As often as not, it's Norman who comes out on top, although in 2011 first place went to Edel Tully of UBS, who correctly guessed the average price.

This year, Tully is the most bullish forecaster. He sees a high of $2,500, a low of $1,400 and an average price of $2,050. That's a pretty bumpy year. Ross, on the other hand, has a calmer outlook. He sees a high of $2,100, a low of $1,590 and an average price of $1,765. Gently bullish, in other words.

The most bearish forecast comes from Rohit Savant of CPM Group in New York. He sees a high of $1,800, a low of $1,200 and an average of $1,612.

The average forecast is for an average price of $1,766, which would be a 10% rise on the year, with a high of $2,055 and a low of $1,443. If this forecast repeats the typical excess conservatism we've seen in the past, we can expect an average price 8% or so higher than $1,766. That would be $1,907. I'll take that.

Forecasts are just forecasts, nothing more. You get the impression that while some might study charts and calculate average price moves over the last 15 years, others have just taken a stab in the dark on their way to the water cooler.


Compare the UK's leading gold brokers Gold

If you're interested in buying gold, our up-to-date directory of the foremost gold brokers and ETF funds makes essential reading.

Gold broker comparison table


Looking at the Thomson Reuters GFMS survey, we see that global investment demand rose by 20% last year to $80bn. In the physical markets, purchases of gold bars rose by more than a third to almost 1,200 tonnes, with demand particularly strong in China, Germany, Switzerland and Austria.

The report predicts an average around today's price of $1,640 for the first half of 2012 and a push towards $2,000 in the second half.

What about the miners?

The PwC report focuses more on mining companies and their activities. Looking back at their predictions for 2011, the gold mining company executives – just as with our men from the LBMA – erred towards the conservative. Though one – I wish I knew who – said $3,000.

For 2012, just as with the LBMA, the highest prediction is $2,500, the lowest is $1,350 and most hover around $2,000. 80% of those asked see an increase, 14% expect current levels to be maintained, and 6% see a decrease. The average price that will be used for mine planning and budgeting is $1,420.

I'll have more on the PwC report in the future. It is very interesting reading about how executives are planning to deal with the relative underperformance of mining stocks versus the metal.

Gold won't hit a new high in the first half of 2012

So, the overall consensus is, I would say, gently bullish. This automatically makes me think 2012 will be anything but gentle. We'll see.

For now the issue with gold is that falling blue trend line I have drawn in the chart below. Until it can break out above that, it's not going anywhere. I see quite strong resistance $1,670-80 area. On the other hand, it seems to have a floor where I have drawn that green line in the $1,530 area.

Gold price chart

This pattern is typical for gold after it has made an interim high, as the chart below shows. It happened in 2006 and again in 2008 – and to a lesser extent in late 2009. It takes many months of consolidation – over a year in 2006 and 2008 – before it breaks out to new highs.

The steepness of the current pullback has me a little concerned. There's something a little '2008' about it – though in percentage terms (you would see this on a log chart), the pullback is actually quite small.

Gold price chart

So, I'm going to make the same 'mistake' as the chaps from the LBMA in my prediction, which also ties in with our man from Thomson Reuteurs, and err towards the conservative. I see a low for the year of $1,535. (We may already have had it in the last week of 2011, in fact.)

I see an average price of, say, $1,850, maybe a little higher. We'll inch higher as the year goes by and the price could make several assaults on $1,900 in the latter part of the year. But I don't see new highs in gold (above $1,920) until the second half of this year at the earliest – in fact, probably not till 2013.

• This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .

Our recommended article for today

Why I'm a big fan of short-selling

It may not be popular with a lot of people, but there's a lot to be said for short-selling stocks, says Bengt Saelensminde. Here, he explains why you shouldn't ignore the opportunities it presents.

Comments (15)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Cooldude

    (18 January 2012, 11:09AM)  Complain about this comment

    Very conservative stuff Dominic considering the state of the banking industry especially in Europe. All these banks, including the German ones, are leveraged around 25-1. That means that anything more than a 4% drop in their assets would make them bankrupt. This will not be allowed to happen so there will be massive central bank currency printing to prop up these zombie institutions most of whom are already on the brink. This massive LTRO and QE (money printing) will lead to far higher gold prices than any of these geniuses seem to think

  • 2. Julia Seizure

    (18 January 2012, 11:20AM)  Complain about this comment

    Very conservative given the extreme and heightened geopolitical tensions in the world's most vital energy choke-point. If Jim Rickards is to be believed, an attack on Iran by the US is a matter of when, not if and it will be this year before the US presidential election. Obama needs a lift and he will get it from an Iran spankfest.

    http://kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/KWN_DailyWeb/Entries/2012/1/13_Jim_Rickards_-_War_With_Iran_has_Begun,_Gold_to_Break_$2,000.html

  • 3. Chester

    (18 January 2012, 12:07PM)  Complain about this comment

    Or, if you are a deflationist, very optimistic. Irrespective of the more established "gold price fundamentals" rehearsed again above, the reality of waning inflation forecast by only a few contrarians is gaining real traction. The rise of the US$ and falling bond yields confirms a different reality, despite fundamentals. A more realistic view could be the current high, falling steadily to below $1300, where gold may find short term support. Personally, I'll buy again when it get's below $500

  • 4. Andy

    (18 January 2012, 12:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    Back to the inflation v deflation discussion then? Can the Central Banks stop deflation by printing money? If they can, then they will IMO.

