Has the gold price bottomed out?

By Matthew Partridge Jun 14, 2012

Matthew Partridge

Share with
friends:

Comments (7) Print this article

We’ve been fans of gold since its bull market began in 2001. Since then it has risen more than sevenfold, from $250 an ounce to near enough $2,000 last summer.

But since peaking at around $1,900 in late August, early September last year, the gold price has slid sharply. At one point in December, it fell below $1,500. Now it’s sitting just above $1,600, close to where it was at the start of 2012.

Our own Dominic Frisby has said that he reckons gold is now in one of its consolidation periods. And it seems that Marc Faber agrees with him. 

Faber - as regular readers will probably know – is the author of the Gloom, Boom and Doom Report newsletter and has a strong forecasting track record. As well as predicting the boom in gold and commodities, he was one of the first to forecast that the US government would end up bailing out the banking system. And while he’s often described as an uber-bear, he in fact called the 2009 turn in the stock market correctly too.

So what does he think of gold just now? He hasn’t predicted how high it will go – and is unsure of whether it will hit a fresh high in the short run. However, in a recent TV interview, he said he believes that gold has now bottomed out, and won’t fall any further. And at the most recent roundtable in US financial newspaper Barron’s, he says that now might be a good time to get back into gold shares.

Central bankers think money printing is the only solution

What’s his reasoning? Faber reckons that government bonds offer awful value. ten-year US Treasuries yield a measly 1.6%, and other ‘safe’ developed world sovereign bonds are similar. At the same time, he is concerned about central bankers’ fondness for quantitative easing (QE) as a sticking plaster for all our economic ills.

More QE would mean more damage to the value of paper currencies in general. By contrast, the supply of gold is relatively fixed, meaning it is likely to go up as more money is printed. As Faber puts it: “I think that in the current environment where it is clear that the worse the economy becomes the more money printers will be at work, that to own a currency whose supply can not be increased at the will of some clowns who occupy the central banks, is a desirable investment”.

So while he is bearish on shares in general, he likes shares in gold mining companies a lot. Many, he says, are “very inexpensive” given the value of their reserves. One he particularly likes is Goldcorp (NYSE: GG). As he tells Barron’s, there’s no real political risk with the stock - “most of its properties are in the US, Canada and Mexico. The company isn’t exposed to regimes that are talking about nationalising resources”.

We suspect Faber’s not wrong. While Ben Bernanke hasn’t been dropping any hints about more QE recently, if the markets tank or jobs growth gets even worse, he’s likely to have all the excuses he needs. Meanwhile, over here, the debate within the Bank of England seems to be moving towards more QE too.

And with the Spanish bail-out falling flat on its face – Spanish bond yields have now risen above the 7% mark widely seen as 'the point of no return' – even Europe may feel forced to act soon. Alexis Tsipras, who has a strong chance of becoming the next Greek president, has all but said Greece will walk if it does not get a similar deal to Spain’s. With Germany unwilling to budge further, at least for the moment, it looks very possible that the euro could lose at least one of its members, which would more than likely be the catalyst for more aggressive monetary measures – if not from Europe, then certainly from the US.

Even central banks themselves seem to be aware of this. The World Gold Council believes that central banks have greatly increased their purchases of gold over the last year. Given that they have been net sellers until very recently, this should push prices higher.

Faber’s tip, Goldcorp, looks reasonable to us. It’s on a forward price/earnings ratio of 12.5, and as the company points out itself, since 2008, earnings per share have nearly quadrupled, and reserves per share have gone up by 23%. Yet the share price is still $40, compared with $49 in July 2008.

However, if you’d prefer to spread your risk, you could buy an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the gold sector. ETF specialist Paul Amery looks at three London-listed ETFs that do the job in this week’s issue of MoneyWeek magazine, out tomorrow. If you’re not already a subscriber, get your first three issues free here.

Comments (7)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Luis de Agustin

    (14 June 2012, 06:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    David Ranson, head of research for strategic investment and forecasting firm, Wainwright Economics observed that one of the big surprises of the past year has been the decline in the price of gold from its all-time high last August. It’s been interpreted by some as the popping of a “bubble,” and by others as a flight by currency traders to the perceived safety of the dollar. A more substantive reason, according to Dr. Ranson, for a decline in the price of gold at any time is an alleviation of the debt threat.

    According to Wainwright, downward pressure on the gold price was never likely to last. The public and the press never know much about what the policymakers are cooking up behind the scenes. The fact that gold is back on the rise now, may reflect increased pressure on central banks to print money. There’s intense pressure on the European Central Bank to violate its own constitution and buy up distressed sovereign debt with freshly created money.

    Luis de Agustin

  • 2. Dylan Montgomery

    (15 June 2012, 10:53AM)  Complain about this comment

    Agree with Luis about the covert actions of governments and the fact that Mrs Merkel has told the EU Germany won't lend Greece their credit card that at least makes me think a position in gold still remains a sensible option in these times of uncertainty.

  • 3. Tom O'Neill

    (15 June 2012, 11:25AM)  Complain about this comment

    "Alexis Tsipras, who has a strong chance of becoming the next Greek president..."
    Greece already has a President. And Tsipras has not said Greece will 'walk' if he becomes PM- he's said he'll simply tear up the austerity agreement and dare Germany to throw Greece out of the eurozone.

  • 4. James

    (15 June 2012, 12:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    The gold price has been greatly affected by the rise in ETF's. It's now a much more tradeable commodity effected more by speculation and trading than fundamentals. If you want to work out what's going to happen to Gold then study the charts which have been showing an obvious bare market since the $1913 top. Mind you .... there's a chance, just a chance, that we might be about to break out of the tramlines and resume the upwards march.

  • 5. Badger Boy

    (15 June 2012, 12:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    #3 Tom - semantics really. If Tsipras becomes PM in Greece then the capital flight from Greece and the other southern distressed EZ countries will mushroom and they will not be able to keep a lid on it. At that point whether they 'walk' from the EZ or are ejected doesn't really matter.
    The Euro has no foundation in economics - only in politics, which is why we see these absurd efforts at 'saving' the Euro and the resultant gyrations in the bond and financial markets.
    In these circumstances there can only be more uncertainty in the markets. This will be good for gold. The only way to deal with the debt is through inflationary default (also good for gold) or a wall of new money (also good for gold).
    In short, the fundamentals have not changed one jot - if anything the case for having 10% to 20% of net wealth in gold is getting stronger.

  • 6. chris

    (15 June 2012, 12:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    Nothing new really.
    Regarding Goldcorp - it has performed worse than gold for the last 10 years and its current P/E of 20 is not quite cheap. I may be missing something of course.

  • 7. Tom O'Neill

    (15 June 2012, 04:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    @Badger - Yes, ultimately it must come to a Grexit, but the time-scale and mode may be quite different. Greece will not volunteer to leave the eurozone. That could mean a few painful weeks or even months of euro-dithering. (As usual.)

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>