  • 5. Mr Fantastic

    (18 January 2012, 12:46PM)  Complain about this comment

    Thanks for the link Julia, I like the directness of the article, no mucking about!
    To the rest - read the article!

  • 6. Ruairí

    (18 January 2012, 02:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    Dominic,

    combining Julia Seizure's quoting of Jim Rickards via Kingworldnews with the quantitative modelling of Old Moore's Almanack (ahem), which predicts a quadrupling of gold prices in 2012-13, your conversion to the safe-men's club is appalling (LOL!).

    Ah yes, its a safe floor from which to build on. I'm sticking with gold. I see nothing in monetary policy to say otherwise. And the Iranian asskicking scenario does ring true with the current state of US election polls. I think USA might pick up a few heavy bruises in that move however. They're more judo, and less krav maga in their efforts.

  • 7. Ian B

    (18 January 2012, 03:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    Whatever happened to the significance of the 144 day moving average? I don't see it on any of the latest charts.

  • 8. JAW

    (18 January 2012, 04:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    Jim Rickards says the US + Israel v Iran war has already secretly begun. Jewish money and lobby power in the US is skilful in getting other people to fight Israel's wars. Bible-belt America completely identifies with Zion. So, another stupid wealth-destroying war starts in 2012... what can stop it? Americans are too arrogant and childish to realize the consequences... a 100 years of World Jihad. Do Obama and militaristic Cameron know what they are doing?

    If the US starts a war against Iran, retaliation will take the form of sabotage of all oil installations in the Middle East, the paralysis of shipping in parts of the world, dirty nuclear bombs in New York, London, Frankfurt, Paris and their mass evacuation etc, world wide attacks against Israeli, US and UK citizens and their assets. No American will feel safe travelling anywhere... the result will be a world economic depression bigger than 1930's. What will the price of gold be then? 2000 tears per ounce.

  • 9. steve acklund

    (18 January 2012, 05:51PM)  Complain about this comment

    so why do we still have this sentiment around (seen above) that deflation is lurking around the corner. Yes I agree the current climate is severely deflationary but isn't it obvious that inflation will win this war eventually. It'll be a political move and not economic one and that will result in currency debasement.
    Why do some people still persist in stating that deflation is what we're going to have, it's physically impossible due to QE.
    Am I missing something here?

  • 10. Critic Al Rick

    (18 January 2012, 11:20PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ 9. Steve

    To my mind what you could be missing is that whereas inflationary forces will probably fix the debt problem (for a while) those same forces are acting in a (beneficially) deflationary direction on contibutors to deficit problems.

    The debt problem cannot be sustainably fixed without fixing the deficit problems; in the absence of significant growth this fix requires at least:

    a) significant reduction in so-called average living standards

    b) significant contraction in the public sector.

    a) & b) are decreases (in effect deflation)

    So, the debt problem can probably be fixed temporarily (the battle be won) by inflationary forces, but not be fixed sustainably (the war be won) without deflationary forces being allowed to act on the contributors to deficits.

    What a dilemma! No significant pain, no sustainable gain.

    I suspect humanity will go down the path of least resistance (least collective pain) and ultimately wish it hadn't.

  • 11. steve acklund

    (19 January 2012, 12:47AM)  Complain about this comment

    Chilling summary Critik Al Risk... the use of inflation to ebb away at those deficits and atleast while the Uk government still has the ability to borrow at low rates you'd have thought they would atleast be 'sensible' about what they spend it on. caMORON's supposed cuts is not really about full austerity but merely reducing the borrowing rate year-on-year to give the same illusion so in the mean time they just going to waste this chance on more free-rides for themselves and leave the real economy to die.
    But yes the deficit is wasted by the policies of this government mostly because of mal-investment. If it was channelled into the 'right' avenues then we'd stand a chance atleast by using this debt eroding ability of inflation.
    Only way out seems like Gold.

  • 12. a

    (19 January 2012, 08:44AM)  Complain about this comment

    Does anyone know if any European states or ECB are holding m large quantities of Gold? dont want to see repeat of 1997 (not 100% sure abt year) when UK decided to dump most of the gold reserves to get debt under control.

  • 13. ROGER WILFERT

    (20 January 2012, 10:11AM)  Complain about this comment

    I AGREE WITH 'JAW' [8] WAR CAN ONLY BRING CATASTROPHY & RUIN FOR ALL DECENT PEOPLE.

  • 14. Noneleft

    (20 January 2012, 03:33PM)  Complain about this comment

    JAW: Couldn't resist responding to your preposterous comments, sorry-

    1. "Jewish money".... "other people fighting Isreals wars"...."Bible Belt America...Zion"- your post reads like an anti-semetic diatribe which would be more at home on an even less mainstream website than moneyweek. Perhaps the Guardian or Huffington Post?

    2. Militaristic Camaron? Really? You can't mean the same man who has just decimated our defence industry with the Strategic Defence and Security Review, and hastened the decline of our once well defended island nation from naval powerhouse into a country dependent on foreign protection?

    3. The well worn argument you employ, that taking any military action is wrong if it results in a reaction against our country, people or forces, is totally flawed. You are following in the approach of Neville Chamberlain - it's called appeasement. Fortunately for all of us Churchill did not agree with you or we would all be living under Nazi oppression today.

  • 15. Matatov

    (12 February 2012, 09:01PM)  Complain about this comment

    I read on American Gold Refinery that everyone is bullish on gold for the new year. It seems like we will break 1800 soon

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>